http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649
Bug #: 52649
Summary: internal compiler error: in predict_paths_for_bb, at
predict.c:1812
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |middle-end
Severity|major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Bug #: 52650
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr51106-2.c *
(internal compiler error)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-21
07:48:02 UTC ---
Regstrapped with the patch in comment #2 without regression (but for
pr52650;-).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-21
08:05:56 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Mar 21 08:05:51 2012
New Revision: 185599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185599
Log:
2012-03-21 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52651
Bug #: 52651
Summary: Fortran testsuite ICEs with -flto
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, wrong-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52638
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-03-21 08:48:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > What was the motivation for this hashing scheme, BTW? Linkers already
> > support
> > 1) long symbol names (I read somewhere
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649
--- Comment #1 from deepu.sarmatian at gmail dot com 2012-03-21 09:37:00 UTC ---
Hi,
Please delete the attachment. Though the bug is in the compiler, it seems it
violates the security protocol of my concern.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #3 from Michael Haubenwallner 2012-03-21 09:38:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We should disable libquadmath on AIX. It is not needed or useful there.
>
> Have you tried adding --disable-libquadmath when configuring GCC?
For -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52649
--- Comment #2 from deepu.sarmatian at gmail dot com 2012-03-21 09:43:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hi,
> Please delete the attachment. Though the bug is in the compiler, it seems it
> violates the security protocol of my concern.
Also p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52652
Bug #: 52652
Summary: call to gfc_match_asynchronous for allocatable at
parse.c line 164
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40058
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2012-03-21
10:05:24 UTC ---
If this ever gets fixed, we can remove a test in SRA as in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg01356.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653
Bug #: 52653
Summary: GCC 4.6.* bug on i386 Linux and mingw platforms
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52459
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52654
Bug #: 52654
Summary: [C++11] Warn on overflow in user-defined literals
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-21
10:48:13 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 21 10:48:08 2012
New Revision: 185602
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185602
Log:
PR testsuite/52641
* gcc.dg/misaligned-exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655
Bug #: 52655
Summary: right shit in switch: gcc compiles with error: label
at end of compound statement
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-21
11:29:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> The following code compiles with error: label at end of compound statement
> with
> the gcc 4.6.1 compiler.
>
> Content of t.c:
> 8<
> void
> f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52548
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-21
11:33:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 26940
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26940
patch
Patch. Not sure what to do about PA_IN - can we even end up with any invalid
expressions i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52548
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-21
11:40:49 UTC ---
Ah, indeed we can. But we should be able to prune from PA_OUT.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24985
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||borut.razem at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
--- Comment #3 from Jan Lachnitt 2012-03-21
12:18:59 UTC ---
Thanks for testing and for the link to GFortranBinaries. I have just installed
the very recent unofficial build of gfortran:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52655
--- Comment #4 from Borut Ražem 2012-03-21
12:44:34 UTC ---
What a shame :-(
Sorry for the false alarm.
Borut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52653
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-21
12:55:55 UTC ---
It's caused by r158372, but silent with 4.7.0 on i686. Duplicate of PR50708.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-21
12:57:54 UTC ---
I have posted the results for powerpc-apple-darwin9 with the patch in comment
#0 at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg02399.html . It shows
some remaining failure
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #4 from Steven Bosscher 2012-03-21
13:01:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 26941
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26941
Needs an ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL platform for testing
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Steven Boss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2012-03-21
13:03:57 UTC ---
Ah, and obviously there should be a pointer_set_insert before VEC_safe_push...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:09:44 UTC ---
This is from my Tru64 UNIX removal patch. Could you please check if
IPPROTO_IPV6 and/or IPV6_MULTICAST_IF are defined in any system header
or if this another case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-21
13:12:51 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, the code compiles with the options in comment #0
(with a lot of warnings) for 4.4.6, 4.5.3, 4.6.3, 4.7.0RC2, and trunk (with
-m32 or -m64). So the prob
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25362
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52461
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-21
13:20:25 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 21 13:20:20 2012
New Revision: 185605
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185605
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52543
PR target/52461
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52652
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52543
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-21
13:20:25 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Mar 21 13:20:20 2012
New Revision: 185605
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185605
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/52543
PR target/52461
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||suckfish at ihug dot co.nz
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|fort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:32:31 UTC ---
> I don't yet know if they are related.
Now I do: I've just built a 32-bit C-only compiler on
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 at r185563 (i.e. immediately before the culprit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-21 13:38:28 UTC ---
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
>
> --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.4.6, 4.5.3
Summary|IC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 13:51:46 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de
> 2012-03-21 13:38:28 UTC ---
[...]
> If they are related (which I doubt), removing the call to cleanup_cfg
> in cf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de
2012-03-21 13:57:34 UTC ---
On Wed, 21 Mar 2012, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
>
> --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47923
Michael Haubenwallner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.haubenwallner at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-21
14:22:49 UTC ---
Reduced test
SUBROUTINE GHDSYM(IZ,IS,LMMAX,S,LMS,Y,L2M,DRL,NLAY2,K0,DCUT)!,
!
COMPLEX Y(L2M,L2M),H(33),S(LMS)
COMPLEX RU,CI,CZ,K0,FF,Z,Z1,Z2,Z3,ST
!
DO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #4 from Michael Haubenwallner 2012-03-21 14:27:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> But the problem isn't with libquadmath itself, but with config-ml.in setting
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH to find the multilib-wise libstdc++.a, and (interesting
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-21 14:43:57 UTC ---
On 3/21/2012 9:09 AM, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
>
> --- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 15:04:51 UTC ---
> IPPROTO_IPV6 and IPV6_MULTICAST_IF are not defined in any system header
> on HP-UX 11.00. As far as I can tell, there is no IPv6 support.
Ok, but at least struc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52656
Bug #: 52656
Summary: [4.8 regression] gcc.target/sparc/fpmul-2.c FAILs
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52656
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 15:51:23 UTC ---
> and with #if 1 they fail? As they are wrong-code regressions on
> an architecture I have no access to, can you see what is the issue here?
Right. I've compared
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #6 from Jan Smets 2012-03-21
15:51:22 UTC ---
Comment on attachment 26941
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26941
Needs an ASM_OUTPUT_EXTERNAL platform for testing
Where does deferred_global_decls come from? Can th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-21
15:56:46 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, compiling the test with 4.6.3, 4.7.0RC2, or trunk
gives the follwoing errors
pr52622.f90:130.2:
function passeverywherefcomplex_impl(self, c1, c2,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52650
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26941|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52629
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-21 16:22:38 UTC ---
On 3/21/2012 11:04 AM, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> Ok, but at least struct sockaddr_in6 is present in/from,
> otherwise the HAVE_INET6 configure test would
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52630
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-21 16:31:41 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-03-21 16:22:38 UTC ---
> On 3/21/2012 11:04 AM, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
>> Ok, but at least
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52626
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645
--- Comment #7 from Rainer Orth 2012-03-21 16:46:21 UTC
---
Created attachment 26943
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26943
proposed patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52657
Bug #: 52657
Summary: [4.7/4.8 regression] error on asm during GMP build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-cod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52657
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-21 17:00:22
UTC ---
Dup of 48496.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52657
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #8 from ncahill_alt at yahoo dot com 2012-03-21 17:47:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 26945
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26945
gcc -version && output with -v added
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Status|WAI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614
--- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt 2012-03-21
18:34:55 UTC ---
I would be willing to commit the patches once they're approved. Let me know.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52450
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin 2012-03-21
19:39:23 UTC ---
Seems fixed on trunk:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg02426.html
Started working on movmisalign but implementation is a bit
tricky.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640
--- Comment #10 from Jan Smets 2012-03-21
19:46:31 UTC ---
Works. ~13 sec for 243k entries. Still slower than GCC 3.4 but at least better
than 80+ seconds.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52479
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo 2012-03-21 20:24:59
UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Mar 21 20:24:41 2012
New Revision: 185617
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185617
Log:
PR target/52479
* config/sh/sh-protos.h (sh_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50751
--- Comment #23 from Oleg Endo 2012-03-21
20:27:59 UTC ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Wed Mar 21 20:27:50 2012
New Revision: 185619
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185619
Log:
PR target/50751
* gcc/target/sh/pr50751-1.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52658
Bug #: 52658
Summary: RECORD_TYPE in generic tree dump file with
non-complete FIELD_DECL tree node
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52658
--- Comment #1 from saturnman 2012-03-21 20:40:09
UTC ---
can any one add this FIX to code base. I just don't has an account, thx.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52642
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2012-03-21 21:12:08
UTC ---
Just for the record...
I've committed the patch as rev 185616, but also messed up the ChangeLog /
commit message header, so it doesn't show up here.
(The ChangeLog entry is now fixed)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52659
Bug #: 52659
Summary: GCC fails to reject a deleted function definition
which is not the first declaration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52659
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52624
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-21 23:25:37
UTC ---
Created attachment 26946
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26946
Patch that implements __builtin_bswap16
Untested patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49152
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52660
Bug #: 52660
Summary: internal compiler error: in cxx_expand_expr, at
cp/expr.c:114
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52660
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||ae32000-elf
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52660
--- Comment #2 from TaoShang 2012-03-22 02:08:03
UTC ---
Created attachment 26947
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26947
preprocessed source file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46981
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn 2012-03-22 03:00:40
UTC ---
AIX fundamentally wants to handle shared objects differently than
SVR4/Solaris/Linux. AIX wants to package shared objects in an archive, like
normal object files. And AIX library ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
Bug #: 52661
Summary: negative maxint for long long gives warning
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52661
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
