[Bug c++/52625] Incorrect specialization semantics of friend class template declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625 Nikolka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tsoae at mail dot ru --- Comment #1 from Nikolk

[Bug middle-end/37780] Conditional expression with __builtin_clz() should be optimized out

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37780 --- Comment #2 from amker.cheng 2012-03-20 07:58:09 UTC --- the special case could be easily detected when gimplifying. but actually I am not sure whether it can be done even in middle end, since the middle end should not depend on any target inf

[Bug fortran/52606] Confusing diagnostics for long identifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug fortran/52622] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26922|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|

[Bug fortran/52621] ICE when compiling Fortran77 code with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52621 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/51802] [OOP] Duplicate mangling for OOP symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-20 08:42:11 UTC --- That that changing this will break the ABI. Thus, it can only be done when we have to break the ABI. That will happen for the new array descriptor. (This bug is listed at http://gcc.g

[Bug c++/52625] Incorrect specialization semantics of friend class template declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler 2012-03-20 08:41:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) If this is indeed related to the injected-class-name, this should have been clarified by http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1004 t

[Bug c/52632] New: GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 Bug #: 52632 Summary: GCC compfail on O0 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug tree-optimization/52633] New: Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1 (ARM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52633 Bug #: 52633 Summary: Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1 (ARM) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-20 09:09:14 UTC --- Testcase?

[Bug fortran/52606] Confusing diagnostics for long identifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/52601] Gcc build fails at "Making all in tools" with "find: bad option -path" and "find: path-list predicate-list"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52601 --- Comment #3 from birender.singh at hotmail dot com 2012-03-20 09:26:01 UTC --- Thanks Eric Botcazou for the valuable suggestion. I downloaded,findutils-4.4.0.tar from gnu website, compiled and installed on my machine. After the installation

[Bug gcov-profile/52627] [4.8 Regression] Build of libgcc fails w/o __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT: error: 'mx' undeclared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52627 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/52563] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/scev-[3,4].c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "&a" 1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2012-03-20 09:51:00 UTC --- On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, liujiangning at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563 > > --- Comment #6 from Jiangning Liu > 2012-03-20 02:32:

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Yakovlev 2012-03-20 10:03:47 UTC --- Created attachment 26929 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26929 Test case

[Bug fortran/52606] Confusing diagnostics for long identifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606 --- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-03-20 10:27:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Indeed, one can construct examples which exceed the length: Namely module > procedures or module variables. The problem is that GFC_MAX_MANGLED_SYMBOL_LEN

[Bug fortran/51802] [OOP] Duplicate mangling for OOP symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas 2012-03-20 10:52:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > That that changing this will break the ABI. Thus, it can only be done when we > have to break the ABI. That will happen for the new array descriptor. > > (Thi

[Bug c++/52619] ICE/segmentation fault in lambda function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52619 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-20 10:55:49 UTC --- The test case, obviously based on the Linux kernel's BUILD_BUG_ON() macro, behaves exactly as intended: since `offset' is not in fact a constant it causes either a compile-time err

[Bug fortran/52606] Confusing diagnostics for long identifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52606 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-20 10:58:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > What was the motivation for this hashing scheme, BTW? Linkers already support > 1) long symbol names (I read somewhere that OpenOffice has symbols up to 4000

[Bug c++/52619] ICE/segmentation fault in lambda function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52619 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-20 11:03:00 UTC --- The crash happens in lvalue_kind: an INDIRECT_REF with no TREE_TYPE.

[Bug c++/52596] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in lvalue_kind, at cp/tree.c:153

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-20 11:06:40 UTC --- No ICE anymore in mainline for the reduced testcase in Comment #1. Instead, with -std=c++11 only we reject it with: 52596.C: In member function ‘T* zone::allocate()’: 52596.C:14:35: e

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-03-20 11:09:43 UTC --- On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote: > either a compile-time error or a link-time error (the latter because gcc > erroneously omits the compile-time error

[Bug tree-optimization/52633] [4.7 Regression] Compiler ICE in vect_is_simple_use_1 (ARM)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52633 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||armv7hl-*-gnueabi Known to work|

[Bug c++/52613] [C++11] ICE with noexcept in lambda expression in member function of class template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52613 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52631] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] VN does not use simplified expression for lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-20 11:13:57 UTC --- Hmm, but then you'd pessimize the case where b_2 & 1 were available? Thus, don't you need to do the lookup with the original expression anyway if the lookup for the simplified expr

[Bug gcov-profile/52627] [4.8 Regression] Build of libgcc fails w/o __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT: error: 'mx' undeclared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52627 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-20 11:19:01 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Mar 20 11:18:57 2012 New Revision: 185569 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185569 Log: 2012-03-20 Richard Guenther PR gcov-pr

[Bug target/52630] [4.7 regression] ICE when compiling ppl-0.12 testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52630 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guen

[Bug gcov-profile/52627] [4.8 Regression] Build of libgcc fails w/o __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT: error: 'mx' undeclared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52627 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51802] [OOP] Duplicate mangling for OOP symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51802 --- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-03-20 11:22:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I agree completely. However, once 4.7 is released, should we be excessively > pristine about ABI breakage in trunk? It is, after all, the development > ver

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #2 from Greta Yorsh 2012-03-20 11:24:41 UTC --- The tests reported in PR52603 are still failing on arm (last tested on trunk r185474).

[Bug c++/52595] [DR 325] commas and non-static data member initializers don't mix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug target/49868] Implement named address space to place/access data in flash memory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49868 --- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-20 11:32:59 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Mar 20 11:32:54 2012 New Revision: 185570 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185570 Log: PR target/49868 * gcc.target/avr/torture/

[Bug bootstrap/52601] Gcc build fails at "Making all in tools" with "find: bad option -path" and "find: path-list predicate-list"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52601 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-03-20 11:48:47 UTC --- > Is this correct or should i again compiled gcc-4.4.4 to get complete > successful compilation ? If you still have the build tree around, do rm -rf sparc-sun-solaris2.9/boehm-gc sp

[Bug c++/52618] Explicit template specialization ignores access rights

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52618 --- Comment #2 from blobbyvolley at mailmetrash dot com 2012-03-20 11:53:29 UTC --- If it can be of any help, I noticed that for partial specializations everything works as intended (the compiler reports an error). class B { typedef double type

[Bug lto/52634] New: multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 Bug #: 52634 Summary: multiple definition error when using alias Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #3 from Laurent Aflonsi 2012-03-20 12:31:31 UTC --- Well, in fact I am facing a runtime crash on another target (SH4). The crash is fixed by the patch proposed previously. On the other hand, I ve tried to reproduce on x86, to easily

[Bug c++/52596] [4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] internal compiler error: in lvalue_kind, at cp/tree.c:153

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-20 12:33:16 UTC --- Oops, sorry, mainline still ICEs, had checking disabled.

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-03-20 12:48:20 UTC --- In principle I have no problem with such zeroings, make sense, but it's been a while since the last time I looked into this code and I fear races. In any case, please try to fully run

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto CC|

[Bug c/52635] New: gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 Bug #: 52635 Summary: gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/52632] GCC compfail on O0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52632 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-20 13:18:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm not aware of such a bug. Please file a separate bug report in > Bugzilla with a testcase for this "erroneously omits the compile-time > error for

[Bug go/52583] Several new go testsuite failues on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583 --- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-03-20 13:48:51 UTC --- > --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2012-03-16 09:55:26 UTC --- [...] > I'm now running into > > --- FAIL: net.TestMulticas

[Bug libstdc++/52604] mt allocator crashes on multi-threaded

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52604 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug c++/52487] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] [C++11] ICE at cp/semantics.c:5613 with lambda capturing reference to incomplete type by value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52487 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug bootstrap/52623] 4.7.0-RC-20120314: bootstrap failure on AIX due to multilib and using C++ in post-stage1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52623 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 --- Comment #2 from Bin Tian 2012-03-20 14:16:02 UTC --- Created attachment 26931 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26931 patch for make-3.82

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 --- Comment #3 from Bin Tian 2012-03-20 14:16:49 UTC --- The bug is reproducable with -r -flto-partition=1to1, and not with -r -flto-partition=none. My project is hard to reduce because of complex dependencies. It seems that if the call graph is

[Bug c/52635] gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-20 14:55:42 UTC --- 2 t1.o 3 164 2f48a666878dc458 PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY_EXP main 169 2f48a666878dc458 UNDEF baz 173 2f48a666878dc458 RESOLVED_IR cfliteValueCallBacks t2.o 2 164 9f18e45b84a4baf8 PREVAIL

[Bug middle-end/52636] New: [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 Bug #: 52636 Summary: [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324 Classification: Unclassified Product:

[Bug c/52635] gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-03-20 15:13:13 UTC --- On Tue, 20 Mar 2012, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote: > > cat bug.c > extern int bar; > void foo(void) > { > (void)sizeof(char[1 - 2 * !__builtin_constant_p(bar)]); >

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/52636] [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/52571] vectorizer changes alignment of common symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug c++/52637] New: ICE producing debug info for c++11 code using templates/decltype/lambda

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52637 Bug #: 52637 Summary: ICE producing debug info for c++11 code using templates/decltype/lambda Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug fortran/52622] ICE in gfortran 4.6.3, x86_64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622 --- Comment #2 from Adrian Prantl 2012-03-20 15:33:40 UTC --- I'm getting the error with both gcc 4.6.2 and 4.6.3 Below is the stack trace. Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. resolve_symbol (sym=0x14091b0) at ../../gcc-4.6.2/gc

[Bug tree-optimization/52571] vectorizer changes alignment of common symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-20 15:55:23 UTC --- > Unfortunately, the patch caused many testsuite failures on both > sparc-sun-solaris > and powerpc-apple-darwin, as can be seen e.g. at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresu

[Bug tree-optimization/52636] [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization --- Comment #2 from

[Bug tree-optimization/52571] vectorizer changes alignment of common symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52571 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-20 15:56:55 UTC --- > PR52603. Could you test the patch? Sorry, pr52614.

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #4 from Greta Yorsh 2012-03-20 16:01:02 UTC --- These tests pass on arm-none-eabi with the option -fno-common. Thank you, Greta

[Bug c++/52625] Incorrect specialization semantics of friend class template declaration

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52625 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/51737] [4.6 Regression] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 --- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka 2012-03-20 16:19:55 UTC --- Created attachment 26932 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26932 patch in testing I am testing the attached patch. It basically delays removal of the clone until aft

[Bug middle-end/51893] Wrong subword index computation in store_bit_field_1 on BIG_ENDIAN targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893 --- Comment #9 from Aurelien Buhrig 2012-03-20 16:22:52 UTC --- Do you need additional information about this bug? Any comment about the provided patch?

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-20 16:26:08 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 20 16:25:54 2012 New Revision: 185577 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185577 Log: PR target/52607 * config/i386/i386.md ("is

[Bug c/51206] Building Cross-Compiler for Linux/x86_64 multilibs fails due to FLAGS_FOR_TARGET

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51206 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com, ktietz

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth 2012-03-20 16:37:04 UTC --- For the single testcase I've been using for the reghunt (gcc.dg/vect/vect-109.c), adding -fno-common fixes the failure. On SPARC, one probably also has to add -fno-common to gcc.target/

[Bug lto/51663] LTO does not reclaim comdat-local statics

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51663 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2012-03-20 16:49:44 UTC --- OK, the funny inconsistency comes from the fact that we always eliminate COMDAT variables, but we keep around static variables with -fno-toplevel-reorder. -O0 imply -fno-toplevel-reorder

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-20 16:51:50 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Mar 20 16:51:41 2012 New Revision: 185579 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185579 Log: PR target/52607 * config/i386/i386.c (expa

[Bug lto/52634] multiple definition error when using alias

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52634 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at g

[Bug testsuite/52614] [4.8 Regression] Test failures in gcc.dg/vect: vectorizing unaligned access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52614 --- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen 2012-03-20 17:21:21 UTC --- Adding -fno-common fixes the failures on powerpc64 also.

[Bug c/52635] gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-20 17:26:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Do you have an example not involving __builtin_constant_p? Unfortunately no. The example is just a cleaned up and reduced version of the one from PR526

[Bug c++/52638] New: ice in build_vector_from_val

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52638 Bug #: 52638 Summary: ice in build_vector_from_val Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/52635] gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-20 18:06:33 UTC --- Not sure what kernel you are looking at, but in current kernel at least since 2009-09 BUILD_BUG_ON is BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO and only MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON macro is using this sizeof and from

[Bug c/52639] New: ice in supportable_widening_operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 Bug #: 52639 Summary: ice in supportable_widening_operation Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/52640] New: performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 Bug #: 52640 Summary: performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/52636] [4.8 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have string_cst in tree_to_double_int, at tree.h:4324

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52636 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-20 18:35:50 UTC --- The patch in comment #2 fixes the PR without side effect on the polyhedron test suite (AFAICT;-). Currently bootstrapping r185584, regtesting scheduled for tonight. Thanks for t

[Bug c++/52639] ice in supportable_widening_operation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52639 dcb changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |c++ --- Comment #1 from dcb 2012-03-20 18:50:21 UT

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 --- Comment #15 from Marc Glisse 2012-03-20 19:00:32 UTC --- If I am not mistaken, the V8SF shuffle 22022246 is doable by a vperm2f128 that takes 01234567 to 01230123, followed by a vshufps (mask 138 maybe). Was your patch supposed to handle it?

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 --- Comment #16 from Marc Glisse 2012-03-20 19:05:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > If I am not mistaken, the V8SF shuffle 22022246 is doable by a vperm2f128 that > takes 01234567 to 01230123, followed by a vshufps (mask 138 maybe). Was your

[Bug c/52635] gcc fails to diagnose invalid type in unused sizeof() when optimizing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52635 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-20 19:09:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Not sure what kernel you are looking at, but in current kernel at least since > 2009-09 BUILD_BUG_ON is BUILD_BUG_ON_ZERO and only MAYBE_BUILD_BUG_ON mac

[Bug c++/52510] [4.8 regression] libitm/config/posix/rwlock.cc doesn't compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52510 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2012-03-20 19:14:33 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Mar 20 19:14:29 2012 New Revision: 185587 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185587 Log: PR c++/52510 * decl.c (reshape_init_class):

[Bug testsuite/52641] New: Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 Bug #: 52641 Summary: Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug testsuite/52641] Test cases fail for 16-bit int targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-20 19:38:57 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Tue Mar 20 19:38:51 2012 New Revision: 185588 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185588 Log: PR testsuite/52641 * gcc.dg/torture/pr4812

[Bug target/52642] New: SH Target: libstdc++ failures due to call insn swapped before prologue frame insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52642 Bug #: 52642 Summary: SH Target: libstdc++ failures due to call insn swapped before prologue frame insns Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Stat

[Bug target/51244] SH Target: Inefficient conditional branch

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244 --- Comment #36 from Oleg Endo 2012-03-20 20:33:30 UTC --- I have created a new PR 52642 for the libstdc++ failures.

[Bug target/52642] SH Target: libstdc++ failures due to call insn swapped before prologue frame insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52642 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/52643] New: Stack overflow ICE in cc1plus when templates, exceptions, and continue out of try used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52643 Bug #: 52643 Summary: Stack overflow ICE in cc1plus when templates, exceptions, and continue out of try used Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3

[Bug target/5360] [SH] Useless address inc-dec sequence for DFmode access

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5360 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2004-01-01 21:00:39 |2012-03-20 CC|

[Bug bootstrap/52644] New: RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have '0' (rtx reg) in ix86_decompose_address, at config/i386/i386.c:11522[4.8 Regression] ICE in stage2:

-rtl-df/gcc/xgcc Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: /mnt/svn/gcc-trunk//configure --enable-checking=yes,rtl,df --enable-languages=c,c++,lto,fortran --prefix=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-185559-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/ --with-cloog --with-ppl --with-cloog-include=/usr/include/clo

[Bug bootstrap/52644] RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'i' or 'n', have '0' (rtx reg) in ix86_decompose_address, at config/i386/i386.c:11522[4.8 Regression] ICE in stage2:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52644 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2012-03-20 21:42:26 UTC --- Created attachment 26937 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26937 preprocessed source $ /home/smatz/build-185559-lto-fortran-checking-yes-rtl-df/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/sma

[Bug target/52607] v4df __builtin_shuffle with {0,2,1,3} or {1,3,0,2}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52607 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26912|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/51893] Wrong subword index computation in store_bit_field_1 on BIG_ENDIAN targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51893 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2

[Bug c++/52595] [DR 325] commas and non-static data member initializers don't mix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-20 23:00:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > So, what's going on? Was the commit for PR51666 incomplete, so to speak? Maybe it was incomplete but then again the Defect report is still open though there

[Bug c/52640] performance bottleneck: gcc/tree.c;value_member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52640 --- Comment #1 from Jan Smets 2012-03-20 23:45:27 UTC --- I'd like to note that this code compiles in a few seconds in GCC 3.4. Thanks Neil for making this profile.

[Bug libgcj/52645] New: gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52645 Bug #: 52645 Summary: gnu/java/net/natPlainDatagramSocketImpl.cc:660:14: error: 'IPPROTO_IPV6' was not declared in this scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug tree-optimization/52631] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] VN does not use simplified expression for lookup

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52631 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-21 00:14:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Hmm, but then you'd pessimize the case where b_2 & 1 were available? Thus, > don't you need to do the lookup with the original expression anyway if the > lo

  1   2   >