http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52592
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-15
07:10:46 UTC ---
Here is the smallest testcase:
__attribute__((cold))
int encode_init(double p) {
return (int)__builtin_round(p);
}
CUT
I think I have a patch, just testing it a little bit.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-15 07:21:12
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> What's failing is not Printf or Println, but the filename and line number.
> Those are retrieved using DWARF lookup on the PC, and evidently something is
> go
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52592
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-15
07:25:21 UTC ---
Created attachment 26897
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26897
Patch which fixes the problem
I don't have enough time to regress test this patch though.
But here i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51244
--- Comment #33 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-03-15
07:52:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> Created attachment 26859 [details]
> testresult on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu [trunk revision 185088].
FYI, looking into the libstdc++ failures for sh4-unkno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45813
--- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-03-15
08:10:55 UTC ---
-fno-strict-aliasing makes no difference to the code generated by 4.5-20120308.
Replacing the type-punning with a union results in both correct-looking and
much tighter code:
un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45213
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52588
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-15
08:58:14 UTC ---
I don't think there is a way for the compiler to see if idx_5 is within the
range of [0, 9]. So we are warning for the cases where idx_5 is out of the
range really.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52587
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-15
09:01:35 UTC ---
This works correctly with "4.8.0 20120313" and "4.7.0 20120212".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52589
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52547
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Internal compiler Error in |ICE with openmp with nested
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52547
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.3.5
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52592
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26897|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52534
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-15
09:41:38 UTC ---
/* Strip off all nops for the sake of the comparison. This
is not quite the same as STRIP_NOPS. It does more.
We must also strip off INDIRECT_EXPR for C++ ref
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-15
09:48:31 UTC ---
Bootstrapped/regtested now on x86_64-linux and i686-linux (trunk) and
{x86_64,i686,powerpc,powerpc64}-linux (4.7 branch, with the rs6000.c change
backed out). No regressions. So thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52593
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
--- Comment #14 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-15 09:57:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Mar 15 09:57:29 2012
New Revision: 185424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185424
Log:
/c-family
2012-03-15 Manuel López-Ibáñ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52534
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52528
--- Comment #3 from Chung-Lin Tang 2012-03-15
10:04:18 UTC ---
Author: cltang
Date: Thu Mar 15 10:04:12 2012
New Revision: 185425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185425
Log:
2012-03-15 Chung-Lin Tang
Backport from m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52580
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-03-15
10:04:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Mar 15 10:04:55 2012
New Revision: 185426
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185426
Log:
2012-03-15 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52580
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Blocks|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52267
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-15
10:37:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 15 10:37:27 2012
New Revision: 185427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185427
Log:
PR tree-optimization/52267
* tree-vrp.c (ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52267
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52575
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-03-15
12:14:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > There are already spill fails reported for AVR, it's a known problem.
> >
> > At this point it cannot be said if this PR is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52580
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Yakovlev 2012-03-15
12:53:50 UTC ---
I checked the fix gives 21% acceleration of 171.swim on Sundy Bridge. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52592
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-15
13:30:10 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 15 13:30:04 2012
New Revision: 185431
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185431
Log:
PR middle-end/52592
* builtins.c (expand_b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52592
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-15
13:40:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 15 13:40:13 2012
New Revision: 185432
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185432
Log:
PR middle-end/52592
* builtins.c (expand_b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52592
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]|[4.6 Regression] gcc fails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52434
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-03-15 15:14:48
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Mar 15 15:14:43 2012
New Revision: 185433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185433
Log:
2012-03-15 Janne Blomqvist
PR libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48878
--- Comment #2 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-03-15 15:14:49
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Mar 15 15:14:43 2012
New Revision: 185433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185433
Log:
2012-03-15 Janne Blomqvist
PR libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38199
--- Comment #15 from Janne Blomqvist 2012-03-15
15:14:51 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Mar 15 15:14:43 2012
New Revision: 185433
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185433
Log:
2012-03-15 Janne Blomqvist
PR libfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48878
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52434
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52540
--- Comment #12 from Pawel Sikora 2012-03-15 15:49:09
UTC ---
hmm, i see something weird. in source tree the c++config.h contains:
# undef _GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE
# define _GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE -1
but after make-install the c++config.h con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker 2012-03-15 16:23:11
UTC ---
Try foo(NAN,NAN) and then check for the INVALID exception. It's not set.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-03-15 16:23:33
UTC ---
If you look at the test (libgo/go/log/log_test.go), you'll see that it simply
does
if useFormat {
Printf("hello %d world", 23)
} else {
Println("hello", 23,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52540
--- Comment #13 from Pawel Sikora 2012-03-15 16:36:33
UTC ---
Created attachment 26899
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26899
don't touch with sed the _GLIBCXX_EXTERN_TEMPLATE redefiniton.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52593
--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker 2012-03-15 16:37:25
UTC ---
Tested with gcc 4.6.2.
#include
#include
int main()
{
volatile double x = 0x1.fp-1;
volatile double y = sqrt(x);
printf("%a\n", y);
}
Compile with -O2 -ffloat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37336
--- Comment #8 from Walter Spector 2012-03-15
17:24:59 UTC ---
Should this bug report number be added to the F2003 meta bug?
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52594
Bug #: 52594
Summary: no traceback expected for explicit fortran stop
command combined with -fbacktrace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
Bug #: 52595
Summary: Incorrect parsing of commas in non-static data member
initializers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-03-15
18:53:00 UTC ---
See C++ defect report 325, it says it applies to NSDMI also.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52594
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52593
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-03-15
19:24:53 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10 (default '-mfpmath=sse'), I get '0x1.fp-1'
for all the revisions I have tested (from 4.4 to 4.8) unless I compile the test
with '-mfpmath=38
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43377
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52582
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2012-03-15
21:22:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 15 21:22:38 2012
New Revision: 185443
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185443
Log:
PR c++/52582
* method.c (implicitly_declar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-03-15 22:01:51
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> If you look at the test (libgo/go/log/log_test.go), you'll see that it simply
> does
>
> if useFormat {
> Printf("hello %d world", 23)
> } els
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52568
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-15
23:45:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 15 23:45:45 2012
New Revision: 185446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185446
Log:
PR target/52568
* config/i386/sse.md (UNSPE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52568
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-03-15
23:46:37 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 15 23:46:34 2012
New Revision: 185447
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=185447
Log:
PR target/52568
* config/i386/i386.c (expan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52593
--- Comment #4 from Rich Felker 2012-03-15 23:53:51
UTC ---
Of course. This bug is 387-math-specific.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596
Bug #: 52596
Summary: internal compiler error: in lvalue_kind, at
cp/tree.c:153
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52597
Bug #: 52597
Summary: [C++11] missing diagnostics for invalid use of
non-static member function in decltype
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[C++11] internal compiler
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52596
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52583
--- Comment #6 from Ian Lance Taylor 2012-03-16 03:18:46
UTC ---
Thanks for looking at this.
The first step is to run readelf --debug=line FILE to make sure that the line
number information is recorded correctly. Which of course it probably is.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52479
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima 2012-03-16
03:21:08 UTC ---
There is no concrete definition of -ffast-math and users will have
different expectations. Numerical programs for astrodynamics may
expect precisions even for -ffast-math and OTOH t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52598
Bug #: 52598
Summary: internal compiler error: in based_loc_descr, at
dwarf2out.c:13636
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
61 matches
Mail list logo
