http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-15
08:13:29 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Feb 15 08:13:22 2012
New Revision: 184256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184256
Log:
PR target/51921
PR target/52205
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-15
08:13:29 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Feb 15 08:13:22 2012
New Revision: 184256
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184256
Log:
PR target/51921
PR target/52205
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-15
08:13:20 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Feb 15 08:13:09 2012
New Revision: 184255
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184255
Log:
PR target/51921
PR target/52205
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52205
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-15
08:13:20 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Feb 15 08:13:09 2012
New Revision: 184255
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184255
Log:
PR target/51921
PR target/52205
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52256
Bug #: 52256
Summary: CSE the memory load from both branches of if statement
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52241
--- Comment #1 from Igor Zamyatin 2012-02-15
09:06:49 UTC ---
BTW, this is a 4.7 regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52257
Bug #: 52257
Summary: [C++11] switch cases accept floating point constants
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
--- Comment #7 from Philipp 2012-02-15 09:29:27 UTC ---
The test struct might come from an external library I have no control of, which
will make it difficult to change its visibility. Currently, I have quite some
code that depends on the behaviou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47486
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-15
09:33:45 UTC ---
Untested patch:
--- a/gcc/fortran/lang-specs.h
+++ b/gcc/fortran/lang-specs.h
@@ -68,7 +68,8 @@
{"@f95",
"f951 %i %{E:%{!cpp:%egfortran does not support -E without -cpp}}\
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47486
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-15
09:40:40 UTC ---
Missed some parts. Better patch - still completely untested (not even built). A
shorter version would be "%{!E:%{!M*:", which is also completely untested.
--- a/gcc/fortran/lang-specs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52251
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-15
10:10:22 UTC ---
I wonder whether that's a [4.2-4.7] regression (backported to 4.1) due to the
patch for PR 25463. (I have not recompiled to check.)
My impression is that without that patch, commen 0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-15
10:15:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> The test struct might come from an external library I have no control of,
> which
> will make it difficult to change its visibility.
You could declare th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47486
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52258
Bug #: 52258
Summary: __builtin_isgreaterequal is sometimes signaling on ARM
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2012-02-15
10:53:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> You could declare the struct before including that library's headers and set
> its visibility with a pragma:
>
> #pragma GCC visibility push(default)
> stru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-15
11:05:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 15 11:05:26 2012
New Revision: 184263
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184263
Log:
2012-02-15 Richard Guenther
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52248
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52256
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23286
--- Comment #34 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-15
11:19:55 UTC ---
*** Bug 52256 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52254
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Richar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52253
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52250
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52255
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-15
11:47:15 UTC ---
The problem is that lsm doesn't cleanup unnecessary VOP PHI after changing:
:
# b.2_21 = PHI
# .MEM_22 = PHI <.MEM_18(10), .MEM_16(8)>
# prephitmp.8_6 = PHI
D.1720_7 = prephi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52252
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
--- Comment #10 from Philipp 2012-02-15 12:02:09 UTC ---
But think about a header only library. My test case isn't that far fetched. A
simple struct with no member functions (except for the implicitly generated
ones) should need no visibility at a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52255
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-15
12:08:38 UTC ---
It can also, when encountering a virtual PHI, simply rename all VOPs. LIM
could also fixup those PHIs after performing store-motion.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52259
Bug #: 52259
Summary: All tm tests fail on targets without pthread support
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52260
Bug #: 52260
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in clone_tree_hash, at
dwarf2out.c:7424
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-15
12:20:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 15 12:20:10 2012
New Revision: 184265
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184265
Log:
2012-02-15 Tobias Grosser
PR tree-opti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261
Bug #: 52261
Summary: [avr] Add support for AVR Xmega cores
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52261
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-02-15
13:16:01 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Feb 15 13:15:56 2012
New Revision: 184269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184269
Log:
libgcc/
PR target/52261
* config/avr/lib1f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52259
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-15
13:50:07 UTC ---
("... wouldn't it be better to fix it?" should read "... to change it?",
otherwise you are begging the question, eh)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52259
Greta Yorsh changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41518
lucdanton at free dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucdanton at free dot fr
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52260
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47486
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-15 15:30:58
UTC ---
I have tested variant suggested in #comment 4 and those in #comment 5. Both
are fixing the ICE. The file test.d (as used as crash example) will be created
empty.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47486
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-15
15:51:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> "%{E|M|MM|MT|MQ|MD|MMD:;:" F951_OPTIONS "}"
Good idea - and looks cleaner. Except (my bug) that -MD and -MMD do not imply
"-E". Thus, those shouldn't appear
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44783
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #26658|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52260
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41518
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23286
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #19634|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51912
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52257
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51912
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52241
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2012-02-15
16:39:00 UTC ---
I don't understand what you mean by "inlining", since '_Rb_tree_node_base' is a
*type* not a function.
Anyway, I don't see how Benjamin's split could have caused inlining issues.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51825
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2012-02-15
17:08:51 UTC ---
I have been working on this one. The order of the lines within the namelist
file can cause the error to go away. I have also found that the read of the
character string acutally compl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43548
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52262
Bug #: 52262
Summary: translatable string typos (3): "REAl"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52255
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52152
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2012-02-15 18:24:37 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Feb 15 18:24:30 2012
New Revision: 184280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184280
Log:
XFAIL objc.dg/stabs-1.m on IRIX (PR target/52152)
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52238
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23286
--- Comment #36 from Steven Bosscher 2012-02-15
18:37:40 UTC ---
The patch was on one of the gsyprf machines, which are gone (didn't I already
tell you this before??). So the "latest" patch is lost...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52263
Bug #: 52263
Summary: Zero-initialization doesn't seem to work correctly for
virtual inheritance
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52263
--- Comment #1 from Ryan 2012-02-15
18:39:38 UTC ---
I forgot to add the system - Linux 2.6.40.3-0.fc15.x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042
--- Comment #10 from pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-15 19:17:47 UTC ---
Author: pmarlier
Date: Wed Feb 15 19:17:42 2012
New Revision: 184281
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184281
Log:
2012-02-15 Iain Sandoe
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52255
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-15
19:20:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 26667
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26667
gcc47-pr52255.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52208
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41518
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-02-15
19:49:29 UTC ---
I agree with the analysis.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51368
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-15
19:56:12 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Wed Feb 15 19:56:07 2012
New Revision: 184282
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184282
Log:
2012-02-15 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51368
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-15
20:11:24 UTC ---
Mine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52264
Bug #: 52264
Summary: translatable string typo: "refernece"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-15
20:20:24 UTC ---
what's the python version you are using that is not working?
I am using 2.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51368
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-02-15
20:24:51 UTC ---
This probably needs changing
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52264
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52265
Bug #: 52265
Summary: [OOP] TREE dump confusing with nested SELECT TYPE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52227
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-15
20:59:06 UTC ---
A related issue, for
class(t), target, allocatable :: a(:)
target :: a
no error is printed - but it should!
The problem seems to be that already for the first line, the class symbol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52199
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner 2012-02-15
21:17:46 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Feb 15 21:17:42 2012
New Revision: 184285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184285
Log:
[gcc]
2012-02-15 Michael Meissner
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52236
Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52199
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[libffi] r184021 needs to |[libffi] r183675,r184021
|be fixe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52199
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner 2012-02-15
21:42:04 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Feb 15 21:42:00 2012
New Revision: 184287
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184287
Log:
[gcc]
2012-02-15 Michael Meissner
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52199
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52266
Bug #: 52266
Summary: [4.7 Regression] syntax error in libgo/configure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #19 from Anders F Björklund
2012-02-15 22:08:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> I think that now the only thing which will need to change in the Go frontend
> proper is using otool instead of objcopy in libgo/Makefile.am.
The oto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #22 from Anders F Björklund
2012-02-15 22:16:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 26670
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26670
gcc-ucontext.diff
ucontext is deprecated on Mac OS X 10.5-10.6, including ucontext.h gives err
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #21 from Anders F Björklund
2012-02-15 22:12:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 26669
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26669
gcc-go_export.diff
Need to give both segment and section for export on Darwin:
/var/folders/S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #20 from Anders F Björklund
2012-02-15 22:10:09 UTC ---
Created attachment 26668
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26668
updated patch for trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #23
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52220
--- Comment #1 from pmarlier at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-15 23:39:50 UTC ---
Author: pmarlier
Date: Wed Feb 15 23:39:28 2012
New Revision: 184293
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184293
Log:
libitm/
2012-02-15 Iain Sandoe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2012-02-16 00:28:25 UTC ---
On 15-Feb-12, at 3:20 PM, bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> what's the python version you are using that is not working?
It's 2.4.2. If I get a chance, I'll try an updat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52254
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-16
03:00:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The combine stage should have access to a valueize() hook as well, to query
> SSA propagator/VNs lattice. That hook can maybe supply this extra info
> (I wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52263
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-16
03:04:24 UTC ---
I think this has been fixed already on both the 4.6 branch and the trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52220
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52267
Bug #: 52267
Summary: a&~N where N has all the bits set up till a specific
point can be folded to ((unsigned)a) < N
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #24 from Jack Howarth 2012-02-16
03:47:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
>
> ucontext is missing altogether from Mac OS X 10.7, but there is no TLS either:
>
> error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
There is t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
Bug #: 52268
Summary: tls support should be added for darwin11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52268
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-apple-darwin11
Host|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52264
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-16
06:29:19 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 16 06:29:12 2012
New Revision: 184298
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184298
Log:
PR translation/52264
* cgraphunit.c (verify
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52265
--- Comment #1 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2012-02-16 06:58:10 UTC ---
Dear Tobias,
I have encountered this in the work on PR41600. I thought to append a
numeric identifier that increments with each new temporary. In fact,
I had w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52264
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51874
--- Comment #12 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-16
07:17:15 UTC ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Feb 16 07:17:03 2012
New Revision: 184300
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184300
Log:
PR go/51874
math: Don't use libc log2 a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-16
07:26:08 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 16 07:25:58 2012
New Revision: 184301
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=184301
Log:
PR middle-end/51929
* cgraphunit.c (verify
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52269
Bug #: 52269
Summary: [C++11]Body of constexpr function templates
instantiated too eagerly in unevaluated operands
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
