[Bug fortran/51514] [OOP] Wrong code when passing a scalar CLASS to a TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51514 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-07 08:15:28 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Tue Feb 7 08:15:14 2012 New Revision: 183954 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183954 Log: 2012-02-07 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/51

[Bug fortran/51514] [OOP] Wrong code when passing a scalar CLASS to a TYPE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51514 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/52060] [4.7 regression] Invalid constant simplification in combine with parallel result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-07 08:46:39 UTC --- > I think the important question is if it is ok that combine_simplify_rtx may > modify the given rtl in place, as opposed to keeping it unmodified and just > allocating new rtx and ret

[Bug c/52146] New: [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 Bug #: 52146 Summary: [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x8000 to 0x Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #1 from Steffen Schmidt 2012-02-07 08:58:00 UTC --- Created attachment 26597 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26597 Generated -mx32 assembler

[Bug c/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 --- Comment #2 from Steffen Schmidt 2012-02-07 08:58:30 UTC --- Created attachment 26598 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26598 Generate -m64 assembler

[Bug rtl-optimization/52060] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Invalid constant simplification in combine with parallel result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 --- Comment #36 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-07 09:19:35 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Tue Feb 7 09:19:27 2012 New Revision: 183955 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183955 Log: libgcc/ PR libstdc++/51296 PR libstdc++/

[Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #54 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-07 09:19:35 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Tue Feb 7 09:19:27 2012 New Revision: 183955 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183955 Log: libgcc/ PR libstdc++/51296 PR libstdc++/

[Bug rtl-optimization/52060] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Invalid constant simplification in combine with parallel result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-07 09:21:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > I'm a little uncomfortable with the patch, because I think it's annoying to > have to copy a pattern that you're going to substitute for. On the other > ha

[Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #55 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-07 09:21:13 UTC --- this should be fixed now - I won't close it until someone can verify it on darwin

[Bug libstdc++/51296] Several 30_threads tests FAIL on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|redi at gcc dot gnu.org |ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #37 f

[Bug middle-end/52074] ICE: RTL flag check: MEM_VOLATILE_P used with unexpected rtx code 'plus' in extract_fixed_bit_field, at expmed.c:1734

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52074 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-07 09:22:55 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 7 09:22:51 2012 New Revision: 183956 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183956 Log: PR middle-end/52074 * expr.c (expand_expr_a

[Bug middle-end/52074] ICE: RTL flag check: MEM_VOLATILE_P used with unexpected rtx code 'plus' in extract_fixed_bit_field, at expmed.c:1734

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52074 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/52142] [trans-mem] inlined transaction_pure functions are instrumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/52141] [trans-mem] ICE due to asm statement in trans-mem.c:expand_block_tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52141 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-07 09:30:45 UTC --- Might I suggest to instead of case GIMPLE_ASM: gcc_unreachable (); use case GIMPLE_ASM: sorry ("asm statements not allowed in transactions");

[Bug c++/52147] New: Preprocessed Chromium source with long compile time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52147 Bug #: 52147 Summary: Preprocessed Chromium source with long compile time Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/25020] NAG extension: module F90_UNIX providing access to UNIX functions (abort ...)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25020 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/52147] Preprocessed Chromium source with long compile time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52147 --- Comment #1 from hans at chromium dot org 2012-02-07 10:12:13 UTC --- Created attachment 26599 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26599 the slowest file

[Bug c++/52147] Preprocessed Chromium source with long compile time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52147 --- Comment #2 from hans at chromium dot org 2012-02-07 10:17:39 UTC --- Created attachment 26600 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26600 file with largest difference between 4.6 and 4.7

[Bug c++/52147] Preprocessed Chromium source with long compile time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52147 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/40068] GCC fails to apply dllexport attribute to typeinfo.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068 --- Comment #9 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-07 10:46:06 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Tue Feb 7 10:45:59 2012 New Revision: 183962 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183962 Log: 2012-02-07 Kai Tietz Dave Korn

[Bug target/40068] GCC fails to apply dllexport attribute to typeinfo.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068 --- Comment #10 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-07 10:49:20 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Tue Feb 7 10:49:14 2012 New Revision: 183963 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183963 Log: 2012-02-07 Kai Tietz Dave Korn

[Bug c++/52147] Preprocessed Chromium source with long compile time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52147 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot

[Bug rtl-optimization/52148] New: [4.7 regression] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2120

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148 Bug #: 52148 Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2120 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/12708] SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault starting java program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12708 Gyan Ojha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gyanendra.webmaster at |

[Bug rtl-optimization/52148] [4.7 regression] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2120

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148 --- Comment #1 from Michal Hlavinka 2012-02-07 10:58:56 UTC --- note: looks similar to http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52025 but compared to both bugs above, adding -fno-caller-save

[Bug rtl-optimization/52148] [4.7 regression] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2120

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||avr Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/52139] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in remove_insn, at emit-rtl.c:3960 with -O -fPIC -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-07 11:42:35 UTC --- Created attachment 26602 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26602 gcc47-pr52139.patch Ugh, this is ugly. The main problem is that delete_insn/remove_insn refuse to r

[Bug fortran/52117] allocated arrays give incorrect results when used with RESHAPE in gcc v4.6.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52117 --- Comment #6 from hirshmansp at ornl dot gov 2012-02-07 11:43:29 UTC --- Tobias Here are the answers to your questions: [qsh@swim SIESTA]$ gfortran -v|&grep -E 'gcc version|Target' Target: x86_64-redhat-linux gcc version 4.6.2 20111027 (Red

[Bug middle-end/51231] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] g++ remove placement new with -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51231 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/40068] GCC fails to apply dllexport attribute to typeinfo.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40068 --- Comment #11 from Kai Tietz 2012-02-07 11:48:41 UTC --- Author: ktietz Date: Tue Feb 7 11:48:34 2012 New Revision: 183965 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183965 Log: 2012-02-07 Kai Tietz Dave Korn

[Bug rtl-optimization/52139] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in remove_insn, at emit-rtl.c:3960 with -O -fPIC -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26602|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/52147] Preprocessed Chromium source with long compile time

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52147 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-07 12:29:24 UTC --- largest regression: trunk -O2: TOTAL : 29.47 3.0632.61 678947 kB 4.6.3-pre -O2: TOTAL : 23.56 3.8

[Bug fortran/52149] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52149 Bug #: 52149 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/52139] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in remove_insn, at emit-rtl.c:3960 with -O -fPIC -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26603|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/52145] [C++11] zero-valued integer constant expression should prefer conversion to pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler at |

[Bug fortran/52149] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52149 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/52117] allocated arrays give incorrect results when used with RESHAPE in gcc v4.6.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52117 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2012-02-07 14:36:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > It compiles/links with the -std:f95 flag, but gives the same wrong results > [qsh@swim SIESTA]$ gfortran -std=f95 reshape.f90 > reshape.f90:37.11: > PA

[Bug c++/52145] [C++11] [DR 903] zero-valued integer constant expression should prefer conversion to pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52145 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/52149] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52149 --- Comment #2 from Greta Yorsh 2012-02-07 14:40:17 UTC --- This patch fixes the problem. Thank you! -- Greta

[Bug fortran/52149] FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52149 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from Richard Gu

[Bug middle-end/51929] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_cgraph_node failed with -O2 -fno-guess-branch-probability -fipa-cp-clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Priority|P3

[Bug debug/51950] [4.6/4.7 Regression] fdebug-types-section regression for member pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51950 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/51994] [4.6/4.7 Regression] git-1.7.8.3 miscompiled due to negative bitpos from get_inner_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/51939] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in compute_affine_dependence, at tree-data-ref.c:4103 with -fcheck-data-deps

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51939 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P5

[Bug c++/52126] [4.7 Regression] compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/52139] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in remove_insn, at emit-rtl.c:3960 with -O -fPIC -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52139 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|4.7.0

[Bug debug/52132] [4.7 Regression] ICE in loc_descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52132 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/49847] [4.7 Regression] NULL deref in fold_rtx (prev_insn_cc0 == NULL)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847 --- Comment #15 from Mikael Pettersson 2012-02-07 15:48:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #12) > The problem appears to be due to the exception region on a cc0 setter, which > separates it from the cc0 consumer: > > (insn 4013 4012 8164 949 (set (

[Bug rtl-optimization/52148] [4.7 regression] ICE: in spill_failure, at reload1.c:2120

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52148 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P

[Bug rtl-optimization/52060] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Invalid constant simplification in combine with parallel result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-02-07 15:48:59 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Feb 7 15:48:52 2012 New Revision: 183972 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183972 Log: PR rtl-optimization/52060 * combine.c (try

[Bug rtl-optimization/52060] [4.6 Regression] Invalid constant simplification in combine with parallel result

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52060 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug target/48743] -march=native mis-detects AMD K6-2+ / K6-3 as Athlon - compiled C fails with "illegal instruction"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48743 --- Comment #9 from Quentin Neill 2012-02-07 16:17:35 UTC --- Author: qneill Date: Tue Feb 7 16:17:26 2012 New Revision: 183973 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183973 Log: 2012-02-07 Quentin Neill Backport from mai

[Bug fortran/52117] allocated arrays give incorrect results when used with RESHAPE in gcc v4.6.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52117 --- Comment #8 from steven hirshman 2012-02-07 16:18:33 UTC --- Thank you. I didn't catch the PAUSE problem. It now runs correctly with the -std=f95 flag, which is what we'll use. Thanks for your helpful responses.

[Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-07 16:59:32 UTC --- > --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-02-07 > 15:37:54 UTC --- > Only sparc-sun-solaris2.10 is a primary target at the moment. Rainer, you > say "regressio

[Bug target/52146] [x32] - Wrong code to access addresses 0x80000000 to 0xFFFFFFFF

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52146 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 20

[Bug middle-end/52141] [trans-mem] ICE due to asm statement in trans-mem.c:expand_block_tm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52141 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson 2012-02-07 17:15:41 UTC --- It is a compiler error, because we're supposed to have handled a transaction involving asms differently, earlier in compilation.

[Bug middle-end/51994] [4.6/4.7 Regression] git-1.7.8.3 miscompiled due to negative bitpos from get_inner_reference

* expr.c (get_inner_reference): If there is an offset, add a negative bit position to it (if any). Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120207-1.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/expr.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

[Bug c++/52126] [4.7 Regression] compilation error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52126 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-02-07 17:23:40 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Further investigation shows that the issue appears only when inheritance from > the template class (class B : private A) is provided explicitly. According

[Bug middle-end/51994] [4.6/4.7 Regression] git-1.7.8.3 miscompiled due to negative bitpos from get_inner_reference

* expr.c (get_inner_reference): If there is an offset, add a negative bit position to it (if any). Added: branches/gcc-4_6-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120207-1.c - copied unchanged from r183974, trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20120207-1.c Modified: branches

[Bug gcov-profile/52150] New: [4.7 regression] junk at end of line in Firefox PGO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150 Bug #: 52150 Summary: [4.7 regression] junk at end of line in Firefox PGO build Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/51994] [4.6/4.7 Regression] git-1.7.8.3 miscompiled due to negative bitpos from get_inner_reference

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51994 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-07 17:29:37 UTC --- > --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-07 > 17:12:26 UTC --- >> I'm quite upset about this because the only reason for that reversion >> he's given so far is

[Bug fortran/52151] New: Segfault with realloc on assignment and RESHAPE to unallocated LHS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151 Bug #: 52151 Summary: Segfault with realloc on assignment and RESHAPE to unallocated LHS Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/52150] [4.7 regression] junk at end of line in Firefox PGO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||assemble-failure Status|UNCON

[Bug gcov-profile/52150] [4.7 regression] junk at end of line in Firefox PGO build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52150 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-07 17:42:41 UTC --- The profiling code forgot to remove the * from the assembly name it looks like. The * means it is defined.

[Bug middle-end/52142] [trans-mem] inlined transaction_pure functions are instrumented

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52142 --- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson 2012-02-07 17:53:14 UTC --- We were *supposed* to already be disallowing inlining of tm_pure into non-tm_pure functions. At least that's what I remember...

[Bug target/51921] [4.6/4.7 regression] EH unwinding support is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51921 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-02-07 17:54:18 UTC --- > You know perfectly well that such a proof is practically impossible: > that would mean updating a machine through every single Solaris 8/9/10 > kernel/libc/libthread patch ever relea

[Bug libstdc++/52068] libc++98.a and libc++11.a are installed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52068 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/52151] Segfault with realloc on assignment and RESHAPE to unallocated LHS

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52151 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/51753] Many gcc.dg/simultate-thread tests fail on Solaris 10+/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51753 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2012-02-07 18:09:45 UTC --- > Please look at gcc.log files in your testsuite directory. There are extensive > single-instruction traces to analyse what went wrong. Comparing your traces to > l

[Bug libitm/52042] libitm.c/clone-1.c (all darwin) and libitm.c/stackundo.c (darwin 11) execution tests fail with -fpie

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52042 --- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07 18:17:33 UTC --- Yes, love to see a patch. I think the argument is important to get right, as otherwise the next bug to track down will be much harder to find (I call this bug pushing). If y

[Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 Jack Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/52152] New: MIPS ELF targets should use dbxelf.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52152 Bug #: 52152 Summary: MIPS ELF targets should use dbxelf.h Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P

[Bug target/52152] MIPS ELF targets should use dbxelf.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52152 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mips*-*-elf* Status|UN

[Bug fortran/52153] New: REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 Bug #: 52153 Summary: REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/52154] New: va_arg with empty aligned structure fails for MIPS EABI32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52154 Bug #: 52154 Summary: va_arg with empty aligned structure fails for MIPS EABI32 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52154] va_arg with empty aligned structure fails for MIPS EABI32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52154 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mipsisa*-*-elf* Status

[Bug target/52155] New: loongson.h requires -flax-vector-conversions with newlib targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52155 Bug #: 52155 Summary: loongson.h requires -flax-vector-conversions with newlib targets Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52155] loongson.h requires -flax-vector-conversions with newlib targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52155 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||mips*-*-elf* Status|UN

[Bug target/52154] va_arg with empty aligned structure fails for MIPS EABI32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52154 --- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07 19:15:15 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Feb 7 19:15:10 2012 New Revision: 183977 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183977 Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/24306 *

[Bug middle-end/24306] [4.0 Regression] va_arg gets confused when skipping over certain zero-sized types with -msse

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24306 --- Comment #19 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07 19:15:15 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Feb 7 19:15:10 2012 New Revision: 183977 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183977 Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/24306

[Bug target/52152] MIPS ELF targets should use dbxelf.h

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52152 --- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07 19:18:33 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Feb 7 19:18:27 2012 New Revision: 183978 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183978 Log: gcc/testsuite/ PR target/52152

[Bug target/52155] loongson.h requires -flax-vector-conversions with newlib targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52155 --- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-02-07 19:23:40 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Tue Feb 7 19:23:35 2012 New Revision: 183979 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183979 Log: gcc/testsuite/ PR target/52155

[Bug c++/52156] New: add warning for allocated array being converted to pointer to base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52156 Bug #: 52156 Summary: add warning for allocated array being converted to pointer to base Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/52153] REAL128 gives extended precision, not quad precision

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52153 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/52156] add warning for allocated array being converted to pointer to base

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52156 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/43673] Incorrect warning: use of 'D' length modifier with 'a' type character

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43673 Ryan S. Arnold changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/14617] [tree-ssa] suboptimal code ('0' <= c && c <= '9') ? c - '0' : 0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14617 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-12-15 04:47:37 |2012-02-07 0:00 --- Comment #2 from Andre

[Bug tree-optimization/52157] New: Missing FRE because of sign change

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52157 Bug #: 52157 Summary: Missing FRE because of sign change Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/52157] Missing FRE because of sign change

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization, TREE Blo

[Bug fortran/52158] New: Regression on character function with gfortran 4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52158 Bug #: 52158 Summary: Regression on character function with gfortran 4.7 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/52159] New: ICE when building qemu with GCC 4.7 trunk: cannot read LTO decls

returned exit code 2 matt@matt-desktop:~/src/qemu-linaro-1.0.50-2012.01$ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.7.0 20120207 (experimental) Copyright (C) 2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY o

[Bug rtl-optimization/10050] ifcvt is not smart enough

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10050 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2012-02-07 21:05:24 UTC --- Note this optimized I think is invalid with the C11/C++11 memory model.

[Bug tree-optimization/21462] if statement not converted to MIN_EXPR

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21462 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||10050 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/33158] missed store sinking opportunity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33158 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||10050 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/24001] Simple redundancy not eliminated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24001 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   >