http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51398
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-23 17:56:48 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:56:42 2012
New Revision: 183445
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183445
Log:
/cp
2012-01-23 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51398
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416
--- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
2012-01-23 17:59:56 UTC ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Jan 23 17:59:51 2012
New Revision: 183446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183446
Log:
2012-01-23 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-23
18:05:01 UTC ---
Patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg01160.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973
Bug #: 51973
Summary: [regression][C++0x] Template parameter deduction fails
for overloaded functions when template parameters have
defaulted arguments
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51969
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-01-23 18:21:14 UTC ---
The following patch (applied to 4.6) fixes the problem for me:
diff --git a/gcc/gengtype.c b/gcc/gengtype.c
index abf17f8..550d3bb 100644
--- a/gcc/gengtype.c
+++ b/gcc/gengtype
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson 2012-01-23
18:31:51 UTC ---
Created attachment 26436
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26436
proposed patch
I'll run this through a cross-build first, but I expect this will fix it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51969
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51922
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51223
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50556
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51958
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51974
Bug #: 51974
Summary: GCC fails to bootstrap with --enable-checking=release
on opensuse
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51542
--- Comment #3 from Matt Hargett 2012-01-23 19:16:12 UTC
---
As I mentioned in the other bug, the specific optimization from -O3 that
triggers this if -fipa-cp-clone.
Is there a reason these patches haven't been applied? Bootstrapping the
compil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49847
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Schwab 2012-01-23 19:51:48
UTC ---
Reduced testcase, to be compiled with -O -fnon-call-exceptions.
int f (float g)
{
try { return g >= 0; }
catch (...) {}
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51900
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz 2012-01-23 19:55:40
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Jan 23 19:55:35 2012
New Revision: 183450
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183450
Log:
PR target/51900
* config/i386/predicates.md (
Hi, not sure if this is a bug or not, but not quite sure where else to turn.
Using Red Hat EL 5.7 (IA64), GCC 4.1.2
uname -a: Linux [Hostname] 2.6.18-274.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jul 8 17:41:07 EDT 2011
ia64 ia64 ia64 GNU/Linux
gcc --version: gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-51)
When compiling a s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51726
--- Comment #2 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2012-01-23 20:22:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 26437
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26437
Patch (not tested)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51948
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-23
20:38:27 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 23 20:38:23 2012
New Revision: 183453
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183453
Log:
2012-01-23 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51900
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Kai Tietz 2012-01
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-23
20:48:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 23 20:48:31 2012
New Revision: 183455
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183455
Log:
PR c++/51930
* decl2.c (determine_visibilit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51930
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51948
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51968
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres
2012-01-23 22:05:44 UTC ---
> g++.dg/torture/pr51344.C: Limit to x86.
>
> -/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-do compile { target { i?86-*-* && ilp32 } } } */
Any reason to limit the test to i?86 and 32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #16 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-23
22:21:53 UTC ---
Well I tried to just use the generated Makefile rules to hack together a
solution for --disable-static using the convenience libraries
My plan was to generate a libstdc++convenien
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51939
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51812
--- Comment #6 from bredelin at ucla dot edu 2012-01-23 22:46:47 UTC ---
I will check this patch tomorrow (Jan 24th) to make sure that it fixes the
problem on non-reduced test cases.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36216
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #17 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-23
23:12:07 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon Jan 23 23:12:01 2012
New Revision: 183457
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183457
Log:
2012-01-20 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51910
--- Comment #7 from Sandra Loosemore
2012-01-23 23:14:18 UTC ---
In addition to specifying an explicit command-line option, I think that if you
configure GCC with --with-demangler-in-ld=no it'll restore the previous
behavior, at least on systems
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19774
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.glisse at normalesup
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42635
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51030
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-23
23:44:11 UTC ---
*** Bug 42635 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50895
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46489
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15826
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51975
Bug #: 51975
Summary: ICE in gcc in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with
fprofile-use when source changes from
fprofile-generate
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51975
--- Comment #1 from asharif at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-24 00:55:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 26439
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26439
Proposed fix.
Here is just the patch if you want to take a quick look at it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|[regression][C++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51973
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51974
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, wrong-code
Component|boot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-24
01:27:30 UTC ---
I cannot reproduce this bug on the trunk or 4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44174
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7|[4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42536
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-24
01:30:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I cannot reproduce this bug on the trunk or 4.6.
I want to say this is really a dup of bug 44174.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
--- Comment #20 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-24
02:45:28 UTC ---
cdecl only applies to the 32-bit ABI. ix86_handle_cconv_attribute normally
warns about using it in 64-bit mode, I wonder why it doesn't on darwin?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #18 from Benjamin Kosnik 2012-01-24
05:07:58 UTC ---
Mine
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829
--- Comment #19 from Jan Kratochvil
2012-01-24 05:14:00 UTC ---
../gcchead/configure --enable-64-bit-bfd --disable-static --enable-shared
--enable-debug --disable-sim --enable-gold --enable-plugins --disable-werror
--with-separate-debug-dir=/usr/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51798
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkoz at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51940
--- Comment #4 from Gary Barnes 2012-01-24
06:05:59 UTC ---
How do I report it to AdaCore? Their web site has lots of marketing stuff but
nothing about reporting bugs. Ditto for the Libre site.
So there are two GNAT's in the world? Do they ev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51969
--- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius 2012-01-24
07:05:03 UTC ---
Thanks, Markus, Jakub.
Despite I don't understand this patch, it patch seems to work for me :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51957
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-24
07:24:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jan 24 07:24:34 2012
New Revision: 183468
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183468
Log:
PR target/51957
* target.def (const_not_ok_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51856
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51940
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2012-01-24
07:44:15 UTC ---
> How do I report it to AdaCore? Their web site has lots of marketing stuff but
> nothing about reporting bugs. Ditto for the Libre site.
See the 'Contact' menu on the Libre site.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51957
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
101 - 160 of 160 matches
Mail list logo