[Bug libstdc++/51845] [4.7 regression] 23_containers/unordered_multimap/erase/24061-multimap.cc segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51845 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target|mips64-linux-gnu and|mips64-*-* s390-linux-gnu

[Bug other/31352] gcc -v --help doesn't notice when front-ends documentation differs for same option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31352 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-13 22:36:37 UTC --- On the trunk we get warnings while building GCC about the mismatch of the documentation of the options.

[Bug preprocessor/37215] ICE on 'gcc -E -dM -fpreprocessed - < /dev/null'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37215 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12 fro

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-13 23:02:09 UTC --- Created attachment 26318 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26318 test findenv Test of findenv found in http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/Libc/Libc-498.1

[Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Last reconfirmed|2012-01-11 00:

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-13 23:11:40 UTC --- Created attachment 26319 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26319 patch for libgcc/libgcov.c to debug findenv Patch to use the findenv in http://www.opensourc

[Bug target/17280] -mrelax and -O cause .uses directives in assembler to refer to non-existent local labels

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17280 --- Comment #2 from Michael Beach 2012-01-13 23:21:53 UTC --- It's no longer an issue for me, as I'm not working on a project using sh-elf-gcc any more. I'm unaware of whether this problem occurs in more recent gcc releases or not.

[Bug libitm/51855] New: improve calculation of stack bottom in libitm's undolog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51855 Bug #: 51855 Summary: improve calculation of stack bottom in libitm's undolog Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug libitm/51855] improve calculation of stack bottom in libitm's undolog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51855 torvald at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFI

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-13 23:35:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > (gdb) stepi > 0x29bd29 y (a); > (gdb) p/x _NSGetEnviron() > $3 = 0x50a8 > (gdb) p/x *_NSGetEnviron() > $4 = 0xbfffd9b4 > (gdb) p/x **_NSGetEnv

[Bug rtl-optimization/51856] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51856 Bug #: 51856 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-c

[Bug rtl-optimization/51856] [4.7 Regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51856 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libitm/51855] improve calculation of stack bottom in libitm's undolog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51855 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-13 23:41:44 UTC --- Hmm, do you know if this works with a split stack?

[Bug libitm/51855] improve calculation of stack bottom in libitm's undolog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51855 --- Comment #2 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-13 23:45:12 UTC --- Author: torvald Date: Fri Jan 13 23:45:06 2012 New Revision: 183172 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183172 Log: libitm: Filter out undo writes that ov

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres 2012-01-13 23:46:47 UTC --- > disas x > > would be interesting here to find out what insn is at 0x29c0 and what is > around > that. 0x291b <+0>:push %ebp 0x291c <+1>:mov%esp,%

[Bug driver/51857] New: gcc -flto ignores -B

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51857 Bug #: 51857 Summary: gcc -flto ignores -B Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/28314] cpp: x86/powerpc inconsistency for the __linux macro

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28314 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc*-*-* Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug c/29358] Warning issued two times with snprintf

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29358 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/32719] ICE when compiling c-format.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32719 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50012] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] C++ front end misses -Wsign-compare warnings when extraneous parentheses are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012 --- Comment #8 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-01-14 00:22:21 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Sat Jan 14 00:22:14 2012 New Revision: 183178 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183178 Log: gcc/: PR c++/50012 * tree.h (TYPE_QU

[Bug c++/50012] [4.5/4.6 Regression] C++ front end misses -Wsign-compare warnings when extraneous parentheses are present

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5/4.6 Regression] C++

[Bug middle-end/31192] functions with __attribute__((externally_visible)) becomes static if "-O -fwhole-program"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31192 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/32719] ICE when compiling c-format.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32719 --- Comment #2 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2012-01-14 00:26:46 UTC --- I no longer have a machine to test it on. Brad

[Bug bootstrap/32719] ICE when compiling c-format.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32719 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-14 00:36:19 UTC --- surely this is obvious, don't HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø before you txøtsø ;) you could also try building with --enable-checking=valgrind or run cc1plus under gdb and provide a stack trace and

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-14 00:38:18 UTC --- Sounds like i?86-darwin target bug. The %ebx value is wrong, should be 0x2929 instead (i.e. the point after call __x86.get_pc_thunk.bx in x, but most probably is the point after call

[Bug middle-end/51784] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr44777.c execution, -fprofile-generate -D_PROFILE_GENERATE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51784 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-14 00:54:05 UTC --- Probably for TARGET_MACHO && !TARGET_64BIT && flag_pic you want to define "nonlocal_goto_receiver" pattern that would compute the right PIC pointer value at that point (not sure if th

[Bug target/51853] MPFR assertion failure with Python: p >= 2 && p <= ((mpfr_prec_t)((mpfr_uprec_t)(~(mpfr_uprec_t)0)>>1))

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51853 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-14 01:40:56 UTC --- > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions.

[Bug libmudflap/20696] all libmudflap tests fail on mips{,el}-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20696 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libmudflap/49843] 64-bit libmudflap.c++/pass55-frag.cxx FAILs at -O

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49843 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libmudflap/51858] New: Some malloc'd inside libc is not being tracked

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51858 Bug #: 51858 Summary: Some malloc'd inside libc is not being tracked Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug target/22473] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/conversion.c execution -O[012]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2012-01-14 04:54:23 UTC --- This is a binutils bug. Single word conversions need to use the 0E opcode rather than the 0C opcode that's currently generated for fcnv,t,sgl,uwd. This doesn't fail for PA1.1 bec

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 --- Comment #3 from Nathan Ridge 2012-01-14 07:11:43 UTC --- Here is stack trace of cc1plus at the point where it prints garbage: #0 tree_check_failed (node=0x7fffdc568b40, file=0xf8f214 "../../src/gcc/cp/pt.c", line=1687, function=0xf94cd0 "eq

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2012-01-14 07:20:06 UTC --- >The message "Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xf3" stands out That just means the version of gdb you are using does not understand the dwarf2 extensions that GCC is emitting. We r

[Bug c++/51832] [4.7 regression] Rev.182970 causes LTO link errors (multiple definitions of allocator_traits)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51832 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf 2012-01-14 07:48:35 UTC --- Created attachment 26320 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26320 testcase patch I've attached the original reduced testcase. markus@x4 allocator_lto_testcase

[Bug c++/51852] [regression] [c++11] tree check: expected tree_list, have HßèMÕþÿøtxøtsø

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51852 --- Comment #5 from Nathan Ridge 2012-01-14 07:55:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > >The message "Unhandled dwarf expression opcode 0xf3" stands out > That just means the version of gdb you are using does not understand the > dwarf2 > exten

<    1   2