[Bug c++/51731] code generation bug in negative indices in arrays on 64-bit targets

2012-01-02 Thread m.hekkelman at cmbi dot ru.nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731 --- Comment #4 from M.L. Hekkelman 2012-01-02 19:08:10 UTC --- Beste jakub, maandag 2 januari 2012, 18:10:17, schreef je: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731 > Jakub Jelinek changed: >What|Removed

[Bug c++/51731] code generation bug in negative indices in arrays on 64-bit targets

2012-01-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-02 19:32:08 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Following your logic, if I rewrite the code from: > > return data.e[-1]; > > to > > int* ep = data.e; > return ep[-1]; > > It would be valid, r

[Bug target/51681] [4.7 Regression]: ICE in gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-v2si.c on ia64

2012-01-02 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51681 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug c++/51737] New: g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

2012-01-02 Thread blog at tessarakt dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 Bug #: 51737 Summary: g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Stat

[Bug c++/51737] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

2012-01-02 Thread blog at tessarakt dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 --- Comment #1 from Jens Müller 2012-01-02 20:10:51 UTC --- Created attachment 26222 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26222 preprocessed source (bzip2'ed because of excessive size)

[Bug c++/51737] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

2012-01-02 Thread blog at tessarakt dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 --- Comment #2 from Jens Müller 2012-01-02 20:21:41 UTC --- Someone on IRC confirmed that 4.6.2 also crashes.

[Bug c/51676] -Wsuggest-attribute={pure,const} should give line number of declaration, not definition

2012-01-02 Thread b.r.longbons at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51676 --- Comment #3 from Ben Longbons 2012-01-02 20:27:41 UTC --- I'm not familiar with GCC internals, but would it be as easy as adding and using a second field for "first declaration"? If the first (possibly only) declaration is the definition, the

[Bug c++/51737] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

2012-01-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-02 20:40:31 UTC --- Please, do your best to reduce the testcase to a manageable size, it's normally rather doable with tools like delta: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction

[Bug c++/51737] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

2012-01-02 Thread blog at tessarakt dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 --- Comment #4 from Jens Müller 2012-01-02 21:20:48 UTC --- Thanks, delta is running. I'll send a result in a few hours :-)

[Bug c++/51737] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

2012-01-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-02 21:22:46 UTC --- Great ;) topformat is also useful, iterating between the two as explained in the wiki, that is.

[Bug c++/51710] decltype and SFINAE

2012-01-02 Thread solodon at mail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51710 --- Comment #3 from Yuriy Solodkyy 2012-01-02 21:35:56 UTC --- Thank you, I am aware of the workaround and that is exactly what I do in my code, however I think the current behavior is counter intuitive: 1. I get error message about instantiatio

[Bug c++/15867] -Wredundant-decls and explicit template specialization

2012-01-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15867 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|gcc-bugs at g

[Bug bootstrap/51725] [4.7 regression] segfault in stage 3 when compiling gcc/opts.c for sparc64-linux

2012-01-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-02 22:17:05 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 2 22:17:02 2012 New Revision: 182819 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182819 Log: PR bootstrap/51725 * cselib.c (add_mem_for_

[Bug driver/48306] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] presence of gcc subdir with . in PATH causes breakdown

2012-01-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-02 22:18:25 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 2 22:18:21 2012 New Revision: 182820 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182820 Log: * make-relative-prefix.c (make_relative_prefix_

[Bug bootstrap/51725] [4.7 regression] segfault in stage 3 when compiling gcc/opts.c for sparc64-linux

2012-01-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/48306] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] presence of gcc subdir with . in PATH causes breakdown

2012-01-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug fortran/51736] generic fortran procedures with allocatable/pointer argument

2012-01-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51736 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/45521] Fortran 2008: GENERIC resolution with ALLOCATABLE/POINTER and PROCEDURE

2012-01-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45521 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wangmianzhi1 at linuxmail

[Bug c++/51738] New: C++11 initializer list does not work correctly with operator[]

2012-01-02 Thread akrzemi1 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51738 Bug #: 51738 Summary: C++11 initializer list does not work correctly with operator[] Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51738] C++11 initializer list does not work correctly with operator[]

2012-01-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51738 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/51737] g++ crashes (internal compiler error: Segmentation fault) when compiling quickbook

2012-01-02 Thread blog at tessarakt dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51737 --- Comment #6 from Jens Müller 2012-01-03 04:17:07 UTC --- Created attachment 26223 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26223 reduced testcase OK, I don't get it any smaller ...

[Bug c++/51722] Options "-g3" or "-ggdb3" or "-g3 -gdwarf-2" and other "-g..level3" - internal compiler error

2012-01-02 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug middle-end/51017] GCC 4.6 performance regression (vs. 4.4/4.5)

2012-01-02 Thread solar-gcc at openwall dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51017 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Peslyak 2012-01-03 04:45:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > It might be interesting to get numbers for the trunk. There have been some > register allocator fixes which might have improved this. I've just tested

[Bug c++/51722] Options "-g3" or "-ggdb3" or "-g3 -gdwarf-2" and other "-g..level3" - internal compiler error

2012-01-02 Thread ylalym at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722 --- Comment #8 from Yuriy Lalym 2012-01-03 06:05:23 UTC --- Created attachment 26224 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26224 new example main.cpp int main() { return 0; } ---

[Bug c++/51722] Options "-g3" or "-ggdb3" or "-g3 -gdwarf-2" and other "-g..level3" - internal compiler error

2012-01-02 Thread ylalym at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722 --- Comment #9 from Yuriy Lalym 2012-01-03 06:08:14 UTC --- Created attachment 26225 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26225 And pch.ii

[Bug c++/51722] Options "-g3" or "-ggdb3" or "-g3 -gdwarf-2" and other "-g..level3" - internal compiler error

2012-01-02 Thread ylalym at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722 --- Comment #10 from Yuriy Lalym 2012-01-03 06:17:03 UTC --- Created attachment 26226 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26226 only main with empty pch main.cpp int main() { return 0;

[Bug c++/51722] Options "-g3" or "-ggdb3" or "-g3 -gdwarf-2" and other "-g..level3" - internal compiler error

2012-01-02 Thread ylalym at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722 --- Comment #11 from Yuriy Lalym 2012-01-03 06:17:49 UTC --- Created attachment 26227 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26227 And pch.ii

[Bug c++/51731] code generation bug in negative indices in arrays on 64-bit targets

2012-01-02 Thread m.hekkelman at cmbi dot ru.nl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731 --- Comment #6 from M.L. Hekkelman 2012-01-03 07:44:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > Following your logic, if I rewrite the code from: > > > > return data.e[-1]; > > > > to > > > > int* ep = data.e; > >

[Bug c++/51669] [4.7 Regression] ICE verify-gimple with openmp

2012-01-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51669 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-03 07:49:53 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jan 3 07:49:48 2012 New Revision: 182828 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182828 Log: PR c++/51669 * semantics.c (finish_omp_clau

[Bug c++/51669] [4.7 Regression] ICE verify-gimple with openmp

2012-01-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51669 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

<    1   2