http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39469
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm*-*-*
Component|middle-end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51070
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 Regression] ICE|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51682
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-02
09:54:44 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Jan 2 09:54:37 2012
New Revision: 182781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182781
Log:
2012-01-02 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51682
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-02
10:15:57 UTC ---
Try disabling PCH, too. If PCH is required to reproduce the bug also
include all preprocessed headers to build the PCH.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51721
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51719
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51717
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at acm dot org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51715
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at acm dot org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51705
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51692
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51687
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2316
--- Comment #38 from Marc Glisse 2012-01-02
10:39:35 UTC ---
Thanks for the comments.
(In reply to comment #36)
> The library should overload qsort, then the libitm/clone.cc change wouldn't be
> needed
Indeed, that was the meaning of my comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51680
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-02
10:43:03 UTC ---
Analyzing function body size: float add1(float)
Accounting size:2.00, time:0.00 on new predicate:(not inlined)
BB 2 predicate:(true)
D.2207_2 = x_1(D) + 1.0e+0;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51679
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-02
10:46:04 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 2 10:46:01 2012
New Revision: 182785
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182785
Log:
2012-01-02 Richard Guenther
PR other/5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51679
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51678
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-02
10:47:19 UTC ---
Must be broken since forever or caused by your host TeX installation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51676
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51669
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51686
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-02
10:59:08 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 2 10:59:04 2012
New Revision: 182788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182788
Log:
2012-01-02 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51686
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-02
11:02:15 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 2 11:02:10 2012
New Revision: 182790
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182790
Log:
2012-01-02 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51686
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51728
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|regression |middle-end
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50616
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51726
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51724
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51703
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51729
Bug #: 51729
Summary: dspr2-MULT.c and dspr2-MULTU.c fail for MIPS
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51729
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-02 11:33:39 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Mon Jan 2 11:33:35 2012
New Revision: 182793
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182793
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/51729
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49951
--- Comment #15 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2012-01-02 12:01:45 UTC ---
> It would be very helpful to get this into 4.6.3 too if it's safe
Sure thing. I am currently testing the patch on 4.6. Thanks for the
head-up.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51730
Bug #: 51730
Summary: [4.7 Regression] autoconf 2.60 through 2.67 stdbool.h
check fails with GCC 4.7
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51730
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
Bug #: 51731
Summary: code generation bug in negative indices in arrays on
64-bit targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51681
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51681
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2012-01-02 12:31:24
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/vshuf-v8qi.c -O2 execution test
It is not related to original failure; following patchlet fixes the failure:
--cut here--
@@ -11207,7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-02
12:30:42 UTC ---
See also RFC patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-10/msg00136.html
and reply: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-10/msg00138.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51681
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2012-01-02 12:35:25
UTC ---
Patch:
--cut here--
Index: ia64.c
===
--- ia64.c (revision 182780)
+++ ia64.c (working copy)
@@ -11085,7 +11085
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2012-01-02 12:46:14
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 2 12:46:08 2012
New Revision: 182796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182796
Log:
2012-01-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/51529
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas 2012-01-02 12:46:15
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 2 12:46:08 2012
New Revision: 182796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182796
Log:
2012-01-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/51529
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51052
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas 2012-01-02 12:46:16
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 2 12:46:08 2012
New Revision: 182796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182796
Log:
2012-01-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/51529
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46328
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas 2012-01-02 12:46:15
UTC ---
Author: pault
Date: Mon Jan 2 12:46:08 2012
New Revision: 182796
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182796
Log:
2012-01-02 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/51529
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51345
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2012-01-02
12:52:00 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 2 12:51:57 2012
New Revision: 182797
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182797
Log:
contrib/
PR target/51345
* gcc_update (fil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51052
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46328
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51730
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2012-01-02 13:03:35 UTC ---
On Mon, 2 Jan 2012, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> char digs[] = "0123456789";
> int xlcbug = 1 / (&(digs + 5)[-2 + (_Bool) 1] == &digs[4] ? 1 : -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51732
Bug #: 51732
Summary: typo in man gcc: "runt-time check"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51334
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45397
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51634
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51733
Bug #: 51733
Summary: [OOP] No allocate on assign for class objects with
allocatable components.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51728
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2012-01-02
13:52:14 UTC ---
Seems that canonical vs. non-canonical VALUEs are mixed up.
In cselib_invalidate_mem, we don't terminate the loop:
addr = cselib_lookup (XEXP (x, 0), VOIDmode, 0, GET_MODE (x
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51730
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51733
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Blo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51733
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2012-01-02
14:11:03 UTC ---
(Mixed up the test cases. The PR mentioned in comment 1 is the same as in
comment 0 - and a good test case. I mixed it up with PR 46262 comment 3, which
is a longer example which also
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51730
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-02
14:15:39 UTC ---
Like
Index: gcc/fold-const.c
===
--- gcc/fold-const.c(revision 182784)
+++ gcc/fold-const.c(working copy)
@@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51734
Bug #: 51734
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap fails in libada
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51734
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51725
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722
--- Comment #3 from Yuriy Lalym 2012-01-02 15:06:30
UTC ---
Without PCH errors aren't present.
> all preprocessed headers to build the PCH
#include
It is enough one header for error origin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722
--- Comment #4 from Yuriy Lalym 2012-01-02 15:16:03
UTC ---
main.cpp
---
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
QCoreApplication a(argc, argv);
return a.exec();
}
---
pc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51669
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #21 from Richard Guenther 2012-01-02
15:52:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
>
> Fortunately it seems that this bug was the last issue that needed to be fixed.
> Firefox now builds fine with -lto and -g.
Can you also check the fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20140
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-02 16:15:55 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Jan 2 16:15:49 2012
New Revision: 182805
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182805
Log:
/cp
2012-01-02 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20140
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-02
16:23:42 UTC ---
Maybe I'm just tired (sorry in case) but I really don't see how this can
possibly work: *negative* index?!? Can you explain?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51669
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735
Bug #: 51735
Summary: [4.7 regression] stage 3 bootstrap failure compiling
tree-ssa-pre.c with r182760
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||s390x-ibm-linux
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #22 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2012-01-02 16:52:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #20)
> >
> > Fortunately it seems that this bug was the last issue that needed to be
> > fixed.
> > Firefox now builds fine wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51735
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51462
--- Comment #1 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-01-02
17:00:21 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Jan 2 17:00:13 2012
New Revision: 182806
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182806
Log:
PR c++/51462 - ICE in cx_check_missing_mem_inits
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46328
--- Comment #9 from Damian Rouson 2012-01-02
17:01:47 UTC ---
Thanks for the fix! I'm very excited about the way 4.7 is shaping up. It
appears this will be a very significant release for those interested in the
more advanced capabilities of OOP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
--- Comment #2 from M.L. Hekkelman 2012-01-02
17:03:46 UTC ---
Beste paolo.carlini,
maandag 2 januari 2012, 17:23:42, schreef je:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
> --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini
> 2012-01-02 16:23:42 U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51731
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51462
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49951
--- Comment #16 from Dodji Seketeli 2012-01-02
17:08:50 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Jan 2 17:08:45 2012
New Revision: 182807
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182807
Log:
PR debug/49951 - jumpy stepping at end of scope i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-02
17:34:19 UTC ---
Andreas, can we close this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
--- Comment #7 from Ollie Wild 2012-01-02 17:35:07 UTC
---
I'm on vacation until Jan. 6.
For compiler related questions, please email c-compiler-t...@google.com.
If you need to contact a manager, please email lp-m...@google.com.
Thanks,
Ollie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49976
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-02
17:44:09 UTC ---
Thanks Iain, if you could manage to test on the branch too - when possible - it
would be great. Or at some point we can as well close the issue as worksforme
in mainline, 4_6-branch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51322
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48051
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47335
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51666
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-02
17:53:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 2 17:53:16 2012
New Revision: 182809
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182809
Log:
DR 325
PR c++/51666
* parser.c (cp_pars
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51675
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-01-02
17:53:32 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 2 17:53:28 2012
New Revision: 182810
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182810
Log:
DR 1359
PR c++/51675
* method.c (walk_f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49204
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2012-01-02
17:56:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> We should also make std::async check the system load when deciding whether to
> run asynchronously or deferred. We should be able to reuse GNU Make's code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51322
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51689
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2012-01-02
18:01:58 UTC ---
In this area we have also PR25137.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51719
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
-libstdcxx-allocator=new
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs
--program-suffix=-4.7 --enable-linux-futex --without-system-libunwind
--with-tune=core2 --build=x86_64-suse-linux
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20120102 (experimental) (SUSE Linux)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49110
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51722
--- Comment #6 from Yuriy Lalym 2012-01-02 18:57:40
UTC ---
Created attachment 26220
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26220
For example in Comment 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51736
Bug #: 51736
Summary: generic fortran procedures with allocatable/pointer
argument
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
1 - 100 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
