http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51645
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-22 08:16:26 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 22 08:16:12 2011
New Revision: 182615
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182615
Log:
PR testsuite/51645
* g++.dg/cpp0x/al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51645
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51652
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51652
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[F03] ICE with allocatable |Allocate with type-spec and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51635
--- Comment #25 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-12-22 09:48:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Another fun (well ...) patch that is worth trying is
>
> Index: gcc/gimple.c
> ===
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27468
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27468
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2011-12-22 10:25:10
UTC ---
With proposed patch to enable REE pass, we still generate:
:
0: 20 05 f0 43 negqa0,v0
4: c0 08 10 46 cmovge a0,a0,v0
8: 00 00 e0 43 sext
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39658
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-22
11:44:04 UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
struct T;
class C
{
public:
typedef ::T T;
static T *m ()
{
static T *d;
return d;
}
};
int
fn ()
{
C::m ();
}
int main() {}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-22
12:00:27 UTC ---
In non-LTO mode we create the DIE for 'C' (which we do not create at all
with -flto) via
#3 0x00d54c57 in rest_of_type_compilation (type=0x75b8f3f0,
toplev=1) at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
Bug #: 51653
Summary: More compact std::tuple
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48362
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-22
12:33:27 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 22 12:33:15 2011
New Revision: 182620
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182620
Log:
PR libstdc++/48362
* python/libstdcxx/v6/p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48362
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-12-22 12:51:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> In non-LTO mode we create the DIE for 'C' (which we do not create at all
> with -flto) via
>
> #3 0x00d54c57 in rest_of_type_compilation (typ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29997
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-12-22 12:53:39 UTC ---
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> I think we encode proligue and epilogues now for all targets.
It's been done for several targets, but when lo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51653
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-22
12:57:06 UTC ---
Neat! Thanks for demonstrating this. I'm not yet convinced we want to apply it,
but it's nice to know it can be done without *too* much trouble.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-22
13:10:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Markus, can you give it a shot?
>
> libxul still fails to build with the same error message (but there is only
> one instanc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-12-22 13:17:46 UTC ---
% cat test.ii
typedef struct { } X;
void test ()
{
typedef X **P;
P g = 0;
}
% g++ test.ii -g -flto -flto-partition=none
lto1: internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_finish,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-12-22 13:26:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> % cat test.ii
> typedef struct { } X;
> void test ()
> {
> typedef X **P;
> P g = 0;
> }
>
> % g++ test.ii -g -flto -flto-partition=none
> lto1:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-22
13:34:15 UTC ---
Oops, typo - it should be
else if (!flag_wpa
&& TREE_CODE (t) == TYPE_DECL)
debug_hooks->type_decl (t, !DECL_FILE_SCOPE_P (t));
(note the negation bef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51413
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51643
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51643
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-12-22
14:13:16 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu Dec 22 14:13:09 2011
New Revision: 182621
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182621
Log:
PR target/51643
* arm.c (arm_function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51643
--- Comment #9 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-12-22
14:28:45 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu Dec 22 14:28:39 2011
New Revision: 182622
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182622
Log:
PR target/51643
* arm.c (arm_function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51643
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50396
Mathias Gaunard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||loufoque at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51654
Bug #: 51654
Summary: C++ preprocessor bug with -maltivec and typedefs
involving 'vector'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50396
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51654
--- Comment #1 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-12-22
15:16:18 UTC ---
Excuse the typo, the above code should have been
template
struct test
{
typedef typename T::vector vector;
};
to be valid C++ code.
The " vector" bit is incorrectly removed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-22
15:28:32 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Dec 22 15:28:24 2011
New Revision: 182625
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182625
Log:
2011-12-22 Richard Guenther
PR lto/516
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51654
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51472
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51654
--- Comment #3 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-12-22
15:54:20 UTC ---
The workarounds
#undef vector
or
compiling with -Dvector=vector
seem to work.
But shouldn't this not be necessary when altivec.h is not included?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51507
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
--- Comment #15 from Michael Hope 2011-12-22
16:07:46 UTC ---
I'm away of holiday until the 4th of January. For anything urgent,
please contact k...@linaro.org.
-- Michael
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51652
--- Comment #3 from David Kinniburgh
2011-12-22 16:21:09 UTC ---
Sorry, I wasn't up-to-date on the long history of allocatable scalars and dt
components, and hadn't checked the documentation in detail recently. Anyway
thanks for all your work on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27468
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-22 16:35:25 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Dec 22 16:35:16 2011
New Revision: 182626
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182626
Log:
PR target/27468
* common/config/alph
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27468
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51655
Bug #: 51655
Summary: FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/memcpy-1.c (test for excess
errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51643
--- Comment #11 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-12-22
17:31:58 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu Dec 22 17:31:50 2011
New Revision: 182628
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182628
Log:
PR target/51643
* arm.c (arm_functio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51643
--- Comment #12 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-12-22
17:33:04 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Thu Dec 22 17:32:58 2011
New Revision: 182629
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182629
Log:
PR target/51643
* arm.c (arm_functio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47643
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-22
17:35:14 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 22 17:35:05 2011
New Revision: 182630
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182630
Log:
PR target/47643
* doc/invoke.texi (i386 an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47643
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24986
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51654
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
--- Comment #4 from Andrew P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-12-22 18:45:24 UTC ---
% cat pr51650.ii
class nsQueryFrame
{
};
struct PLDHashEntryHdr {
};
template < class > class nsPtrHashKey:PLDHashEntryHdr
{
};
class nsIFrame;
namespace mozilla
{
struct Fra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #49 from David Edelsohn 2011-12-22
18:46:20 UTC ---
libstdc++ testsuite does not appear to run 30_ thread tests on AIX. What
controls this? The testsuite probably assumes that it is testing
"single-threaded" multilib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51654
--- Comment #5 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-12-22
18:48:36 UTC ---
gaunard@emeria:~$ g++-4.6 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++-4.6
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/powerpc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/lto-wrapper
Target: powerpc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48362
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-22
18:58:20 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Dec 22 18:58:15 2011
New Revision: 182632
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182632
Log:
PR libstdc++/48362
* testsuite/libstdc++-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50982
--- Comment #50 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-22
19:03:02 UTC ---
Those tests have a target selector, which doesn't include AIX:
{ target *-*-freebsd* *-*-netbsd* *-*-linux* *-*-solaris* *-*-cygwin
*-*-darwin* alpha*-*-osf* mips-sgi-irix6* }
So
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51650
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-12-22 19:14:38 UTC ---
Reduced (it almost identical to the first testcase):
struct T;
class C
{
public:
typedef ::T T;
virtual void E();
static T *m ()
{
static T *d;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51310
--- Comment #8 from toon at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-22 19:23:31 UTC ---
Author: toon
Date: Thu Dec 22 19:23:26 2011
New Revision: 182634
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182634
Log:
2011-12-22 Toon Moene
PR fortran/513
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51212
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-12-22
20:18:20 UTC ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Thu Dec 22 20:18:11 2011
New Revision: 182636
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182636
Log:
PR middle-end/51212
* opts.c (finish_optio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51212
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51656
Bug #: 51656
Summary: C front end and strtold handle hexadecimal floating
differently
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-12-22 20:44:44
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Thu Dec 22 20:44:32 2011
New Revision: 182638
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182638
Log:
PR 51646 Use POSIX mode flags in open() argument.
2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51646
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
Summary|Make libgfor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
Bug #: 51657
Summary: bind1st multiplies a pointer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51658
Bug #: 51658
Summary: [C++0x] delegating constructor ICE in
build_data_member_initialization, at
cp/semantics.c:5806
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51643
--- Comment #13 from Alexander Osipenko 2011-12-22
21:31:56 UTC ---
Thanks, Richard!
It now works fine with -mabi=aapcs
Perhaps I don't understand some details, could you tell me why the
-mabi=aapcs-linux is not included in this fix?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51658
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #2 from Christopher Yeleighton
2011-12-22 21:46:58 UTC ---
The standard is obviously wrong.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.std.c++/browse_thread/thread/de856e5116876ff3/b34116c5e51b1d07?lnk=gst&q=bind1st#b34116c5e51b1d07
>
Repo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-22
22:00:44 UTC ---
Too bad was ignored, but really, if you are interested in my advice, you should
get in touch with somebody very active in the LWG if you want to be sure
nothing is forgotten (eg, these
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-22
22:28:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Report silently ignored.
No it wasn't, see the note at the top of the post:
[Moderator's note: this defect report has been
forwarded to th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51658
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-22
22:29:52 UTC ---
Bah, it's probably a local change I was testing a few weeks ago on gcc20 - I'll
try again - thanks for checking it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51658
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51643
--- Comment #14 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-12-22
23:27:29 UTC ---
Because the ABI says it only works for bare metal.
On a system with shared libraries, you can't tell at static link time if a weak
symbol will be resolved by a shared library, so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51643
--- Comment #15 from Alexander Osipenko 2011-12-23
00:40:13 UTC ---
Oh, I see, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Yeleighton
2011-12-23 00:45:28 UTC ---
Well, I am astonished at the carelessness of the LWG. If something is plainly
wrong, it should be fixed (which would be trivial in this case) or withdrawn,
not deprecated. D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-23
01:31:05 UTC ---
Yeah, it's unbelievable, you should help these poor souls.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51657
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-23
01:31:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Well, I am astonished at the carelessness of the LWG. If something is plainly
> wrong, it should be fixed (which would be trivial in this case) or withdra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2011-12-23
01:53:20 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Dec 23 01:53:13 2011
New Revision: 182646
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182646
Log:
PR middle-end/51252
* config/pa/pa.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin 2011-12-23
02:03:03 UTC ---
Fixed on PA.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin 2011-12-23
02:11:03 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Dec 23 02:10:52 2011
New Revision: 182647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182647
Log:
PR testsuite/50722
gcc.dg/pr49994-3.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51659
Bug #: 51659
Summary: ICE in function output_move_double
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51659
--- Comment #1 from Carrot 2011-12-23 02:29:49 UTC
---
(gdb) cont
Continuing.
Breakpoint 2, output_move_double (operands=0x19be680, emit=1 '\001', count=0x0)
at ../../../trunk/gcc/config/arm/arm.c:13933
13933 gcc_assert (!emit);
(gdb) p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43491
--- Comment #6 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-23 05:43:17 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Dec 23 05:43:09 2011
New Revision: 182650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182650
Log:
2011-12-22 Bin Cheng
Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51660
Bug #: 51660
Summary: ICE on function missing argument list
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51661
Bug #: 51661
Summary: ICE when template class list repeated
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
85 matches
Mail list logo
