http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51457
Bug #: 51457
Summary: Add warning about impossible boolean comparisons
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51456
--- Comment #3 from junkmailnotread at yahoo dot com 2011-12-07 20:31:02 UTC ---
I'm using glibc-2.12.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51449
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51229
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-07
20:43:12 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 20:43:06 2011
New Revision: 182088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182088
Log:
PR c++/51229
* decl.c (reshape_init_class):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51429
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-07
20:46:41 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 20:46:38 2011
New Revision: 182089
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182089
Log:
PR c++/51429
* typeck2.c (cxx_incomplete_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51369
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51229
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51429
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51458
Bug #: 51458
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Accepts invalid designated
initializers
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51458
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973
--- Comment #10 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-12-07 20:56:01 UTC ---
On Wed, 7 Dec 2011, tromey at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Note that GCC also handles the tab case incorrectly here.
Yes, GCC should be fixed to follow the GCS there as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51446
--- Comment #3 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu 2011-12-07 21:07:09 UTC ---
I've looked through the code in real.c a bit (and perhaps the component of this
bug report should be changed).
It appears that do_divide, when given 0.0/0.0, calls get_c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #47 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-12-07
21:12:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #42)
> -O2 -W -Wall -gnatpg -nostdinc a-assert.adb -o a-assert.o
> +===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
> | 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50051
--- Comment #5 from Anthony Green 2011-12-07 21:48:29
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Thanks Andrew. Does this force the generation of FP instructions, which are
> > then emulated through OS traps?
>
> Yes and th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50237
--- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-07
22:06:04 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:05:59 2011
New Revision: 182090
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182090
Log:
PR bootstrap/50237
* internal.h (_cpp_init
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51454
Pubby8 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
Bug #: 51459
Summary: [4.6 Regression] 'double free or corruption' involving
std::function, std::vector and lambdas
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
--- Comment #1 from kennytm at gmail dot com 2011-12-07 22:48:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 26018
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26018
The .ii file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50051
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-07
22:59:10 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Wed Dec 7 22:59:06 2011
New Revision: 182092
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182092
Log:
2011-12-07 Andrew Pinski
PR libffi/50051
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51420
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50051
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51459
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 Regression] 'double|[4.7 Regression] 'double
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51454
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME
Severity|trivial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #9 from maxim_kuvyrkov at mentor dot com 2011-12-08 00:06:40 UTC ---
On 7/12/2011, at 7:40 AM, sebpop at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
>
> --- Comment #8 from sebpop at gmail dot com
> 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51460
Bug #: 51460
Summary: [4.6 regression] Struct with two boost mutexes
allocated on the heap inside of a while loop causes
compiler segfault
Classification: Unclassified
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51460
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51460
--- Comment #2 from Faraaz Sareshwala 2011-12-08
00:46:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 26019
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26019
preprocessed source (gzipped because too large otherwise)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51460
--- Comment #3 from Faraaz Sareshwala 2011-12-08
00:46:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > Please submit a full bug report,
> > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
> > See for instructions.
> >
> > Please let me know if I have forgotte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51401
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-08
00:50:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Dec 8 00:50:26 2011
New Revision: 182097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182097
Log:
PR c++/51401
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Err
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51401
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51440
--- Comment #2 from Chris 2011-12-08
01:04:18 UTC ---
When narrowing down the issue I stripped a detail which may be important. All
contents of the test.h file are in fact in extern "C" { } range. When the repro
case from my original report is mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
--- Comment #15 from Cesar Strauss 2011-12-08
01:23:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> Unfortunately I don't seem to be able to reproduce on Linux. Could you see
> what object code has been generated for the line
>
> gcc_assert (Nkind (gnat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39509
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #23 from Andrew Pinski 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21617
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-08
03:34:57 UTC ---
-O1:
.L2:
movl%eax, %edx
sarl$31, %edx
shrl$24, %edx
leal(%eax,%edx), %ecx
andl$255, %ecx
subl%edx, %ecx
movb%cl, (%ebx,%eax)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21617
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-08
03:37:28 UTC ---
-O1:
:
# __crc0_73 = PHI <__crc0_35(5), __crc0_54(7)>
# __data_75 = PHI <__data_32(5), data_7(7)>
D.1900_26 = __crc0_73 >> 56;
D.1901_27 = (int) D.1900_26;
D.1902_28 = MEM[b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski 201
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #10 from sebpop at gmail dot com
2011-12-08 04:08:14 UTC ---
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 18:06, maxim_kuvyrkov at mentor dot com
wrote:
> Do I understand correctly that you are suggesting effectively disabling loop
> flattening completely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-08
04:54:41 UTC ---
A better non specific to tree-ssa-structaliasing patch:
Index: cgraphunit.c
===
--- cgraphunit.c(revision 18209
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51361
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-08
04:58:51 UTC ---
This could also be related to PR 51449.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51361
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51215
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo