http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-05
08:15:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 5 08:15:23 2011
New Revision: 182000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182000
Log:
PR middle-end/51323
PR middle-end/50074
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-05
08:15:38 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Dec 5 08:15:23 2011
New Revision: 182000
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182000
Log:
PR middle-end/51323
PR middle-end/50074
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #37 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-05 08:18:00 UTC ---
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
>
> --- Comment #34 from Tobias Burnus 2011-12-02
> 17:06:57 UT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #38 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-05 08:27:08 UTC ---
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
>
> --- Comment #35 from Eric Botcazou 2011-12-02
> 21:21:15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] g++|[4.6 Regression] g++
|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50074
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51418
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49719
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #39 from Eric Botcazou 2011-12-05
09:21:15 UTC ---
> Thus, I think if at the RTL level we see a missed invariant motion then
> this is a RTL level bug (esp. if it only triggers with -fno-protect-parens).
Well, how can the RTL level
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51417
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51410
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
Status|UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51395
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51285
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51069
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51391
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #40 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-12-05 09:55:47 UTC ---
On Mon, 5 Dec 2011, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
>
> --- Comment #39 from Eric Botcazou 2011-12-05
> 09:21:15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #41 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-12-05 10:12:39 UTC ---
Using --param lim-expensive=1 when compiling induct.f90 does not change the
timing, as for today (r181994):
gfc -Ofast induct.f90
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #42 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-05
10:19:11 UTC ---
Argh. It seems LIM didn't get proper lifting both at tuplification and
alias-improvements time. So it's memory handling (everything it does
with VOPs) is a little very much conse
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Component|rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307
--- Comment #7 from Arnaud Charlet 2011-12-05
10:32:03 UTC ---
Author: charlet
Date: Mon Dec 5 10:31:58 2011
New Revision: 182004
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182004
Log:
2011-12-05 Bob Duff
* sem_ch3.adb (Deriv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Arnaud Charl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50557
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51414
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51225
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|paolo.carlini at o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51406
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51399
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51396
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51423
Bug #: 51423
Summary: Questions regarding Clobber List for inline ARM/NEON
assembly
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51069
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51154
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51128
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51350
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51263
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51097
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51223
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51228
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51091
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51097
--- Comment #3 from Igor Zamyatin 2011-12-05
14:16:09 UTC ---
Hope to finish a patch this week
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51361
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51363
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51197
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51262
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51091
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51339
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51237
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51128
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-12-05 14:35:03
UTC ---
/* { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-fno-fat-lto-objects" } { "" } } */
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #45 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-05
14:36:48 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Dec 5 14:36:44 2011
New Revision: 182010
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182010
Log:
2011-12-05 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48641
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24012|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cgf at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51237
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-12-05 15:01:49 UTC ---
There is no longer any bootstrap issues. Does it remain something to fix?
Otherwise I'll close this PR as fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51363
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51350
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51135
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51245
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094
--- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth 2011-12-05
15:25:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 25992
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25992
verbose assembly for objc.dg/torture/strings/string1.m -O2 -flto
-flto-partition=none -fnext-runtime
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094
--- Comment #10 from Jack Howarth 2011-12-05
15:30:42 UTC ---
Attached verbose assembly from x86_64-apple-darwin11 using gcc trunk at
r181974 with http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-12/msg00241.html generated
using...
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51339
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51404
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-12-05 15:46:34 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Dec 5 15:46:30 2011
New Revision: 182011
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182011
Log:
/cp
2011-12-05 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51404
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51275
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-12-05
15:49:44 UTC ---
Another approach is to not create CLOBBERs in the outermost scope at all
but re-create those during inlining when building the containing BLOCK.
That would probably avoid CLOBBERs f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51183
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51275
--- Comment #7 from Michael Matz 2011-12-05 16:02:10
UTC ---
As said, this would still require ugly fiddling with exception edges.
Getting rid of some of the clobbers a posteriori seems cleaner.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51183
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-05
16:06:57 UTC ---
Nice!
it should be pretty simple:
template
pair(piecewise_construct_t,
tuple<_Args1...> __first, tuple<_Args2...> __second)
: pair(std::move(__fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51424
Bug #: 51424
Summary: [C++11] G++ should diagnose self-delegating
constructors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51183
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-05
16:09:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51408
--- Comment #1 from Kazu Hirata 2011-12-05 16:11:43
UTC ---
Author: kazu
Date: Mon Dec 5 16:11:35 2011
New Revision: 182014
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182014
Log:
gcc/
PR target/51408
* config/arm/arm.md (*min
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51183
--- Comment #8 from Paolo Carlini 2011-12-05
16:12:35 UTC ---
I suspected that. Thus, Jon, if you like, just test and commit! ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51408
Kazu Hirata changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51423
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51183
--- Comment #10 from Chris Jefferson 2011-12-05
16:25:13 UTC ---
Oh, and one other tiny detail, I've about given up trying to understand corner
cases in the name look-up rules in C++, so I'd probably std:: qualify those
'get's, just to be on the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51339
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51183
--- Comment #9 from Chris Jefferson 2011-12-05
16:19:40 UTC ---
The only difference in the version I wrote was that I passed the arguments into
the explicit constructor as non-const references, rather than by value with
std::move, which should be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51183
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-05
16:27:07 UTC ---
I was assuming that since the public piecewise constructor takes them by value
the extra move would be elided ... that might not be true though.
I haven't written any tests for it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39480
lu_zero at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lu_zero at gentoo dot org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667
lu_zero at gentoo dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lu_zero at gentoo dot org
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50775
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-12-05
17:02:59 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Mon Dec 5 17:02:54 2011
New Revision: 182015
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182015
Log:
2011-12-05 Vladimir Makarov
PR other/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe 2011-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51381
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904
--- Comment #48 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-12-05 17:58:13 UTC ---
> Fixed (fingers crossing).
So far, so good! The runtime for induct compiled with -fprotect-parens -Ofast
went down from 14.11s to 13.14s, and compiled with -Ofast from 14.62s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51128
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 17:59:44 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Dec 5 17:59:32 2011
New Revision: 182016
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182016
Log:
PR testsuite/51128
* gcc.dg/torture/
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo