http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37829
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-16
21:37:47 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Nov 16 21:37:43 2011
New Revision: 181425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181425
Log:
gcc/fortran
2011-11-16 Tobias Burnus
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37829
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39427
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51181
Bug #: 51181
Summary: [4.7 regression] libstdc++.so __sync_sub_and_fetch_4
linkage error causing many test suite failures on
m68k-linux
Classification: Unclassified
Prod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51182
Bug #: 51182
Summary: [ipa-iterations] running multiple passes of early IPA
on a file produces difference code when it shouldn't
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51182
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett 2011-11-16 23:09:22 UTC
---
I see the same seeming no-op register and instruction twiddles with inflate.c
from zlib, as well. Adding more iterations has a kind of ping-pong effect where
it goes between the two dif
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51142
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-11-16 23:11:32 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Nov 16 23:11:26 2011
New Revision: 181427
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181427
Log:
2011-11-16 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51142
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28220
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51151
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-11-17 01:23:53 UTC ---
On 16-Nov-11, at 2:03 PM, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote:
> Please try a new run with a recent checkout and see what fails. I'm
> assuming
> that atomic-noinline.c wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39427
--- Comment #31 from Damian Rouson 2011-11-17
01:43:38 UTC ---
This is awesome news!
:D
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:54 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39427
>
> Tobia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51183
Bug #: 51183
Summary: pair piecewise_construct_t constructor copies
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50802
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51130
Patrick Marlier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.marlier at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125
Patrick Marlier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrick.marlier at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51184
Bug #: 51184
Summary: Abstract class in function return type
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51185
Bug #: 51185
Summary: [C++0x] false-positive results of
std::is_constructible
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo