http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17838
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25994
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50518
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51155
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20681
--- Comment #33 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko 2011-11-16
09:04:40 UTC ---
> Not a bug, enum foo can have other values except e_1.
>
> What happens if you call bar( (foo)1 ) ?
sorry for noise :(
You are right - no error in c#31
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51157
Bug #: 51157
Summary: decltype/typeof of template member with default
template argument confuses g++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #10 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-11-16
09:27:59 UTC ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Wed Nov 16 09:27:56 2011
New Revision: 181405
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181405
Log:
2011-11-16 Andreas Krebbel
PR middle-e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
--- Comment #61 from Jiangning Liu 2011-11-16
09:47:01 UTC ---
Author: liujiangning
Date: Wed Nov 16 09:46:58 2011
New Revision: 181406
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181406
Log:
2011-11-16 Jiangning Liu
Backpo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-16
10:21:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I have no doubt the regression occurred in 181189:181208 as per the archive
> link; I'll bisect from that.
It's r181205:181206 (r181205 was a build fai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51098
--- Comment #6 from Stupachenko Evgeny 2011-11-16
10:32:31 UTC ---
Bootstrap fail was caused by later commit (revision 181246):
r181246 | rth | 2011-11-10 04:29:38 +0400 (T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51157
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51152
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51149
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-16
11:23:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> But, there's two situations I tend to do all the time that cause several pages
> of irrelevant suggestions/template failures fly by. If you do several of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51158
Bug #: 51158
Summary: C++ std::real() is broken when using -std=c++0x mode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51158
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mtall.gcc at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51101
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |4.6.3
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51100
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51099
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083
--- Comment #17 from Mark Tall 2011-11-16 12:46:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> I'm planning to apply this fix to the 4.6 branch, but probably not 4.4 and 4.5
> because it only affects users of TR1 (and noone ever noticed the bug in the
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083
--- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-16
12:54:23 UTC ---
But -std=c++0x in the 4.4 release is highly experimental, if using it causes
problems, don't use it.
If in a few weeks this hasn't caused problems on the 4.6 branch I might
*consid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51150
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43999
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49132
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51141
fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51159
Bug #: 51159
Summary: build failure with --enable-build-with-cxx in
"gcc-4.6.2/gcc/objc/objc-next-runtime-abi-02.c"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Fortran (GCC) 4.7.0 2016 (experimental)
and I'm compiling with
gfortran -g test.f90 -o prg
module mod1
implicit none
type, abstract :: at
contains
procedure(i_copy), deferred, pass(y) :: copy
end type at
abstract interface
subroutine i_copy(y,x)
import :: at
implicit none
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51098
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51098
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-16 14:51:19 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Nov 16 14:51:13 2011
New Revision: 181408
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181408
Log:
PR bootstrap/51098
* acinclude.m4 (L
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51098
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49960
--- Comment #3 from razya at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-16 14:58:10 UTC ---
Author: razya
Date: Wed Nov 16 14:58:04 2011
New Revision: 181409
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181409
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49960
* gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49960
--- Comment #4 from razya at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-16 14:59:18 UTC ---
Author: razya
Date: Wed Nov 16 14:59:14 2011
New Revision: 181410
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181410
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49960
* gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49960
--- Comment #5 from razya at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-16 15:01:52 UTC ---
Author: razya
Date: Wed Nov 16 15:01:47 2011
New Revision: 181411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181411
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49960
* tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51161
Bug #: 51161
Summary: [C++0x] Illegal static_cast to rvalue reference to
ambiguous base class
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45102
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51162
Bug #: 51162
Summary: [Regression] ICE: segfault in dump_gimple_call
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51160
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51102
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Macleod 2011-11-16
15:43:23 UTC ---
Author: amacleod
Date: Wed Nov 16 15:43:15 2011
New Revision: 181414
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181414
Log:
2011-11-16 Andrew MacLeod
PR libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50958
--- Comment #3 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-11-16
16:03:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 25839
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25839
Patch to correctly resolve literal operators.
Literal operators were n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51163
Bug #: 51163
Summary: gcc.dg/tm/alias-1.c failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51163
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51164
Bug #: 51164
Summary: gcc.dg/tm/alias-2.c failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51165
Bug #: 51165
Summary: gcc.dg/tm/memopt-3.c failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51166
Bug #: 51166
Summary: gcc.dg/tm/memopt-4.c failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51167
Bug #: 51167
Summary: gcc.dg/tm/memopt-5.c failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51168
Bug #: 51168
Summary: gcc.dg/tm/memopt-7.c failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51169
Bug #: 51169
Summary: XFAIL: libitm.c/dropref-2.c execution test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51170
Bug #: 51170
Summary: XFAIL: libitm.c/dropref.c execution test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51170
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51171
Bug #: 51171
Summary: XFAIL: libitm.c/reentrant.c execution test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51171
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51172
Bug #: 51172
Summary: XFAIL: libitm.c++/dropref.C execution test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51173
Bug #: 51173
Summary: XFAIL: libitm.c++/static_ctor.C
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51173
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174
Bug #: 51174
Summary: AIX unexpected error_mark node in new TM tests
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51164
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51165
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51166
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51167
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51168
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51172
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||alpha-dec-osf5.1b,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51169
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51175
Bug #: 51175
Summary: Memory Leak with Transfer intrinsic
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn 2011-11-16 16:45:01
UTC ---
/tmp/2015/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/2015/gcc/
/farm/dje/src/src/gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/tm/freq.c-fgnu-tm -O -S -o
freq.s
/tmp/2015/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/2015/gcc/ /farm/dje/s
/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../configure --with-libelf=/usr/local --enable-lto
--prefix=/home/regehr/z/compiler-install/gcc-r181415-install
--program-prefix=r181415- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 2016
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41102
fwi at inducks dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fwi at inducks dot org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51177
Bug #: 51177
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure on Linux/ia32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641
--- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-11-16
17:02:52 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Wed Nov 16 17:02:44 2011
New Revision: 181416
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181416
Log:
2011-11-16 Richard Earnshaw
Bernd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51175
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51142
--- Comment #6 from Pawel Sikora 2011-11-16 17:19:51
UTC ---
any plans to 4.6 backport?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51178
Bug #: 51178
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/lookup/builtin5.C scan-assembler
_ZSt5atanhd
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51142
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-16
17:30:39 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2011-11/msg00157.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641
--- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-11-16
17:53:31 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Wed Nov 16 17:53:28 2011
New Revision: 181418
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181418
Log:
2011-11-16 Richard Earnshaw
Bernd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn 2011-11-16 17:59:47
UTC ---
(gdb) print decl
$1 = 0x0
(gdb) where
#0 internal_error (
gmsgid=0x11288a94 "tree check: expected tree that contains %qs structure,
have %qs in %s, at %s:%d") at /farm/dje/src/sr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51153
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-16 18:23:22 UTC ---
> --- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn 2011-11-16
> 16:31:00 UTC ---
> Confirmed. I think this may be present on alpha-dec-osf as well.
The failure on Tru64 UNIX i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn 2011-11-16 18:30:29
UTC ---
The rs6000.c failure looks like rs6000_xcoff_section_type_flags() should deal
with decl == NULL.
But the other similar failure is in trans-mem.c:
(gdb) where
#0 internal_error (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51174
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn 2011-11-16 18:43:06
UTC ---
DECL_COMDAT field validly can be NULL on some targets. And most other uses
seem to be copying the value. I think that tm_mangle() needs to be prepared
for its argument to be NULL or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Macleod 2011-11-16
19:03:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 25840
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25840
potential fix
rth has finished the libgcc changes required for supplying __atomic mappings
like __s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51179
Bug #: 51179
Summary: poor vectorization on interlagos.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51144
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20128
--- Comment #9 from Volker Reichelt 2011-11-16
19:24:55 UTC ---
*** Bug 34617 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34617
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20128
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #10 from Volker Reich
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51180
Bug #: 51180
Summary: [C++0x][C++11] inner class alias-definition variadic
template error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51177
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] bootstrap |[4.7 Regression] bootstrap
|f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50888
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51177
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51159
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-11-16
21:18:20 UTC ---
Have you tried the trunk? --enable-build-with-cxx is really only needed if
your plugin is written in C++.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39427
--- Comment #29 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-16
21:37:48 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Nov 16 21:37:43 2011
New Revision: 181425
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181425
Log:
gcc/fortran
2011-11-16 Tobias Burnus
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
