http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51073
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-11-14
08:15:29 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Nov 14 08:15:09 2011
New Revision: 181348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181348
Log:
2011-11-14 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/51
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51073
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-14 08:47:16
UTC ---
Created attachment 25814
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25814
adjustment to final.c
(just a heads up)
although not a bootstrap issue, this revision also caused a f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51098
--- Comment #3 from Stupachenko Evgeny 2011-11-14
09:40:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 25815
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25815
make output
The additional information (make log grep) is attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51059
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-14 11:53:36
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Mon Nov 14 11:53:33 2011
New Revision: 181350
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181350
Log:
gcc/testsuite:
PR testsuite/51059
* gcc.mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51005
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-14 12:05:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 25816
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25816
Patch that also delegates updating the vops, but keeps dominator info
up-to-date
bootstrapp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka 2011-11-14 12:18:43
UTC ---
Hi,
coud you please verify that the attached patch solves the problem?
Thanks,
Honza
Index: cgraph.h
===
--- cgraph.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50605
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2011-11-14
13:13:11 UTC ---
I have posted a proposed fix to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg01509.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51120
Bug #: 51120
Summary: [C++0x][C++11] name alias `using` dont need Semicolon
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51027
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trashyankes at wp dot pl
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51120
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51086
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-11-14 14:17:50 UTC ---
> --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-14
> 08:47:16 UTC ---
> Created attachment 25814
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25814
> adjustm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-14
14:21:17 UTC ---
Hmm, it looks like I can't reproduce this anymore with r181280 on trunk.
Are you still seeing it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-14 14:32:00
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hmm, it looks like I can't reproduce this anymore with r181280 on trunk.
>
> Are you still seeing it?
No, due to [1]. But - isn't this patch just papering ov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51121
Bug #: 51121
Summary: Duplicate destructors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51121
--- Comment #1 from David Bustos 2011-11-14 14:34:54 UTC ---
Created attachment 25817
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25817
.ii file of problematic code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51068
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.hope at linaro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51068
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036
--- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-11-14 15:21:50 UTC ---
Interesting. In any case, I hardly find this issue related to my patch,
like what H.J.'s bissecting (thanks for that H.J. by the way!) is
suggesting. So a memory manageme
GNAT BUG DETECTED======+
| 4.7.0 2014 (experimental) [trunk revision 181350] (sparc-sun-solaris2.11)
GCC error:|
| in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:3437 |
| Error detected around /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/ada/opt.adb:347:8 |
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-11-14 16:04:57 UTC ---
> coud you please verify that the attached patch solves the problem?
On x86_64-apple-darwin10, I have only done an update with the patch at revision
181350 (but I have rebuilt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-14
16:14:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> FAIL: 30_threads/thread/native_handle/typesizes.cc execution test
This test should be disabled on darwin (and probably everywhere except
GNU/Linux)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44473
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||db4 at mm dot st
--- Comment #20 from Pao
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51121
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-14 16:30:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> coud you please verify that the attached patch solves the problem?
(applied, together with c#15 PR51094)
full regstrap incl. Ada and Java, i686-darwin9 r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14
16:56:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 14 16:55:56 2011
New Revision: 181355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181355
Log:
PR bootstrap/51094
PR middle-end/51116
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14
16:56:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 14 16:55:56 2011
New Revision: 181355
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181355
Log:
PR bootstrap/51094
PR middle-end/51116
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34383
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka 2011-11-14 17:02:22
UTC ---
thank you! What kind of weakref issues you see?
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51112
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51122
Bug #: 51122
Summary: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2001
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-11-14 17:09:04
UTC ---
I'm not going to be able to look at it anytime soon, but just some general
thoughts:
1. Disabling caller-saves probably isn't appropriate. Just looking at
codesize isn't the way t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35167
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu.org |
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51123
Bug #: 51123
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 445.gobmk in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to
build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51123
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] 445.gobmk |[4.7 Regression]
|in SPEC CPU
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50598
--- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka 2011-11-14
17:32:52 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Nov 14 17:32:47 2011
New Revision: 181358
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181358
Log:
PR middle-end/50598
* cgraph.h (varpool_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51123
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-14 17:35:19
UTC ---
It also happens on Linux/x86-64:
g++ -c -o XalanNamespacesStack.o -DSPEC_CPU -DNDEBUG -DAPP_NO_THREADS
-DXALAN_INMEM_MSG_LOADER -I. -Ixercesc -Ixercesc/dom -Ixercesc/dom/impl
-Ixercesc/sax
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14
17:56:04 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 14 17:55:57 2011
New Revision: 181359
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181359
Log:
PR c++/6936
PR c++/25994
PR c++/26256
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26256
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14
17:56:02 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 14 17:55:57 2011
New Revision: 181359
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181359
Log:
PR c++/6936
PR c++/25994
PR c++/26256
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25994
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14
17:56:02 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 14 17:55:57 2011
New Revision: 181359
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181359
Log:
PR c++/6936
PR c++/25994
PR c++/26256
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6936
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14
17:56:01 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 14 17:55:57 2011
New Revision: 181359
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181359
Log:
PR c++/6936
PR c++/25994
PR c++/26256
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51122
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51122
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51124
Bug #: 51124
Summary: libitm failures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125
Bug #: 51125
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/tm/pr45940-3.C
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51123
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-14 18:18:22
UTC ---
I also see
[hjl@gnu-33 gcc]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc-x32/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51126
Bug #: 51126
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181358
on x86_64-apple-darwin10
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-14 18:25:23
UTC ---
*** Bug 51123 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51123
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51127
Bug #: 51127
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20100302
cp_lto_20100302_0.o-cp_lto_20100302_1.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51127
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50601
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-14 18:36:39
UTC ---
*** Bug 51127 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35167
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14
18:45:30 UTC ---
We shouldn't close it, it's still broken in C++98 mode.
-fbuilding-libgcc -fno-stack-protector
-fno-common -fexceptions -o unwind-dw2.s
Reading symbols for shared libraries
+ done
GNU C (GCC) version 4.7.0 2014 (experimental) (x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0)
compiled by GNU C version 4.2.1 Compatible Apple Clang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036
--- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-14 18:55:06
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Hmm, it looks like I can't reproduce this anymore with r181280 on trunk.
> >
> > Are you still seeing it?
>
> No, due to [1]. Bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-14 18:58:33
UTC ---
A gdb backtrace would certainly help.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51128
Bug #: 51128
Summary: [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51125
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-11-14 19:41:12
UTC ---
(gdb) bt
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x103d0c0 "/export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/gimplify.c",
line=468, function=0x103dfc3 "create_tmp_var")
at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/diagnostic.c:8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35167
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-14
19:52:02 UTC ---
Ok, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129
Bug #: 51129
Summary: 4.7 trunk libgcc cannot compute suffix of object files
- cannot find find libcloog, though in path
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-14
20:05:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 14 20:05:12 2011
New Revision: 181363
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181363
Log:
PR c++/51107
* typeck.c (check_literal_oper
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51036
--- Comment #7 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-11-14
20:15:18 UTC ---
I am closing this then, as it appears fixed in trunk now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51130
Bug #: 51130
Summary: ICE: in create_tmp_var, at gimplify.c:468 with
-fgnu-tm and __transaction_atomic
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51131
Bug #: 51131
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51131
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51126
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build, ice-on-valid-code
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51126
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129
--- Comment #2 from Toshiro K. Ohsumi
2011-11-14 21:20:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> did you export LD_LIBRARY_PATH?
Oh yes, I tried that too. :-) Thank you for the clarifying question. In
fact, /usr/local/lib is in /etc/ld.so.conf to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51132
Bug #: 51132
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL:
libgomp.graphite/force-parallel-[678].c
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-14
21:31:27 UTC ---
is /usr/local/lib/libcloog.so.0.0.0 a 64-bit library?
what does 'ldconfig -p | fgrep cloog' show?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51126
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51126
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51097
--- Comment #1 from Stupachenko Evgeny 2011-11-14
21:59:45 UTC ---
Tests fails caused by revision 181170:
r181170 | jakub | 2011-11-08 19:29:51 +0300 (Tue, 08 Nov 2011) | 7 lines
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_preferred_simd_mode): Even fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51086
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|amodra at gcc do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
Bug #: 51133
Summary: Incorrect implementation of std::tr1::hermite()
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129
Toshiro K. Ohsumi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51097
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-14 22:39:57
UTC ---
These are not failures. These "FAIL"s mean that somebody has to go through
vectorizer testsuite and update scan patterns for AVX.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51098
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86-avx
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2011-11-14 23:18:29
UTC ---
Created attachment 25821
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25821
Preprocessed source.
Confirmed with attached source on x86_64
[uros@localhost libgcc]$ ~/gcc-build-fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51118
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |tree-optimization
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-11-14
23:31:17 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Nov 14 23:31:13 2011
New Revision: 181371
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181371
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/51051
* cfgrtl.c (cfg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51134
Bug #: 51134
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL:
gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/arrayarg.f90
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51129
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |INVALID
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51098
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2011-11-14
23:50:59 UTC ---
... which will not be declared if AVX support is disavowed.
... except that the configure was --with-arch=corei7-avx.
If true, the problem is user error. How can you expect to
co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51133
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at verizon dot net
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51005
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-15 00:12:51 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Nov 15 00:12:45 2011
New Revision: 181372
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181372
Log:
2011-11-15 Tom de Vries
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-11-15
00:25:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 25822
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25822
Testcase suitable for the testsuite
Testcase suitable for the test suite - it is not that difficult
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo