[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #5 from Richard Lewis 2011-11-12 08:33:13 UTC --- I see... so suddenly from this year, building from a directory 1 level deeper than the source distribution is "unsupported" even though this has been working for years. However I was a

[Bug libstdc++/51078] [PATCH] performance improvement of std::count algorithm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078 --- Comment #14 from Grygoriy Fuchedzhy 2011-11-12 10:09:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > I would say, the next step, is analyzing why: std::count seems a very simple > algorithm, no aliasing issues for example, compiler should be able to u

[Bug libstdc++/51078] [PATCH] performance improvement of std::count algorithm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078 --- Comment #15 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-12 11:12:36 UTC --- Actually, patches do not belong to Bugzilla at all thus this issue should have been posted and discussed only on the mailing list. In any case, we are not going to add to the library

[Bug libstdc++/51078] [PATCH] performance improvement of std::count algorithm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078 --- Comment #16 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-12 12:11:48 UTC --- By the way, without having investigated at all what the optimizers are actually doing, in mainline, on an i7-980X I have here at hand I don't see the manual unrolling providing any ad

[Bug libstdc++/51078] [PATCH] performance improvement of std::count algorithm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078 --- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-12 12:14:06 UTC --- Created attachment 25804 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25804 Some numbers: i7-980X, mainline, -Ofast -funroll-loops, -march=native

[Bug middle-end/50628] [4.7 Regression] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/entry_4.f90 fails

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50628 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-11-12 12:21:27 UTC --- On x86_64-apple-darwin10 the test was failing for both -m32 and -m64 up to revision 181046. From revision 181258 it fails only with -m64.

[Bug lto/51105] New: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-1.c compilation, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51105 Bug #: 51105 Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/920501-1.c compilation, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc

[Bug libstdc++/51078] [PATCH] performance improvement of std::count algorithm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078 --- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-12 12:32:22 UTC --- Created attachment 25805 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25805 Same, without -funroll-loops

[Bug libstdc++/51078] [PATCH] performance improvement of std::count algorithm

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51078 --- Comment #19 from Paolo Carlini 2011-11-12 12:34:51 UTC --- All in all - again, without having analyzed in any detail the optimization passes - I come to the conclusion that -funroll-loops is doing its job pretty well, and also that manually u

[Bug target/51093] GCC 4.4.3 build fails with 'OPTION_ISA_AES' as undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51093 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-11-12 13:12:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > I've downloaded gcc 4.4.3 tar-ball package. > Configured and build as follows for host-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu: > <./configure --prefix=$HOME/instal

[Bug bootstrap/50822] [4.7 regression] Solaris/SPARC bootstrap failure with Sun as: invalid assembler for ios_init.cc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50822 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-11-12 13:19:59 UTC --- Author: hubicka Date: Sat Nov 12 13:19:55 2011 New Revision: 181311 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181311 Log: PR bootstrap/50822 * cgraphunit.c (output

[Bug target/51106] New: [4.5 regression] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:2314

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51106 Bug #: 51106 Summary: [4.5 regression] ICE in move_insn, at haifa-sched.c:2314 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-12 14:05:03 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Sat Nov 12 14:04:58 2011 New Revision: 181314 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181314 Log: gcc/objc: Backport from mainline 2011-10-2

[Bug ada/49248] Cross compile ada failed at finding command gnatmake.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49248 Maciej Bliziński changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maciej at opencsw dot org --- Comment

[Bug target/45233] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-12 14:12:31 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Sat Nov 12 14:12:26 2011 New Revision: 181315 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181315 Log: gcc: PR target/45233 * config/rs6000/rs600

[Bug target/45233] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/45233] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/pr44707.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45233 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-12 14:14:46 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Sat Nov 12 14:14:43 2011 New Revision: 181316 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181316 Log: gcc: PR target/45233 * config/rs6000/rs600

[Bug testsuite/51059] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-14.c (test for excess errors) on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51059 --- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe 2011-11-12 14:30:52 UTC --- Author: iains Date: Sat Nov 12 14:30:45 2011 New Revision: 181317 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181317 Log: gcc/testsuite: PR testsuite/51059 * gcc.mis

[Bug testsuite/51059] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-14.c (test for excess errors) on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51059 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #7 from Richard Lewis 2011-11-12 14:51:32 UTC --- Created attachment 25807 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25807 libgfortran build log

[Bug libstdc++/51083] [C++11] [cmplx.over] overloads not constrained

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-11-12 15:57:07 UTC --- Author: redi Date: Sat Nov 12 15:57:03 2011 New Revision: 181321 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181321 Log: PR libstdc++/51083 * include/ext/type_tra

[Bug libstdc++/51083] TR1 [tr.c99.cmath.over] and C++11 [cmplx.over] overloads not constrained

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51083 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50904] [4.7 regression] pessimization when -fno-protect-parens is enabled by -Ofast

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50904 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl 2011-11-12 16:52:37 UTC --- On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 02:51:32PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 > > --- Comment #7 from Richard Lewis 2011-11-12 > 14:

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #9 from Richard Lewis 2011-11-12 17:22:42 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 02:51:32PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 > > > > --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #10 from Richard Lewis 2011-11-12 17:25:05 UTC --- Created attachment 25808 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25808 gcc-4.6.2/x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0/libgfortran/config.log Builds to completion if I don't build fo

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #11 from Steve Kargl 2011-11-12 17:29:38 UTC --- On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 05:22:42PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 > > --- Comment #9 from Richard Lewis 2011-11-12 > 17

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #12 from Richard Lewis 2011-11-12 17:53:39 UTC --- This is what I originally did: 1. tar xvjf gcc-4.6.2.tar.bz 2. mkdir build 3. ../gcc-4.6.2/configure 4. make -j 8 Doesn't matter where I build it from, it fails (In reply to comme

[Bug c++/51107] New: [C++11] Accepts invalid literal operator with void argument list.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107 Bug #: 51107 Summary: [C++11] Accepts invalid literal operator with void argument list. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 --- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl 2011-11-12 17:58:18 UTC --- On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 05:53:39PM +, richalewis at gmail dot com wrote: > This is what I originally did: > > 1. tar xvjf gcc-4.6.2.tar.bz > 2. mkdir build > 3. ../gcc-4.6.2/config

[Bug c++/51108] New: g++ segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51108 Bug #: 51108 Summary: g++ segfault Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/51107] [C++11] Accepts invalid literal operator with void argument list.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107 --- Comment #1 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-11-12 19:10:38 UTC --- As I was testing a patch that turned out to be totally bogus, it looked like maybe processing_template_decl is false when processing a template specializa

[Bug target/51109] New: bdver1 scheduler state machine too large

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51109 Bug #: 51109 Summary: bdver1 scheduler state machine too large Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/51107] [C++11] Accepts invalid literal operator with void argument list.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51107 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-12 20:54:02 UTC --- On 11/12/2011 02:10 PM, 3dw4rd at verizon dot net wrote: > But is there a test for when you're looking at a template specialization? DECL_TEMPLATE_SPECIALIZATION (current_function_dec

[Bug c/51110] New: Intel pentium G9650 (core i5) identified as core i7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51110 Bug #: 51110 Summary: Intel pentium G9650 (core i5) identified as core i7 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/51111] New: Optimization bug with array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 Bug #: 5 Summary: Optimization bug with array Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/51094] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181279 on non-ELF targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-12 21:40:03 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Nov 12 21:39:59 2011 New Revision: 181326 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181326 Log: PR bootstrap/51094 * gcc/configure.ac: Che

[Bug bootstrap/51094] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181279 on non-ELF targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-12 21:40:10 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sat Nov 12 21:40:07 2011 New Revision: 181327 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181327 Log: PR bootstrap/51094 * config/elfos.h (STRIN

[Bug bootstrap/51094] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure at revision 181279 on non-ELF targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51094 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-12 21:44:17 UTC --- As you can see, I applied the stpcpy patch and the change to define/use STRING_ASM_OP. I don't have a strong opinion about which way to go with the macro renaming.

[Bug fortran/38312] Unexpected STATEMENT FUNCTION statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38312 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug web/50642] onlinedocs formated text too small to read

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642 --- Comment #6 from Jon Grant 2011-11-12 22:15:36 UTC --- Could this be followed up with the proposed change implemented? pre.smallexample { font-size:normal } Thanks, Jon

[Bug fortran/38312] Unexpected STATEMENT FUNCTION statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38312 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl 2011-11-12 22:41:06 UTC --- On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:03:49PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-11-12 22:03:49 UTC --- > I've looked at this issue, and I

[Bug bootstrap/51112] New: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51112 Bug #: 51112 Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/51113] New: [4.7 regression] rev. 181105 causes Firefox profiledbuild failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113 Bug #: 51113 Summary: [4.7 regression] rev. 181105 causes Firefox profiledbuild failure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/51114] New: Got compiler error when creating a private subtype

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51114 Bug #: 51114 Summary: Got compiler error when creating a private subtype Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/51051] [4.7 Regression]: build fails on cris-elf building libstdc++-v3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51051 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/51103] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51103 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot

[Bug c++/51060] Temporary object stack space is not re-used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51060 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-13 00:44:43 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Nov 13 00:44:39 2011 New Revision: 181332 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181332 Log: PR c++/51060 * gimplify.c (gimplify_target_

[Bug c++/51060] Temporary object stack space is not re-used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51060 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51115] New: "-Wstrict-prototypes" is rejected for C++ (ok) but accepted for Ada (meaningless)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51115 Bug #: 51115 Summary: "-Wstrict-prototypes" is rejected for C++ (ok) but accepted for Ada (meaningless) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Statu

[Bug ada/51095] "make install" with --program-suffix does not install the bin/gnat* binaries with that suffix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51095 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/19563] Makefiles don't handle configure --program-suffix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19563 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/51116] New: [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 Bug #: 51116 Summary: [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/51116] [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-11-13 04:19:34 UTC --- Forgot to say, this was introduced in revision 181279. -bash-3.2$ ./xgcc -B./ -v Reading specs from ./specs COLLECT_GCC=./xgcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=./lto-wrapper Target: hppa64-hp-

[Bug middle-end/51116] [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2011-11-13 04:22:16 UTC --- Created attachment 25812 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25812 Assembler file

[Bug middle-end/51116] [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 --- Comment #3 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2011-11-13 04:32:06 UTC --- According to another email mips is broken the same way. Sent from my Palm Pre on AT&T On Nov 12, 2011 20:18, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

[Bug c++/986] g++ misses warning for reference on temporary that invokes undefined behaviour

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=986 --- Comment #32 from Jason Merrill 2011-11-13 05:09:43 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Sun Nov 13 05:09:36 2011 New Revision: 181334 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181334 Log: PR c++/986 * call.c (set_up_extended_ref_tem

[Bug middle-end/51116] [4.7 Regression] configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51116 jimis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 from jimi

[Bug c++/50372] [C++0x] pointers to static functions should be valid template parameters

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50372 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from