http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #8 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-26
08:52:13 UTC ---
Thanks. FTR, the reason we get this on PA64 and not on x86* (and probably not
on PA32) is that pa_internal_arg_pointer sets up a pseudo to hold r29+offset.
The pseudo is fwpropped i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-26 09:22:41 UTC ---
> --- Comment #2 from Graham Reed 2011-10-25 20:04:32
> UTC ---
> This may be the same fault I'm seeing on AIX with GCC 4.6.1--does Tru64 use an
> "emulated TLS"
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41844
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-26
09:30:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Oct 26 09:30:29 2011
New Revision: 180517
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180517
Log:
2011-10-26 Richard Guenther
PR lto/418
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41844
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50872
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
--- Comment #15 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26 09:34:00 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Oct 26 09:33:56 2011
New Revision: 180519
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180519
Log:
2011-10-26 Tom de Vries
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
--- Comment #14 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-26 09:33:52 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Wed Oct 26 09:33:49 2011
New Revision: 180518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180518
Log:
2011-10-26 Tom de Vries
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50763
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50872
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||markus at trippelsdorf dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-26
10:29:50 UTC ---
Yes, I suppose it should be:
~_Unlock()
{
if (uncaught_exception())
__try { _M_lock.lock(); } __catch(...) { }
else
_M_lock.lock();
}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50592
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-26
10:30:49 UTC ---
Do you have a smaller reproducer? 190 KB is unmanageable. Have also a look to:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-26
10:40:30 UTC ---
Ah of course it's a system header thing, but -pedantic would have caught it.
This let a bug slip through in the library, which I fixed with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/trunk/libstdc%
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler
2011-10-26 10:44:55 UTC ---
The corresponding CWG issue is
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#1288
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50025
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-26
11:31:07 UTC ---
I know. -pedantic works indeed. Really, changing this would be easy, if we
wanted, maybe it's just something from the past? Jason should know...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50815
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, patch
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50842
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-10-26
12:03:12 UTC ---
gnatmake needs to be linked against /usr/lib/libiconv.dylib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-26 12:38:05
UTC ---
Author: iains
Date: Wed Oct 26 12:37:59 2011
New Revision: 180523
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180523
Log:
gcc:
PR target/48108
* config/darwin.c (to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #11 from bartek 'basz' szurgot
2011-10-26 12:41:34 UTC ---
i'm not sure about uncaught_exception(). i remember reading in Herb Sutter's
that it's usage should be avoided, since it has some flaw, that makes it's
return value unsure. bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50229
--- Comment #9 from Ruben Van Boxem
2011-10-26 12:49:43 UTC ---
I received a build of a darwinx-ld binary from the darwinx toolchain maintainer
that accepts the -no_compact_unwind option, and the problem has not gone away.
Configure is either usi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-26
13:02:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> i'm not sure about uncaught_exception(). i remember reading in Herb Sutter's
> that it's usage should be avoided, since it has some flaw, that makes it's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-26
13:05:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> unique_lock __my_lock(_M_mutex);
> _Unlock __unlock(__lock);
> unique_lock __my_lock2(std::move(__my_lock));
> _M_cond.wait(__my_lock2);
> __unlock.relea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48108
--- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth 2011-10-26
13:28:20 UTC ---
Can we backport r180523 to gcc-4_6-branch (perhaps even for gcc 4.6.2)?
Also in gcc trunk we should also now fully revert...
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Mar 14 02:47:49 2011
New Revision: 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-26
13:32:57 UTC ---
Nice, a testsuite run detected gcc.dg/torture/pr43165.c -Os -g on
i686-linux-gnu gets a debug stmt referencing a user variable using a debug temp
as the address. Sadly, that exposes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-10-26
13:37:23 UTC ---
Are the libstdc++ headers treated as system headers when building the library
itself? If so, that seems like the thing to fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #14 from bartek 'basz' szurgot
2011-10-26 13:42:29 UTC ---
uhum - i missed that one... :/
ok then - looks like http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862#c10 is a
working solution. :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50873
Bug #: 50873
Summary: The fix to PR50730 causes
gcc.c-torture/unsorted/dilayout.c to ICE
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50871
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-26
13:46:45 UTC ---
Yes they are. Not doing that would be a good idea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-26
13:47:56 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Wed Oct 26 13:47:48 2011
New Revision: 180525
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180525
Log:
PR debug/50826
* var-tracking.c (rtx_debug_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50826
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #15 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-26
13:55:25 UTC ---
Shouldn't the testcase contain:
// { dg-require-sched-yield "" }
? I'm getting a failure because this_thread::yield is not defined, and
30_threads/this_thread/2.cc contains this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50862
--- Comment #16 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-26
14:06:12 UTC ---
Yes, thanks for spotting it. Ideally we'd define this_thread::yield() anyway,
but until then the test should use the dg-require
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50874
Bug #: 50874
Summary: loc_t in tree-diagnostics.c conflicts with system
header on AIX
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #4 from Graham Reed 2011-10-26 15:36:40
UTC ---
Created attachment 25617
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25617
KLUDGE/workaround for ICE
I worked around the ICE on AIX with this patch. THIS IS A WORKAROUND ONLY--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #5 from Graham Reed 2011-10-26 15:39:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Sorry, forgot to add:
I made the patch against 4.6.1, and have run bootstrap and testing on AIX 5.3
TL4. I was able to apply it unchanged against trunk r18043
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
Bug #: 50875
Summary: O3 and -march=native lead to internal compiler error:
in find_reloads
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-26 15:52:07 UTC ---
> I made the patch against 4.6.1, and have run bootstrap and testing on AIX 5.3
> TL4. I was able to apply it unchanged against trunk r180430, but have not yet
> g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
xunxun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xunxun1982 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #2 from Joly Aarons 2011-10-26 16:08:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Your gcc -v information?
> And your cpu model? (I think it's related with cpu instruction set)
>
> I use i686-w64-mingw32 gfortran 4.6.2 to run the test well
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #3 from xunxun 2011-10-26 16:35:38
UTC ---
The issue is related with "-mavx"
I use "gfortran -O3 -mavx" to reproduce the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50789
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25614|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48721
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48100
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50608
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48437
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50210
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47435
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47481
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48666
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50444
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50052
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47841
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47888
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47918
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45402
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50063
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47581
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47936
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50275
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44495
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50205
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44688
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47889
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50138
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #30 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50078
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50807
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #4 from Joly Aarons 2011-10-26 17:30:32
UTC ---
Excellent, just for completeness, I can confirm that :
gfortran -O3 -mavx
does reproduce the problem identically and that :
(In reply to comment #3)
> The issue is related with "-mav
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44415
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50870
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-26 17:59:42 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Oct 26 17:59:36 2011
New Revision: 180531
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180531
Log:
2011-10-26 Paolo Carlini
* typec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48173
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50875
--- Comment #5 from Joly Aarons 2011-10-26 17:35:29
UTC ---
Excellent, just for completeness, I can confirm that on my machines :
gfortran -O3 -mavx
does reproduce the problem identically and that :
gfortran -O3 -mno-avx -march=native
compi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45325
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50684
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.2 |4.6.3
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
