http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50799
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-10-20
22:52:54 UTC ---
Yep. That, or some other difference in the compiler's assembly output, that I
asked for in comment 1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #1 from Ville Voutilainen
2011-10-20 23:26:57 UTC ---
Oh my.
struct C
{
int x;
};
int main()
{
struct C final {};
int y = final.x;
}
says
error: ‘final’ was not declared in this scope
When it's just struct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen
2011-10-20 23:34:06 UTC ---
It thus looks like it gets parsed as a class definition instead of a variable
definition.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen
2011-10-20 23:48:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> It thus looks like it gets parsed as a class definition instead of a variable
> definition.
..which is actually correct, pardon my ruminations, it just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50815
Bug #: 50815
Summary: ICE on assignment to non-allocated deferred length
character when -fbounds-check
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45385
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|lopezibanez a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50196
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-21
00:15:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 25564
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25564
patch for configure
could you test the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01912
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50815
--- Comment #1 from A. Rohou 2011-10-21 00:19:10
UTC ---
I have come up with an even simpler reproducer:
$ cat test2.f90
subroutine test(string)
character(len=:), allocatable :: string
allocate(character(len=3) :: string)
end subroutine test
$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50814
--- Comment #1 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-10-21
00:24:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> It is also not clear to me why SH2A seems to require different handling for
> dynamic shifts than SH3 or SH4...
Will be slightly different because sh2a's
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50811
--- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen
2011-10-21 00:40:58 UTC ---
Patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01914.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50740
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-10-21 01:09:46
UTC ---
Created attachment 25565
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25565
A patch
Kirill, can you take care of it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50709
--- Comment #6 from gfunck at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-21 02:23:30 UTC ---
Author: gfunck
Date: Fri Oct 21 02:23:26 2011
New Revision: 180285
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180285
Log:
Merge trunk version 180276 into
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50709
Serge Belyshev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
Bug #: 50816
Summary: [4.6.1] Discriminators are emitted in DWARF 2 format
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
--- Comment #1 from Anitha Boyapati
2011-10-21 03:17:20 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2011-10/msg00348.html
The fix in trunk should be backported to gcc-4_6-branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50816
Anitha Boyapati changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||AVR
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50754
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
