http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50754
Bug #: 50754
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE in expand_debug_expr, at
cfgexpand.c:3341
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25975
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ejtttje at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50747
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50744
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50741
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |matz at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50741
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50752
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50703
--- Comment #7 from hoenle2...@kayser-threde.com 2011-10-17 08:17:21 UTC ---
@Jonathan: You ask "was gcc built with a non-default value for --enable-clocale
?". I don't think so. We perform cross development on Windows with MinGW as
supported out-o
isable-nls --disable-shared
--enable-languages=c,c++ --with-dwarf2 --disable-lto --enable-checking=yes,rtl
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.7.0 20111017 (experimental) (GCC)
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.7.0 20111017 (experimental) (avr)
compiled by GNU C version 4.3.2 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 141291
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50698
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-10-17 09:26:05 UTC ---
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50698
>
> --- Comment #6 from vincenzo Innocente
> 2011-10-15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-10-17 09:33:49 UTC ---
On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, propolice at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213
>
> Eduardo Tongson changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50752
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50754
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50752
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 09:46:34 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Oct 17 09:46:30 2011
New Revision: 180079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180079
Log:
2011-10-17 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 09:46:33 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Oct 17 09:46:30 2011
New Revision: 180079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180079
Log:
2011-10-17 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-17 09:48:06 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Oct 17 09:48:02 2011
New Revision: 180080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180080
Log:
/cp
2011-10-17 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48489
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50742
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50756
Bug #: 50756
Summary: request to better handle non-constant distance vectors
to avoid unnecessary alias check
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50755
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #33 from Iain Sandoe 2011-10-17 09:58:53
UTC ---
Created attachment 25518
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25518
test of a foreign except thrown from a sig handler in c++
1. the code for the D10 libSystem unwind li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263
--- Comment #40 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-10-17
09:59:02 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Mon Oct 17 09:58:56 2011
New Revision: 180081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180081
Log:
Linemap infrastructure for virtual locations
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263
--- Comment #41 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-10-17
10:26:42 UTC ---
Most of the work done in the patches in attachment was finally checked in to
support tracking locations across macro expansions. The summary of the
submission is at http://gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50752
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50473
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50213
--- Comment #11 from Peter A. Bigot 2011-10-17 11:16:16
UTC ---
Richard: Thanks for the fix.
For my non-integrated target I don't need it backported to 4.6 since I have a
separate way to provide the patch. As I recall, the original patch didn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50709
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-17 11:30:24 UTC ---
Bernd,
IRIX 6.5 bootstrap is now broken for more than a week. How should we
proceed with this?
Thanks.
Rainer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-17
11:40:25 UTC ---
AFAIK there's no IRIX6.5 machine in the compile farm. Can you debug a bit at
the point of the crash to see what's going on?
Configure won't let me build the target without "--neable-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50755
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-10-17
11:44:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25519
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25519
./gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/constant2.C
It is the testcase from the GCC source tree:
./gcc/t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50757
Bug #: 50757
Summary: Cannot turn off -Wnonnull when using C++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25518|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50716
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-17
12:21:11 UTC ---
Candidate patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-10/msg01508.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-10-17
12:23:04 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Oct 17 12:22:54 2011
New Revision: 180087
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180087
Log:
2011-10-17 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44524
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|gcc-bugs at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50757
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50757
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-10-17
12:33:41 UTC ---
Could be fixed by adding C++ and ObjC++ to the Wnonnull definition in
c-family/c.opt, or by adjusting the warning() in c-family/c-common.c to use
Wformat when compiling C++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50757
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50729
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50715
--- Comment #10 from Sean McGovern 2011-10-17
13:18:51 UTC ---
Successfully bootstrapped 180071 this morning -- not sure which change fixed
this though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50758
Bug #: 50758
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap fails at stage 2 on
x86_64-apple-darwin10: error: variable 'token_no' set
but not used
Classification: Unclassified
Prod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50755
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 20
||med.uc.edu
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-10-17
14:34:30 UTC ---
I don't see this issue at r180087 on x86_64-apple-darwin11 with...
../gcc-4.7-20111017/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.7
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/info
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50636
--- Comment #15 from ak at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 14:43:45 UTC ---
Author: ak
Date: Mon Oct 17 14:43:37 2011
New Revision: 180093
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180093
Log:
Use MADV_DONTNEED for freeing in garbage collec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-17 14:52:49 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-17
> 11:40:25 UTC ---
> AFAIK there's no IRIX6.5 machine in the compile farm. Can you debug a bit at
I think they've
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50715
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-17 14:55:14 UTC ---
> --- Comment #10 from Sean McGovern 2011-10-17
> 13:18:51 UTC ---
> Successfully bootstrapped 180071 this morning -- not sure which change fixed
> this though.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50715
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-17
15:04:17 UTC ---
Well, shooting in the dark, let's get a few preliminaries out of the way - what
are the return values of dwarf2out_do_cfi_asm() and targetm.debug_unwind_info
()?
Also, a few of the la
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50758
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50715
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth 2011-10-17 15:15:08
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Oct 17 15:14:54 2011
New Revision: 180097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180097
Log:
Remove duplicate symbol in gnu.ver (PR bootstrap/50715)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50715
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50741
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz 2011-10-17 15:18:08
UTC ---
Reducable to:
% cat x.cc
struct PublishLo
{
const char *functionName;
~PublishLo();
};
struct A { A(); };
A::A()
{
static PublishLo _rL_53 = {__FUNCTION__};
}
The problem doesn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50758
--- Comment #3 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-10-17 15:26:54 UTC ---
Are you still seing this with commit r180090?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49801
--- Comment #12 from Paulo J. Matos 2011-10-17
15:26:51 UTC ---
Sorry for the time taken to reply.
I have tested snapshots of 4.6 and 4.7 and both seem happy now.
Looks like it's sorted. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50741
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Ethan Tira-Thompson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Component|middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50737
--- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 15:36:36 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Mon Oct 17 15:36:28 2011
New Revision: 180098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180098
Log:
libgcc/ChangeLog:
2011-10-16 Uros Bizjak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50678
--- Comment #35 from Eric Botcazou 2011-10-17
15:36:11 UTC ---
> 1. the code for the D10 libSystem unwind library is available from here:
> http://www.opensource.apple.com/tarballs/libunwind/
Thanks for the pointer.
> 2. Looking at a build of t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
--- Comment #20 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-17
15:40:52 UTC ---
No way the library is going to do anything else but forward to the builtins
here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50758
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-10-17
15:42:09 UTC ---
> Are you still seing this with commit r180090?
I have bootstrapped revision 180087 with the following patch
--- /opt/gcc/_clean/libcpp/line-map.c2011-10-17 12:04:41.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725
--- Comment #9 from gee 2011-10-17 15:42:21 UTC ---
here is more specific option for reproduce this bug.
$ g++ -fverbose-asm -c -O1 -finline-small-functions -ftree-vectorize
-finline-functions -mstackrealign -march=core2 ./pseudo-reloc.ii
-save-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25975
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-17
15:43:58 UTC ---
*** Bug 50724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Component|libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50754
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-17 15:50:06 UTC ---
> --- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-17
> 15:04:17 UTC ---
> Well, shooting in the dark, let's get a few preliminaries out of the way -
> what
> are the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth 2011-10-17 15:52:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 25521
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25521
nothrow dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth 2011-10-17 15:53:11
UTC ---
Created attachment 25522
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25522
dwarf2 dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth 2011-10-17 15:54:02
UTC ---
Created attachment 25523
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25523
final dump
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50758
--- Comment #5 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-10-17 15:56:05 UTC ---
"dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" a écrit:
> I guess that revision 180090 is a similar fix that should work (I'll
> have the answer in a couple hours;-).
OK, thanks.
> Last q
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 15:59:37 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Oct 17 15:59:32 2011
New Revision: 180099
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180099
Log:
2011-10-17 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47023
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 regression]|C_Sizeof: Rejects valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #38 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-10-17
16:26:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #36)
> > With this patch, a trivial forward-port of the gcc-4.5.3 Ada/m68k patch,
> > and a
> …
> > r178834) I was finally able to successfully bootstrap Ada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-17
16:34:42 UTC ---
Ok, so there are two restore_state notes following each other; note 374 and
note 375. We'll want a breakpoint in add_cfi to catch the two calls where these
notes are added. I'd expect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Ethan Tira-Thompson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|DUPLICA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25975
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-10-17
16:49:03 UTC ---
*** Bug 50724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50759
Bug #: 50759
Summary: [4.7 Regression] @table ended by @end quotation at
line 595
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50760
Bug #: 50760
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746
--- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson 2011-10-17
17:02:12 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:02:05 2011
New Revision: 180100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180100
Log:
PR 50746
* optabs.c (expand_vec_perm_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50746
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #5 from Richard H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50760
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #15 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-10-17 17:13:10 UTC ---
> --- Comment #14 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-17
> 16:34:42 UTC ---
> Ok, so there are two restore_state notes following each other; note 374 and
> note 375. We'l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50761
Bug #: 50761
Summary: g++ internal compiler error using
std::initializer_list
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50705
--- Comment #10 from SK 2011-10-17 17:16:36
UTC ---
Please let me know if I have to add or remove any GCC options while configuring
it or while compiling Linux.
Any comment which can help me move further will be helpful.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50761
--- Comment #1 from Stéphane Magnenat 2011-10-17
17:16:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 25525
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25525
correct code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50761
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50731
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50761
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Target Milestone|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
--- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-10-17 17:36:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The following produces a Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_structure (r178925)
>
> type t
>integer g
> end type
> type(t) ::
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50686
--- Comment #16 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-10-17
17:37:11 UTC ---
Sorry, I was being imprecise - only the instances where we generate notes 374
and 375 are interesting. Can you identify these two?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50683
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-10-17
17:40:30 UTC ---
> I would suggest against a gcc workaround, let's just fix binutils.
> I have posted a fix to the binutils list for testing.
OK, I don't have a strong opinion. What do the Debian fol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50757
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-17 17:44:47 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:44:42 2011
New Revision: 180101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180101
Log:
/gcc
2011-10-17 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50757
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50757
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-17 17:49:10 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:49:06 2011
New Revision: 180102
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180102
Log:
/gcc
2011-10-17 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44524
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-10-17 17:51:04 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Oct 17 17:51:00 2011
New Revision: 180103
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180103
Log:
/cp
2011-10-17 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50762
Bug #: 50762
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2137 (unrecognizable
insn) with -mavx2 and __builtin_shuffle
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
