[Bug c++/35722] [C++0x] Variadic templates expansion into non-variadic class template

2011-10-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lcid-fire at gmx dot net --- Comment #18

[Bug c++/50271] [C++0x] G++ fails to handle combination of explicit and deduced variadic template arguments

2011-10-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50271 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c++/50271] [C++0x] G++ fails to handle combination of explicit and deduced variadic template arguments

2011-10-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50271 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50563] [C++0x] Weird syntax acceptance rules for non-static data members initialized in place

2011-10-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50563 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50707] [C++0x] Non-static const data member initializer breaks default constructor

2011-10-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50707 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/50507] Huge amount of memory used while building GCC4

2011-10-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50507 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor

2011-10-14 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug c/50733] New: avr-gcc 4.3.5 generates incorrect code when using PROGMEM macro

2011-10-14 Thread marcos_vc at coel dot com.br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50733 Bug #: 50733 Summary: avr-gcc 4.3.5 generates incorrect code when using PROGMEM macro Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.3.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/50724] isnan broken by -ffinite-math-only in g++

2011-10-14 Thread ejtttje at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724 --- Comment #9 from Ethan Tira-Thompson 2011-10-14 20:07:41 UTC --- Thanks, I think Michael hit the nail on the head for summarizing my intention, I'm satisfied to file this as a feature request (although personally I'd still call it a bug ;)) F

[Bug middle-end/50724] isnan broken by -ffinite-math-only in g++

2011-10-14 Thread marc.glisse at normalesup dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724 --- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse 2011-10-14 21:12:40 UTC --- As a library writer, having isnan return false is precisely what I am expecting from -ffinite-math-only. In my code, I implement regular computations for finite numbers, and I need some

[Bug c++/50734] New: const and pure attributes don't have the effect as in C

2011-10-14 Thread drepper.fsp at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50734 Bug #: 50734 Summary: const and pure attributes don't have the effect as in C Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/50724] isnan broken by -ffinite-math-only in g++

2011-10-14 Thread ejtttje at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50724 --- Comment #11 from Ethan Tira-Thompson 2011-10-14 22:07:44 UTC --- Marc: is this code perusable? I'm curious because I expect either the calculations may generate NaN or not at all. If they might and you even have test cases to handle it, then

[Bug target/50354] [4.7 regression] architecture mismatch between compiler and assembler

2011-10-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50354 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2011-10-14 23:02:46 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Fri Oct 14 23:02:40 2011 New Revision: 180013 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180013 Log: PR target/50354 * config/sparc/linux64.

[Bug libstdc++/49894] [C++0x] Uniform initialization in constructor

2011-10-14 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49894 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction

2011-10-14 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 --- Comment #12 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-10-14 23:06:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > Created attachment 25491 [details] > Proposed patch including test case Looks fine. A very minor style nits: > + if (GET_CODE (XEXP (x, 0)) == AN

[Bug target/50354] [4.7 regression] architecture mismatch between compiler and assembler

2011-10-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50354 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50735] New: [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/vector-2.c:52:1: ICE: verify_ssa failed at -O1 and above

2011-10-14 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50735 Bug #: 50735 Summary: [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/vector-2.c:52:1: ICE: verify_ssa failed at -O1 and above Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/50615] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in distribute_notes, at combine.c:13282 with -O --param max-cse-insns=1

2011-10-14 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50615 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/49777] for c++ code, without -g option, cannot generate PIC *.so library.

2011-10-14 Thread hekun_hekun at 163 dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49777 --- Comment #5 from kun.he 2011-10-15 01:47:14 UTC --- Thanks Paolo & Nick, When I replace gcc-4.5.1 by Gcc-linaro-4.5-2011.06, the issue disappeared. And I found patch http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~linaro-toolchain-dev/gcc-linaro/4.5/revision/99

[Bug target/49263] SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction

2011-10-14 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263 --- Comment #13 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-10-15 02:32:56 UTC --- Author: kkojima Date: Sat Oct 15 02:32:53 2011 New Revision: 180020 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180020 Log: PR target/49263 * config/sh/sh.h (ZERO

[Bug fortran/50718] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE (fold_convert) with -fcheck=pointer

2011-10-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50718 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-10-15 06:55:35 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Sat Oct 15 06:55:28 2011 New Revision: 180022 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=180022 Log: 2011-10-15 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/50

[Bug fortran/50718] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE (fold_convert) with -fcheck=pointer

2011-10-14 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50718 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

<    1   2