[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |paolo.carlini at oracle dot

[Bug c++/48562] [C++0x] warn about uses of initializer_list that will lead to dangling pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/49514] [C++0x] Crashes on valid use of constexpr constructor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49514 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/50458] [4.6 Regression] ICE when using brace-initializer for new array

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50458 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE when using |[4.6 Regression] ICE when

[Bug c++/46858] ICE: in cp_lexer_new_from_tokens, at cp/parser.c:464

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46858 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Status|UN

[Bug c++/46309] optimization a==3||a==1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46309 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/44267] SFINAE does not handle down static_cast over virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23 22:50:50 UTC --- Looks like we need to pass complain down into build_base_path.

[Bug c++/44267] SFINAE does not handle down static_cast over virtual inheritance

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/50500] New: [C++0x] [DR 1082] move constructor should cause copy constructor to be deleted, but still declared

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50500 Bug #: 50500 Summary: [C++0x] [DR 1082] move constructor should cause copy constructor to be deleted, but still declared Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug libstdc++/50501] New: Insertion of complex into a stream may fail without invalidating the stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50501 Bug #: 50501 Summary: Insertion of complex into a stream may fail without invalidating the stream Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNC

[Bug libstdc++/50501] Insertion of complex into a stream may fail without invalidating the stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50501 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/50501] Insertion of complex into a stream may fail without invalidating the stream

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50501 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-24 00:35:13 UTC --- What failure scenario are you talking about? Surely if there's a memory allocation failure it will throw a bad_alloc exception, so __s.str() will never get called?

[Bug ada/50502] New: GNAT fails to compile a modification of B37101A ACATS test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50502 Bug #: 50502 Summary: GNAT fails to compile a modification of B37101A ACATS test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/50503] New: GNAT fails to compile a modification of B433001 ACATS test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50503 Bug #: 50503 Summary: GNAT fails to compile a modification of B433001 ACATS test Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

<    1   2