http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50460
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-23
07:26:10 UTC ---
Looking at:
const char *str1 = "JIHGFEDCBA";
#define strcpy(x,y) __builtin___strcpy_chk (x, y, __builtin_object_size (x, 1))
int
f1 (void)
{
struct A { char buf1[9]; char buf2[1]; }
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50477
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #24 from Michael Meeks 2011-09-23
08:33:17 UTC ---
> I can imagine that this sort of magic breaks with LTO. Is the solution as
> simple as using non-LTO version of libgcc3_uno.so? I will try to take a look
> how this is implemented.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50477
--- Comment #4 from miles at gnu dot org 2011-09-23 08:59:47 UTC ---
It's different because unlike most function/method definitions, this is _two_
things together -- a virtual method declaration, which pertains to this class
and all subclasses, and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49433
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23
10:00:10 UTC ---
I would say put a breakpoint on write_builtin_type and see what a heck is that
type!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38607
Lukasz Filipkowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lukasz.filipkowski at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
Bug #: 50492
Summary: Bootstrap failure on x86_64-apple-darwin10 when using
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50446
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-23
10:14:26 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Sep 23 10:14:23 2011
New Revision: 179116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179116
Log:
PR target/50446
* config/avr/avr.md (rotlq
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #57 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-09-23 10:16:28 UTC ---
> I would appreciate some help with testing on Darwin 11 and with lto-bootstraps
> on Darwin 10 (since my resources are stretched to the limit right now).
See pr50492 for boot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50446
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50108
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50400
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23
11:27:49 UTC ---
Jason, what are we going to do about this? For the record, something like the
below would pass the testsuite...
///
Index: cp/decl.c
=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50117
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45993
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-23
12:18:03 UTC ---
How about using a permerror instead? Since it's deprecated, requiring users to
give -fpermissive if they want to use it in C++11 seems reasonable to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe 2011-09-23 12:28:21
UTC ---
also on i686-darwin9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45855
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50492
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45755
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Member function template is |[C++0x] Member function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45382
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #25 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-23 12:42:26 UTC ---
New ICE with today's gcc and today's libreoffice:
[ build PAG ] writer
[ build LNK ] Executable/oosplash
[ build LNK ] Library/libspl_unxlo.so
[ build CMP ] desktop/unx/splash
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44906
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
--- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23
12:45:43 UTC ---
Of course would work for me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45755
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-23
12:55:23 UTC ---
That wording was changed to clarify that it means a template will never be
instantiated to produce S::S(S), it does not mean a template cannot be used to
perform copies, see
http://w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45755
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-23
12:56:54 UTC ---
... so I think this is a dup of PR 46004
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46004
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boostcpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45755
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23
13:07:33 UTC ---
permerror sounds good to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45755
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23
13:09:22 UTC ---
Ah, great, quite misleading indeed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472
--- Comment #2 from Paulo J. Matos 2011-09-23
13:18:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Duplicate of PR50078?
Might be but I can't confirm. Surely we will know once Mat fixes PR50078.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601
Paulo J. Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Paulo.Matos at csr dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50472
Paulo J. Matos changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Paulo.Matos at csr dot com
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601
--- Comment #4 from Paulo J. Matos 2011-09-23
13:22:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Richard raised concerns about this PR being an old bug and already fixed.
> Initially I only confirmed it in 4.6.1 but I can reproduce it in git head
> 3618
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-23
13:29:23 UTC ---
I believe I fixed this one, will double check.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10980
Ruben Van Boxem changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vanboxem.ruben at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10980
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-23 13:40:55 UTC
---
> This problem popped up when compiling LLVM's libc++:
> M:\Development\Source\libc++\src\locale.cpp:1:0: warning: -fPIC ignored for
> target (all code is position independent) [enabled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10980
--- Comment #9 from Ruben Van Boxem
2011-09-23 13:46:27 UTC ---
Current Clang compiled everything without a hitch. It might ignore the
attribute, I haven't checked. Perhaps this error should be made a warning?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44906
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2011-09-23
13:59:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Honestly, nothing similar will happen any time soon, it means changing
> completely the semantics of templates. Maybe we can produce a better
> diagnos
I bet it just ignores the attribute that is not how the attribute is
supposed to work.
We output error in this case intentionally (and warning in at the same
spot if function is declared inline and -Winline is given).
Functions marked always_inlined really ought to be always inlined and
attribute
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10980
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-23 14:10:53
UTC ---
I bet it just ignores the attribute that is not how the attribute is
supposed to work.
We output error in this case intentionally (and warning in at the same
spot if function is declar
ble-target-optspace
target_alias=arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi --enable-languages=c++ --disable-shared
--disable-libmudflap --disable-libssp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110923 (experimental) [trunk revision 179117] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. -O3 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp ~/ice.i -fpic
/home/ryan/ic
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
Bug #: 50494
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c fails spuriously on ppc
with -flto
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44906
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
Bug #: 50495
Summary: Optimize exact matches in overload resolution
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 14:52:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 25348
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25348
test.c minimized from gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-2char.c
To reproduce:
$ powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 15:05:19 UTC ---
Same issue occurs for gcc.dg/vect/pr44507.c with -m64.
-prefix=/usr --enable-languages=all,ada,java,obj-c++
--with-build-config='bootstrap-lto bootstrap-debug'
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.6.2 20110923 (prerelease) [gcc-4_6-branch revision 179117] (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50481
Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||de...@the-user.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
Bug #: 50496
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in redirect_jump, at jump.c:1497
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
--- Comment #2 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-09-23
15:46:50 UTC ---
Would you happen to have a reference to those changes or discussed
improvements?
I'm not testing with a very recent GCC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-23 15:50:00 UTC ---
Testcase is too big ATM: 1193 kilobytes.
Will post reduced testcase later.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #26 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-23 15:52:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> New ICE with today's gcc and today's libreoffice:
>
> /var/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice--r1/work/libreoffice-core-/dbaccess/source/co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23
16:00:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I recently made a number of improvements that will be in 4.7.0; see PR 48481.
The fn_set change in particular should cut your overload resolution time by
50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-09-23 16:04:18 UTC ---
On 9/20/2011 6:32 PM, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386
>
> --- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan
> 2011-09-20 22:32
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-23 16:20:00 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Sep 23 16:19:52 2011
New Revision: 179121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179121
Log:
/cp
2011-09-23 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50258
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
--- Comment #5 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-09-23
16:38:11 UTC ---
clang was already 50% faster in my tests, so I guess that will put gcc 4.7 on
par with it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50447
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-23
17:02:20 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Sep 23 17:02:10 2011
New Revision: 179123
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179123
Log:
PR target/50447
* config/avr/avr.md: (adju
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50447
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-23
17:06:49 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Sep 23 17:06:44 2011
New Revision: 179124
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179124
Log:
* config/avr/avr.md (adjust_len): Add alternat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23
17:08:57 UTC ---
By the way, since apparently you ran actual benchmarks, some testcases (and
relative numbers?) would not hurt here...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50447
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50497
Bug #: 50497
Summary: gcc 4.6.x '-g' option no longer emits the
.debug_pubnames section
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50497
--- Comment #1 from Geir Johansen 2011-09-23 17:20:49
UTC ---
If there is some workaround that will enable previous behavior please add
that to this bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50497
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489
--- Comment #4 from Gary Funck 2011-09-23 17:38:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Does the problem vanish if you add -fno-strict-aliasing?
>
> One more thing, you mention -O2 in the flags, but then refer to selective
> scheduler, which is on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
--- Comment #7 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-09-23
17:56:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 25349
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25349
Python script to generate C++ files with many overloads
Syntax is
./generate.py [use single functi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50495
--- Comment #8 from Mathias Gaunard 2011-09-23
17:58:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 25350
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25350
Bash script to more easily drive python script
Same usage as generate.py, but doesn't take the fir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50498
Bug #: 50498
Summary: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap_16 isn't supported for
x86_64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50498
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-23 19:50:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 25351
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25351
testcase
Somewhat reduced testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50496
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code, lto
Component
On Thursday 22 September 2011 11:56:12 Teodori Serge wrote:
> Hello,
> I'm building a toolchain in /opt dir. I have already build and installed
> glibc-2.14 and binutils-2.21.1a in /opt.
> Now I want to build and install gcc-4.6.1 with gmp, mpfr and mpc also in
> /opt.
>
> Here is my configure:
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48875
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42844
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23
21:30:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 23 21:30:48 2011
New Revision: 179130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179130
Log:
Core 234 - allow const objects with no initial
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20039
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-23
21:30:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 23 21:30:48 2011
New Revision: 179130
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179130
Log:
Core 234 - allow const objects with no initiali
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45158
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50400
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hans.buchmann at fhnw dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44267
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23
21:38:33 UTC ---
Jason, can you help me triaging this PR? Thanks..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
--- Comment #12 from Cary Coutant 2011-09-23
21:39:13 UTC ---
Author: ccoutant
Date: Fri Sep 23 21:39:10 2011
New Revision: 179132
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179132
Log:
include/ChangeLog:
PR 40831
* demangle.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43734
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at CeBiTec dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42194
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iant at google dot com
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-23
21:57:15 UTC ---
Jakub, shall we close this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499
Bug #: 50499
Summary: segmentation fault in gcc.dg/compat/struct-by-value-1
c_compat_x_tst.o-c_compat_y_tst.o with ppc -m64
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48562
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 22:08:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 25352
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25352
preprocessed struct-by-value-1_y.c
to reproduce:
$ powerpc-linux-gnu-gcc -c-m64 struct-by-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29751
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski 2011-09-23
22:09:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Created attachment 18307 [details]
> Patch which I am testing
There is one bug in that patch which I have a fix for.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 22:10:51 UTC ---
gcc -v configure line:
...
Configured with:
/scratch/vries/b6/pr43864.42.all-fsf-mainline-powerpc-linux-gnu.cfg/src/gcc-mainline/configure
--build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=i68
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50494
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-23 22:12:13 UTC ---
Configure line for compiler same as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50499#c2
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
