http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451
--- Comment #5 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 07:21:14 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Thu Sep 22 07:21:07 2011
New Revision: 179079
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179079
Log:
PR tree-optimization/50451
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
--- Comment #18 from Ira Rosen 2011-09-22 07:51:35 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #16)
> and -3.c fails with an ICE in the vectorizer, Ira,
> could you look at that?
--- tree-vect-stmts.c 2011-09-22 09:48:34.0 +0200
+++ tree-vect-stmts
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50479
Bug #: 50479
Summary: Unevaluated usage of parameters in function default
arguments is accepted
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50380
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-09-22
08:51:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 25335
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25335
reduced test case
Much reduced test case. So far I've only been able to reproduce the looping
c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #27 from Marc Glisse 2011-09-22
09:25:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
[builtins to reverse the bit order]
> I think a separate Bugzilla requesting as an enhancement such intrinsics would
> be certainly appropriate.
Has this RFE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41733
--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 09:32:14 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Sep 22 09:32:11 2011
New Revision: 179080
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179080
Log:
2011-09-22 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #52 from Iain Sandoe 2011-09-22 09:34:49
UTC ---
Created attachment 25336
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25336
remove ranlib special casing from the darwin port
so, this has taken a long time...
Mike's throw-awa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41733
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #28 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-22
09:49:18 UTC ---
I think we should. Can you do that? Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50478
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50465
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-22
09:55:20 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Sep 22 09:55:13 2011
New Revision: 179081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179081
Log:
PR target/50447
PR target/50465
* conf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50447
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-22
09:55:21 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Sep 22 09:55:13 2011
New Revision: 179081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179081
Log:
PR target/50447
PR target/50465
* conf
Hello,
I'm building a toolchain in /opt dir. I have already build and installed
glibc-2.14 and binutils-2.21.1a in /opt.
Now I want to build and install gcc-4.6.1 with gmp, mpfr and mpc also in
/opt.
Here is my configure:
../gcc-4.6.1/configure --prefix=/tools --disable-nls --disable-shared
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480
Bug #: 50480
Summary: 10% performance regression on Spec2006 410.bwaves
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480
--- Comment #1 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-09-22
10:00:34 UTC ---
Checkin URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177368
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35860
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50481
Bug #: 50481
Summary: builtin to reverse the bit order
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #29 from Marc Glisse 2011-09-22
10:29:07 UTC ---
See Bug 50481 about bit-reversal builtins (and feel free to add details there).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50480
--- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-09-22
10:33:06 UTC ---
Here is optset details:
base=-static -O2 -ffast-math ("-m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse" if 32 bit mode)
peak=-static -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math ("-m32 -msse2 -mfpmath=sse" if 32
bit mode)
o --no-create --no-recursion
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.7.0 20110922 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-D' 'HAVE_MKSTEMP' '-D' 'HAVE_FONTCONFIG' '-D'
'HAVE_LIBIDN' '-D' 'HAVE_SETLOCALE' '-D' &#x
re http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2011-09/msg01506.html
This mailing list is for automated emails from our bug database,
people don't use it for discussions via email.
To report a bug please use bugzilla, using the instructions at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
To ask for help using or building GCC us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #53 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 10:51:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #52)
> Created attachment 25336 [details]
> remove ranlib special casing from the darwin port
>
> [...]
>
> I would appreciate some help with testing o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49992
--- Comment #54 from Iain Sandoe 2011-09-22 11:01:05
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #53)
> (In reply to comment #52)
> > Created attachment 25336 [details]
> > remove ranlib special casing from the darwin port
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I would apprec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
vincenzo Innocente changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincenzo.innocente at cern
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50483
Bug #: 50483
Summary: lto turns visibility from HIDDEN to DEFAULT
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
--- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora 2011-09-22 11:23:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think that, unless not imposed by the standard (why??) the visibility of
> "namespace std" SHALL NOT BE forced to default
part of the std:: (exceptions ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484
Bug #: 50484
Summary: [4.6 regression] ia64-portbld-freebsd9.0,
conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation
fault: 11
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50484
--- Comment #1 from Anton Shterenlikht 2011-09-22
11:27:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 25338
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25338
config.log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-09-22 11:49:29 UTC ---
indeed
and in "exception" header-file is a place where visibility is correctly handled
#pragma GCC visibility push(default)
extern "C++" {
namespace std
{
}
#pragma GCC visibilit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50485
Bug #: 50485
Summary: gcc.target/i386/sse4_1-blendps.c fails spuriously on
i686
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50485
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 12:25:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 25339
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25339
proprocessed sse4_1-blendps.c with patch applied to make failure reproducible
To reproduce:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50113
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 12:26:48 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Sep 22 12:26:41 2011
New Revision: 179085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179085
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/50113
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-22
12:26:56 UTC ---
dup of PR 36022 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50061
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 12:26:48 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Sep 22 12:26:41 2011
New Revision: 179085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179085
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/50113
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-22
13:23:41 UTC ---
Seems so, thanks Jon. The older one also includes some rationale from Benjamin.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50160
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Schmidt-Dominé 2011-09-22
13:39:22 UTC ---
Sorry, thank you for creating the feature-request.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-22
13:45:10 UTC ---
I think before the default visibility was added everywhere it was pretty easy
to cause segfaults by using -fvisibility=hidden
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50344
--- Comment #5 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 14:16:33 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 22 14:16:27 2011
New Revision: 179088
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179088
Log:
/cp
2011-09-22 Jonathan Wakely
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50344
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50430
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-22
14:20:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 25340
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25340
reduced testcase
This is somewhat reduced testcase. The problem can be a bit illustrated on C.
We ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50486
Bug #: 50486
Summary: No warning at signed -> unsigned casting
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50348
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36022
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-09-22
14:42:38 UTC ---
*** Bug 50348 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50481
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50486
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #25333|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45810
--- Comment #26 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-09-22 15:25:48 UTC ---
AFAICT this pr has been fixed since some time. Here are the results I get on
x86_64-apple-darwin10 (Core2Duo 2.53Ghz, 3Mb cache, 4Gb RAM) at revision
179079:
Compile options :
-4.7
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0/4.7.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-apple-darwin11.2.0
Configured with: ../gcc-4.7-20110922/configure --prefix=/sw
--prefix=/sw/lib/gcc4.7 --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc4.7/info
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50374
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-22
15:52:11 UTC ---
The reason why many of the loops in *-12.c aren't vectorized is that for
idxtype other than unsigned int which is the type of i there is a cast from i
to the type of pos.
OT, one big
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-22
16:24:34 UTC ---
Sorry for that, yeah, the patch looks right.
BTW, for CONST_VECTOR containing all bits set we could do better,
for VEC_COND_EXPR x < y ? -1 : z we can do mask = x < y; z | mask;
and fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2011-09-22 16:27:01
UTC ---
Shorter testcase:
void
test (int code, unsigned int * image, int * colors)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < code; ++i)
image[i] = (colors[i] < 0 ? ~(unsigned int) 0 : colors[i]);
}
gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-22
16:33:27 UTC ---
unsigned short a[1024], b[1024];
void
foo (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++)
a[i] = b[i] > 10 ? b[i] : 0x;
}
ICEs too with -O3 -msse4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-09-22
17:02:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 25342
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25342
gcc47-all-ones-cst.patch
Patch to optimize vector x < y ? -1 : z and vector and/ior/xor with -1 oper
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50473
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50437
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50371
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
Bug #: 50487
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/bessel_6.f90
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50055
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 17:35:06 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Sep 22 17:35:00 2011
New Revision: 179094
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179094
Log:
PR target/50482
* config/i386/i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49527
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50464
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 17:41:30 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Sep 22 17:41:25 2011
New Revision: 179095
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179095
Log:
PR target/50464
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49447
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50488
Bug #: 50488
Summary: Destructor problem in struct
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50488
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47627
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Variadic|[C++0x] Variadic
|base-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50488
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-09-22
18:11:03 UTC ---
Also I think he forgot about copy constructor happening.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Krügler
2011-09-22 18:11:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Suggestions about a better error message? (should be easy to change)
What about:
"error: every valid template specialization requires an empty template
pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50488
--- Comment #3 from karman 2011-09-22 18:12:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> you have two problems, one is that the code won't compile because you're
> missing a header, the second is that GCC 3.4.5 is ancient, so although this
> does appear
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libfortran |testsuite
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2011-09-22 18:19:07 UTC ---
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:16:35PM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
>
> H.J. Lu changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50371
--- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-09-22 18:20:58 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 22 18:20:53 2011
New Revision: 179096
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179096
Log:
/cp
2011-09-22 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50371
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-09-22 18:22:25
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> >
> > It works for me. Can you check it in?
> >
>
> Sure, do you want me to apply it to 4.5 and 4.6 as well.
Yes, please.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 18:28:18 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 22 18:28:14 2011
New Revision: 179097
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179097
Log:
2011-09-22 Steven G. Kargl
PR test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 18:30:42 UTC ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Sep 22 18:30:36 2011
New Revision: 179098
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179098
Log:
011-09-22 Steven G. Kargl
PR tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl
2011-09-22 18:35:09 UTC ---
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 06:22:25PM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50487
>
> --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu 2011-09-22 18:22:25
> U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50488
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-22
18:41:41 UTC ---
GCC is open source so you can attempt to fix it yourself or pay someone to do
it for you, but it will never be fixed in the official GCC 3.4 because that
release series is discontinu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50488
--- Comment #5 from karman 2011-09-22 18:43:30
UTC ---
ha, ok, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
--- Comment #4 from Johannes Schaub
2011-09-22 19:01:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > Suggestions about a better error message? (should be easy to change)
>
> What about:
>
> "error: every valid template specia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489
Bug #: 50489
Summary: [UPC/IA64] mis-schedule of MEM ref with
-ftree-vectorize and -fschedule-insns2
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47436
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-22
19:19:21 UTC ---
I'd go for "error: variadic template A is invalid because every valid
specialization requires an empty template parameter pack"
but I'm not sure that would be needed if the original
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489
--- Comment #1 from Gary Funck 2011-09-22 19:21:54
UTC ---
Created attachment 25343
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25343
UPC test case that demonstrates instruction mis-schedule
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50464
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-22 19:28:03 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Sep 22 19:27:59 2011
New Revision: 179100
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=179100
Log:
PR target/50464
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48803
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50489
--- Comment #2 from Gary Funck 2011-09-22 19:31:04
UTC ---
Created attachment 25344
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25344
zipped tar file with build script, readme, test case and test artifacts
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50464
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #22 from Markus Trippelsdorf
2011-09-22 19:42:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> For:
>
> terminate called after throwing an instance of
> 'com::sun::star::container::NoSuchElementException'
> It throws an exception in: xmlreader
> > is altogether more hairy - we create at run-time C++ vtables packed with
> > trampolines so we can intercept / model native C++ objects and interact with
> > them via python etc. that would need some more intense debugging love I
> > guess.
>
> and this one is the only remaining issue.
That
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #23 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-22 20:29:38
UTC ---
> > is altogether more hairy - we create at run-time C++ vtables packed with
> > trampolines so we can intercept / model native C++ objects and interact with
> > them via python etc. th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50485
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-09-22
20:41:07 UTC ---
I get this failure also. At first I thought it was my patch and then I noticed
no code changes with my change.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45483
--- Comment #8 from Pacho Ramos
2011-09-22 20:47:04 UTC ---
It's still using generic in gcc-4.5, -march has moved from prescott to
pentium-m:
gcc-4.4: \_ /usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.4.5/cc1 -quiet -
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -march=prescott --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50485
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-09-22 20:47:01
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
>
> The assignment is translated as a push/pop on the float stack:
> ...
...
>
> So after the push/pop tmp[1] contains a quiet Nan, while the corresponding
> par
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
