http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50403
--- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca 2011-09-16
07:12:52 UTC ---
You asked where do I get such an enormous amount of invalid fortran code.
Probably I was too terse in my answer.
I created invalid codes to check corner or extreme cases.
I do believe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407
--- Comment #11 from Vittorio Zecca 2011-09-16
07:22:09 UTC ---
If you add
character(9) s
s=2.ip.8
gfortran, and g95, compile successfully.
On the contrary gfortran fails to parse
write(6,fmt=2.ip.8)
To me, it looks like the parser does not
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50403
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-16 07:30:25 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> You asked where do I get such an enormous amount of invalid fortran code.
> Probably I was too terse in my answer.
Ok, I get it.
> I created inva
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50428
Bug #: 50428
Summary: Consider changing semantics of +initialize so that it
is inherited
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50428
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50383
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-16
08:33:30 UTC ---
Quick&dirty workaround for this problem:
Index: lto-symtab.c
===
--- lto-symtab.c(revision 178757)
+++ lto-symtab.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-16
08:36:23 UTC ---
With workaround I attached to PR50383 I can now build libsvx (and I did not try
to get further, with bit of luck it will just work ;)
W/o lto:
evans:/abuild/jh/libreoffice/:[0]# size
.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50423
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-16
09:34:31 UTC ---
As documented at http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.7/changes.html
"Avoid polluting the global namespace by inclusion of ."
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-16
09:44:21 UTC ---
your final version exits immediately using 4.6.1, but not with 4.5
although it might finish eventually I do think this can be considered a bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-16
09:48:11 UTC ---
Now it dies at
/abuild/jh/trunk-install/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/../../../../x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
warning: hidden symbol 'typeinfo for SolarMutexResettableGuard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment #7 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-16
10:10:45 UTC ---
OK, I guess the problem is that we don't stream initializer of extern
variables. This leads to Martin's new devirtualization code to no longer be
able to get the optimization done (and s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-16
10:14:09 UTC ---
BTW we find only 1 devirtualization case on sfx:
evans:/abuild/jh/libreoffice/:[0]# grep "known target"
./core/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/LinkTarget/Library/libsvxcorelo.so.wpa*
./core/workdir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429
Bug #: 50429
Summary: LibGOMP built with "-flto" will result in crash code
for OpenMP program...
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50427
--- Comment #1 from Peter A. Bigot 2011-09-16 10:25:31
UTC ---
Created attachment 25302
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25302
Potential fix for problem
As far as I can tell, IRA misses this because it doesn't detect that the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429
--- Comment #1 from xunxun 2011-09-16 10:29:50
UTC ---
Created attachment 25303
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25303
The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429
--- Comment #2 from xunxun 2011-09-16 10:31:14
UTC ---
sorry, I put a wrong test program.
The newer is right.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50430
Bug #: 50430
Summary: Constructors of static external vars are throwed away
leading to missed optimizations (and ipa-cp ICE).
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429
--- Comment #3 from xunxun 2011-09-16 10:36:21
UTC ---
It's my fault.
I think this is not libgomp and lto issue, and that's the libpthread's problem.
Close it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50429
xunxun changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #10 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-16
11:02:07 UTC ---
PR50430 now tracks the svx2 issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
Bug #: 50431
Summary: lambda bug for array size def
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
--- Comment #1 from zhudiqi at 163 dot com 2011-09-16 11:36:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 25304
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25304
lambda for array size def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
--- Comment #2 from zhudiqi at 163 dot com 2011-09-16 11:40:42 UTC ---
BUG1:
auto sz = []()->constexpr long { return 100L; };
int arr[sz()];
Why constexpr for lambda won't be compiled? Can i not use auto type for a
lambda variant?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50432
Bug #: 50432
Summary: lto1.exe: internal compiler error: in
cgraph_mark_functions_to_output, at cgraphunit.c:1173
when build Qt4.7.4 rcc
Classification: Unclassified
Pro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407
--- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl
2011-09-16 12:44:37 UTC ---
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 07:22:09AM +, zeccav at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> To me, it looks like the parser does not handle correctly the format
> specification as a default-char-expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50326
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50431
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-09-16
13:47:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> BUG1:
> auto sz = []()->constexpr long { return 100L; };
> int arr[sz()];
>
> Why constexpr for lambda won't be compiled? Can i not use auto type for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50433
Bug #: 50433
Summary: [4.7 Regression] acats tests FAIL: c460010 on
x86_64-apple-darwin10
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50434
Bug #: 50434
Summary: genmodes.c hardcodes size of CCmode
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50432
--- Comment #1 from xunxun 2011-09-16 14:08:45
UTC ---
Created attachment 25305
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25305
-v output log
Add -v output log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435
Bug #: 50435
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/bb-slp-25.c (-flto)?
scan-tree-dump-times slp "basic block vectorized using
SLP" 1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50176
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment #8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50430
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-16
14:40:14 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Sep 16 14:40:06 2011
New Revision: 178908
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178908
Log:
PR lto/50430
* gimple-fold.c (gimple_get_vi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50325
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-16
14:41:19 UTC ---
I have done a clean bootstrap of powerpc-apple-darwin9 and
x86_64-apple-darwin10 with the patch in comment #5 with all languages except
go.
I have posted the results of the te
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407
--- Comment #13 from Steve Kargl
2011-09-16 14:42:31 UTC ---
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:44:37PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50407
>
> --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl
> 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-16
14:45:07 UTC ---
With fix I commited for PR50430 and the workaround for PR50383 my build dies on
java modules. I believe it is the problem we run into with Michael on the
opensuse conference and we mad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50430
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-09-16
15:02:42 UTC ---
Created attachment 25306
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25306
testcase
One will need to revert the gimple-fold.c patch mentioned above to get an
error. Otherwise it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #1 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34265
--- Comment #35 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-09-16 15:42:15 UTC ---
This pr (as well as pr49006) seems to have been fixed between revisions 176696
and 177649. I am closing
pr49006 as fixed and I'll use this pr to track the remaining issues.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
lto scan-tree-dump-times slp "basic block
vectorized using SLP" 1
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes4
# of unexpected failures2
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes8
# of unexpected failures4
/opt/gcc/build_w/gcc/xgcc version 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen 2011-09-16 16:18:37 UTC
---
Well, at least the loop is not vectorized now :).
Could you please attach the slp dump (-fdump-tree-slp-details)?
Thanks,
Ira
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24167
--- Comment #5 from simon at pushface dot org 2011-09-16 17:27:27 UTC ---
Fixed in 4.6.0.
Am I allowed/able to mark this RESOLVED?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24167
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50435
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-09-16
17:37:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 25307
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25307
slp dump attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50386
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|libgomp.h:87:5: error: |[4.7 Regression]
|u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50358
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-09-16
18:27:16 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Sep 16 18:27:10 2011
New Revision: 178912
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178912
Log:
PR target/50358
* config/avr/avr.md (*ashi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50358
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50436
Bug #: 50436
Summary: Crash or hang on invalid template code
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50436
--- Comment #1 from Zack Weinberg 2011-09-16 19:13:13
UTC ---
Here's a variant that hangs.
template struct VI {};
template
struct IP
{
static const bool r = IP::r;
};
template
struct V
{
static const bool r = IP::r;
VI vi;
};
struct X;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50437
Bug #: 50437
Summary: [C++0x] [4.7 regression] ICE for trivial use of lambda
in template function
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50361
--- Comment #8 from Jordan DeLong 2011-09-16 20:12:43
UTC ---
Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50438
Bug #: 50438
Summary: proc pointer to subroutine in structure constructors
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50439
Bug #: 50439
Summary: gfortran infinite loop with -floop-interchange
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50440
Bug #: 50440
Summary: 128 bit unsigned int subtraction generates too many
register moves
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-16
21:13:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 16 21:13:42 2011
New Revision: 178917
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178917
Log:
PR c++/50424
* tree.c (bot_manip): Set cp_f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-09-16
21:16:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Sep 16 21:16:16 2011
New Revision: 178918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=178918
Log:
PR c++/50424
* call.c (set_flags_from_calle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50433
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50424
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou 2011-09-16
21:24:30 UTC ---
> It seems postreload.c should be changed to the following to avoid combining
>
> --- postreload.c(revision 178904)
> +++ postreload.c(working copy)
> @@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@ r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50397
--- Comment #2 from Matt Hargett 2011-09-16 22:00:25 UTC
---
Verified this also happens on trunk with g++ (Ubuntu/Linaro 20110914-1) 4.7.0
20110914 (experimental) [trunk revision 178863]. Tried it with and without
lto-partition=none.
test BN_ls
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
Elias Pipping changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
--- Comment #6 from Elias Pipping 2011-09-16
22:08:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 25308
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25308
reduction for gcc 4.6.1
I used gcc 4.5 during reduction, assuming that a reduced test case would "ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50390
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335
--- Comment #1 from Gregory Maxwell 2011-09-17
00:31:43 UTC ---
Still failing in r178925.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50441
Bug #: 50441
Summary: [C++0x] is missing GNU extension types
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50442
Bug #: 50442
Summary: Constructing T from implicit conversion to T&
ambiguous in C++0x mode, not C++98
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50442
Mike Hommey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mh+gcc at glandium dot org
--- Comment #1 f
71 matches
Mail list logo
