http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50012
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50121
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44995
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50113
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49437
--- Comment #3 from jye2 at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-19 08:28:15 UTC ---
Author: jye2
Date: Fri Aug 19 08:28:08 2011
New Revision: 177891
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177891
Log:
PR target/49437
* config/arm/a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-19 08:31:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > Created attachment 24987 [details]
> > Revised patch
> >
> > Sorry, seems there are two copies of the logic. Ple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50109
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-08-19
09:14:59 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Aug 19 09:14:55 2011
New Revision: 177892
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177892
Log:
2011-08-19 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/50
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50109
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2011-08-19
09:16:08 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Aug 19 09:16:03 2011
New Revision: 177893
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177893
Log:
2011-08-19 Tobias Burnus
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36993
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-19
09:17:02 UTC ---
Jason, can you help me re-evaluating this? Is it an accepts-invalid now.. or
not?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50114
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-19
09:18:00 UTC ---
You know what I'm going to ask... ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49987
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-19
09:40:18 UTC ---
> Would you be able to run a full bootstrap and
> regression test with it? I'll submit the patch if that succeeds.
I have done a clean bootstrap of revision 177878 with the p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-08-19
10:34:13 UTC ---
A simple (partial) revert of the patch of PR 47285
(http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-01/msg00226.html) will lead to wrong
results as one does not honour the following.
write(*,'(G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44995
--- Comment #4 from Frank Ch. Eigler 2011-08-19
11:24:19 UTC ---
We have worked around this powerpc oddity in systemtap's recent sdt.h
versions by using both %0 and %I0 together to get a special markup for
literals vs. register names.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-19
11:36:42 UTC ---
Can't we just standardize on some particular element size (say derived from
DR_BASE_ADDRESS's type or even record it in the data_reference structure), use
it if it can be expressed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-19
11:51:07 UTC ---
We seem to be "safe" in more cases also because of weird stripping of
MEM_REFs in dr_analyze_indices.
if (TREE_CODE (ref) == MEM_REF
&& TREE_CODE (TREE_OPERAND (ref, 0)) ==
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50109
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-08-19
11:55:19 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Aug 19 11:55:16 2011
New Revision: 177895
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177895
Log:
2011-08-19 Tobias Burnus
Backport from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-19
12:00:11 UTC ---
I think the element sizes of the access functions need to be reflected in
the base object, which we require to be operand_equal_p to any other
base to which we compare our access fu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36993
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50124
Bug #: 50124
Summary: gfortran.dg/graphite/interchange-1.f XPASSes
everywhere
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49792
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-19
13:25:26 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Aug 19 13:25:22 2011
New Revision: 177898
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177898
Log:
PR fortran/49792
* trans-expr.c (gfc_trans_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49792
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-19
13:26:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Aug 19 13:26:50 2011
New Revision: 177900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177900
Log:
PR fortran/49792
* trans-expr.c (gfc_trans_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50125
Bug #: 50125
Summary: gcc.dg/uninit-B.c and gcc.dg/uninit-pr19430.c XPASS
everywhere
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50109
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7
|R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50126
Bug #: 50126
Summary: g++ does not recognize a friend declaration
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49792
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-19
13:36:49 UTC ---
Testcase showing that stripping the offset for the indirect base is bogus:
extern int memcmp(const void *, const void *, __SIZE_TYPE__);
extern void abort (void);
short a[33] = {
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50109
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50101
--- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner
2011-08-19 14:05:51 UTC ---
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 08:58:28AM +, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Did you try pessimizing the non-ctr reg alternatives (and the memory
> alternative even more)? Like ad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127
Bug #: 50127
Summary: [4.7 regression] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C FAILs
on several targets
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-08-19
14:22:34 UTC ---
See pr50035 marked as a duplicate of bug 49972.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-19
14:23:51 UTC ---
That is exposed by my 2nd posted patch as well, for
gcc.c-torture/execute/pr33870-1.c. Testing a fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50067
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-19
14:26:19 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Aug 19 14:26:13 2011
New Revision: 177903
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177903
Log:
2011-08-19 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50127
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||49972
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-19 14:34:33
UTC ---
This may be a glibc bug:
http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2011-08/msg00063.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36993
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-08-19
14:39:12 UTC ---
Oops, I completely missed the fix going in. Thanks anyway!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50101
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-08-19 15:35:36
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/19/11 08:05, meissner at linux dot vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50101
>
> --- Comment #8 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50128
Bug #: 50128
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50107
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-19 16:05:58
UTC ---
We start with
(insn 11 4 16 2 (set (reg:TI 65)
(mult:TI (zero_extend:TI (reg/v:DI 64 [ b ]))
(zero_extend:TI (reg/v:DI 63 [ a ] uti-2.i:3 339
{bmi2_umulditi3_1}
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50107
--- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-08-19
16:12:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > > movq%rdi, %rdx
> > > mulx%rsi, %rax, %rsi
> > > movq%rsi, %rdx
> > > ret
> > > .cfi_endp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50128
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Stubbs 2011-08-19 16:24:09
UTC ---
I believe this is fixed in 177910, if not before.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50128
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48739
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50099
Greta Yorsh changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Greta.Yorsh at arm dot com
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50129
Bug #: 50129
Summary: ICE on where statement
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50130
Bug #: 50130
Summary: ICE with invalid array slice
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50105
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50129
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50129
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50130
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50083
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50130
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50131
Bug #: 50131
Summary: Optimize x = -1 with "or" for -O
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50131
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-19 20:58:00
UTC ---
There are 1273 "movl $0x," and 924 "movq 0x,"
in cc1plus. This change can reduce cc1plus size by 6242 bytes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49721
--- Comment #26 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-19
21:18:06 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Aug 19 21:18:03 2011
New Revision: 177914
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177914
Log:
Permute conversion and addition of constant
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50130
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50132
Bug #: 50132
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in maybe_record_trace_start, at
dwarf2cfi.c:2234 with -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
and long double
Classification: Unclassified
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50133
Bug #: 50133
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
vect_finish_stmt_generation (gimple.h:4821) with
-ftree-vectorize -fno-tree-loop-im
Classification: Unclassified
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50134
Bug #: 50134
Summary: -Wmissing-prototypes doesn't work for C++
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov 2011-08-19
22:17:29 UTC ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Fri Aug 19 22:17:26 2011
New Revision: 177916
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177916
Log:
2011-08-19 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50083
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2011-08-19 22:21:53
UTC ---
Created attachment 25058
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25058
Proposed patch to fallback to lround call
I can't trigger the problem on Linux, can you please test at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
--- Comment #8 from torsten at debian dot org 2011-08-19 22:54:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 25059
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25059
An obviously correct example that triggers the bug.
(In reply to comment #7)
> GCC 4.6.1 i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50132
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50133
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48739
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-19
23:04:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Simplified testcase:
>
> /* PR tree-optimization/48739 */
> /* { dg-do compile } */
> /* { dg-options "-O1 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 -fno-tree-dominator
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36489
Arun Chandrasekaran changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||visionofarun at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50129
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin 2011-08-19
23:20:35 UTC ---
Author: mikael
Date: Fri Aug 19 23:20:30 2011
New Revision: 177918
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177918
Log:
2011-08-19 Mikael Morin
PR fortran/50129
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40831
Cary Coutant changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23439|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46967
--- Comment #7 from The Written Word
2011-08-20 03:34:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This should be fixed. Albert, can you confirm that the pthread active
> changes fixed this problem?
>
> Regarding comment #3, look at the libgomp test l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50135
Bug #: 50135
Summary: Loop optimization.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50136
Bug #: 50136
Summary: Loop inc/dec optimization.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
75 matches
Mail list logo