http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #60 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-27
22:33:03 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Jul 27 22:33:00 2011
New Revision: 176852
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176852
Log:
2011-07-27 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49880
Summary: SuperH: ICE when -m4 is used with -mdiv=call-div1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881
Summary: [AVR] Inefficient stack manipulation around calls
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #49 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-27
22:56:10 UTC ---
Thanks for your feedback Kaveh. Note, however, that, as I mentioned only today
in Comment #45, with -m32 we have problems also with the overload for double, I
have no idea how to fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881
--- Comment #1 from Eric Weddington
2011-07-27 23:13:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Created attachment 24848 [details]
> Hack to set ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS
>
> While looking at PR49864 I noticed some awful code.
>
> First, the argument
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
--- Comment #50 from Kaveh Ghazi 2011-07-27 23:13:18
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> Another note, about std::nextafter, std::nexttoward, & co: I see mpfr provides
> an mpfr_nexttoward, which likely could be exploited in builtins.c pretty
> e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
--- Comment #6 from Thorsten Glaser 2011-07-27 23:29:13
UTC ---
Mikael, can you please publish your “fully tested patches to fix this for
4.4.5, 4.5.2, and 4.6.0” so we can at least include this in the packages?
If the FSF itself (i.e. gnulib) s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49881
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49864
--- Comment #3 from Richard Henderson 2011-07-28
00:06:16 UTC ---
Hum, this patch is too hacky and likely to fail for
other targets for different reasons. We need a more
comprehensive solution.
Consider it withdrawn.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49877
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Lacombe 2011-07-28
01:00:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 24849
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24849
add non-reduced testcase
command to trigger the ICE:
% h8300-elf-gcc -O1 -mh -mint32 -c -o vsprint
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49877
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Lacombe 2011-07-28
01:02:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 24850
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24850
non-reduced testcase
ldr.i: command to trigger the ICE:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49877
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Lacombe 2011-07-28
01:06:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 24851
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24851
non-reduced testcase
synaptics.i: command to trigger the ICE:
% h8300-elf-gcc -O2 -mh -mint32 -c -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49879
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Lacombe 2011-07-28
01:22:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 24852
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24852
non-reduced testcase
command to reproduce the ICE:
% h8300-elf-gcc -O2 -mh -mint32 -g -fomit-frame
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-28 02:43:35
UTC ---
Another testcase:
[hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-28]$ cat y.i
extern __thread int *foo;
extern void x (void *);
void
bar ()
{
x ((void *) &foo);
}
[hjl@gnu-6 ilp32-28]$ make y.s
/export/build/gnu/gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-28 02:45:20
UTC ---
TLS on X32 is almost identical to TLS on x86-64. The only
difference is x32 address space is 32bit. That means TLS
symbols can be in either SImode or DImode with upper 32bit
zero.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #17 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-28
05:39:00 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jul 28 05:38:54 2011
New Revision: 176857
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176857
Log:
2011-07-28 Tobias Burnus
Backport fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #61 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-28
05:40:28 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Jul 28 05:40:21 2011
New Revision: 176858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176858
Log:
2011-07-28 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-28
05:47:39 UTC ---
The issue of the original report (comment 0) is now fixed for GCC 4.4 to the
trunk (4.7): The vendor extension extended array read of normal arrays in
namelists works again.
However,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #51
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
