http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849
Summary: loop optimization prevents vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49671
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-26
07:52:27 UTC ---
Author: pinskia
Date: Tue Jul 26 07:52:24 2011
New Revision: 176785
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176785
Log:
2011-07-25 Andrew Pinski
PR tree-opt/4967
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49671
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849
--- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-07-26 08:30:45 UTC ---
it may be a duplicate of my own PR49730
as
void bar2(int jj) {
const int S=8;
float x[S];
float y[S];
int j = jj*S;
for (int i=0; i!=S; ++i)
x[i] = co[k[j+i]];
fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49840
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-26
09:25:00 UTC ---
It sounds like a linker bug. Please try without fancy linker options like
--as-needed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49850
Summary: Implicit creation of a temporary object when a
constant reference is passed as parameter and the
actual and formal types are not identical
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49776
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49844
--- Comment #2 from PcX 2011-07-26 09:32:14 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It sounds like a linker bug. Please try without fancy linker options like
> --as-needed.
I remove "-Wl,-O1 -Wl,--sort-common -Wl,--as-needed", and it also has the
pr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849
--- Comment #3 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-07-26 09:38:13 UTC ---
Thanks Richard,
--param max-completely-peel-times=1
does the trick and, in my real life example, does not have any adverse effect
elsewhere
while it speeds up the loop as expected
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49849
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49850
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49822
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49851
Summary: IVOPTs makes a mess out of polyhedron air derivx and
derivy
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
--- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-26 12:00:36 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 26 12:00:33 2011
New Revision: 176788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176788
Log:
PR target/47381
PR target/49832
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-26 12:00:36 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 26 12:00:33 2011
New Revision: 176788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176788
Log:
PR target/47381
PR target/49832
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49832
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-26 12:00:37 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 26 12:00:33 2011
New Revision: 176788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176788
Log:
PR target/47381
PR target/49832
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47381
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x32
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49832
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-26
12:26:32 UTC ---
Proposed fix posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02247.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
--- Comment #19 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-26
12:27:01 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Jul 26 12:26:58 2011
New Revision: 176789
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176789
Log:
2011-07-26 Martin Jambor
PR bootstrap/49
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49850
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49786
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49840
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-26
12:37:03 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 26 12:37:00 2011
New Revision: 176790
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176790
Log:
2011-07-26 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49840
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49851
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-26
12:53:47 UTC ---
Testcase with caller, use -fwhole-program to force inlining.
IMPLICIT REAL*8(a-H,O-Z)
PARAMETER (NX=150,NY=150)
DIMENSION ux(NX,NY) , uy(NX,NY) , vx(NX,NY) , vy(N
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-07-26 13:00:18 UTC ---
in case anybody wandering
it seems fixed in
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=c++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/afs/cern.ch/user/i/innocent/w2/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.7.0/lt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49852
Summary: [4.7 Regression] cp-demangle.c segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49851
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-26
13:59:26 UTC ---
AIR spends 86% of its time in DERIV[XY] (for ICC), 78% of its time there for
GCC.
The performance difference also reproduces when not inlining DERIV[XY] at all
(though it's slightly
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49846
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
--- Comment #59 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-26
14:27:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #53)
> reduced testcase for 4.7
> y=>rs_gauge(i)%rs(j)%rs_grid%r
Here, "%r->data" is marked as restricted as "r" is allocatable. However, all
other references
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49851
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-26
14:32:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> AIR spends 86% of its time in DERIV[XY] (for ICC), 78% of its time there for
> GCC.
> The performance difference also reproduces when not inlining DERIV[X
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47446
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49853
Summary: [x32] PIC doesn't work with external symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49852
--- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-26 14:40:32 UTC ---
78de04b4b6af769e72b723db729459736a67bc33 is the first bad commit
commit 78de04b4b6af769e72b723db729459736a67bc33
Author: DJ Delorie
Date: Wed Jun 22 19:13:31 2011 +
merge
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49852
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49854
Summary: Clean up SPE/e500 option handling
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49852
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-26 15:36:56
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> 78de04b4b6af769e72b723db729459736a67bc33 is the first bad commit
> commit 78de04b4b6af769e72b723db729459736a67bc33
> Author: DJ Delorie
> Date: Wed Jun 22 19:13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49852
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49852
--- Comment #5 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-07-26 15:40:23 UTC ---
Patch committed: Fix demangler crash
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02263.html
From: Ian Lance Taylor
DJ's script will merge it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49852
--- Comment #6 from Jürg Billeter 2011-07-26 15:43:11 UTC
---
It works here now, both, just calling cxxfilt and the full ld command from
libreoffice. Thanks for the quick fix. For some reason, 'make' didn't rebuild
libbfd after updating cp-mangle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48470
--- Comment #3 from Stephen Cleary
2011-07-26 15:56:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The test case reduces to the following:
> void __attribute__((naked)) f(void)
> {
> int x = 0;
> g(&x);
> }
> It ICEs 4.4.5, 4.5.2, and 4.6.0, but n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49852
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-26 16:27:39
UTC ---
On Linux/ia32, revision 176793 gave:
FAIL at line 4023: unknown demangling style
_ZSt10_ConstructI10CellBorderIS0_EEvPT_DpOT0_
FAIL at line 4027: unknown demangling style yz.qrs
FAIL at lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49855
Summary: internal compiler error: in
fold_convert_const_int_from_real
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49853
--- Comment #1 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-26 18:03:59 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 26 18:03:54 2011
New Revision: 176798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176798
Log:
PR target/47369
PR target/49853
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47369
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-26 18:03:59 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Jul 26 18:03:54 2011
New Revision: 176798
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176798
Log:
PR target/47369
PR target/49853
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48805
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26 18:47:51
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jul 26 18:47:44 2011
New Revision: 176801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176801
Log:
Fix PR48805: Do not instantiate ADDR_EXPRs
With thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26
18:48:19 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jul 26 18:48:08 2011
New Revision: 176802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176802
Log:
Fix PR47653: do not handle loops using wrapping sem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26
18:48:32 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jul 26 18:48:20 2011
New Revision: 176803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176803
Log:
Add testcase for PR47593
2011-07-26 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47046
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26 18:48:57
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jul 26 18:48:49 2011
New Revision: 176805
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176805
Log:
Fix PR47046: correct evolution_function_is_affine_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47046
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48805
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49853
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820
--- Comment #13 from Agner Fog 2011-07-26 19:31:48 UTC
---
My example does indeed give a warning when compiled with -Wstrict-overflow=2.
Unfortunately, -Wall implies only -Wstrict-overflow=1 so I got no warning in
the first place. I think the war
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49764
--- Comment #18 from _artem_ 2011-07-26 19:34:13
UTC ---
I've compiled gcc-avr from trunk and Arduino IDE stoped complaining about
PROGMEM. I downgraded binutils-avr from 2.21 to 2.20 patched and now delay()
function works as it should on arduino
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49853
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-26 19:34:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Another testcase:
This is PR47372.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49853
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|spop at gcc dot gn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49856
Summary: ICE when compiling mktime.c (gnulib, embedded in
libvirt)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49776
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-26 20:00:34 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jul 26 20:00:31 2011
New Revision: 176809
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176809
Log:
/cp
2011-07-26 Paolo Carlini
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49776
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49856
--- Comment #1 from Thorsten Glaser 2011-07-26 20:04:49
UTC ---
Also applies to 4.6.1-4:
root@ara5:~ # /usr/lib/m68k-linux-gnu/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/4.6.1/cc1
-fpreprocessed y.i -m68020 -O2 -o y.s
__strcspn_c1 __strcspn_c2 __strcspn_c3 __strsp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43804
--- Comment #26 from Thorsten Glaser 2011-07-26 20:16:22
UTC ---
Both gcc-4.4 and gcc-4.6 with that patch applied compile memtest.i properly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44303
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26 20:19:03
UTC ---
I will close this PR when the patches from Tobias will go on trunk:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01892.html
This patch-set removes support for CLooG-PPL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49856
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Summary: Put constant switch-tables into flash
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47908
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tg at mirbsd dot org
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49856
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49597
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49858
Summary: lost ability to use driver for external language
support?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45450
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45313
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47372
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-26
21:44:01 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jul 26 21:43:57 2011
New Revision: 176812
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176812
Log:
Call simplify_gen_subreg for PIC with mode o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47369
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x32
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47537
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x32
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47926
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x32
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49858
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-07-26 23:31:27 UTC ---
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, bigotp at acm dot org wrote:
> Is there a mechanism by which the driver can be informed of options that it
> should allow in this situation, given
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49858
--- Comment #2 from Peter A. Bigot 2011-07-27 00:38:16
UTC ---
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 6:31 PM, joseph at codesourcery dot com <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49858
>
> --- Comment #1 from joseph
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49808
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859
Summary: gcc could warn about statements between "switch" and
first "case"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859
--- Comment #1 from Wojciech Koszek 2011-07-27
01:16:25 UTC ---
I'd expect GCC to warn me about this case, since it's very likely an error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49764
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-27
01:22:05 UTC ---
-Wunreachable-code support was removed because it dependent on optimization and
caused some "false positives" (well they are not false positives in the sense
they were unreachable code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859
--- Comment #3 from Wojciech Koszek 2011-07-27
01:28:28 UTC ---
Looks like GCC and Clang both agree on Duff's stuff:
wkoszek@wkoszek:~/p/duff$ cat duff.c
#include
void
duff(to, from, count)
register short *to, *from;
register int count;
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48388
Daniel E. Platt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danp57 at optonline dot net
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47446
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47446
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49860
Summary: [x32] Error: cannot represent relocation type
BFD_RELOC_64 in x32 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49547
--- Comment #2 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-07-27
05:04:04 UTC ---
Patch prepared.
Discussion is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02266.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
Summary: Cross compile for mingw32, All executable file can not
start up, lead crash!
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49861
--- Comment #1 from Yuchen Deng 2011-07-27 05:51:01
UTC ---
Created attachment 24840
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24840
Full build script
host=i686-mingw32
96 matches
Mail list logo