http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820
Summary: Explicit check for integer negative after abs
optimized away
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49821
Summary: [4.6 regression] ICE in dwarf2out_cfi_begin_epilogue,
at dwarf2out.c:3015
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49819
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49819
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49819
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet 2011-07-23
09:19:47 UTC ---
Author: charlet
Date: Sat Jul 23 09:19:44 2011
New Revision: 176673
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176673
Log:
2011-07-23 Arnaud Charlet
PR ada/49819
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49793
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49819
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-23
09:20:06 UTC ---
OK, reassigning.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49819
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49819
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49818
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39386
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39386
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49819
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-23
10:23:46 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Jul 23 10:23:42 2011
New Revision: 176674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176674
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-23 Arna
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-23
10:27:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> New Revision: 176661
This commit fixes the original issue. A more special case still fails,
cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-07/msg00252.html Thus,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49819
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #46 from wbrana 2011-07-23 13:25:44 UTC
---
-O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -march=core2 -funroll-loops -fno-tree-pre
4.4.6 - 1730.9
4.5.2 - 2368
4.6.1 - 2205.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #5 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-07-23 13:29:36 UTC ---
Any news on this item?
Is this feature still foreseen for 4.7?
A patch to test for instance.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39386
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-23
13:48:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 24814
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24814
Minimal testcase
Minimal testcase that also miscompiles for newer versions of the compiler like
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21485
--- Comment #47 from wbrana 2011-07-23 13:53:46 UTC
---
-O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer -march=core2 -funroll-loops
4.4.6 - 1522.8
4.5.2 - 1502.6
4.6.1 - 1418.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49822
Summary: [gcc-4.7 regression] Segfault in
remove_prop_source_from_use
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49816
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49816
--- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-07-23
14:43:37 UTC ---
Author: rearnsha
Date: Sat Jul 23 14:43:33 2011
New Revision: 176687
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176687
Log:
PR target/49816
* arm.c (aapcs_vfp_al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48805
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49708
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-23 14:44:27 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Sat Jul 23 14:44:22 2011
New Revision: 176688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176688
Log:
2011-07-23 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49816
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29560
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-23
14:50:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 24816
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24816
Test case for 16-bit shifts that use low part only
Reopened this optimization issue.
For the att
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49708
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29560
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46779
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||frank at mynety dot net
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41894
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|avr at gjlay dot de |gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolut
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41894
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.5.0 |
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-07-23
15:26:09 UTC ---
Several years ago, I sketched out a "flow" chart for all of namelist so I could
walk the logic and see what to do. I think we need to do this again and maybe
post it to the wiki. (un
: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: fl...@flast.jp
All of following three template functions occur ICE with GCC 4.7.0 20110723.
8<
template < typename T >
auto f( const T &x )
-> typename decltype( x )::type; // ICE on here
template < typename T >
typename
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49823
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-23
17:23:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Integer overflow is undefined. You have to check before the fact, or compile
> with -fwrapv.
That should say signed integer overflow is undefined.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
--- Comment #6 from davidxl 2011-07-23 17:28:30
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Any news on this item?
> Is this feature still foreseen for 4.7?
> A patch to test for instance.
Sri is working on this. He will post a formal specification of f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab 2011-07-23 17:30:21
UTC ---
Unsigned integers never overflow.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49810
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dj at redhat dot com
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49824
Summary: AVR: Missing documentation for OS_task and OS_main
attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49824
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.weddington at atmel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49764
--- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-23
18:41:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 24817
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24817
test case
test case passes with avr-gcc-4.6.1-RC1
avr-gcc -v -S foo.c
Using built-in specs.
COL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49764
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49764
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Last reconfirmed|2011-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820
Jeffrey Walton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||noloader at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49825
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/tree-prof/partition2.C
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.weddington at atmel
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49807
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr |avr, mips*-*-*
Status|UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-23
22:17:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Johann,
>
> You've committed a patch for this PR. Can this be closed now?
I'm not sure.
This can be improved like outlined in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49811
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-23
22:19:20 UTC ---
"-shared -static" does not make sense really. Are you trying to compile a
libary that contains all other libraries compiled staticly? If so then
"-shared -static" makes sense. It do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49810
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49820
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Walton 2011-07-23
22:28:07 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > CPUs which use 2s compliment representations are usually well equipped to
> > deal
> > with overflow and carry. I would claim a result which overflows is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48778
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Summary|gcc 4.6 -Wa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48812
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48795
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48867
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-23
23:06:13 UTC ---
>g++: internal compiler error: Killed (program cc1plus)
You ran out of memory.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48910
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49825
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48922
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-23
23:20:08 UTC ---
SUPPORTS_DISCRIMINATOR should be 0 in your case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49012
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49025
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48932
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49057
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49146
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48799
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-24
00:54:43 UTC ---
Works for me with
GNU C (GCC) version 4.7.0 20110723 (experimental) [trunk revision 176707]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
hdp_gr.c: In function ‘dumpgr_usage’:
hdp_gr.c:31:19: warning
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48802
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-24
02:01:59 UTC ---
Works for me with:
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.7.0 20110723 (experimental) [trunk revision 176707]
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.7.0 20110723 (experimental
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48876
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49825
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49826
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Symbols are not decorated with
attribute stdcall and -mrtd
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47691
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
73 matches
Mail list logo