http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49771
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49782
Summary: Missed optimization due to dependency analysis
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-19
08:05:42 UTC ---
Can you attach preprocessed source of the Salsa20 testcase please?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49145
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36208
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49783
Summary: GCC must bring ads and adb files after installation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-19
08:33:23 UTC ---
On x86_64 we have
f3:
.LFB2:
.cfi_startproc
xorb$1, (%rdi)
andb$1, (%rdi)
ret
already, thus only a truncation to bitfield precision is lef
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43118
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #28 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-07-19
09:12:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 24791
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24791
working patch for gcc-4.7-20110709
gcc-4.7-20110709 bootstrapped fine with the attached forward
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49768
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
09:24:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 09:24:28 2011
New Revision: 176437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176437
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49768
* gimple-fold.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49768
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49768
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
09:40:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 09:40:03 2011
New Revision: 176438
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176438
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49768
* tree-ssa-ccp.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49784
Summary: GCC can't resolve a call which formed with using of
typedef and typename operators
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3746
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11398
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15065
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49784
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15174
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21954
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39788
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39951
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40947
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40947
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-19 12:11:27
UTC ---
One other possible problem: please avoid relative pathnames to configure and
an object directory that is a subdir of the source tree. Better do (say)
mkdir /vol/gcc/obj/gcc-4.6.1
cd /
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44424
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44476
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 from R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49708
--- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-19 12:39:02 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jul 19 12:38:59 2011
New Revision: 176447
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176447
Log:
2011-07-19 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45287
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-19 12:37:06 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Jul 19 12:37:03 2011
New Revision: 176446
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176446
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/4974
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49039
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
12:44:49 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 12:44:46 2011
New Revision: 176448
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176448
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-18 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Component|target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48973
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
12:46:42 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 12:46:39 2011
New Revision: 176449
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176449
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-23 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49120
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
12:48:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 12:48:50 2011
New Revision: 176450
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176450
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-23 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49161
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
12:51:31 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 12:51:29 2011
New Revision: 176451
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176451
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-26 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
12:54:37 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 12:54:34 2011
New Revision: 176452
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176452
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-26 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
12:56:50 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 12:56:48 2011
New Revision: 176453
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176453
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-27 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
12:58:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 12:58:54 2011
New Revision: 176454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176454
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-04 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32811
Christian Häggström changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at kalvdans dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32811
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49640
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
13:06:04 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 13:06:00 2011
New Revision: 176455
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176455
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-07 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49781
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-19 13:06:19
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
>
> > Many lea insns can be combined with the load/store insn followed.
>
> No, these are leal insns, they have inherent zero_extend fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
13:07:27 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 13:07:23 2011
New Revision: 176456
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176456
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-07 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
13:08:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 13:08:33 2011
New Revision: 176457
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176457
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-07 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49621
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
13:09:51 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 13:09:48 2011
New Revision: 176458
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176458
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-08 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-19
13:28:19 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jul 19 13:28:15 2011
New Revision: 176460
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176460
Log:
2011-07-19 Richard Guenther
* expr.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18908
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49785
Summary: [C++0x] ICE in coerce_template_parms
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49785
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |c++
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49120
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49161
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49644
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46278
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2011-07-07 00:00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-19 13:57:43 UTC ---
I see what's happening now: the unaligned access is happending inside
librt (sem_wait), with uac p noprint nofix sigbus:
Program received signal SIGBUS, Bus error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Version
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47407
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
14:14:22 UTC ---
You mean that __alignof (sem_t) is 2, yet librt assumes it is 4 byte aligned?
These proprietary OSes are of terrible quality.
You could add config/osf/sem.h, which would be a copy of c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49317
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32013
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38266
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38400
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40250
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47393
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48321
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47393
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
14:59:29 UTC ---
Yeah.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48572
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49456
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49455
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
--- Comment #8 from Jay 2011-07-19 15:15:46 UTC
---
Is there no annotation in /usr/include/whatever.h to get the required
alignment? Maybe that gcc doesn't-but-maybe-should understand?
- Jay (phone)
On Jul 19, 2011, at 7:33 AM, "ro at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-19 15:23:47 UTC ---
> --- Comment #8 from Jay 2011-07-19 15:15:46
> UTC ---
> Is there no annotation in /usr/include/whatever.h to get the required
> alignment? Maybe that gcc doesn'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49785
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
--- Comment #10 from Jay 2011-07-19 15:58:04 UTC
---
>> Is there no annotation in /usr/include/whatever.h to get the required
>> alignment? Maybe that gcc doesn't-but-maybe-should understand?
>
> No, the section I cited is all there is. No idea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
--- Comment #11 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques
2011-07-19 16:12:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 24793
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24793
the preprocessed source of salsa20 from Crypto++ with gcc 4.5.1, option -O2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140
--- Comment #12 from Sébastien Kunz-Jacques
2011-07-19 16:14:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 24794
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24794
the preprocessed source of Salsa20 from Crypto++, with gcc 4.6.0, option -O2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45351
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-19 16:57:00 UTC ---
> Do struct alignment rules on Tru64 have an effect? Not that I
> looked-up/read the ABI details..
I had a look at `Calling Standard for Alpha Systems', and the r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49785
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-19
17:26:55 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jul 19 17:26:52 2011
New Revision: 176471
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176471
Log:
PR c++/49785
* pt.c (coerce_template_parms)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49785
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-19
17:28:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jul 19 17:28:13 2011
New Revision: 176472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176472
Log:
PR c++/49785
* pt.c (coerce_template_parms)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49785
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49735
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49039
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
19:27:34 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 19:27:30 2011
New Revision: 176481
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176481
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-18 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48973
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
19:28:44 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 19:28:41 2011
New Revision: 176482
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176482
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-23 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
19:31:04 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 19:31:01 2011
New Revision: 176484
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176484
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-27 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
19:30:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 19:29:57 2011
New Revision: 176483
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176483
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-05-26 Jakub J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
19:32:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 19:32:12 2011
New Revision: 176485
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176485
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-04 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49640
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-19
19:33:34 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jul 19 19:33:30 2011
New Revision: 176486
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176486
Log:
Backport from mainline
2011-07-07 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49039
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49640
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48973
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43181
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-19
22:09:49 UTC ---
I think this is a BRANCH_COST issue.
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo