[Bug tree-optimization/49773] New: use of class data members prevent vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49773 Summary: use of class data members prevent vectorization Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization As

[Bug fortran/49708] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with allocate and no dimensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49708 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-18 07:33:07 UTC --- Janus, what's the status? (In reply to comment #4) > I just verified that this patch is free of testsuite regressions. The patch is OK with a test case, ChangeLog - and CCing it to f

[Bug middle-end/49675] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE (segfault) with -finstrument-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49675 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/46798] [4.6 Regression] invalid conversion in gimple call; verify_stmts failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46798 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0 Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regr

[Bug middle-end/49545] [4.6 Regression] New C++ test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.7.0 Target Milestone|4.7.0

[Bug c/35634] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] operand of pre-/postin-/decrement not promoted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35634 --- Comment #31 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-18 08:16:58 UTC --- Well, I'd still go for comment#14 ... we could teach VRP to shorten the operations again, if possible, to avoid the optimization regressions.

[Bug target/49742] [4.7 Regression] ICE for gcc.dg/vect/O3-pr39675-2.c on ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-18 08:24:40 UTC --- This must be an artifact of the load-/store-lanes stuff. It looks like they play foul with aliasing. It might also be that predictive commoning simply does not know how to re-mate

[Bug tree-optimization/49772] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in ipa_pta_execute, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:6790 with -fipa-pta

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49772 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49770] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49770 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/49771] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49771 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Target M

[Bug other/49767] __mulsc3 runs into infinite recursion if GCC is compiled with -O0 option

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49767 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/49768] [4.6/4.7 Regression] C99 style union initializations does not work as expected with optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49768 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-18 08:47:01 UTC --- I suppose fold produces some BIT_FIELD_REF here, giving up probably is easiest for now.

[Bug middle-end/49774] New: [meta-bug] restrict qualification aliasing issues

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49774 Summary: [meta-bug] restrict qualification aliasing issues Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assigne

[Bug tree-optimization/49761] restrict keyword ignored if in structure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49761 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49760] vectorization inhibited if indices are references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords|

[Bug testsuite/49757] FAIL: gcc.target/tic6x/*.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49757 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/49775] New: [4.6.1 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775 Summary: [4.6.1 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo:

[Bug other/49775] [4.6.1 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775 --- Comment #1 from Anitha Boyapati 2011-07-18 09:01:36 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17906 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35432

[Bug other/49752] [4.7 Regression] Non-existing struct `tree_type' in fold_checksum_tree in fold-const.c, can't build with `--enable-checking=fold'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49752 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #28 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-18 09:08:39 UTC --- Here is my latest proposed patch: --cut here-- Index: i386.c === --- i386.c(revision 176386) +++ i386.c(working

[Bug tree-optimization/49749] Reassociation rank algorithm does not include all non-NULL operands

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49749 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49760] vectorization inhibited if indices are references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760 --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente 2011-07-18 09:39:49 UTC --- Thanks for the detailed explanation. In the real life code, "out" is filled calling "foo" multiple times (a sort of nested loop), "k" was used to track the current size of it. It

[Bug tree-optimization/49760] vectorization inhibited if indices are references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-07-18 09:44:23 UTC --- On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760 > > --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente > 2011-07-18

[Bug bootstrap/49769] [4.7 regression] configuration mismatch -- extra parts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49769 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug tree-optimization/49760] vectorization inhibited if indices are references

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49760 --- Comment #4 from vincenzo Innocente 2011-07-18 10:07:10 UTC --- Fair enough. I think I can persuade developers to use only local variables as induction variable. More difficult will be to make them to copy also all other variables stored in me

[Bug middle-end/49029] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5266

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49029 Anitha Boyapati changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anitha.boyapati at atmel

[Bug tree-optimization/49140] [4.6 regression] wrong code with -O2 and -O3, not with -O3 -no-inline

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49140 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose 2011-07-18 10:19:28 UTC --- the pari tests still fail

[Bug tree-optimization/49770] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -fno-tree-forwprop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49770 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-18 10:46:28 UTC --- Ok, it's sth I worried about when doing the patch. Namely: /* Make sure to use a valueized reference ... */ if (!ao_ref_init_from_vn_reference (&r, vr1.set, vr1.type,

[Bug c++/49776] New: [C++0x]ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5499

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49776 Summary: [C++0x]ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5499 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/49541] [4.6/4.7 regression] TLS support partially broken in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541 --- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-18 12:09:22 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Jul 18 12:09:18 2011 New Revision: 176393 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176393 Log: PR target/49541 * testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp (li

[Bug target/49541] [4.6/4.7 regression] TLS support partially broken in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541 --- Comment #17 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-18 12:10:39 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Jul 18 12:10:34 2011 New Revision: 176394 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176394 Log: PR target/49541 * testsuite/lib/libgomp.exp (li

[Bug target/49541] [4.6/4.7 regression] TLS support partially broken in 64-bit mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49768] [4.6/4.7 Regression] C99 style union initializations does not work as expected with optimizations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49768 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-18 12:47:36 UTC --- Created attachment 24787 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24787 gcc47-pr49768.patch The easier fix attached. The more complicated would probably mean if we see pos

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-18 13:55:05 UTC --- (In reply to comment #28) > Here is my latest proposed patch: > > --cut here-- > Index: i386.c > === > --- i386.c(revisi

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #30 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-18 14:00:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > This patch increases bootstrap time from On which target?

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-18 14:04:13 UTC --- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #29) > > > This patch increases bootstrap time from > > On which target? I used --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib --with-demangler

[Bug tree-optimization/49773] use of class data members prevent vectorization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49773 --- Comment #1 from vincenzo Innocente 2011-07-18 14:11:11 UTC --- I just upgraded to c++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=c++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-apple-darwin10.8.0/4.7.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-apple-darwin

[Bug tree-optimization/49771] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49771 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-18 14:12:49 UTC --- That commit looks bogus, the change it made is: # ivtmp.37_45 = PHI vect_pa.7_44 = (vector(4) int *) ivtmp.37_45; - D.2731_1 = vect_pa.7_44 < &a; - D.2733_14 = vect_pa.7_44 >

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug libmudflap/49550] Many libmudflap tests fail on Solaris 11/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49550 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug boehm-gc/49381] Unresolved symbols in libgcjgc.a when linking gctest

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49381 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-18 14:30:23 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Jul 18 14:30:14 2011 New Revision: 176401 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176401 Log: PR boehm-gc/49381 Backport from mainline: 20

[Bug c++/49777] New: for c++ code, without -g option, cannot generate PIC *.so library.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49777 Summary: for c++ code, without -g option, cannot generate PIC *.so library. Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/49545] [4.6 Regression] New C++ test failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 --- Comment #10 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-07-18 14:35:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Can you check what patch caused it on the 4.6 branch? It is this one: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-07/msg00431.html 2011-07-11 Martin Jambor

[Bug boehm-gc/49381] Unresolved symbols in libgcjgc.a when linking gctest

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49381 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #32 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-18 14:54:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #31) > > But I was running SPEC CPU at the same time. I will re-time it. Is isn't too bad: 5182.95user 396.13system 15:32.41elapsed 598%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 36255

[Bug tree-optimization/49170] [4.7 regression] Several libstdc++ tests fail to link on Solaris 8/9: cexp missing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49170 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49756] g++ ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49756 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-07-18 15:22:11 UTC --- For this testcase, even 30MB isn't enough, but 40MiB is, so I think I'll round up to 64MB. I think it's probably best to raise the limit in both places to avoid confusion when invokin

[Bug go/48223] gob/check fails on Solaris 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48223 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/46944] gcc should accept -fuse-linker-plugin only if linker handles -plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46944 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46023] gcc.dg/vect/pr43430-2.c FAILs on Solaris 8 and 9/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46023 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46021] 3 tree-ssa tests XPASS almost everywhere

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46021 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49771] [4.7 Regression] wrong code with -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49771 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irar at il dot ibm.com --- Comment #3 from Ir

[Bug libstdc++/48430] std::hash partial specialization for std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr are using unary_function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48430 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/45508] Does adding configure-options for specs-hardcoding make sense?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45508 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/48430] std::hash partial specialization for std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr are using unary_function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48430 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 16:07:34 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Jul 18 16:07:24 2011 New Revision: 176405 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176405 Log: 2011-07-18 Paolo Carlini PR libs

[Bug libstdc++/48430] std::hash partial specialization for std::unique_ptr and std::shared_ptr are using unary_function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48430 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/44642] bootstrap fails to build libgcc when gold is built (at least on Solaris_x86)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44642 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from R

[Bug debug/44171] gcc -gdwarf-2 -dA unconditionally emits .ascii

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44171 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgomp/44093] Linking libgomp.so fails on Solaris 9/x86 with Sun as: relocations remain

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44093 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/43324] core dump on throw

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43324 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/42753] _Complex_I is reported as undeclared. Code builds with Sun compiler.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42753 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/42278] [4.4 Regression] incorrect dwarf data gcc-4.4.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42278 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug libstdc++/49778] New: Can't take pointer to std::make_pair in c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49778 Summary: Can't take pointer to std::make_pair in c++0x Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo:

[Bug target/41810] Cannot build gcc: gthr-default.h:466: error: '__mutex' was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41810 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/40483] gcc 4.x needs to utilize better COMDAT mechanism under Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40483 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/40227] Solaris standard link libraries missing /lib

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40227 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED URL|

[Bug target/40183] g++.dg/tls/static-1.C, execution abort

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40183 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/39810] [melt] - revision 146327 - compiler-probe.c:106: undefined reference to `unlikely'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39810 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/49452] [4.7 regression] comp-goto-2.c regresses in testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452 --- Comment #17 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-07-18 16:35:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > The machine-dependent reorg pass does something unexpected: > > > > (insn 30 18 14 3 (set (reg/f:SI 11 fp) > >

[Bug testsuite/39215] Running Testsuite with Multilib Flags exposes many errors in Testsuite (and gcc)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39215 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/39186] Configury incorrect for 64-bit Targets on Solaris

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39186 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/39150] Configure scripts have no 64-Bit Solaris defined (only i386-solaris*).

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39150 --- Comment #24 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-18 16:36:37 UTC --- *** Bug 39186 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/49452] [4.7 regression] comp-goto-2.c regresses in testing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452 --- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-07-18 16:31:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) > The machine-dependent reorg pass does something unexpected: > > (insn 30 18 14 3 (set (reg/f:SI 11 fp) > (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 11 fp) >

[Bug bootstrap/49769] [4.7 regression] configuration mismatch -- extra parts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49769 --- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-18 16:42:00 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Jul 18 16:41:55 2011 New Revision: 176406 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176406 Log: PR bootstrap/49769 * config.gcc (alpha*-*-linux*

[Bug bootstrap/49769] [4.7 regression] configuration mismatch -- extra parts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49769 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/39111] gcc 4.4.0 20090204 - Configury from GNU linker to Operating System's Linker broke (reverse works OK)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39111 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #33 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-18 16:52:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #32) > Is isn't too bad: > > 5182.95user 396.13system 15:32.41elapsed 598%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata > 362556maxresident)k My check on unloaded SNB (using current ma

[Bug bootstrap/39024] static libelf needs to be built PIC

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39024 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #34 from H.J. Lu 2011-07-18 16:55:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #33) > > Please also note, that there is no need for new lea_x32 patterns anymore. My x32 branch has 2011-07-18 Uros Bizjak PR target/47744 * config/i3

[Bug libstdc++/49778] Can't take pointer to std::make_pair in c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49778 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/43785] [C++0x] std::make_pair vs explicit template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43785 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzilla.gcc.gnu.com at

[Bug inline-asm/38804] libgcj multilib fails if not able to exec "non" native programs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38804 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/38730] gcc 4.4.0 20090104 - "make -i check" - over 60 FAILs in "C" compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38730 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/49708] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with allocate and no dimensions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49708 --- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:08:43 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Janus, what's the status? Well, mostly "busy with other things" mixed with a bit of "waiting for comments and/or approval" ;) > The patch is OK w

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #35 from Uros Bizjak 2011-07-18 17:17:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #34) > 2011-07-17 H.J. Lu > > * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_decompose_address): Don't support > 32bit address in x32 mode. This one is also not needed an

[Bug c/49779] New: Wrong code generated for while loop with guard containing continue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779 Summary: Wrong code generated for while loop with guard containing continue Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/38239] The function mcount in gmon.o changes register ecx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38239 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from R

[Bug c/49779] Wrong code generated for while loop with guard containing continue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-18 17:36:38 UTC --- Hmm, statement expressions are an extension to the C language.

[Bug target/36356] gcc-4.2.4 bootstrap failure on Solaris/x86 caused by PR31868 fix

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36356 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100 --- Comment #37 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-18 17:38:13 UTC --- *** Bug 36356 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/49779] Wrong code generated for while loop with guard containing continue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779 --- Comment #2 from bagnara at cs dot unipr.it 2011-07-18 17:42:39 UTC --- An extension that is still supported by GCC, right? Here is another testcase showing the same phenomenon with `break': int main() { do { while (({ break; 1; })) {

[Bug bootstrap/36330] i386-pc-solaris2.10 configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36330 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/33100] [4.3/4.4 regression] on bootstrap getting section .eh_frame: bad cie version 0: offset 0x0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33100 --- Comment #38 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-18 17:45:29 UTC --- *** Bug 36330 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/49779] Wrong code generated for while loop with guard containing continue

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49779 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-18 17:47:49 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > An extension that is still supported by GCC, right? Yes but the semantics are not well defined in this area IIRC.

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #36 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:49:04 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Jul 18 17:49:01 2011 New Revision: 176409 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176409 Log: Remove ix86_simplify_base_index_disp. 2011

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #37 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:51:36 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Mon Jul 18 17:51:33 2011 New Revision: 176413 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176413 Log: PR target/47744 * config/i386/i386.

[Bug target/47744] [x32] ICE: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:403

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47744 --- Comment #38 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-18 17:53:46 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Jul 18 17:53:43 2011 New Revision: 176414 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176414 Log: Allow only subregs of DImode hard regs in P

  1   2   >