http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43746
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-14
07:49:19 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Jul 14 07:49:14 2011
New Revision: 176262
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176262
Log:
gcc/
PR target/43746
* config/avr/elf.h (T
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43746
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ivansavvateev at yandex dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48151
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49625
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anhvofrcaus at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49724
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-07-14
08:41:36 UTC ---
I will have a look at it next week (if it can be reproduced on the hppa in the
compile farm). Nevertheless, the interesting thing is that the patch only
makes SRA to do less, never mo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46350
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24491|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |4.7.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48727
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48757
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
08:50:48 UTC ---
Vlad, is the fix backportable to release branches, at least the 4.6 branch?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
08:58:42 UTC ---
> I will have a look at it next week (if it can be reproduced on the hppa in the
> compile farm).
A cross-compiler from your favorite linux box is sufficient.
> Nevertheless, the int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49733
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-14
09:03:58 UTC ---
Ah, so passing the non-aliasing-var to a function which takes a POINTER
argument, returning that pointer and modifying it in the function that
takes the non-aliasing-var is ok then?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49737
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49725
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49735
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-14
09:05:32 UTC ---
It probably papers over a different issue though - even recursive inlining
should be limited by a --param, but appearantly that is not working here.
Honza?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49739
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49743
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49740
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-*-*
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49742
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*-*
Component|tree-optimi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49724
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
09:13:19 UTC ---
Based on Martin's comment in the other PR, I wonder whether this isn't rather a
temporary failure because of a glitch on the host. Can you reproduce it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49739
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-14 09:18:14 UTC ---
>> It doesn't work and build failed much earlier:
>
> Patch is missing '}'.
Thanks for fixing this. That's what you get for providing an untested
patch minutes be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49733
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-07-14
09:25:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Ah, so passing the non-aliasing-var to a function which takes a POINTER
> argument, returning that pointer and modifying it in the function that
> takes the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
09:27:25 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 14 09:27:22 2011
New Revision: 176265
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176265
Log:
PR ada/48711
* g-socthi-mingw.adb (Fill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49744
Summary: Use of prev-gcc/xgcc as PLUGINCC breaks bootstap-lean
tests
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
09:27:41 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jul 14 09:27:39 2011
New Revision: 176266
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176266
Log:
PR ada/48711
* g-socthi-mingw.adb (Fill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48711
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49744
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
Summary: error: ‘int truncate’ redeclared as different kind of
symbol
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49746
Summary: Generated PA-RISC2.0w code cannot be assembled by GNU
as-2.21.1
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-14
10:51:57 UTC ---
dup of PR 36231 ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-14
11:01:26 UTC ---
the problem is actually in gthr-posix.h
no libstdc++ header includes except which
is a non-standard extension and so that's not a problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49746
--- Comment #1 from H.Merijn Brand 2011-07-14
11:09:18 UTC ---
FYI I completed building gcc-4.6.1 with
gcc (GCC) 4.2.4
GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.18
gmp-5.0.2
mpfr-3.0.1
mpc-0.8.2
on HP-UX 11.23-ia64 and HP-UX 11.31-ia64 (both IPF/Itanium
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-14
11:13:13 UTC ---
Why does gthr-posix.h even include ?
--- gcc/gthr-posix.h.orig 2011-07-14 11:09:00.148778460 +
+++ gcc/gthr-posix.h2011-07-14 11:09:01.763786789 +
@@ -39,7 +39,6 @
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49736
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-07-14 11:49:05 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Thu Jul 14 11:49:01 2011
New Revision: 176270
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176270
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/49736
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49724
--- Comment #3 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-07-14 11:54:32 UTC ---
On 14-Jul-11, at 4:40 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Can you confirm that this also comes from Martin's patch on the 4.6
> branch?
No, it doesn't come from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46350
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net 2011-07-14 11:57:34 UTC ---
On 14-Jul-11, at 4:44 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Can you submit the patch if it works?
It works. I will install later today after work if someone doesn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
--- Comment #2 from Vorfeed Canal 2011-07-14
12:07:01 UTC ---
Which compilation options? I'm not specifying anything strange and even if I
use -O0 the result is the same:
/localbuild/build/sysnative-prencurses-5.9/narrowc/Ada95/src$ gnatmake -O0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-14
12:07:45 UTC ---
Before resolving as dup of 36231, let's add in CC Jakub too, it would be nice
if for 4.7 we could finally take the plunge and follow Jon's suggestion, or a
variant of it, but I don't k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
12:12:35 UTC ---
> Which compilation options?
-g -O2 -gnata -gnatf -gnatn -gnato -gnatVa
It's usually more convenient to change them for a particular file in the
project file than patching the source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-14
12:13:27 UTC ---
I don't think there is a maintainer for gthreads
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-14
12:33:16 UTC ---
svn blame isn't hard to use.
You'll find out that the unistd.h include was added by
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-10/msg01666.html
There are still some of the unistd.h guard m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-07-14
12:34:32 UTC ---
BTW, really shouldn't be using __gthread_mutex_timedlock if it isn't
available...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-14
12:36:23 UTC ---
C testcase that fails at -O2:
extern void abort (void);
struct X {
int *p;
int *q;
};
void __attribute__((noinline, noclone))
foo (struct X x) { *x.q = 0; }
volatile int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49745
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2011-07-14
12:43:53 UTC ---
Thanks Jakub. Thus, seems a little more difficult than we hoped, but still
doable. We'll give a try to your scheme.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|4.7.0 |4.3.6
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
--- Comment #4 from Vorfeed Canal 2011-07-14
13:22:31 UTC ---
Ah, I see. Well, it looks it's -gnatafno option which triggers the error. And I
have no idea what it's supposed to do :-(
/localbuild/build/sysnative-prencurses-5.9/narrowc/Ada95/src$
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49747
Summary: warning:dereferencing type-punned pointer will break
strict-aliasing rules
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-07-14
13:33:41 UTC ---
> Ah, I see. Well, it looks it's -gnatafno option which triggers the error.
-gnatafno is -gnata -gnatf -gnatn -gnato. Can you further narrow it down?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
--- Comment #6 from Vorfeed Canal 2011-07-14
13:52:07 UTC ---
Ah-ha. Here we go:
gcc -c -O0 -gnato -I- -gnatA
/ncplc/src/sysnative-prencurses-5.9/Ada95/src/terminal_interface-curses-menus.adb
raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow (or erroneous
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
--- Comment #8 from Vorfeed Canal 2011-07-14
14:43:49 UTC ---
It makes sense because patch which "fixes" the problem effectively removes the
information needed to do overflow check.
And now, when I know where to look is much smaller reproducer:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49747
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-14
14:49:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> After emerging sys-devel/gcc-4.4.5 on Gentoo Linux kernel-2.6.38-gentoo-r6
What does this mean? Not everyone uses gentoo or wants to understand its pkg
s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-14
14:53:33 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 14 14:53:30 2011
New Revision: 176274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176274
Log:
2011-07-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2011-07-14
14:56:30 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 14 14:56:27 2011
New Revision: 176275
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176275
Log:
2011-07-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49732
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.4
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49747
--- Comment #2 from douganla at gru dot com 2011-07-14 14:57:47 UTC ---
gcc-4.4.5 is the latest version available in gentoo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49651
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.2, 4.7.0
Summary|[4.4/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-14
15:10:17 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Jul 14 15:10:12 2011
New Revision: 176276
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176276
Log:
PR target/49487
* config/avr/avr.md (rotl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-14
15:15:31 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Jul 14 15:15:28 2011
New Revision: 176277
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176277
Log:
PR target/49487
Backport from mainline r1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44506
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41426
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49748
Summary: char * const * cannot be assigned to char const *
const *
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49748
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-07-14
16:44:08 UTC ---
the bug reporting guidelines clearly ask for a complete and self-contained test
case, not several snippets of code which don't form a complete program
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
the w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44506
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49749
Summary: Reassociation rank algorithm does not include all
non-NULL operands
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-07-14 17:08:09 UTC ---
> Same here, but the link line starts with:
>
> /nile.build/botcazou/gcc-head/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/gcc/collect2 -V -Y
> P,/lib/sparcv9:/usr/lib/sparcv9 -Qy -o ./con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11320
--- Comment #10 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-07-14
17:06:38 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Thu Jul 14 17:06:33 2011
New Revision: 176280
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176280
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/11320
* config/ia64/i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38159
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49452
--- Comment #12 from Easwaran Raman 2011-07-14
17:16:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> I have confirmed that the -Os failures began with r175063 and that the tests
> pass for several revision before that and pass for several after, so it's
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49665
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38159
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-07-14
17:28:07 UTC ---
Must be new artifact,
r176217 fails and my local 176136 passes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-14 17:37:43 UTC
---
Created attachment 24755
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24755
proposed 4.6 patch
Here's the 4.6 backport of the sol2.h patch. Could you please give it a try on
Sol
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49748
--- Comment #2 from Alain Knaff 2011-07-14
17:38:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 24756
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24756
Test program for const warning bug
> the warning is correct, see http://c-faq.com/ansi/constmismatch.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49541
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth 2011-07-14 17:40:06
UTC ---
Created attachment 24757
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24757
proposed libgomp testsuite patch
Here's the libgomp testsuite part of the patch. It should apply to b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49735
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski 2011-07-14
18:26:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> It probably papers over a different issue though - even recursive inlining
> should be limited by a --param, but appearantly that is not working here.
>
> H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49491
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687
--- Comment #2 from Eric Weddington
2011-07-14 18:41:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 24758
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24758
Test case results using GCC 4.3.3 (WinAVR 20100110)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49750
Summary: -gdwarf-4 bug
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
Rep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49687
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49751
Summary: Incorrect optimization related to smallest int64_t
value.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49751
--- Comment #1 from Blaies Gassend 2011-07-14
18:49:59 UTC ---
Created attachment 24759
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24759
The sample program that fails.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49749
--- Comment #1 from William J. Schmidt 2011-07-14
19:22:08 UTC ---
Created attachment 24760
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24760
Gimple prior to reassoc2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49749
--- Comment #2 from William J. Schmidt 2011-07-14
19:23:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 24761
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24761
Gimple following reassoc2 with TARGET_MEM_REFs
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
