http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-29 07:31:09 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Jun 29 07:31:05 2011
New Revision: 175618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175618
Log:
PR libffi/46660
* testsuite/libffi.call/cls_doub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-29 07:35:43 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Jun 29 07:35:37 2011
New Revision: 175619
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175619
Log:
PR libffi/46660
* testsuite/libffi.call/cls_doub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835
--- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-29
07:40:20 UTC ---
4.2.4 (lightly patched) and 4.3.6 (heavily patched) both bootstrap fine with
gnat and rebuild themselves without problems. I'm going to rebuild 4.3.6 with
a much smaller patch ki
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49435
--- Comment #9 from Valery 2011-06-29 07:53:36
UTC ---
I commented all calls "powf" in the specified functions (float_XX_to_YY) and
compiler errors do not arise
I can replace "powf" with something?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34734
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-29
07:57:28 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jun 29 07:57:25 2011
New Revision: 175621
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175621
Log:
PR target/34734
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49567
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-29
08:15:10 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 29 08:15:00 2011
New Revision: 175622
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175622
Log:
PR debug/49567
* dwarf2out.c (mem_loc_descr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49451
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-29 08:19:16 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Jun 29 08:19:08 2011
New Revision: 175623
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175623
Log:
PR libgcj/49451
* include/private/gcconfig.h [IR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49567
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851
Jonathan Gray changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsg at openbsd dot org
--- Comment #10 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Summary: Give a warning for insane overloading
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49451
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-29 08:58:43 UTC ---
>> * why do you insist on specifying the symvers flavor manually?
>
> "I" didn't insist on specifying it manually. crosstool-ng did.
> While you might say that is a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-29 09:03:46 UTC ---
> Sure. Re-reading comment #3, maybe I sounded a bit brass.
No problem, I can stand some heat :-)
>> > * why do you insist on specifying the symvers flavor manual
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14482
Aaron Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nocannedmeat at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
09:20:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> > all the
> > standalones will fail to compile and build their application.
>
> Huh? Why?
Oops, I meant to put that "Why?" below, not here (I know why i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.7
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49571
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49545
--- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-29 09:42:46 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jun 29 09:42:42 2011
New Revision: 175627
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175627
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/4954
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49569
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49575
Summary: OpenMP has a problem with -funroll-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38738
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48041
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14482
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49364
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.7 |---
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
Summary: Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: pch
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14482
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #6 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-06-29
12:15:20 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Wed Jun 29 12:15:08 2011
New Revision: 175631
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175631
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49114
* reload.c (s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519
--- Comment #5 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-06-29
12:24:25 UTC ---
Problem here is that GCC incorrectly stores arguments to stack in case of
tail-call opt.
Here is snippet
movl40(%esp), %eax
movl%eax, 28(%esp)
movl3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49577
Summary: [C++0x] narrowing conversion not rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49577
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
12:43:16 UTC ---
... or does this not count as a narrowing conversion because it's not an
implicit conversion?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49577
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
12:49:07 UTC ---
G++ also accepts this, which the example in [dcl.init.list]/7 says is an error:
unsigned int ui1 = {-1}; // error: narrows
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49577
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
12:54:54 UTC ---
And the following line in the same example:
signed int si1 =
{ (unsigned int)-1 }; // error: narrows
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49516
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-06-29
12:55:48 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Wed Jun 29 12:55:44 2011
New Revision: 175634
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175634
Log:
2011-06-29 Martin Jambor
Backport from mai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49516
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333
Dexuan Cui changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dexuan.cui at intel dot com
--- Comment #26
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49570
--- Comment #5 from Alan N. Sayre 2011-06-29
13:31:42 UTC ---
Thanks paolo.
Upgrading from Intel C/C++ version 12.0.3 to 12.0.4 fixed this problem.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48155
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29
13:32:09 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jun 29 13:32:06 2011
New Revision: 175635
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175635
Log:
Remove reload_plus_ok.
2011-06-27 H.J. Lu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29
13:32:42 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jun 29 13:32:40 2011
New Revision: 175636
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175636
Log:
Don't handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29
13:33:25 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jun 29 13:33:23 2011
New Revision: 175637
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175637
Log:
Remove SUBREG_LOC member from struct replace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48155
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29
13:34:25 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jun 29 13:34:20 2011
New Revision: 175638
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175638
Log:
Add *lea_0_x32 to support addresses with com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725
--- Comment #6 from Siarhei Siamashka
2011-06-29 13:35:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 24630
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24630
test.c
Attached a slightly updated testcase, which can demonstrate unnecessary spills
to stack e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49578
Summary: Profiling: call graph table overflows on Solaris.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-29 13:37:45
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Author: ro
> Date: Wed Jun 29 07:31:05 2011
> New Revision: 175618
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175618
> Log:
> PR libffi/46660
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-29 13:39:32 UTC ---
> This caused:
>
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 7.0
> FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
14:35:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 29 14:34:58 2011
New Revision: 175646
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175646
Log:
PR c++/45923
* class.c (explain_non_litera
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579
Summary: Document how to use PCH with Automake
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: pch
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49580
Summary: SPEC2006 GCC benchmark build failure when run with
autopar
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-29
14:39:28 UTC ---
I think this should be an automake bug rather than a GCC one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579
--- Comment #2 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
14:46:00 UTC ---
I kinda agree, but:
Automake (and CMake) devs say they don't know how to properly support PCHs. So
maybe GCC devs could help them and ensure end users can use this feature of
GCC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48385
Martin Decky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.0 |4.6.1
--- Comment #1 from Martin Decky 20
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49580
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49581
Summary: [trans-mem] save/restore of thread-local data in
nested txns is missing
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49554
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-29
16:03:00 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jun 29 16:02:56 2011
New Revision: 175650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175650
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49539
* tree-ssa-f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-29
16:04:51 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jun 29 16:04:47 2011
New Revision: 175651
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175651
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49539
* tree-ssa-f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49520
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-29 16:17:03
UTC ---
Created attachment 24633
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24633
A patch to restore bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-29 16:17:38
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Trunk now fails to build on PPC with the following:
>
> /home/gccbuild/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/gcc/reload.c: In function ‘push_reload’:
> /home/gccbuild/gcc_trunk_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #12 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-06-29
16:19:14 UTC ---
Author: uweigand
Date: Wed Jun 29 16:19:08 2011
New Revision: 175652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175652
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49114
* reload.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #13 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-06-29
16:24:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Created attachment 24633 [details]
> A patch to restore bootstrap
Huh, sorry for the duplicate patch ... I hadn't seen yours.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715
--- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29
16:39:50 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Jun 29 16:39:45 2011
New Revision: 175654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175654
Log:
Promote argument before checking non-legiti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49540
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49379
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-06-29 17:07:50 UTC ---
See also bug 48127.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
--- Comment #2 from gee 2011-06-29 17:08:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 24635
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24635
testcase
i hope it would be helpful
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.3.50.20110610-cvs
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49554
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
17:15:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 29 17:15:06 2011
New Revision: 175657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175657
Log:
PR c++/49554
* semantics.c (lambda_proxy_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49520
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
17:15:20 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 29 17:15:16 2011
New Revision: 175658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175658
Log:
PR c++/49520
* semantics.c (constexpr_fn_re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-29
17:25:32 UTC ---
I don't think this can be done really. Because of the way PCH works and the
way you are supposed to use PCH. That is you are supposed to have a header
file which just includes many o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49520
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49554
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49364
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-29
17:28:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 24636
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24636
gcc47-pr49364.patch
Ugh, broken vendor tools.
Anyway, does the following patch fix it? There is no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582
Summary: configure-target-libquadmath fail on powerpc-darwin8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #2 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
17:32:02 UTC ---
So why exactly can't this be done?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
17:34:11 UTC ---
If your program has:
#include "everything.h"
#include
and you have a PCH for everything.h.gch then something.h should be added to
everything.h
Isn't that easy enough?
I don't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49272
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29
17:38:58 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 29 17:38:53 2011
New Revision: 175659
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175659
Log:
PR c++/49272
* g++.old-deja/g++.jason/rfg10
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49272
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|2011-06-25 00:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582
--- Comment #1 from David Fang 2011-06-29
17:57:34 UTC ---
My 32b-only powerpc arch is a G4, which really should have multilib disabled
for most components. I couldn't find an option to
--disable-libquadmath-multilib.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248
--- Comment #15 from David Fang 2011-06-29
18:02:48 UTC ---
This bug can probably be closed. --with-dwarf2 has been working for quite a
while.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-06/msg02820.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
--- Comment #4 from gee 2011-06-29 18:03:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 24637
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24637
generated asm with i686-pc-mingw32-gcc testsetjmp.c -S -s
> I compiled program with 4.6.0 gcc using mingw-w64 a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18145
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230
--- Comment #6 from gee 2011-06-29 18:08:34 UTC ---
> $ gcc -v
i'm sorry to attach invalid gcc -v. this is proper one.
$ i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=i686-pc-mingw32-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-ming
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #4 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
18:12:24 UTC ---
Suppose your app has 10557 include directives. What do you add to your PCH?
Why /usr/include? Because these headers are unlikely to change, so they're a
good candidate for PCH.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49583
Summary: Reloading stack operands in the wrong order, so needs
to insert fxch
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114
--- Comment #14 from Pat Haugen 2011-06-29
18:21:23 UTC ---
Working fine now, thx.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
18:26:01 UTC ---
My company installs libraries under /foo/third-party and /foo/releases, those
files don't change, why should they be excluded because they're not under
/usr/include?
If you want a n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #6 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
18:31:52 UTC ---
> why should they be excluded because they're not under /usr/include?
Because unless you tell GCC, GCC won't know they're good candidates.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49575
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29
18:41:33 UTC ---
And how do I do that?
It would be better to do it for system dirs, not /usr/include, which would also
work for cross compilers where the sysroot is not under /usr
(this is what I m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2011-06-29 18:44:55
UTC ---
Patch set containing the work around and the fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg02261.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576
--- Comment #8 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29
19:01:53 UTC ---
/usr/include was just an example and not the main point of this feature
request.
I expect GCC devs to be smart enough to pick the best implementation of a
certain request themselve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584
Summary: [4.4.7 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux:
segfault compiling _muldi3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.7
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo