[Bug libffi/46660] cls_double_va.c, cls_longdouble_va.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5

2011-06-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-29 07:31:09 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Wed Jun 29 07:31:05 2011 New Revision: 175618 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175618 Log: PR libffi/46660 * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_doub

[Bug libffi/46660] cls_double_va.c, cls_longdouble_va.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5

2011-06-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-29 07:35:43 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Wed Jun 29 07:35:37 2011 New Revision: 175619 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175619 Log: PR libffi/46660 * testsuite/libffi.call/cls_doub

[Bug ada/48835] Porting GNAT to GNU/Linux/m68k

2011-06-29 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48835 --- Comment #16 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-29 07:40:20 UTC --- 4.2.4 (lightly patched) and 4.3.6 (heavily patched) both bootstrap fine with gnat and rebuild themselves without problems. I'm going to rebuild 4.3.6 with a much smaller patch ki

[Bug pch/49435] get_z.c:46: MPFR assertion failed: exp < 0 || exp <= ((mpfr_prec_t)((mpfr_uprec_t)(~(mpfr_uprec_t)0)>>1))

2011-06-29 Thread longvalery at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49435 --- Comment #9 from Valery 2011-06-29 07:53:36 UTC --- I commented all calls "powf" in the specified functions (float_XX_to_YY) and compiler errors do not arise I can replace "powf" with something?

[Bug target/34734] attribute((progmem)) not handled properly in C++ for AVRs

2011-06-29 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34734 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-29 07:57:28 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Wed Jun 29 07:57:25 2011 New Revision: 175621 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175621 Log: PR target/34734 * config/avr/avr.c (avr_ha

[Bug debug/49567] [4.7 Regression] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor due to typed DWARF stack changes

2011-06-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49567 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-29 08:15:10 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 29 08:15:00 2011 New Revision: 175622 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175622 Log: PR debug/49567 * dwarf2out.c (mem_loc_descr

[Bug libgcj/49451] FileHandleGcTest FAILS on IRIX

2011-06-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49451 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-29 08:19:16 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Wed Jun 29 08:19:08 2011 New Revision: 175623 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175623 Log: PR libgcj/49451 * include/private/gcconfig.h [IR

[Bug debug/49567] [4.7 Regression] ICE in mem_loc_descriptor due to typed DWARF stack changes

2011-06-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49567 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/48851] lto-plugin.c:224:7: error: missing sentinel in function call [-Werror=format]

2011-06-29 Thread jsg at openbsd dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48851 Jonathan Gray changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsg at openbsd dot org --- Comment #10 fr

[Bug c++/49574] New: Give a warning for insane overloading

2011-06-29 Thread djszapi at archlinux dot us
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574 Summary: Give a warning for insane overloading Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@g

[Bug libgcj/49451] FileHandleGcTest FAILS on IRIX

2011-06-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49451 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug bootstrap/49555] libjava fails to configure if --enable-symvers=gnu or --enable-symvers=sun

2011-06-29 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-29 08:58:43 UTC --- >> * why do you insist on specifying the symvers flavor manually? > > "I" didn't insist on specifying it manually. crosstool-ng did. > While you might say that is a

[Bug c++/49574] Give a warning for insane overloading

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Severity|normal

[Bug bootstrap/49555] libjava fails to configure if --enable-symvers=gnu or --enable-symvers=sun

2011-06-29 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49555 --- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-29 09:03:46 UTC --- > Sure. Re-reading comment #3, maybe I sounded a bit brass. No problem, I can stand some heat :-) >> > * why do you insist on specifying the symvers flavor manual

[Bug c++/14482] hard to avoid -Weffc++ warnings with union members

2011-06-29 Thread nocannedmeat at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14482 Aaron Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nocannedmeat at gmail dot

[Bug c++/49574] Give a warning for insane overloading

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49574 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29 09:20:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > > all the > > standalones will fail to compile and build their application. > > Huh? Why? Oops, I meant to put that "Why?" below, not here (I know why i

[Bug regression/49572] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c scan-tree-dump-times cddce2 ".rtmem" 0

2011-06-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.7 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guen

[Bug lto/49571] -flto -Wl,--as-needed drops needed libraries with GNU ld and linker plugin

2011-06-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49571 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49568] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr41257-2.C FAILs to link on Tru64 UNIX

2011-06-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug middle-end/49545] [4.7 Regression] New C++ test failures

2011-06-29 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49545 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29 09:42:46 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Wed Jun 29 09:42:42 2011 New Revision: 175627 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175627 Log: gcc/ PR tree-optimization/4954

[Bug c++/49569] -std=gnu++0x causes segmentation fault

2011-06-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49569 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/49575] New: OpenMP has a problem with -funroll-loops

2011-06-29 Thread sailorweb2 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49575 Summary: OpenMP has a problem with -funroll-loops Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug libmudflap/38738] libmudflap could be enabled for Solaris when using GNU ld

2011-06-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38738 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/48041] dwarf2out emits unnecessary null byte in empty .debug_abbrev section

2011-06-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48041 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/14482] hard to avoid -Weffc++ warnings with union members

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14482 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|| --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2

[Bug debug/49364] [4.7 regressions] Empty .debug_abbrev sections confuse SGI nm

2011-06-29 Thread ro at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49364 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug regression/49572] [4.4 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030709-2.c scan-tree-dump-times cddce2 ".rtmem" 0

2011-06-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49572 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.4.7 |--- --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 20

[Bug pch/49576] New: Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH

2011-06-29 Thread olafvdspek at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576 Summary: Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: pch AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/14482] hard to avoid -Weffc++ warnings with union members

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14482 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49114] Reload failed to handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (reg:Y) 0) (const_int)))

2011-06-29 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 --- Comment #6 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-06-29 12:15:20 UTC --- Author: uweigand Date: Wed Jun 29 12:15:08 2011 New Revision: 175631 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175631 Log: PR rtl-optimization/49114 * reload.c (s

[Bug c++/49519] [4.7 Regression] Revision 175272 miscompiled 447.dealII in SPEC CPU 2006

2011-06-29 Thread kirill.yukhin at intel dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49519 --- Comment #5 from Yukhin Kirill 2011-06-29 12:24:25 UTC --- Problem here is that GCC incorrectly stores arguments to stack in case of tail-call opt. Here is snippet movl40(%esp), %eax movl%eax, 28(%esp) movl3

[Bug c++/49577] New: [C++0x] narrowing conversion not rejected

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49577 Summary: [C++0x] narrowing conversion not rejected Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: accepts-invalid Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/49577] [C++0x] narrowing conversion not rejected

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49577 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29 12:43:16 UTC --- ... or does this not count as a narrowing conversion because it's not an implicit conversion?

[Bug c++/49577] [C++0x] narrowing conversion not rejected

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49577 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29 12:49:07 UTC --- G++ also accepts this, which the example in [dcl.init.list]/7 says is an error: unsigned int ui1 = {-1}; // error: narrows

[Bug c++/49577] [C++0x] narrowing conversion not rejected

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49577 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29 12:54:54 UTC --- And the following line in the same example: signed int si1 = { (unsigned int)-1 }; // error: narrows

[Bug tree-optimization/49516] SRA generates memory references into its replacements

2011-06-29 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49516 --- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor 2011-06-29 12:55:48 UTC --- Author: jamborm Date: Wed Jun 29 12:55:44 2011 New Revision: 175634 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175634 Log: 2011-06-29 Martin Jambor Backport from mai

[Bug tree-optimization/49516] SRA generates memory references into its replacements

2011-06-29 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49516 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/39333] gcc 4.3.3 miscompiles when -finline-small-functions is used

2011-06-29 Thread dexuan.cui at intel dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39333 Dexuan Cui changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dexuan.cui at intel dot com --- Comment #26

[Bug c++/49570] /usr/include/c++/4.6.0/bits/stl_algobase.h(378): error: type name is not allowed

2011-06-29 Thread ansayre at babcock dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49570 --- Comment #5 from Alan N. Sayre 2011-06-29 13:31:42 UTC --- Thanks paolo. Upgrading from Intel C/C++ version 12.0.3 to 12.0.4 fixed this problem. Alan -Original Message- From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com [mailto:gcc-bugzi...@gcc.

[Bug rtl-optimization/48155] Reload doesn't handle subreg properly

2011-06-29 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48155 --- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29 13:32:09 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jun 29 13:32:06 2011 New Revision: 175635 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175635 Log: Remove reload_plus_ok. 2011-06-27 H.J. Lu

[Bug rtl-optimization/49114] Reload failed to handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (reg:Y) 0) (const_int)))

2011-06-29 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29 13:32:42 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jun 29 13:32:40 2011 New Revision: 175636 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175636 Log: Don't handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (r

[Bug rtl-optimization/49114] Reload failed to handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (reg:Y) 0) (const_int)))

2011-06-29 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 --- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29 13:33:25 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jun 29 13:33:23 2011 New Revision: 175637 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175637 Log: Remove SUBREG_LOC member from struct replace

[Bug rtl-optimization/48155] Reload doesn't handle subreg properly

2011-06-29 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48155 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29 13:34:25 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jun 29 13:34:20 2011 New Revision: 175638 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175638 Log: Add *lea_0_x32 to support addresses with com

[Bug target/43725] Poor instructions selection, scheduling and registers allocation for ARM NEON intrinsics

2011-06-29 Thread siarhei.siamashka at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43725 --- Comment #6 from Siarhei Siamashka 2011-06-29 13:35:13 UTC --- Created attachment 24630 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24630 test.c Attached a slightly updated testcase, which can demonstrate unnecessary spills to stack e

[Bug other/49578] New: Profiling: call graph table overflows on Solaris.

2011-06-29 Thread a153dmw at warme dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49578 Summary: Profiling: call graph table overflows on Solaris. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo:

[Bug libffi/46660] cls_double_va.c, cls_longdouble_va.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5

2011-06-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-29 13:37:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Author: ro > Date: Wed Jun 29 07:31:05 2011 > New Revision: 175618 > > URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175618 > Log: > PR libffi/46660 >

[Bug libffi/46660] cls_double_va.c, cls_longdouble_va.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5

2011-06-29 Thread ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-29 13:39:32 UTC --- > This caused: > > FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O0 -W -Wall output pattern test, is 7.0 > FAIL: libffi.call/cls_double_va.c -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer output pa

[Bug c++/45923] constexpr diagnostics, more more

2011-06-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45923 --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29 14:35:03 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 29 14:34:58 2011 New Revision: 175646 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175646 Log: PR c++/45923 * class.c (explain_non_litera

[Bug pch/49579] New: Document how to use PCH with Automake

2011-06-29 Thread olafvdspek at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579 Summary: Document how to use PCH with Automake Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: pch AssignedTo: unassig

[Bug tree-optimization/49580] New: SPEC2006 GCC benchmark build failure when run with autopar

2011-06-29 Thread razya at il dot ibm.com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49580 Summary: SPEC2006 GCC benchmark build failure when run with autopar Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug pch/49579] Document how to use PCH with Automake

2011-06-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-29 14:39:28 UTC --- I think this should be an automake bug rather than a GCC one.

[Bug pch/49579] Document how to use PCH with Automake

2011-06-29 Thread olafvdspek at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49579 --- Comment #2 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29 14:46:00 UTC --- I kinda agree, but: Automake (and CMake) devs say they don't know how to properly support PCHs. So maybe GCC devs could help them and ensure end users can use this feature of GCC.

[Bug target/48385] x86-64: Tail call recursion optimization with -mcmodel=large can generate invalid assembly (immediate operand illegal with absolute jump)

2011-06-29 Thread martin at decky dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48385 Martin Decky changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.6.0 |4.6.1 --- Comment #1 from Martin Decky 20

[Bug tree-optimization/49580] SPEC2006 GCC benchmark build failure when run with autopar

2011-06-29 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49580 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49230] please provide workaround for setjmp/longjmp in mingw32

2011-06-29 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from

[Bug target/49423] [arm] internal compiler error: in push_minipool_fix

2011-06-29 Thread ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Stat

[Bug c/49581] New: [trans-mem] save/restore of thread-local data in nested txns is missing

2011-06-29 Thread torvald at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49581 Summary: [trans-mem] save/restore of thread-local data in nested txns is missing Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/49554] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] lambda capture causes "cannot call member function ... without object"

2011-06-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49554 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49114] Reload failed to handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (reg:Y) 0) (const_int)))

2011-06-29 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pthaugen at gcc dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/49539] [4.7 regression] ICE building gnattools

2011-06-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-29 16:03:00 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Jun 29 16:02:56 2011 New Revision: 175650 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175650 Log: PR tree-optimization/49539 * tree-ssa-f

[Bug tree-optimization/49539] [4.7 regression] ICE building gnattools

2011-06-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-29 16:04:51 UTC --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Jun 29 16:04:47 2011 New Revision: 175651 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175651 Log: PR tree-optimization/49539 * tree-ssa-f

[Bug tree-optimization/49539] [4.7 regression] ICE building gnattools

2011-06-29 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49539 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49520] [C++0x] using-declaration and operator&& confuses constexpr

2011-06-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49520 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49114] Reload failed to handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (reg:Y) 0) (const_int)))

2011-06-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-29 16:17:03 UTC --- Created attachment 24633 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24633 A patch to restore bootstrap

[Bug rtl-optimization/49114] Reload failed to handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (reg:Y) 0) (const_int)))

2011-06-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-29 16:17:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > Trunk now fails to build on PPC with the following: > > /home/gccbuild/gcc_trunk_anonsvn/gcc/gcc/reload.c: In function ‘push_reload’: > /home/gccbuild/gcc_trunk_

[Bug rtl-optimization/49114] Reload failed to handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (reg:Y) 0) (const_int)))

2011-06-29 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 --- Comment #12 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-06-29 16:19:14 UTC --- Author: uweigand Date: Wed Jun 29 16:19:08 2011 New Revision: 175652 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175652 Log: PR rtl-optimization/49114 * reload.c (

[Bug rtl-optimization/49114] Reload failed to handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (reg:Y) 0) (const_int)))

2011-06-29 Thread uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 --- Comment #13 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-06-29 16:24:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Created attachment 24633 [details] > A patch to restore bootstrap Huh, sorry for the duplicate patch ... I hadn't seen yours.

[Bug target/47715] [x32] TLS doesn't work

2011-06-29 Thread hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47715 --- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-29 16:39:50 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jun 29 16:39:45 2011 New Revision: 175654 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175654 Log: Promote argument before checking non-legiti

[Bug fortran/49540] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Memory-hog with large DATA stmt

2011-06-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49540 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/49379] warning from Mac OS X linker alignment lost for -ftree-vectorize optimization

2011-06-29 Thread d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49379 --- Comment #7 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-06-29 17:07:50 UTC --- See also bug 48127.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49230] please provide workaround for setjmp/longjmp in mingw32

2011-06-29 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-06-29 17:08:41 UTC --- Created attachment 24635 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24635 testcase i hope it would be helpful GNU gdb (GDB) 7.3.50.20110610-cvs Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundati

[Bug c++/49554] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] lambda capture causes "cannot call member function ... without object"

2011-06-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49554 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29 17:15:11 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 29 17:15:06 2011 New Revision: 175657 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175657 Log: PR c++/49554 * semantics.c (lambda_proxy_ty

[Bug c++/49520] [C++0x] using-declaration and operator&& confuses constexpr

2011-06-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49520 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29 17:15:20 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 29 17:15:16 2011 New Revision: 175658 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175658 Log: PR c++/49520 * semantics.c (constexpr_fn_re

[Bug pch/49576] Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH

2011-06-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-06-29 17:25:32 UTC --- I don't think this can be done really. Because of the way PCH works and the way you are supposed to use PCH. That is you are supposed to have a header file which just includes many o

[Bug c++/49520] [C++0x] using-declaration and operator&& confuses constexpr

2011-06-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49520 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49554] [4.7 Regression] [C++0x] lambda capture causes "cannot call member function ... without object"

2011-06-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49554 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/49364] [4.7 regressions] Empty .debug_abbrev sections confuse SGI nm

2011-06-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49364 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-29 17:28:45 UTC --- Created attachment 24636 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24636 gcc47-pr49364.patch Ugh, broken vendor tools. Anyway, does the following patch fix it? There is no

[Bug bootstrap/49582] New: configure-target-libquadmath fail on powerpc-darwin8

2011-06-29 Thread fang at csl dot cornell.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582 Summary: configure-target-libquadmath fail on powerpc-darwin8 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assig

[Bug rtl-optimization/49230] please provide workaround for setjmp/longjmp in mingw32

2011-06-29 Thread ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230 Kai Tietz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug pch/49576] Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH

2011-06-29 Thread olafvdspek at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576 --- Comment #2 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29 17:32:02 UTC --- So why exactly can't this be done?

[Bug pch/49576] Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29 17:34:11 UTC --- If your program has: #include "everything.h" #include and you have a PCH for everything.h.gch then something.h should be added to everything.h Isn't that easy enough? I don't

[Bug c++/49272] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.jason/rfg10.C (test for errors, line 11)

2011-06-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49272 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-29 17:38:58 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 29 17:38:53 2011 New Revision: 175659 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175659 Log: PR c++/49272 * g++.old-deja/g++.jason/rfg10

[Bug c++/49272] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.jason/rfg10.C (test for errors, line 11)

2011-06-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49272 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|2011-06-25 00:

[Bug bootstrap/49582] configure-target-libquadmath fail on powerpc-darwin8

2011-06-29 Thread fang at csl dot cornell.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49582 --- Comment #1 from David Fang 2011-06-29 17:57:34 UTC --- My 32b-only powerpc arch is a G4, which really should have multilib disabled for most components. I couldn't find an option to --disable-libquadmath-multilib.

[Bug bootstrap/45248] Stage 3 bootstrap comparison failure (powerpc-darwin8)

2011-06-29 Thread fang at csl dot cornell.edu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248 --- Comment #15 from David Fang 2011-06-29 18:02:48 UTC --- This bug can probably be closed. --with-dwarf2 has been working for quite a while. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-06/msg02820.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/49230] please provide workaround for setjmp/longjmp in mingw32

2011-06-29 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230 --- Comment #4 from gee 2011-06-29 18:03:24 UTC --- Created attachment 24637 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24637 generated asm with i686-pc-mingw32-gcc testsetjmp.c -S -s > I compiled program with 4.6.0 gcc using mingw-w64 a

[Bug target/18145] Do not emit __do_copy_data or __do_clear_bss if .data or .bss is empty.

2011-06-29 Thread eric.weddington at atmel dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18145 Eric Weddington changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/49230] please provide workaround for setjmp/longjmp in mingw32

2011-06-29 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0 Known to fail|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49230] please provide workaround for setjmp/longjmp in mingw32

2011-06-29 Thread jojelino at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49230 --- Comment #6 from gee 2011-06-29 18:08:34 UTC --- > $ gcc -v i'm sorry to attach invalid gcc -v. this is proper one. $ i686-pc-mingw32-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=i686-pc-mingw32-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-ming

[Bug c++/49568] [4.7 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr41257-2.C FAILs to link on Tru64 UNIX

2011-06-29 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49568 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug pch/49576] Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH

2011-06-29 Thread olafvdspek at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576 --- Comment #4 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29 18:12:24 UTC --- Suppose your app has 10557 include directives. What do you add to your PCH? Why /usr/include? Because these headers are unlikely to change, so they're a good candidate for PCH.

[Bug tree-optimization/49583] New: Reloading stack operands in the wrong order, so needs to insert fxch

2011-06-29 Thread sgunderson at bigfoot dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49583 Summary: Reloading stack operands in the wrong order, so needs to insert fxch Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/49114] Reload failed to handle (set reg:X (plus:X (subreg:X (reg:Y) 0) (const_int)))

2011-06-29 Thread pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49114 --- Comment #14 from Pat Haugen 2011-06-29 18:21:23 UTC --- Working fine now, thx.

[Bug pch/49576] Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29 18:26:01 UTC --- My company installs libraries under /foo/third-party and /foo/releases, those files don't change, why should they be excluded because they're not under /usr/include? If you want a n

[Bug pch/49576] Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH

2011-06-29 Thread olafvdspek at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576 --- Comment #6 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29 18:31:52 UTC --- > why should they be excluded because they're not under /usr/include? Because unless you tell GCC, GCC won't know they're good candidates.

[Bug c++/49575] OpenMP has a problem with -funroll-loops

2011-06-29 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49575 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||openmp CC|

[Bug pch/49576] Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH

2011-06-29 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-29 18:41:33 UTC --- And how do I do that? It would be better to do it for system dirs, not /usr/include, which would also work for cross compilers where the sysroot is not under /usr (this is what I m

[Bug middle-end/47654] [4.6/4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-outer-4h.c FAILs with -floop-block

2011-06-29 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654 --- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2011-06-29 18:44:55 UTC --- Patch set containing the work around and the fix http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg02261.html

[Bug pch/49576] Option to suggest headers for addition to PCH

2011-06-29 Thread olafvdspek at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49576 --- Comment #8 from Olaf van der Spek 2011-06-29 19:01:53 UTC --- /usr/include was just an example and not the main point of this feature request. I expect GCC devs to be smart enough to pick the best implementation of a certain request themselve

[Bug bootstrap/49584] New: [4.4.7 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux: segfault compiling _muldi3

2011-06-29 Thread mikpe at it dot uu.se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49584 Summary: [4.4.7 regression] bootstrap failure on m68k-linux: segfault compiling _muldi3 Product: gcc Version: 4.4.7 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

  1   2   >