http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49482
Summary: [regression][4.6.1-RC-20110620][C++0x] unused
parameter warning on lambda in function template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49478
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #2 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
--- Comment #62 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-21
07:34:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #61)
> > FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_lock_3.f90 -O (test for errors, line 72)
> The following reduced code does not give the expected error:
> lock(lock[1]) !
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49472
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2011-06-21
08:31:22 UTC ---
> --- gcc/simplify-rtx.c.jj2011-06-08 08:53:15.0 +0200
> +++ gcc/simplify-rtx.c2011-06-21 09:46:27.0 +0200
> @@ -686,13 +686,13 @@ simplify_unary_operation_1 (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-21
08:58:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I think gfortran's convention is - and also TR 29113 requires - that the
> addr_expr is not NULL if the variable is allocated - even if it is zero sized.
Th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
--- Comment #4 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-21 09:01:29 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Tue Jun 21 09:01:23 2011
New Revision: 175246
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175246
Log:
PR testsuite/49443
* gcc.dg
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49443
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49483
Summary: unable to vectorize code equivalent to "scalbnf"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
As
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
Summary: gcov crash if two(or more) forks happen at the same
time
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49484
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-21
09:24:20 UTC ---
gcc-4.1.2 is no longer supported upstream. Please try again with gcc-4.3.5 or
newer, preferably gcc-4.6.0 or 4.5.3. Or report this to Red Hat who delivered
your 4.1.2-based compi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49483
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49479
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-21
09:30:32 UTC ---
Actually, thinking about it: "RESHAPE(allocatable_array, shape)" is *not*
allocatable.
trans-expr.c has:
147 if (!sym->attr.pointer && !sym->attr.allocatable
148 && sym->as
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49480
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49478
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-21
09:39:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I am testing this patch:
>
> Index: tree-vect-loop.c
> ===
> --- tree-vect-loop.c(rev
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49477
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49474
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |rtl-optimization
Target Milestone|--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49478
--- Comment #4 from Ira Rosen 2011-06-21 10:03:05 UTC
---
OK.
Thanks,
Ira
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49072
Franck Z changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||franck.z.bugzilla at orange
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46350
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49483
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente
2011-06-21 10:42:01 UTC ---
great!
unfortunately
gcc-4.7-20110528 $ patch -p0 < vect.patch
patching file gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 2089.
Hunk #2 FAILED at 2099.
Hunk #3 FAILED at 2134.
3 out
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-21
10:45:20 UTC ---
Of course it was. The branch merge allows s to be allocated in registers
so we expand from
MEM[(T * {ref-all})&s + 1B] = x_2(D);
and we run into the movmisalign_optab code in e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49483
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-06-21 10:50:14 UTC ---
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49483
>
> --- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente
> 2011-06-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49072
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-21
10:51:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Apparently, gmp's scripts create a gmp.h file when configure is run, but the
> gmpxx.h wrapper is copied only when a command "make install" is issued, so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49483
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-21
11:02:42 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 21 11:02:38 2011
New Revision: 175252
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175252
Log:
2011-06-21 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49483
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493
--- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-21
11:24:39 UTC ---
I can do a bootstrap and regtest with Richard's patch in #c5 tomorrow, but as
my HW is armv5te I can't catch any neon-related runtime regressions. Does
anyone else want to do the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-06-21 11:40:18 UTC ---
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011, mikpe at it dot uu.se wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48493
>
> --- Comment #6 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-06-21
> 11:24:39 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49478
--- Comment #5 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-21 11:58:36 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Tue Jun 21 11:58:33 2011
New Revision: 175255
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175255
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49478
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-21 12:09:30 UTC ---
> The question now is what's a clean fix for this issue, rather than
> hardcoding the result?
I've now checked this with native and GNU iconv: feff.utf-8 is the i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112
--- Comment #12 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-21 12:12:58 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jun 21 12:12:51 2011
New Revision: 175257
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175257
Log:
2011-06-21 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49478
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112
--- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-21 12:20:33 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Jun 21 12:20:28 2011
New Revision: 175259
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175259
Log:
2011-06-21 Janus Weil
PR fortran/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49112
--- Comment #14 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-21 12:26:44 UTC ---
The "duplicate save" regression is fixed on trunk and 4.6. Remaining problems:
1) The structure constructor regression in comment #6.
2) The ICE in comment #7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485
Summary: Performance problem with C++ code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49485
--- Comment #1 from İsmail "cartman" Dönmez
2011-06-21 12:37:49 UTC ---
Test machine has Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz CPU with 8GB of RAM.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49442
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-21
12:43:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 24571
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24571
gcc47-builtins.patch
Prerequisite patch for __builtin_assume_aligned patch. These are just random
t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-06-21
12:48:36 UTC ---
Possibly, yes. I plan to submit a fix for PR49094 this week, please
try after that.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49442
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-21
12:50:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 24572
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24572
gcc47-assume-aligned.patch
Current version of the __builtin_assume_aligned support. On top of the
p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49442
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-21
12:50:47 UTC ---
Of course something like #c4 is highly desirable independently on this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49486
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49486
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45885
--- Comment #5 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-06-21
13:03:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > $ ./xgcc -B. -c -O3 -mtune=cortex-a8 -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=neon -g
> > ~/ice.i
>
>
> What happens if you do a -mcpu=corte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49418
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49418
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-21
13:34:35 UTC ---
Perhaps the top-level quals from the older type could be used, if the standard
doesn't disallow it? Like, if T const arg is instantiated with T int or const
int, it would be int const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46350
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-06-21 13:38:12 UTC ---
> Try to remove the cast to System.Interrupt_Management.Interrupt_ID in the
> call.
It fixes the compile error. Testing in progress...
Dave
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49418
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-21
13:41:19 UTC ---
template
void f (int const x)
{
#pragma omp parallel default(none)
int y = x;
}
template
void g (int const x)
{
#pragma omp parallel default(none) shared(x)
int y = x;
}
void h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46551
Dan Gohman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dgohman at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49418
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
Summary: Internal compiler error in AVR code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429
--- Comment #14 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-21 15:21:44
UTC ---
The bootstrap and testing of this patch on IA64 looks good. There were no
regressions and it seems to have fixed all the test cases that started breaking
on IA64 with the patch to PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49488
Summary: [C++0x] Use 'final' for devirtualization purposes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #1 from Eric Wedding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-21 15:48:14
UTC ---
I built an hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 compiler with --disable-bootstrap and then ran
the test suite to see if I could get a smaller test case. The tests are still
running but there are many
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49489
Summary: [4.7 Regression]
gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c fails on
x86_64-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49489
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36848
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
Joerg Wunsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j at uriah dot heep.sax.de
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17920
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49488
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-21
16:03:43 UTC ---
*cough* PR 46043 *cough*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49488
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31397
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-21
16:12:42 UTC ---
G++ 4.7 implements C++0x explicit override control so you can add 'override'
class B : public A
{
B( int y );
~B();
int f( int x ) override;
};
and you'll get an error if it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
Eric Weddington changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49488
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-21
16:16:22 UTC ---
Last I checked G++ supported 'final' with -std=c++98 -pedantic-errors, I don't
know if that's been fixed yet. It's definitely useful to support it in c++98
mode, I don't care whethe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49489
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-21
16:26:03 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 21 16:25:57 2011
New Revision: 175265
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175265
Log:
PR middle-end/49489
* builtins.c (expand_bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2011-06-21 16:26:44
UTC ---
I should have mentioned in comment #2 that the build and test I did included
the proposed patch in comment #11 pf PR 49429.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49490
Summary: suboptimal load balancing in loops
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
--- Comment #16 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-21 17:10:02
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Jun 21 17:09:57 2011
New Revision: 175266
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175266
Log:
PR libgcj/49314
* gnu/gcj/convert/natIconv.cc (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49487
--- Comment #3 from gandalf at winds dot org 2011-06-21 17:17:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Compiling the following function triggers an internal compiler error in (at
> > least) GCC versions 4.2, 4.3, 4.5 and t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49454
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-06-21 17:23:27 UTC ---
> I should have mentioned in comment #2 that the build and test I did included
> the proposed patch in comment #11 pf PR 49429.
I assumed so. Richard's comments regard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49491
Summary: Superflouos move because of unnecessary spill for
2-operand insn.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, ra
Severi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
--- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-21
17:30:57 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jun 21 17:30:54 2011
New Revision: 175269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175269
Log:
PR target/33049
* config/avr/avr.md (extz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49492
Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-bitops-1.c
execution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33049
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49492
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49489
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49489
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29560
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49493
Summary: ICE: in insert_vi_for_tree, at
tree-ssa-structalias.c:2637 with -O -fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49418
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.2
Summary|openmp default(n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49418
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-21
19:05:28 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 21 19:05:25 2011
New Revision: 175271
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175271
Log:
PR c++/49418
* call.c (cxx_type_promotes_to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49418
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6/4.7 regression] G++|[4.6 regression] G++
|d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49494
Summary: ICE: in remap_predicate at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1876
with -findirect-inlining -finline-small-functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49495
Summary: -O3 causes error message "edge points to wrong
declaration:"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44149
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44149
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44149
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.1 |---
--- Comment #8 from Dominique
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49482
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49482
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49496
Summary: [4.7 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with
-O -ftree-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49482
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-21
20:08:05 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 21 20:08:01 2011
New Revision: 175274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175274
Log:
PR c++/49482
* semantics.c (maybe_add_lambd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49482
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-21
20:07:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 21 20:07:45 2011
New Revision: 175273
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175273
Log:
PR c++/49482
* semantics.c (maybe_add_lambd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49494
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49482
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49430
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-21 21:18:50 UTC ---
Slightly reduced/modified test case, giving a different error:
abstract interface
function messageProcedure()
character(:), allocatable :: messageProcedure
e
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
