http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-06-07 07:12:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174699
> then. What does:
> p *defs
> p *defs->ref
> say?
strangely
(gdb) list
513
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-07
07:16:50 UTC ---
So
p (*use_rec)->base.chain
p (*use_rec)->base.chain->ref
p *(*use_rec)->base.chain->ref
p (*use_rec)->base.chain->next
p (*use_rec)->base.chain->next->ref
p *(*use_rec)->base.chain->n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49309
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with -fmudflap: verify_stmts
failed: type mismatch in pointer plus expression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49309
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49169
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #4 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-06-07 07:33:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> So
> p (*use_rec)->base.chain
> ?
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
rest_of_handle_ud_dce () at /data/vondele/gcc_bench/gcc_trunk/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-07
07:35:40 UTC ---
Your gdb is very old.
Then
rm dce.o; make CFLAGS="-g -O0" cc1 cc1plus f951
and retry.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-06-07 07:45:53 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Your gdb is very old.
> Then
> rm dce.o; make CFLAGS="-g -O0" cc1 cc1plus f951
> and retry.
upgraded gdb instead (7.2). Now I have:
(gdb) p *defs
Cann
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49282
--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen 2011-06-07
08:15:35 UTC ---
It seems GCOV is not the only cause. I just got the malloc corruption
again when building for 32bit (instead of 64bit), but still with gcov disabled.
So probably for the other build disab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #7 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-06-07 08:27:13 UTC ---
reduced testcase:
> gfortran-trunk -c -O2 -funroll-loops -g bug.f90
bug.f90: In function ‘calculate_first_density_matrix’:
bug.f90:29:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49306
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-07
08:31:46 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#configure_suffix
Read the docs for --with-gmp, if linking dynamically you need to reconfigure
your dynamic linker to look in /opt/local, or use LD_LIBRAR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
--- Comment #11 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-07 08:38:45
UTC ---
Patched gcc fails following testcase:
--cut here--
#include
float
__attribute__((noinline))
ll2f (long long i)
{
return i;
}
long long
__attribute__((noinline))
f2ll (float f)
{
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-07
08:46:17 UTC ---
I guess I'm going to commit my patchlet, in case issues remain should be just
matter of tweaking a few chars in the strings, patch preapproved.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
--- Comment #6 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-07 08:50:08 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jun 7 08:50:04 2011
New Revision: 174737
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174737
Log:
2011-06-07 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-06-07 09:00:06 UTC ---
On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
>
> H.J. Lu changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49278
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-07
09:17:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > The following aborts. Note sure if it is conforming.
> Hence, it seems to be valid, but I wouldn't mind if someone could cross
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49304
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov 2011-06-07
09:28:30 UTC ---
*** Bug 49304 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49303
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-07
09:44:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 24455
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24455
gcc47-pr49308.patch
Untested fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-07
09:48:57 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 7 09:48:53 2011
New Revision: 174738
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174738
Log:
PR gcov-profile/49299
* value-prof.c (gimpl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-07
09:53:20 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 7 09:53:17 2011
New Revision: 174739
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174739
Log:
PR gcov-profile/49299
* value-prof.c (gimpl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49299
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Compile time hog
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
--- Comment #8 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-06-07
11:12:55 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Tue Jun 7 11:12:50 2011
New Revision: 174742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174742
Log:
Fix PR debug/49130
gcc/c-family/
* c-pretty-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297
--- Comment #2 from Shekhar 2011-06-07
11:35:12 UTC ---
We are glad that you answered for our problem. Thanks for your help. But
we have new version of gcc. It is gcc 4.6. Even after this, we are not
able to install MOLCAS 7.6. It is showing erro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
--- Comment #2 from William J. Schmidt 2011-06-07
11:51:56 UTC ---
I'll have a look. With -ffast-math, cabs is converted to
sqrt(pow(rpart,2.0),pow(ipart,2.0)). Not sure yet why the pow calls aren't
converted back to x*x form. We may have to r
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
--- Comment #3 from William J. Schmidt 2011-06-07
12:08:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I'll have a look. With -ffast-math, cabs is converted to
> sqrt(pow(rpart,2.0),pow(ipart,2.0)). Not sure yet why the pow calls aren't
> converted back
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49308
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49307
Ryan Mansfield changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in spill_failure, at|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49191
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan 2011-06-07
13:13:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> And arm-linux-gnueabi.
Though on ARM I would expect this to pass once we can support unaligned
memcpy's for certain versions of the architecture.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
--- Comment #12 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-07 13:16:37
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> A bit has been lost...
... due to additional cvtsd2ss conversion.
Any help would be appreciated here.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2011-06-07
13:23:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
Please ignore that. It leaked in when I was trying to CC somebody.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-07
13:47:00 UTC ---
The original failure only occured with -O0 compile and -O2 -ffast-math link.
The linker-plugin use was already a workaround for the -O0 link by collect2,
so not sure why that isn't
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49305
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-07
14:04:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> we have new version of gcc. It is gcc 4.6.
Are you sure? I am asking because the error message:
| fmm_aux_qlm_builder.f90:154: internal compiler error: in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49305
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-07
14:05:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 24457
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24457
A reduced testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
Summary: Missing static const symbol with -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
--- Comment #1 from Hartmut Schirmer
2011-06-07 14:11:17 UTC ---
Created attachment 24458
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24458
Small test case
Note bar() doesn't fail
Simple changes like
return direction==0 ? A::PEN+0 :
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49297
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-07 15:01:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> On Mon, 6 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> Can you bisect the set of object files (adding -r -nostdlib to the link)
> and provide preprocessed sou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-07
15:09:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 7 15:09:29 2011
New Revision: 174751
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174751
Log:
PR c++/48780
* typeck.c (perform_integral_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49310
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] Compile|[4.7 Regression] Compile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #12 from William J. Schmidt
2011-06-07 15:12:07 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Tue Jun 7 15:12:04 2011
New Revision: 174752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174752
Log:
2011-06-07 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48780
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-07
15:12:18 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 7 15:12:15 2011
New Revision: 174753
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174753
Log:
PR c++/48780
* typeck.c (perform_integral_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-06-07 15:20:37 UTC ---
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
>
> --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-07 15:01:48
> UTC ---
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #13 from William J. Schmidt
2011-06-07 15:24:29 UTC ---
Work is complete on the planned changes. Note there is an open regression
PR49302 that has yet to be addressed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47858
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24422|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-07
15:57:43 UTC ---
This is a dup of
PR 10483
PR 13795
PR 13332
PR 13259
PR 44673
PR 42101
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48532
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48497
--- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-07 16:43:33 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Tue Jun 7 16:43:29 2011
New Revision: 174759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174759
Log:
gcc:
PR tree-optimization/48497
* doc/source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48497
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49312
Summary: Make DW_AT_name contain only simple name, no
template-id
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49312
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-06-07
17:06:03 UTC ---
I managed to get pr20755.f fixed last night with only a minor change and I
found a problem elsewhere for fmt_g0_6.f08 which I am still working on. I will
have a look at your patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
Summary: Inefficient libgcc implementations for avr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49314
Summary: md5test, shatest output FAILs on Tru64 UNIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48007
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-06-07
17:33:08 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jun 7 17:33:05 2011
New Revision: 174760
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174760
Log:
Support UNIQUE_UNWIND_CONTEXT.
2011-04-09
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49315
Summary: Throw_2 SEGVs on Tru64 UNIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49313
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-06-07
17:41:15 UTC ---
Created attachment 24460
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24460
Patch for ffs part.
This patch forwards to the standard C library implementation instead of using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49316
Summary: ICE in in function_and_variable_visibility, at
ipa.c:926 with g++.dg/tls/diag-1.C
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49317
Summary: g++.dg/abi/local1.C FAILs on Tru64 UNIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49318
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 177.mesa in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to
build
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319
Summary: [4.7 regression] g++.dg/abi/thunk5.C FAILs on Tru64
UNIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49319
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-07 17:53:17 UTC
---
Created attachment 24461
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24461
assembler output
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
--- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson 2011-06-07
18:40:48 UTC ---
I apologize. The error you're seeing here is the sort that's
handled by the second #if section in libgcc's __floatdisf.
In particular,
/* Protect against double-rounding erro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49302
--- Comment #8 from William J. Schmidt 2011-06-07
20:25:20 UTC ---
Because the compile uses -O0 and the link uses -O2 -ffast-math, we have a
mismatch of expectations. With -O0 and no -ffast-math, builtin cabs isn't
folded into sqrt(pow+pow) duri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49318
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49320
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4-unknown.c FAILs
with random flags
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49321
Summary: Incorrect Optimization O2 and O3 on Shift Operation
for 64 bit Integers
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49321
--- Comment #1 from bbli08 at yahoo dot com 2011-06-07 21:01:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 24463
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24463
Added attachment for the last commitment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48421
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49321
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49318
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-07 21:42:18
UTC ---
LTO isn't needed:
[hjl@gnu-16 0002]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-spec-lto/usr/bin/gcc
-DSPEC_CPU2000_LP64 -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math get.c
patt.87_1188 = i_1431 w* 8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49256
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44175
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-07
21:54:13 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 7 21:54:07 2011
New Revision: 174772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174772
Log:
PR c++/48969
PR c++/44175
gcc/c-family/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-07
21:54:12 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 7 21:54:07 2011
New Revision: 174772
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174772
Log:
PR c++/48969
PR c++/44175
gcc/c-family/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49312
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-06-07
22:11:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 24464
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24464
Candidate patch
I am currently testing this candidate patch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
--- Comment #9 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-06-07 22:21:43 UTC ---
After the discussions we've had elsewhere, I think DW_AT_name should
contain only the simple template name (with no template arguments) when
it refers to a template instant
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49130
--- Comment #10 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-06-07
22:26:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I think it would be nicer if there were a DW_AT_mangled_name we could use
> instead because it's shorter. This also would avoid inconsistencies.
Sorry, I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49277
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu 2011-06-07 22:29:21
UTC ---
It may be a pilot error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36328
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48421
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24453|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48421
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49307
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49311
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49322
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many libstdc++ testsuite failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49322
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49322
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49238
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-08
04:07:29 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Wed Jun 8 04:07:25 2011
New Revision: 174793
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174793
Log:
PR target/49238
* config/sh/sh.c (expan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49238
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-08
04:10:30 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Wed Jun 8 04:10:26 2011
New Revision: 174794
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174794
Log:
PR target/49238
* config/sh/sh.c (expan
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
