http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107
--- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-05
07:16:43 UTC ---
Well, auto_ptr is already deprecated in the FDIS. Personally, I would have no
objections to breaking auto_ptr in c++0x mode if this is the only way to save
the noexcept machinery. We
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107
--- Comment #18 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-05
08:48:38 UTC ---
It's Core/1092
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49283
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49286
Summary: LTO incompatible with PIC and inline asm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49287
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL:
obj(c|-c++).dg/gnu-api-2-(class|objc).(m|mm)
-fnext-runtime (test for excess errors) FAIL:
objc.dg/gnu-api-2-(objc.m -fnext-runtime (test for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
--- Comment #17 from Pawel Sikora 2011-06-05 11:43:45
UTC ---
i've found the clue: pushing -gdwarf-4 through --enable-cxx-flags breaks the
world.
The problem is that GCC do not see that evil_long is used by the asm statement.
Static variables are renamed (in order to produce single .s file you can't have
two different statics with the same name) and then the problem is misdiagnozed
as external reference.
Make evil_long as output of the asm.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49286
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-05 11:55:22 UTC
---
The problem is that GCC do not see that evil_long is used by the asm statement.
Static variables are renamed (in order to produce single .s file you can't have
two different statics with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49286
Emil Langrock changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49288
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/cdtor-1.C
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49287
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.7 Regression] FAIL: |[4.7 Regression] FAIL:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49287
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-05
12:04:53 UTC ---
I have forgotten to report the errors:
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/gnu-api-2-class.m: In function 'main':
/opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/objc.dg/gnu-api-2-class.m:112:7: w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49287
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49289
Summary: eh_frame section created although using
-fno-exceptions and fno-rtti
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
on x86_64 you want -fno-asynchronous-unwind-info. Eh-frame is mandated by the
PS-ABI.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49289
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-05 13:42:33 UTC
---
on x86_64 you want -fno-asynchronous-unwind-info. Eh-frame is mandated by the
PS-ABI.
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49289
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Schlegl 2011-06-05
13:49:07 UTC ---
> on x86_64 you want -fno-asynchronous-unwind-info. Eh-frame is mandated by the
> PS-ABI.
Yeah, but I´m compiling for i586, so x86_32!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49286
--- Comment #3 from Emil Langrock 2011-06-05
13:50:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 24436
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24436
Minimal example with fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49290
Summary: [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] ICE in in
cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/semantics.c:6795
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48250
Chung-Lin Tang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49287
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-05
14:14:44 UTC ---
The patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00328.html fixes this
pr on x86_64-apple-darwin10. Thanks for the quick fix.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49291
Summary: error: no matching function for call to
std::list
>::remove_if(A::release(B*)::F)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49291
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24438|application/octet-stream|text/plain
mime type|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49291
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-05
15:17:44 UTC ---
basically the same issue as PR 47942 - thus invalid
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47942
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49291
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49289
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49289
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Schlegl 2011-06-05
15:54:32 UTC ---
> Oh it is done so that people can unwind as the frame pointer is omitted. Try
> with -fno-omit-frame-pointer or -fno-asynchronous-unwind-info .
-fno-asynchronous-unwind-info doesn´
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49292
Summary: [c++0x] non_const_var_error ICE for error when mixing
static_assert, template, and constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49291
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-05
17:31:42 UTC ---
yes, it's an MS extension enabled by default, you can disable it with /Za
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49287
--- Comment #5 from Nicola Pero 2011-06-05 17:37:09
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Sun Jun 5 17:37:06 2011
New Revision: 174657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174657
Log:
In gcc/objc/:
2011-06-05 Nicola Pero
* objc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
Summary: 22_locale/time_get/get_weekday/char/38081-[12].cc fail
with glibc 2.14
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47013
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-06-05
19:05:00 UTC ---
Is there any reason (beside reviewing) for not having committed the patch in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg01175.html ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49287
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49083
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2011-06-05
20:36:36 UTC ---
Fixed at r174307. Now the provided test case properly errors with gcc trunk...
howarth% gcc-fsf-4.7 hidden_bug.cc
hidden_bug.cc: In function ‘int main()’:
hidden_bug.cc:14:8: error: re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49255
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-05
21:11:49 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Sun Jun 5 21:11:46 2011
New Revision: 174663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174663
Log:
2011-06-05 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/49
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49294
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in mem_loc_descriptor, at
dwarf2out.c:14636 with -O -g
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49255
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49294
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49186
--- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-05
21:47:44 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Sun Jun 5 21:47:42 2011
New Revision: 174665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174665
Log:
PR target/49186
* config/sh/sh.c (expan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49186
--- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-05
21:50:32 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Sun Jun 5 21:50:29 2011
New Revision: 174666
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174666
Log:
PR target/49186
* config/sh/sh.c (expan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49094
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49186
--- Comment #8 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-05
21:53:27 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Sun Jun 5 21:53:25 2011
New Revision: 174667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174667
Log:
PR target/49186
* config/sh/sh.c (expan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49186
--- Comment #9 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-06-05
21:55:49 UTC ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Sun Jun 5 21:55:46 2011
New Revision: 174668
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174668
Log:
PR target/49186
* config/sh/sh.c (expan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49186
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49290
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49284
--- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen 2011-06-05
23:43:07 UTC ---
FWIW I just commented out the offending assert and the option works
now.
Is that the correct fix?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49295
Summary: math-68881.h definiton of scalb doesn't match builtin
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49270
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49116
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49116
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49285
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-06-06
04:06:16 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Mon Jun 6 04:06:08 2011
New Revision: 174681
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174681
Log:
PR target/49285
* config/mmix/mmix.md ("t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49285
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49134
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-06
04:16:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 6 04:16:38 2011
New Revision: 174682
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174682
Log:
PR c++/49134
* tree.c (build_target_expr):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-06
04:18:08 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 6 04:18:03 2011
New Revision: 174683
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174683
Log:
PR objc++/49221
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49134
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-06
04:31:30 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jun 6 04:31:24 2011
New Revision: 174684
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174684
Log:
PR c++/49134
* tree.c (build_target_expr):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49134
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong I/O END OF FILE
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49296
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.0
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49293
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-06
06:17:14 UTC ---
Yeah, the locale changed:
http://sources.redhat.com/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commitdiff;h=f49839299a085505eb673544744b61d2d9cdd1db
I think it is a mistake to use variable length abmon, espec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47013
revital.eres at linaro dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||revital.eres at linaro dot
65 matches
Mail list logo