http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #20 from Thomas Henlich
2011-06-01 08:12:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Created attachment 24406 [details]
> New updated patch
>
> This updated patch takes care of Comment #16.
Unfortunately, now the other testcases fail aga
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49251
Summary: [C++0x][parameter pack expanding] unused parameter
warning with unpacking empty tuples
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47077
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-06-01 08:54:43 UTC ---
On Tue, 31 May 2011, hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
>
> --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-31
> 16:05:49 UT
unsupported tests 86
/home/nicola/GCC/build-trunk2-full-parallel/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++/../../g++
version 4.7.0 20110601 (experimental) (GCC)
make[1]: [check-obj-c++] Error 1 (ignored)
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/nicola/GCC/build-trunk2-full-parallel/gcc'
For the record, they are d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49252
Summary: Problem with inline
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49252
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49249
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49243
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-06-01
10:30:42 UTC ---
Looks good. Can you test the patch and post it to gcc-patches?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab 2011-06-01 10:57:40
UTC ---
Bootstrap broken for 2 months now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Debug-mode forward_list broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49223
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48716
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49221
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49254
Summary: cannot declare member template as friend of class
template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: minor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49250
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
--- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-06-01
12:26:28 UTC ---
Regarding comment #18, the test case passes regardless 0f the -std=legacy
option specified at the beginning of the source file. I am questioning why that
option is ignored in current
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49255
Summary: -fcheck=pointer diagnosts too much: Passing NULL
pointer to OPTIONAL argument
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, patch, rejects-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49256
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 403.gcc in SPEC CPU 2006 went to an
infinite loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49180
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49256
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24395|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
Summary: -mfpmath=sse generates x87 instructions on 32 bits OS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
--- Comment #5 from Matt Hargett 2011-06-01 14:36:17 UTC
---
any chance this can be fixed for 4.6.1? this is a critical regression for us.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47733
Jan Smets changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jan.sm...@alcatel-lucent.co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258
Summary: -ffunction-sections and --gc-sectinons have no effect
at gcj
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49259
Summary: template/incomplete6.C ICE in build_target_expr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unas
> coverity pointed out the infinite loop below.
> I guess it is unreachable or at least hard to reach,
> or it would have been reported/fixed before now:
Would you mind opening a PR with bugzilla?
--
Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49258
licheng.1...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20215
--- Comment #11 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-06-01 16:12:04 UTC ---
is anybody here???
-ffunction-sections -fdata-sections
-fimplicit-templates -fPIC
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.7.0 20110601 (experimental) [trunk revision 174532]
(sparc-sun-solaris2.11)
compiled by GNU C version 4.4.2, GMP version 4.3.2, MPFR version
2.4.2-p3, MPC version 0.8.1
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49250
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-06-01 16:46:38 UTC
---
Created attachment 24409
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24409
preprocessed input
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31249
William J. Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49250
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49250
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-06-01 17:11:49 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-01
> 17:03:50 UTC ---
> Created attachment 24410
> --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24410
> gcc47-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49260
Summary: cpp0x/lambda/lambda-eh2.C fails execution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-01
17:31:08 UTC ---
It seems unfortunate that make check-libstdc++-v3 doesn't catch obvious
breakage like this; at the least we could make sure that stdc++.h compiles in
debug/parallel modes?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49260
--- Comment #1 from Janis Johnson 2011-06-01
17:31:24 UTC ---
Output when the test runs on QEMU for arm-none-linux-gnueabi:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'int'
*** EXIT code 4242
FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/lambda/lambda-eh2.C execution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39604
--- Comment #23 from Sandra Loosemore
2011-06-01 17:34:56 UTC ---
Draft patch that addresses this bug here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02029.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-01 17:57:44
UTC ---
The problem is in floatunsdidf2 expander that is currently disabled on x86_32
due to TARGET_KEEPS_VECTOR_ALIGNED_STACK. Without this expander, gcc generates
unsigned DImode->XFmode conve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44175
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-01
18:07:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 1 18:07:03 2011
New Revision: 174539
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174539
Log:
PR c++/49253
* typeck2.c (build_x_arrow): D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
--- Comment #3 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-01 18:27:49
UTC ---
Actually, there is no DImode SSE conversion instruction for 32bit targets, so
implicit conversion generates fildq insn that uses x87 registers even with
unsigned DImode operands.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49253
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-06-01
18:39:43 UTC ---
Yes. Running by default the entire testsuite in debug-mode too is not an
option, would take too much time. Honestly, however, in my experience, isn't
*that* common that a front-end iss
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31249
--- Comment #23 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-06-01 19:02:03 UTC ---
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31249
>
> William J. Schmidt changed:
>
>What|Remov
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49181
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-01
19:08:45 UTC ---
Another "Error reporting routines re-entered" ICE, I think this code worked a
few days ago, using the 4.7-20110528 snapshot, but fails with trunk
#include
namespace std
{
temp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49261
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-9.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49262
Summary: 3-yr-old infinite loop in dwarf2out.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.g
Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> coverity pointed out the infinite loop below.
>> I guess it is unreachable or at least hard to reach,
>> or it would have been reported/fixed before now:
>
> Would you mind opening a PR with bugzilla?
Not at all:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49262
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49261
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48808
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-01 19:47:22 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jun 1 19:47:19 2011
New Revision: 174540
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174540
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/48830
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830
--- Comment #13 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-01 19:47:22 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jun 1 19:47:19 2011
New Revision: 174540
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174540
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/4883
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48792
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-01 19:47:22 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jun 1 19:47:19 2011
New Revision: 174540
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174540
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/48830
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45074
--- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-01 19:49:55 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Jun 1 19:49:53 2011
New Revision: 174541
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174541
Log:
gcc/
PR target/45074
* opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49134
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45074
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49157
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49134
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Stat
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263
Summary: SH Target: underutilized "TST #imm, R0" instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48830
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|49226 |
Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44175
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-01
20:27:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Jun 1 20:27:22 2011
New Revision: 174543
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174543
Log:
PR c++/44175
* pt.c (template_args_equal):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49262
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49263
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo 2011-06-01 20:42:00 UTC
---
Created attachment 24412
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24412
Proposed Patch
Although the patch gets the job done, programmer's sense tells me it is fishy,
or at leas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48840
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
--- Comment #4 from Uros Bizjak 2011-06-01 20:52:13
UTC ---
Created attachment 24413
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24413
Patch that wires up ix86_expand_convert_sign_didf_sse
For some reason, ix86_expand_convert_sign_didf_s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48658
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49257
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49181
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-06-01
21:06:37 UTC ---
I take it back - that works ok with latest trunk - I must have not updated
something in the front end
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
Summary: Internal compiler error: segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49250
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-06-01
21:45:37 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 1 21:45:34 2011
New Revision: 174548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174548
Log:
PR debug/49250
* var-tracking.c (add_uses,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49250
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49261
davidxl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49264
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49265
Summary: Double colon in procedure-stmt (generic interface)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49265
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
--- Comment #14 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-02
01:02:10 UTC ---
Same get_typedef_die ICE with this patch, too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897
--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka 2011-06-02
01:12:12 UTC ---
The problem as confirmed in Comment 9 no longer reproduce on mainline. So
problem is either fixed or went latent. I am going to try 4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48906
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #24406|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49255
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-06-02
05:54:53 UTC ---
The patch was not quite correct...
Submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-06/msg00015.html
85 matches
Mail list logo
