[Bug libobjc/38307] Calling of the +initialize method is not completely thread-safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38307 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug objc/48187] infinite errors with misplaced [ in @interface definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48187 Nicola Pero changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/47720] problems with makefile dependency generation using -M

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720 --- Comment #2 from Kris 2011-05-25 19:36:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > May I ask what version of gfortran this is? (Trunk build of gfortran from > yesterday is a bit ambiguous) I was using a build of gfortran from CVS 2/12/2011. > The

[Bug c++/49156] [C++0x] Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49156 --- Comment #1 from froydnj at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-25 19:36:46 UTC --- On 05/25/2011 05:14 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > template T declval(); > > template > struct S { > > template > static U get(const volatile T&); > >

[Bug fortran/49159] OpenMP compilation errors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49159 --- Comment #3 from Jose 2011-05-25 19:37:08 UTC --- > !$OMP PRIVATE(number1,& > !$OMP number2)& It seems to work this way. thank you very much.

[Bug fortran/47720] problems with makefile dependency generation using -M

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720 --- Comment #3 from Kris 2011-05-25 19:45:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > I was using a build of gfortran from CVS 2/12/2011. I meant SVN, not CVS.

[Bug c++/49165] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on for-loop/throw combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3 f

[Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted as function declaration‏‏

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 19:50:52 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 19:50:49 2011 New Revision: 174225 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174225 Log: PR c++/47184 * parser.c (cp_parser_paramete

[Bug c++/46696] [C++0x] Implicit copy constructor can't construct array of subtype with user-defined copy constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46696 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 19:51:46 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 19:51:44 2011 New Revision: 174226 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174226 Log: PR c++/46696 * typeck.c (cp_build_modify_ex

[Bug c++/46145] [C++0x] Should defaulted copy constructor imply default move constructor?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46145 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 19:52:04 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 19:52:02 2011 New Revision: 174228 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174228 Log: PR c++/46145 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Com

[Bug c++/45698] C++0x Variadic Templates: Infinite template recursion rather than an error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45698 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 19:52:14 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 19:52:10 2011 New Revision: 174229 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174229 Log: PR c++/45698 * pt.c (dependent_template_arg

[Bug c++/46245] [C++0x] rejects function with late-specified return type as a non-type template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 19:51:56 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 19:51:54 2011 New Revision: 174227 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174227 Log: PR c++/46245 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Com

[Bug fortran/47720] problems with makefile dependency generation using -M

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720 --- Comment #4 from Zaak 2011-05-25 19:56:38 UTC --- I'm not a gfortran dev, but the duplicates are likely due to the fact the the source code is being parsed and there is need to remove duplicates, since the output is intended for consumption by

[Bug c/38037] false uninitialized warnings when using a pointer as a guard

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38037 Török Edwin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nicola at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 fr

[Bug fortran/47720] problems with makefile dependency generation using -M

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47720 --- Comment #5 from Zaak 2011-05-25 20:01:01 UTC --- In comment 4, in the first sentence there is a typo. I meant: I'm not a gfortran dev, but the duplicates are likely due to the fact the the source code is being parsed and there is *NO* need t

[Bug c++/44311] [C++0x] no error with switch over enum class and integer case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44311 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 20:02:45 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 20:02:41 2011 New Revision: 174231 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174231 Log: PR c++/44311 * decl.c (case_conversion): Ne

[Bug c++/49165] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE on for-loop/throw combination

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 20:04:47 UTC --- Yes, that's right. 5.16/2: If either the second or the third operand has type (possibly cv-qualified) void, then the lvalue-to-rvalue (4.1), array-to-pointer (4.2), and function-to-p

[Bug c++/47184] [C++0x] initialization construct interpreted as function declaration‏‏

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 20:29:42 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 20:29:39 2011 New Revision: 174232 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174232 Log: PR c++/47184 * parser.c (cp_parser_paramete

[Bug c++/46696] [C++0x] Implicit copy constructor can't construct array of subtype with user-defined copy constructor.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46696 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 20:29:49 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 20:29:47 2011 New Revision: 174233 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174233 Log: PR c++/46696 * typeck.c (cp_build_modify_ex

[Bug c++/45698] C++0x Variadic Templates: Infinite template recursion rather than an error message

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45698 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 20:30:19 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 20:30:12 2011 New Revision: 174236 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174236 Log: PR c++/45698 * pt.c (dependent_template_arg

[Bug c++/44311] [C++0x] no error with switch over enum class and integer case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44311 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 20:30:26 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 20:30:21 2011 New Revision: 174237 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174237 Log: PR c++/44311 * decl.c (case_conversion): Ne

[Bug c++/45401] [C++0x] reference collapsing and reference qualifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45401 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46245] [C++0x] rejects function with late-specified return type as a non-type template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 20:29:56 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 20:29:54 2011 New Revision: 174234 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174234 Log: PR c++/46245 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Com

[Bug c/38037] false uninitialized warnings when using a pointer as a guard

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38037 --- Comment #7 from Nicola Pero 2011-05-25 20:32:46 UTC --- Apologies. You are right; I committed a fix for libobjc/38307. ;-) Thanks

[Bug c++/46145] [C++0x] Should defaulted copy constructor imply default move constructor?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46145 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25 20:30:07 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Wed May 25 20:30:01 2011 New Revision: 174235 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174235 Log: PR c++/46145 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Com

[Bug c++/49156] [C++0x] Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49156 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/44994] [C++0x] ICE on invalid with variadic templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44994 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 fr

[Bug c++/44994] [C++0x] ICE on invalid with variadic templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44994 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/42082] [C++0x] ICE on probably invalid with "canonical types differ for identical types"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42082 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/48599] [C++0x] no diagnostic for invalid use of auto with array declarator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48599 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug libobjc/49166] New: [4.7 Regression] Many objc failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49166 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many objc failures Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libobjc AssignedTo: unassig...@g

[Bug c++/46071] [C++0x] ill-formed use of decltype and auto causes segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46071 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug debug/49167] New: dwarf marker for function return instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49167 Summary: dwarf marker for function return instruction Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: aol

[Bug middle-end/49168] New: [4.7 Regression] Aligned store used with unaligned address

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49168 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Aligned store used with unaligned address Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug bootstrap/49160] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49160 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48536] [C++0x] Automatic Enumerator Incrementation is not compliant with Clause 7.2/5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48536 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug target/49002] 128-bit AVX load incorrectly becomes 256-bit AVX load

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49002 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libobjc/49166] [4.7 Regression] Many objc failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49166 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/47719] [4.6 regression] ICE compiling libavcodec/adxdec.c (FFmpeg) for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719 --- Comment #7 from Nitin Kamble 2011-05-25 22:42:44 UTC --- Created attachment 24358 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24358 preprocessed output This is the failing case. $ ccache arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-gcc -march=armv7-a -mt

[Bug target/47719] [4.6 regression] ICE compiling libavcodec/adxdec.c (FFmpeg) for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719 Nitin Kamble changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nitin.a.kamble at intel dot

[Bug target/47719] [4.6 regression] ICE compiling libavcodec/adxdec.c (FFmpeg) for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719 --- Comment #9 from Nitin Kamble 2011-05-25 23:01:25 UTC --- The ICE is on the gcc_assert line (config/arm/arm.c:12084) in the code bellow: static void push_minipool_fix (rtx insn, HOST_WIDE_INT address, rtx *loc, enum machine

[Bug target/47719] [4.6 regression] ICE compiling libavcodec/adxdec.c (FFmpeg) for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47719 --- Comment #10 from Nitin Kamble 2011-05-25 23:05:33 UTC --- Also adding -fno-inline-functions parameter to gcc command line does not help.

[Bug libstdc++/49060] use of deleted memory in __gnu_cxx::hashtable::erase

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49060 --- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 23:09:20 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Wed May 25 23:09:14 2011 New Revision: 174240 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174240 Log: PR libstdc++/49060 * include/backwar

[Bug libstdc++/49060] use of deleted memory in __gnu_cxx::hashtable::erase

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49060 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/46003] cond5.C fails for ARM EABI tests.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46003 Janis Johnson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/49169] New: ARM: optimisations strip the Thumb/ARM mode bit off function pointers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49169 Summary: ARM: optimisations strip the Thumb/ARM mode bit off function pointers Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/48599] [C++0x] no diagnostic for invalid use of auto with array declarator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48599 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26 02:22:56 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 26 02:22:54 2011 New Revision: 174257 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174257 Log: PR c++/48599 * decl.c (create_array_type_fo

[Bug c++/49156] [C++0x] Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49156 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26 02:22:49 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 26 02:22:46 2011 New Revision: 174256 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174256 Log: PR c++/49156 * error.c (dump_template_bindi

[Bug c++/45401] [C++0x] reference collapsing and reference qualifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45401 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26 02:22:42 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 26 02:22:39 2011 New Revision: 174255 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174255 Log: PR c++/45401 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Don

[Bug c++/48536] [C++0x] Automatic Enumerator Incrementation is not compliant with Clause 7.2/5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48536 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26 02:23:04 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 26 02:23:02 2011 New Revision: 174258 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174258 Log: PR c++/48536 * decl.c (build_enumerator): I

[Bug c++/44994] [C++0x] ICE on invalid with variadic templates

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44994 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/45401] [C++0x] reference collapsing and reference qualifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45401 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26 03:06:13 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 26 03:06:09 2011 New Revision: 174260 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174260 Log: PR c++/45401 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Don

[Bug c++/48536] [C++0x] Automatic Enumerator Incrementation is not compliant with Clause 7.2/5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48536 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/44311] [C++0x] no error with switch over enum class and integer case

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44311 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49156] [C++0x] Error reporting routines re-entered

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49156 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-26 03:06:19 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Thu May 26 03:06:17 2011 New Revision: 174261 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174261 Log: PR c++/49156 * error.c (dump_template_bindi

[Bug c++/48599] [C++0x] no diagnostic for invalid use of auto with array declarator

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48599 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/45401] [C++0x] reference collapsing and reference qualifiers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45401 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48424] C++0x parameter packs expansion problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/49118] Endless operator-> chain causes infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118 --- Comment #4 from David Krauss 2011-05-26 03:37:44 UTC --- Created attachment 24359 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24359 Patch fixes behavior but error message repeats twice. I implemented the suggested fix, but the result

[Bug c++/49118] Endless operator-> chain causes infinite loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49118 David Krauss changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #24359|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/48818] Wrong copy constructor used when using std::pair in .so and app.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48818 Wolfgang Bangerth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bangerth at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/49147] graphite branch ICEs with -fgraphite-opencl-ignore-dep

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49147 Alexey Kravets changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mr.kayrick at gmail dot com --- Comment

<    1   2