http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49136
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-25
07:00:06 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 25 07:00:01 2011
New Revision: 174168
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174168
Log:
PR c++/49136
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_bit_fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49155
Summary: [C++0x] decltype-specifier not supported as base type
specifier
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-25
07:12:21 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 25 07:12:17 2011
New Revision: 174171
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174171
Log:
PR target/49128
* config/i386/driver-i386.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49136
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49136
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-25
07:03:28 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 25 07:03:25 2011
New Revision: 174169
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174169
Log:
PR c++/49136
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_bit_fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49133
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48971
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014
--- Comment #5 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-05-25
07:59:09 UTC ---
Author: abel
Date: Wed May 25 07:59:06 2011
New Revision: 174172
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174172
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/49014
* con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49155
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-25
08:31:13 UTC ---
dup of PR 42603
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49144
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||48702
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48106
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-25
08:18:15 UTC ---
thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49155
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler
2011-05-25 08:48:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> dup of PR 42603
I agree - I apologize for the missing bug search in this case (I usually do).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49156
Summary: [C++0x] Error reporting routines re-entered
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: error-recovery, ice-on-invalid-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48292
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-25
09:05:15 UTC ---
Jason, I've found a decent workaround now so if you have higher priority issues
you'd rather fix then don't spend time on this one for my benefit. Thanks for
the incredible number of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48177
--- Comment #7 from Nicola Pero 2011-05-25 09:08:00
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Wed May 25 09:07:57 2011
New Revision: 174176
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174176
Log:
In libobjc/:
2011-05-25 Nicola Pero
Backport
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48177
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47336
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-25
08:58:32 UTC ---
Thanks, Jason, I submitted PR 49156
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-25
09:26:56 UTC ---
Try -ffast-math (the default for ICC) which disables subnormals.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49155
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49141
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-05-25 09:46:02 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed May 25 09:45:58 2011
New Revision: 174179
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174179
Log:
2011-05-24 Paolo Carlini
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49141
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|paolo.carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42603
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48881
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.korn.cygwin at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48738
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|paulo1205 at yahoo dot com |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48633
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49157
Summary: Unnecessary stack save/restore code generated for a
leaf function (arm-elf-gcc)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49158
Summary: Incorrect pointer arithmetic with negative offset
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #22 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-25
10:19:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 24354
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24354
alternative patch for 4.6
This is another patch - it avoids creating MEM_REFs for base addresses
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49062
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|49144 |
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49158
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49144
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Depends on|48702
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49062
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-05-25 10:20:16 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Wed May 25 10:20:12 2011
New Revision: 174180
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174180
Log:
2011-05-25 Jan Hubicka
PR middle-end/49062
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
--- Comment #10 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-05-25 11:34:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Author: jakub
> Date: Wed May 25 07:12:17 2011
> New Revision: 174171
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174171
> Log:
> PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-25
11:36:53 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed May 25 11:36:49 2011
New Revision: 174183
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174183
Log:
PR tree-optimization/44897
* ipa-inline.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44897
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-25
11:44:17 UTC ---
OK, division by 0 should be fixed both on mainline and 4.6 branch. I think the
wrong code issue might be the corruption of jump tables, but will need to get
past firewall to double che
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49102
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.1 |4.7.0
--- Comment #5 from Paolo Carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-05-25
12:16:45 UTC ---
To be honest, the behavior vs the original testcase, which just uses pair, can
be considered a regression; the reduced one, in Comment #5, fails also with
4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49107
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++0x] incomplete type |[C++0x][4.7 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-25
11:54:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed May 25 11:53:58 2011
New Revision: 174184
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174184
Log:
PR target/49128
* config/i386/driver-i386.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48738
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2011-05-25
12:15:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I don't think this is a library issue. Maybe Bill is interested / has an
> opinion..
Just to agree that it is WAD. The proposed solution just moves th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49066
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boostcpp at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48935
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45539
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49128
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45523
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49159
Summary: OpenMP compilation errors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49133
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 13:26:46 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed May 25 13:26:42 2011
New Revision: 174195
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174195
Log:
PR target/49133
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49160
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-25 13:33:18
UTC ---
Revision 174185 is OK.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49160
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49160
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #6 from William J. Schmidt 2011-05-25
13:35:58 UTC ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Wed May 25 13:35:53 2011
New Revision: 174196
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174196
Log:
2011-05-25 Bill Schmidt
PR tree-opt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46728
--- Comment #7 from William J. Schmidt 2011-05-25
13:42:14 UTC ---
Patch 2 transforms pow(x,n) to multiplies for integer n, similar to patch 1 for
powi(x,n).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45523
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.1 |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48702
--- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-25
13:58:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Created attachment 24354 [details]
> alternative patch for 4.6
>
> This is another patch - it avoids creating MEM_REFs for base addresses that
> we do
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49160
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49161
Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Fix VRP on switch stmts
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49162
Summary: ICE in in output_die, at dwarf2out.c:10568 with
-femit-struct-debug-reduced
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49159
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49161
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49161
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-25
14:13:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 24356
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24356
gcc46-pr49161.patch
Untested fix. The problem seems to be that GIMPLE_SWITCH uses until VRP
differe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49159
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-25
14:23:53 UTC ---
I just tested with some other compilers:
ifort accepts the invalid code, PathScale and Open64 show a similar syntax
error as gfortran, and PGI has a somewhat more legible error messag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48292
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
14:32:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 14:32:06 2011
New Revision: 174201
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174201
Log:
PR c++/48292
* pt.c (tsubst_decl) [PARM_DEC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45418
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
14:35:12 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 14:35:09 2011
New Revision: 174204
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174204
Log:
PR c++/45418
* init.c (perform_member_init)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49161
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-25
14:35:14 UTC ---
Ick. The patch looks ok to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45080
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
14:35:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 14:35:00 2011
New Revision: 174203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174203
Log:
PR c++/45080
* pt.c (instantiate_class_temp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48935
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
14:35:20 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 14:35:17 2011
New Revision: 174205
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174205
Log:
PR c++/48935
* parser.c (cp_parser_construc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49148
--- Comment #7 from John Peyton 2011-05-25 14:40:56
UTC ---
> Try -ffast-math (the default for ICC) which disables subnormals.
Thanks, this helped it run much faster!
I noticed it still takes longer to divide by 3.0 than by 4.0. More
specifical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49154
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-axis-elf |cris-axis-elf,
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47277
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49047
--- Comment #2 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-05-25 15:15:03 UTC ---
The candidate patch below might do what you want.
Note that, constructors/destructor functions are cloned. The cloning
process yields a DIE tree. So the destructor K::~K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45080
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
15:26:29 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 15:26:25 2011
New Revision: 174208
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174208
Log:
PR c++/45080
* pt.c (instantiate_class_temp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45418
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
15:26:37 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 15:26:33 2011
New Revision: 174209
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174209
Log:
PR c++/45418
* init.c (perform_member_init)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48935
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48935
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
15:26:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 15:26:42 2011
New Revision: 174210
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174210
Log:
PR c++/48935
* parser.c (cp_parser_construc
del: single
gcc version 4.7.0 20110525 (experimental) [trunk revision 174205] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. ~/ice.i -Os
/home/ryan/ice.i: In function 'foo':
/home/ryan/ice.i:42:1: internal compiler error: in change_address_1, at
emit-rtl.c:1936
Please submit a full bug report,
with preproces
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45080
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48292
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-25
15:26:18 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed May 25 15:26:14 2011
New Revision: 174207
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174207
Log:
PR c++/48292
* pt.c (tsubst_decl) [PARM_DEC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45418
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48292
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47451
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47220
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47184
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49135
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47014
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46696
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49164
Summary: GNAT BUG on access procedure parameter in protected
type entry
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49142
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25
16:19:40 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed May 25 16:19:36 2011
New Revision: 174211
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174211
Log:
Replace q_regs_operand with QIreg_operand in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49133
--- Comment #9 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 16:39:25 UTC ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed May 25 16:39:22 2011
New Revision: 174215
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174215
Log:
PR target/49133
* config/i386/sse.md
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49160
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-05-25
16:42:26 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Wed May 25 16:42:23 2011
New Revision: 174216
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174216
Log:
PR bootstrap/49160
* libgcc2.h (__powisf2,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46245
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46145
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49153
--- Comment #3 from dizzy at roedu dot net 2011-05-25 16:53:52 UTC ---
Indeed it seems a problem with the code because of the semantics of the
injected class names.
Namely that a nested (in MetaBind1st) struct "type" is defined which
incidentally
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46005
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45698
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49047
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey 2011-05-25 18:00:23
UTC ---
I tried this patch on a simple example and I think the
output looks good.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165
Summary: ICE on for-loop/throw combination
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165
--- Comment #1 from Vijay Rao 2011-05-25 18:34:31
UTC ---
/tmp/redux.cc
#include
#include
int main(int argc,char**argv)
{
std::string str;
for ( int field(0);
(field<10) && ((std::cin>>str)? 1 :(throw std::string("failure")));
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49165
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38037
--- Comment #5 from Nicola Pero 2011-05-25 18:54:43
UTC ---
Author: nicola
Date: Wed May 25 18:54:40 2011
New Revision: 174221
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174221
Log:
In libobjc/:
2011-05-25 Richard Frith-Macdonald
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
