http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49074
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49076
Summary: ASSOCIATE: Array descriptor passed to explicit-shaped
dummy
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49073
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-20
07:50:02 UTC ---
I think the bug is fairly obviously in and_comparisons_1 (and also in
or_comparisons_1), going through a PHI node needs to be done with lots of care.
We have:
:
# i_1 = PHI <1(2), i_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48252
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hules at free dot fr
--- Comment #10 from Ira
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46072
mrgcc at mailinator dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrgcc at mailinator dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49061
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45978
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.7.0
Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-05-20
08:27:39 UTC ---
I'm trying to reduce the preprocessed test case, but since I'm not a C++ person
this might take some time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48706
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-05-20
09:05:31 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I'm trying to reduce the preprocessed test case, but since I'm not a C++
> person
> this might take some time.
Scratch that, the preprocessed code is w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47873
--- Comment #13 from Ibaidul Sahib 2011-05-20
09:29:00 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Fixed.
Thanks I have tested this and the bug is fixed.
ggc-4.6 -v
==
gcc version 4.6.1 20110329 (prerelease) (Debian 4.6.0-2)
uname -a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48706
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-20
09:35:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The patch in comment #3 regtests successfully.
Patch looks OK.
Thus, you can commit it with a test case and a changelog - and with posting the
patch to gcc-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49068
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
Summary|g++ optimizer br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48849
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-20
09:35:47 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 20 09:35:44 2011
New Revision: 173939
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173939
Log:
2011-05-20 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-20
09:48:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > I'm trying to reduce the preprocessed test case, but since I'm not a C++
> > person
> > this might take some time.
>
> Scra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077
Summary: gcjwebplugin.cc doesn't compile against latest
xulrunner 2.0b13 sdk
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49067
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.2
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077
--- Comment #1 from Jason Vas Dias 2011-05-20
10:07:20 UTC ---
my config:
$ /usr/build2/gcc/gcc-4.6.0/configure --prefix=/usr --libdir=/usr/lib64\
--with-cpu-32=i686 --with-cpu-64=k8 --enable-languages=all \
--enable-targets=all --enab
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47873
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-20
09:46:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> BTW who is responsible for changing the bug report Status to Verified/Closed,
> QA or me?
Don't bother, we don't use that status - RESOLVED+FIXED is all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49064
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49034
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49067
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077
--- Comment #2 from Jason Vas Dias 2011-05-20
10:17:10 UTC ---
See https://developer.mozilla.org/en/firefox_3.6_for_developers :
"Interfaces merged
The following interfaces have been combined together:
nsIPluginTagInfo2 has been merged int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077
--- Comment #4 from Jason Vas Dias 2011-05-20
11:19:25 UTC ---
Created attachment 24298
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24298
patch to gcjwebplugin.cc to compile against xulrunner-2.0
First attempt that compiles
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49078
Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with
bootstrap-profiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
Hello everyone
I am sorry if this question doesn't relates to the bugs mailing list
but I think its a bug.
I posted a question on gcc-help but didn't got a useful answer yet. I
am using plugin with gcc-4.5.3.
The plugin just uses a simple number_of_loops() function. Plugin
defines 2 passes (one
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49078
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Bogus constant folding
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-20
12:34:27 UTC ---
Hm, no, it's not constant-folding from s2, I misread.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49064
--- Comment #3 from Piotr Wyderski 2011-05-20
12:50:49 UTC ---
#include
#include
struct X {
__m128i*m_Data;
std::size_t m_Len;
void xor_all(const X& v1, const X& v2);
void xor_all2(const X& v1, const X& v2);
};
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48529
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-20
12:47:16 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri May 20 12:47:13 2011
New Revision: 173943
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173943
Log:
Use ptr_mode instead of Pmode for vtable adj
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48529
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-20 12:53:40
UTC ---
As of revision 173943, the x32 failures are
FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/4879.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/9964.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49040
kiloalphaindia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kilo at stierand dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077
--- Comment #5 from Jason Vas Dias 2011-05-20
12:56:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> gcjwebplugin is dead, it should have been removed, but nobody has done that.
> Just don't enable it in configure.
Well then what replaces the Firefox plugi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49078
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-20 13:02:19
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 173939:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2011-05/msg00718.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49069
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-05-20
13:08:05 UTC ---
This ICE happens for me on the 4.6 branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-05-20
13:04:58 UTC ---
With rev173940
$ ./cc1 -fpreprocessed ice.i -quiet -O1
ice.i: In function 'bar':
ice.i:33:1: internal compiler error: in get_arm_condition_code, at
config/arm/arm.c:17021
Please sub
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-20
13:05:23 UTC ---
We call ustr_cmp_fast_buf with
s1, $3 = 0x6101b0 "\245\001\002s2", 1
when compiled with -O1 instead of with
s1, $1 = 0x40ac06 "s2", 2
when compiled with -O0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
--- Comment #2 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-05-20
13:07:17 UTC ---
With rev173940 I can reproduce it with -marm.
$ ./cc1 -quiet -fpreprocessed ice.i -O3 -marm
ice.i: In function 'foo':
ice.i:28:1: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints:
(insn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-20
13:15:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > gcjwebplugin is dead, it should have been removed, but nobody has done that.
> > Just don't enable it in configure.
>
> Well th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-20
13:21:23 UTC ---
I think it goes wrong when folding during inlining of ustr_len.
D.2729_11 = xi1_6 + 1;
switch (xi2_9) , case 0: , case 1: , case 2: , case
4: , case 8: >
...
:
D.2772_47 = ME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49077
Andrew John Hughes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48977
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-05-20 13:40:47
UTC ---
Actually, in the version control log for acinclude.m4 we have
commit b00fa2cfbfd81cbdc31d5a44e4ce8140cc153776
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Feb 25 17:56:04 2011 +
* ac
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49072
--- Comment #2 from Jose 2011-05-20 13:47:38
UTC ---
Thank you very much, Jonathan, for your comments.
I tried as you suggested. Instead of using mpfr-2.4.2, I downloaded the latest
version, namely, mpfr-3.0.1. I also tried with mpc-0.8.1 and mp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49049
--- Comment #3 from Ian Bolton 2011-05-20 13:50:56
UTC ---
Thanks for confirming that.
If I try "-marm -mcpu=arm7tdmi" I can get the ICE, but not with "-marm
-mcpu=cortex-a9".
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49021
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-20
13:44:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 24299
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24299
reduced by delta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-20
14:13:27 UTC ---
I'm testing a patch already (probably caused by the mem-ref merge).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
--- Comment #4 from Nicolai Stange 2011-05-20
14:14:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Are you sure you need the
>
> #include
Definitely, i've got compile errors when it isn't there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48982
--- Comment #5 from Nicolai Stange 2011-05-20
14:15:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Can you test whether this works on 4.6?
Sure, but this might take some time.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49073
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-20
14:19:07 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 20 14:19:05 2011
New Revision: 173948
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173948
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49073
* gimple-fold.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-20
14:29:04 UTC ---
Started in:
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164688
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49030
--- Comment #4 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-05-20
14:41:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I was hoping the compiler command would tell me what -mcpu it was defaulting
> to.
I'm using an arm-unknown-linux-gnueabi configuration which defaults an
a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48529
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-20
14:34:03 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri May 20 14:33:58 2011
New Revision: 173949
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173949
Log:
Disable gcc.dg/20020219-1.c for x32.
2011-0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48529
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-05-20 14:39:37
UTC ---
As of revision 173950, the x32 failures are
FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/4879.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf/close/char/9964.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/basic_filebuf
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49073
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-20
14:35:23 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 20 14:35:20 2011
New Revision: 173951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173951
Log:
PR tree-optimization/49073
* gimple-fold.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49073
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48977
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48977
--- Comment #3 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-05-20 14:45:53
UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Fri May 20 14:45:51 2011
New Revision: 173952
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173952
Log:
PR 48977 Denormal exception on glibc targets
Modifi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49081
--- Comment #1 from Roger Jeurninck 2011-05-20
15:04:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 24302
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24302
commands to reproduce (first part of script)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49081
--- Comment #2 from Roger Jeurninck 2011-05-20
15:05:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 24303
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24303
patch file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49080
Summary: Wrong register allocation for even register
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ra, wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-20
15:08:59 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 20 15:08:56 2011
New Revision: 173955
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173955
Log:
2011-05-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49081
--- Comment #3 from Roger Jeurninck 2011-05-20
15:05:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 24304
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24304
patched file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49079
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-20
15:02:51 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 20 15:02:49 2011
New Revision: 173954
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173954
Log:
2011-05-20 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48849
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49082
Summary: [C++0x] Issues with noexcept propagation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49078
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #94 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-20
15:30:38 UTC ---
Callgrinding htab_find_slot_with_hash leads to:
2,535,276,742 < /libiberty/hashtab.c:htab_find_slot'2 (27545437x) [//lto1]
84,947,655,239 < /libiberty/hashtab.c:htab_find_slot (5291
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #95 from Jan Hubicka 2011-05-20
15:31:28 UTC ---
... and
7,456,601,134 < /gcc/gimple.c:gimple_type_eq (18852945x) [//lto1]
1,384,102,312 < /gcc/gimple.c:gimple_type_hash (3452343x) [//lto1]
936,822,402 * ???:_obstack_begin [/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49081
Summary: Incorrect counter used for compilation of string
literals.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36883
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49080
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab 2011-05-20 16:01:04
UTC ---
FWIW, the copy of longlong.h in glibc is slightly out of date, it lacks support
for zarch, which uses a different definition of smul_ppmm.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49081
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-05-20 16:03:50 UTC ---
I don't see any explanation of what you think the compiler is doing wrong.
For example, "when this source file is compiled with the following
options, the program ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49083
Summary: g++ should error when a variable declared in a
condition is hidden by a variable in the immediately
contained block
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084
Summary: Bootstrap failure with bug box of Program_Error
EXCEPTION_ACCESS _VIOLATION / Error detected at
system.ads:175:5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41495
Alasdair Lumsden changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alasdairrr at gmail dot com
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@boost-consulting.com
--- Comment #16
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49085
Summary: Crash with SIGSEGV during compilation.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49086
Summary: [4.7 Regression] libgomp/task.c:79:1: internal
compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49086
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-20
16:49:58 UTC ---
Backtrace
(gdb) run -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../work/libgomp
-I../../../work/libgomp/config/bsd -I../../../work/libgomp/config/posix
-I../../../work/libgomp -Wall -Werror -g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49087
Summary: crash in vect_is_slp_reduction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35722
Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||3dw4rd at ve
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49087
--- Comment #1 from Ryan Mansfield 2011-05-20
16:55:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 24307
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24307
slightly more reduced testcase
Slightly more reduced test case than original.
1 - 100 of 178 matches
Mail list logo
