[Bug middle-end/49009] New: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49009 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo:

[Bug fortran/48955] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong result for array assignment due to missing temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-05-16 07:27:07 UTC --- Submitted patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2011-05/msg00090.html It fixes the test case of comment 0, but (cf. review comment) it does not handle a modified version.

[Bug middle-end/49009] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49009 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48989] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/lto/pr46036 f_lto_pr46036_0.o assemble

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48989 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at pci

[Bug target/46934] gcc ICE: error: unrecognizable insn: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46934 Chung-Lin Tang changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/49010] New: Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010 Summary: Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo

[Bug target/48941] [arm gcc] NEON: Stack pointer operations performed even tho stack is not accessed at all in function.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48941 --- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-05-16 08:13:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Created attachment 24234 [details] > Proposed patch > > The attached patch seems to fix the testcase and doesn't > regress neon.exp. I'll test it fully

[Bug fortran/49011] New: Wrong repeat count in error message for REPEAT intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49011 Summary: Wrong repeat count in error message for REPEAT intrinsic Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/49004] Improve the error message for linking failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49004 Mu Qiao changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49006] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed vectorization due to revision 167531

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 --- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-05-16 08:57:46 UTC --- On Sun, 15 May 2011, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 > >Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed vectorization

[Bug fortran/49011] Wrong repeat count in error message for REPEAT intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49011 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49006] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed vectorization due to revision 167531

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-05-16 09:24:28 UTC --- > The patch changes inliner heuristics only. Yes, but the vectorization of induct.f90 is very sensitive to inlining: see pr34265. Did you checked the vectorization of the test

[Bug fortran/49010] Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/49006] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed vectorization due to revision 167531

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-05-16 10:41:58 UTC --- On Mon, 16 May 2011, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 > > --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres > 2011-05-16 09:24

[Bug fortran/49011] Wrong repeat count in error message for REPEAT intrinsic

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49011 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48999] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/20090706-1.C due to an ICE on *-*-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48999 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug c/48996] fixincl on Red Hat EL 5 breaks sys/stat.h fstat64()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48996 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/49006] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed vectorization due to revision 167531

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1

[Bug rtl-optimization/48986] Missed optimization in atomic decrement on x86/x64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48986 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug target/48554] Regression for coldfire platform

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48554 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-05-16 11:52:32 UTC --- gcc-4.6-20110513 still ICEs on this test case, but after backporting the fix for PR47612 (r173393) compilation succeeds.

[Bug c++/49003] [C++0x] decltype in member function's trailing return type should deduce constness of *this

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49003 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-16 11:09:05 UTC --- ah I was thinking of PR 45908 (where I provided that reduced testcase - I knew it looked familiar!) but that was for an ICE which is fixed, so this one should be kept for the change

[Bug c++/45873] Parameter packs not expanding consistently in function return types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45873 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug bootstrap/48679] [4.7 regression] bootstrap comparison failures on m68k-linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48679 --- Comment #7 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-05-16 12:17:45 UTC --- The bootstrap comparison failure appears to be gone in a c-only build of gcc-4.7-20110514. I'll run a bisect to identify which rev fixed this bug.

[Bug c/48996] fixincl on Red Hat EL 5 breaks sys/stat.h fstat64()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48996 --- Comment #2 from psmith at gnu dot org 2011-05-16 11:56:33 UTC --- Created attachment 24251 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24251 Un-fixed sys/stat.h Yes, sorry, it was silly not to have done that.

[Bug target/48986] Missed optimization in atomic decrement on x86/x64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48986 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-05-16 12:50:59 UTC --- Created attachment 24252 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24252 gcc47-pr48986.patch Untested patch using peephole2.

[Bug fortran/48955] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong result for array assignment due to missing temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955 --- Comment #6 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com 2011-05-16 12:48:32 UTC --- Indeed - I just need to find the time to sort out the logic. Structurally the patch is OK. Cheers Paul On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:56 AM, burnus at gcc dot gnu.o

[Bug c/48996] fixincl on Red Hat EL 5 breaks sys/stat.h fstat64()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48996 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-05-16 13:07:56 UTC --- I don't see anything wrong with the fixinclude though it is a bit fragile as it wants to fixup both prototype and redicrected inline function and both are not guarded with the same

[Bug c/49012] New: weak const optimisations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49012 Summary: weak const optimisations Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c/49012] weak const optimisations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49012 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/48999] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/20090706-1.C due to an ICE on *-*-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48999 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug target/45099] [avr] Warning could be issued for use of register variables that will fail.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45099 --- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-05-16 14:16:30 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon May 16 14:16:22 2011 New Revision: 173791 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173791 Log: PR target/45099 * config/avr/avr.c (avr_fu

[Bug c++/48999] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/20090706-1.C due to an ICE on *-*-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48999 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug target/41076] [avr] pessimal code for logical OR of 8-bit fields

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41076 --- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-05-16 14:20:25 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon May 16 14:20:19 2011 New Revision: 173792 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173792 Log: PR target/27663 PR target/41076 * conf

[Bug middle-end/27663] missed-optimization transforming a byte array to unsigned long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27663 --- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-05-16 14:20:25 UTC --- Author: gjl Date: Mon May 16 14:20:19 2011 New Revision: 173792 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173792 Log: PR target/27663 PR target/41076 * conf

[Bug c/49012] weak const optimisations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49012 --- Comment #2 from etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr 2011-05-16 14:36:41 UTC --- Well, with gcc-4.4.5-8 the weak attribute did the trick: $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='

[Bug c++/48999] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/20090706-1.C due to an ICE on *-*-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48999 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-16 14:30:36 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 16 14:30:30 2011 New Revision: 173793 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173793 Log: PR c++/48999 * tree-inline.c (copy_statemen

[Bug target/45099] [avr] Warning could be issued for use of register variables that will fail.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45099 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/49003] [C++0x] decltype in member function's trailing return type should deduce constness of *this

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49003 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-16 14:48:13 UTC --- A simpler test for DR 1207 being implemented is: struct A { auto a() const -> decltype(this) { return this; } }; nc.cc:2:32: error: invalid use of 'this' at top level nc.cc:2:3

[Bug middle-end/27663] missed-optimization transforming a byte array to unsigned long

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27663 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org Known to f

[Bug c/48996] fixincl on Red Hat EL 5 breaks sys/stat.h fstat64()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48996 --- Comment #4 from psmith at gnu dot org 2011-05-16 15:07:40 UTC --- I'm attaching a small test program that fails for me. I'm just running the compiler with "c++ -o tstfstat.o -c tstfstat.cpp"; no extra flags. After looking more carefully I can

[Bug c/48996] fixincl on Red Hat EL 5 breaks sys/stat.h fstat64()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48996 --- Comment #5 from psmith at gnu dot org 2011-05-16 15:08:35 UTC --- Created attachment 24253 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24253 Test invocation of fstat64()

[Bug c++/45873] Parameter packs not expanding consistently in function return types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45873 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-16 15:42:36 UTC --- This seems like a dup of 35722.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49007] ICE in extract_true_false_edges_from_block at tree-cfg.c:7379

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49007 --- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-05-16 16:22:28 UTC --- On Mon, 16 May 2011, danglin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > By trial and error, it appears tree-cfgcleanup.c is miscompiled at -O1 > without -fno-delayed-branch. Attached

[Bug c++/45873] Parameter packs not expanding consistently in function return types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45873 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-05-16 17:04:12 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > This seems like a dup of 35722. Ah yes, it definitely is for the call to foo in my second example in comment 2: modifying pt.c to always complain at the F

[Bug c++/48999] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/20090706-1.C due to an ICE on *-*-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48999 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/49000] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed with -O2 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49000 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com,

[Bug tree-optimization/49000] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed with -O2 -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49000 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/48955] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong result for array assignment due to missing temporary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48955 --- Comment #7 from tkoenig at netcologne dot de 2011-05-16 18:10:03 UTC --- Hi Paul, > Indeed - I just need to find the time to sort out the logic. > Structurally the patch is OK. I think the logic could be as follows: You could have two flags

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #17 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-05-16 18:34:34 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Mon May 16 18:34:31 2011 New Revision: 173801 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173801 Log: PR preprocessor/48677 * cppspec.c (lang_

[Bug bootstrap/49013] New: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49013 Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug rtl-optimization/49014] New: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7132 with even more insane set of flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49014 Summary: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7132 with even more insane set of flags Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/45853] Segfault while experimenting with c++-0x initializer lists

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 --- Comment #5 from James Michael DuPont 2011-05-16 19:17:06 UTC --- Ok, I will have to look into it, thanks, mike On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:19 PM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45853 > > Jonathan W

[Bug fortran/49010] Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/48969] ICE with -std=c++0x

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48969 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-05-16 20:52:24 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon May 16 20:52:18 2011 New Revision: 173805 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173805 Log: PR c++/48969 * pt.c (deduction_tsubst_fntyp

[Bug fortran/49010] Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl 2011-05-16 21:17:44 UTC --- There is an additional problem with MOD(A,P) and MODULO(A,P). In F95, one finds "P = 0, the result is processor dependent." In F2003 and F2008, one finds "P shall not be zero." Consid

[Bug c++/46071] [C++0x] ill-formed use of decltype and auto causes segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46071 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug c++/49015] New: [C++0x] Non-defining constexpr function declarations require complete argument/return types

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49015 Summary: [C++0x] Non-defining constexpr function declarations require complete argument/return types Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/49013] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49013 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone|-

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 --- Comment #18 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-05-16 21:23:18 UTC --- Author: jsm28 Date: Mon May 16 21:23:14 2011 New Revision: 173808 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173808 Log: PR preprocessor/48677 * cppspec.c (lang_

[Bug fortran/49010] Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl 2011-05-16 21:43:57 UTC --- On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 09:31:57PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > In F95, one finds "P = 0, the result is processor dependent." > > In F2003 and F2008, one find

[Bug preprocessor/48677] cpp.exe broken ?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/49016] New: always_inline causes references below the current stack pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49016 Summary: always_inline causes references below the current stack pointer Product: gcc Version: 4.3.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug c/49017] New: [avr] -ffunction-sections causes linker to fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49017 Summary: [avr] -ffunction-sections causes linker to fail Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug c/49016] always_inline causes references below the current stack pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49016 --- Comment #1 from Lee Merrill 2011-05-16 22:45:58 UTC --- Created attachment 24257 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24257 The source file which generates the problem This file, when compiled via the attached "rc" script, wil

[Bug c/49016] always_inline causes references below the current stack pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49016 --- Comment #2 from Lee Merrill 2011-05-16 22:49:14 UTC --- Created attachment 24258 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24258 The output of running rc with "-v -save-temps" added. This is the output from running the "rc" script,

[Bug c/49017] [avr] -ffunction-sections causes linker to fail

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49017 --- Comment #1 from stefan.hladnik at gmail dot com 2011-05-16 22:51:14 UTC --- Created attachment 24259 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24259 Object files before and after linking

[Bug c/49016] always_inline causes references below the current stack pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49016 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski 2011-05-16 23:09:13 UTC --- Well x86_64 ABI has a red zone which allows for these references to happen if they are under 128 bytes.

[Bug c/49016] always_inline causes references below the current stack pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49016 --- Comment #3 from Lee Merrill 2011-05-16 22:51:33 UTC --- A disassembly snippet to show the problem: : 0: 55 push %rbp 1: 48 89 e5mov%rsp,%rbp # Note that these statements r

[Bug target/46655] invalid '.line 0' directive emitted with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 --- Comment #29 from Richard Nolde 2011-05-16 23:19:24 UTC --- On 04/01/2011 06:24 AM, michael.haubenwallner at salomon dot at wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 > > --- Comment #28 from Michael Haubenwallner dot at> 2011

[Bug c/49016] always_inline causes references below the current stack pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49016 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/46655] invalid '.line 0' directive emitted with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 --- Comment #30 from Eric Botcazou 2011-05-17 05:55:57 UTC --- > I'm now running AIX 6.1, oslevel -s returns 6100-06-03-1048 and the > problem seems to persist with newer versions of gcc as well. I installed > gcc 4.4.6 today after having issu

[Bug fortran/49010] Result of MOD and MODULO intrinsic has wrong sign

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49010 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Henlich 2011-05-17 05:51:56 UTC --- The fmod behaviour is correct for x < 0 according to N1548: double fmod(double x, double y); float fmodf(float x, float y); The fmod functions return the value x−ny, for some intege