http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48785
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-27
07:04:29 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 27 07:04:25 2011
New Revision: 173011
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173011
Log:
PR c/48742
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-27
07:05:56 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Apr 27 07:05:54 2011
New Revision: 173012
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173012
Log:
PR c/48742
* c-typeck.c (build_binary_op):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48765
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786
Summary: [OOP] Generic ambiguity check too strict for
polymorphic dummies
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48742
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-27 07:46:00
UTC ---
Hi,
this patch is not really tested, I need to construct a testcase that reproduces
fo rme, but it
adds the mising add_new_function hook and should solve the problem.
Honza
Index: ipa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-27
07:30:36 UTC ---
Hi,
the problem is that ipa-prop is not really looking for newly inserted
functions. So inliner knows about the arguments but asks the ipa-prop machinery
that doesn't. I will add the mi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
Andrey Belevantsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #15 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 07:45:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > Fixed on 4.5.
Can it please be fixed in 4.4, too? (Maybe I am wrong, but I see only commits
to trunk/4.6 and 4.5 he
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #16 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-27
08:10:12 UTC ---
The patch from 4.5 can likely be ported to 4.4 somewhat easy, however, it is
big enough and I am not sure that there will be any more releases off
4.4-branch. If there is such a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48787
Summary: Invalid UP rounding with F editing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #18 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 08:26:51 UTC ---
P.S: Maybe you can backport it anyway, since I opened Gentoo bug #365045 [1].
Having the backport readily available from upstream would probably help
including it in a distr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #17 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 08:25:13 UTC ---
This bug prevents Erlang 14B2 from building on my machine, so for me it is
serious. Someone else has to tell whether there will be further 4.4 releases,
of course.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48771
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo.carlini
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] |[4.6 / 4.7 Regression]
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783
Andrew Stubbs changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ams at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750
--- Comment #15 from Seth Heeren 2011-04-27 09:51:26 UTC
---
Probably redundant info, but the compiler used in my prior post is
sehe@sid:~$ g++-4.6 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++-4.6
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783
--- Comment #2 from Michael Hope 2011-04-27
09:52:09 UTC ---
Sorry, the original attachment included the __attribute__((noinline))
workaround on pll_factors(). Attached is the original that shows the fault.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48090
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48604
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #20 from Andrey Belevantsev 2011-04-27
10:04:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 24112
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24112
backported patch
Good. Then attached is the initial backport, I have just verified that it
pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783
--- Comment #3 from Michael Hope 2011-04-27
09:54:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 24111
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24111
Preprocessed source
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #19 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44618
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.huber@embedded-br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48772
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-27
10:36:38 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Apr 27 10:36:35 2011
New Revision: 173019
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173019
Log:
2011-04-27 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48765
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen 2011-04-27 10:25:16 UTC
---
As analyzed by Richard, the problem (btw, unrelated to Richard's patch) is that
the vectorization factor is changed after the analysis for this loop, and the
same checks that worked fine d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48772
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48775
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-27
09:50:08 UTC ---
Possibly Tru64 needs similar handling as hppa*-hpux*?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48788
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in
resolve_global_procedure (resolve.c:2190) on invalid
(?) fortran code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48783
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Stubbs 2011-04-27 11:08:10
UTC ---
Somewhat reduced testcase:
static void
f (unsigned int a)
{
unsigned long long __res;
if (~0ULL % (a / (a & -a)) == 0)
{
asm ("": "+&r" (__res));
}
}
int
g (unsign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
--- Comment #3 from Török Edwin 2011-04-27
11:11:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 24116
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24116
bench.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #21 from devurandom at gmx dot net 2011-04-27 10:56:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> Created attachment 24112 [details]
> backported patch
Thanks! I notified downstream, hopefully they will give it testing through a
bump to gcc-4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750
--- Comment #14 from Seth Heeren 2011-04-27 09:48:57 UTC
---
I just built a debian SID chroot and applied the diff to it's libstdc++6
(4.6.0-2), and tested your patch with the minimal.cpp from this bug report
patch -p1 < ~sehe/attachment.cgi?id=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
--- Comment #2 from Török Edwin 2011-04-27
11:10:49 UTC ---
Created attachment 24115
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24115
test.S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
--- Comment #1 from Török Edwin 2011-04-27
11:10:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 24114
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24114
reverse.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48789
Summary: missed ARM optimization: use LDMIA
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48788
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #12 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-04-27 11:37:43 UTC ---
> Dodji, is there any reason not to apply this fix to 4.5 as well?
I was waiting to see how the initial fix would behave in 4.6 and it felt
below my radar. But then PR c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48790
Summary: ARM GCC divide/modulo bug
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42260
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-04-27
12:07:20 UTC ---
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Apr 27 12:07:16 2011
New Revision: 173024
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173024
Log:
Revert "Fix PR c++/42260"
gcc/cp
* cp-tree.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #13 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2011-04-27 12:32:09 UTC ---
I have committed those in 4.5 and the changes can be browsed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=eb9cc5c6f
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48790
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davidxl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48767
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48142
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #22 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-27
13:08:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> PS: C++1x is private jargon, but well, as -std= argument, together with c++0x
> we'll need something more realistic, at some point, don't you think? ;)
At
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #14 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-27
13:09:47 UTC ---
*sigh*, 2nd commit while the 4.5 branch is frozen ...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
--- Comment #23 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-27
13:27:50 UTC ---
Got it ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-27 14:11:10 UTC ---
Gay's routines (http://www.netlib.org/fp/) can handle double, float, extended,
quad; rounding directions may be specified. They can output a given number of
digits (compatible to all
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48786
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.3
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-27
14:38:01 UTC ---
DECL_STRUCT_FUNCTION (node->decl) is NULL for covariant return thunk to
AB::getThis()
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-27
14:41:15 UTC ---
#3 0x010e2203 in ipa_add_new_function (node=0x75b90940, data=0x0)
at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/ipa-prop.c:2068
2068 ipa_analyze_node (node);
(gdb) cal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-27
14:59:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Gay's routines (http://www.netlib.org/fp/) can handle double, float, extended,
> quad
libquadmath initially used dtoa for __float128 [REAL(16)] I/O, but the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48746
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-27
15:07:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > Problem here is that the return array "dtype" field is uninitialized when
> > lhs is (unallocated) allocatable. Due to this ther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #14 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-27 15:20:32 UTC ---
> I still can't reproduce the testcase but I guess I can make one myself just by
> forcing global constructor. Will try to have patch before lunch.
I realized last ni
ble-libmudflap --disable-libssp
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110427 (experimental) [trunk revision 173031] (GCC)
$ ./xgcc -B. -c -march=armv7-a -mfloat-abi=softfp -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -O2 t.ii
t.ii: In member function 'void
icu_46::ValueRecord::adjustPosition(icu_46::ValueFormat, co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-27
15:56:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 27 15:56:46 2011
New Revision: 173036
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173036
Log:
PR c++/48046
* parser.c (cp_parser_diagnose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-27
15:57:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Apr 27 15:57:06 2011
New Revision: 173038
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173038
Log:
PR c++/48046
* parser.c (cp_parser_diagnose
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48046
--- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-27
15:59:01 UTC ---
Thanks Jason.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48417
--- Comment #3 from licheng.1212 at gmail dot com 2011-04-27 16:03:56 UTC ---
GCJjava_main.java
Using built-in specs.
Target: mips-elf
Configured with: ../gcc-4.4.2/configure --prefix=/home/lee/gnu_src/dist
--target=mips-elf --with-new
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-27 16:04:21
UTC ---
Hi,
I hope the problem is now fixed at mainline tree. Could you please give it a
try?
Thanks,
Honza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
Ulrich Weigand changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48791
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43085
--- Comment #23 from Ulrich Weigand 2011-04-27
16:28:32 UTC ---
Patch posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02131.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40975
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793
Summary: Optimization -O2 Incorrectly Removes Logic
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40052
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment #3 from Ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15347
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment #9 from Ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37242
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment #19 from M
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39689
Matt Hargett changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment #8 from Ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15347
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-27 18:32:34
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> This appears to be fixed in 4.6.0. Mark as resolved?
Need to add a few testcases first.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48794
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in remap_eh_region_nr
(tree-inline.c:1194) with -Os -fopenmp -fexceptions
-fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48511
--- Comment #9 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-04-27 18:36:12
UTC ---
I've been thinking about this issue now and then over the past few weeks, and
funnily enough, while I initially thought this would be a nice improvement,
I've subsequently come to th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48774
davidxl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xinliangli at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750
sing...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||singler at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48750
--- Comment #17 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-27
20:23:25 UTC ---
Thanks Johannes. Indeed, I was still a little nervous about those bits of
losertree.h. If you can, please make sure that (even if it costs a bit of
performance):
1- After memory al
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48788
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-27
20:32:26 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Wed Apr 27 20:32:21 2011
New Revision: 173048
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173048
Log:
2011-04-27 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752
--- Comment #16 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-04-27 21:08:26 UTC ---
On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote:
> I hope the problem is now fixed at mainline tree. Could you please give it a
> try?
Bug is still present in revis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jason at gcc dot gnu.org, |
|jason at redhat dot c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
--- Comment #2 from Steve Ellcey 2011-04-27 21:58:53
UTC ---
It looks like I was wrong about this showing up on IA64 Linux. I am only
seeing it on IA64 HP-UX and only in 32 bit mode. That probably means it is
related to the HP-UX pointer extens
-name='s/^g++$/jasong++/' --prefix=/home/Daniel/jasongcc --enable-languages=c++
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: single
gcc version 4.7.0 20110427 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-v' '-save-temps' '-std=c++0x' '-Wall' '-shared-libgcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793
--- Comment #2 from Chris DUrso 2011-04-27 22:36:16
UTC ---
Hi Andreas,
Are you saying that
myInteger = -myInteger;
or
if( myInteger < 0 )
is undefined for the integer MIN_INT?
Read a little closer, the overflow/underflow/abs are just
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48794
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48793
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-27
22:59:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> myInteger = -myInteger;
>
> is undefined for the integer MIN_INT?
The above is undefined for the value of MIN_INT. As there is an overflow as
-MIN_INT is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48530
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48530
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-27 23:07:09
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> The issue noticed by Daniel in Comment #3 seems simple: happens only with
> checking enabled and disappears with the below (which passes testing).
>
> Jason, if y
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48530
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-27
23:09:09 UTC ---
Sure.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48795
Summary: -Warray-bounds false positive
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig.
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
