[Bug c++/48759] New: Inconsistency in code generation for inline virtual functions depending on position of the "inline" keyword

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48759 Summary: Inconsistency in code generation for inline virtual functions depending on position of the "inline" keyword Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRME

[Bug c/48758] gcc miscompiles Emacs by incorrectly substituting memcpy for memmove

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48758 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libfortran/48615] Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with E and ES descriptors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615 --- Comment #12 from Thomas Henlich 2011-04-25 08:43:32 UTC --- The patch submitted to the list is different to the one I based my comments on. My mistake. Good work. With the current method of letting printf do the conversion, there seems to b

[Bug libfortran/48684] Incorrect field alignment with Gw.dEe descriptor

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48684 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Henlich 2011-04-25 08:46:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > On 04/23/2011 02:27 PM, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- snip --- > > > > Unpatched gfortran and ifort give: > > I meant patched gfortran and ifor

[Bug lto/48725] 4.6.0 fails to link p7zip 9.20.1 with LTO and gold

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48725 --- Comment #3 from Vadim Markovtsev 2011-04-25 09:47:25 UTC --- BTW, gold fails to link if used in a similar way in LLVM LTO, so it is likely not a GCC bug.

[Bug libstdc++/48760] New: std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Summary: std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assig

[Bug middle-end/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org Compone

[Bug middle-end/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-25 12:41:59 UTC --- PR24581 can be related, its additional, "unexpected", nans. A C snippet showing the issue would be: int main() { float r = 0; float i = __builtin_nanf (""); __complex__ float

[Bug middle-end/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-25 13:21:58 UTC --- By the way, just in case isn't super-clear to people coming from C, there is nothing C++1x specific here (26.4.4/1 and /2 are identical to 26.2.4 in the old standard)

[Bug lto/48725] 4.6.0 fails to link p7zip 9.20.1 with LTO and gold

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48725 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/48761] New: Indirect inlining needs to perform type checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48761 Summary: Indirect inlining needs to perform type checking Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assigned

[Bug middle-end/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-04-25 16:02:11 UTC --- On Mon, 25 Apr 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > A C snippet showing the issue would be: > > int main() > { > float r = 0; > float i = __builtin_nanf

[Bug lto/48725] 4.6.0 fails to link p7zip 9.20.1 with LTO and gold

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48725 --- Comment #5 from Vadim Markovtsev 2011-04-25 16:06:25 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Does it work with BFD linker in CVS? I will check that out tomorrow.

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |libstdc++ --- Comment #5 from Paolo Carli

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/48762] New: valgrind: Invalid read/write of size 8 in cse_main with -O --param max-cse-path-length=0 on basic code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48762 Summary: valgrind: Invalid read/write of size 8 in cse_main with -O --param max-cse-path-length=0 on basic code Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug libfortran/25830] [libgfortran] Optionally support multi-process locking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830 --- Comment #4 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-04-25 16:41:26 UTC --- Some writings arguing that POSIX locking is more or less fundamentally broken: http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/locking.html http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/locking2.html http://

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||g...@integrable-solutions.ne

[Bug lto/48763] New: Inliner type ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48763 Summary: Inliner type ICE Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org Repo

[Bug lto/48763] Inliner type ICE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48763 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-25 17:04:55 UTC --- OK, the problem is that we check only return types for compatibility: 244 /* Redirect all incoming edges. */ 245 compatible_p 246 = gimple_types_compatible_p (TREE_T

[Bug c++/48707] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [c++0x] ICE initializing static const int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48707 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #7 from John Maddock 2011-04-25 17:21:15 UTC --- Sorry to be dumb, but doesn't the result of the C code violate section G.5.2 in C99 - which is to say that no matter what the value of the imaginary part of an expression, it never chan

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Gabriel Dos Reis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gdr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug testsuite/48753] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/val-prof-2.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48753 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48720] quad precision literals do not work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48720 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-25 18:44:48 UTC --- See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg01986.html for a patch.

[Bug tree-optimization/48764] New: wrong-code bug in gcc-4.5.x, related to __restrict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48764 Summary: wrong-code bug in gcc-4.5.x, related to __restrict Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug debug/48670] explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670 --- Comment #4 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-25 18:55:36 UTC --- ping? Anything else you need from me on this?

[Bug middle-end/48722] ICE in df_refs_verify() with -mno-push-args

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48722 --- Comment #1 from Pat Haugen 2011-04-25 20:47:52 UTC --- Created attachment 24095 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24095 reduced testcase Similar failure on powerpc64-linux when building cpu2006 benchmark 435.gromacs. > /ho

[Bug tree-optimization/48765] New: ICE in vect_transform_stmt

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48765 Summary: ICE in vect_transform_stmt Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 Gabriel Dos Reis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/48707] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [c++0x] ICE initializing static const int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48707 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-25 21:51:36 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 25 21:51:33 2011 New Revision: 172941 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172941 Log: PR c++/48707 * decl.c (type_dependent_init_

[Bug c++/48707] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [c++0x] ICE initializing static const int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48707 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-25 21:54:04 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Apr 25 21:53:57 2011 New Revision: 172942 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172942 Log: PR c++/48707 * pt.c (value_dependent_expres

[Bug c++/48707] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [c++0x] ICE initializing static const int

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48707 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48760] [4.6 / 4.7 Regression (?)] std::complex constructor buggy in the face of NaN's

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48760 --- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-25 22:04:56 UTC --- Thanks Gaby, your analysis certainly helps. Let's see what Jason, thinks, then.

[Bug middle-end/48663] [4.7 regression] final.c:dump_basic_block_info breaks several Tru64 UNIX tests

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48663 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/48766] New: Infinite recursion in fold_binary_loc()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48766 Summary: Infinite recursion in fold_binary_loc() Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo

[Bug c/48767] New: compiler error: Segmentation fault with set void in va_arg

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48767 Summary: compiler error: Segmentation fault with set void in va_arg Product: gcc Version: 4.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 --- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2011-04-26 01:57:57 UTC --- ICE occurs at i==2. Breakpoint 1, evaulate_conditions_for_edge (e=0x78730cf0, inline_p=1 '\001') at ../../gcc/gcc/ipa-inline-analysis.c:481 481 tree val = VEC_index

[Bug middle-end/48752] [4.7 Regression] ICE in evaulate_conditions_for_edge at ipa-inline-analysis.c:466

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48752 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/48768] New: ICE in get_expr_operands()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48768 Summary: ICE in get_expr_operands() Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug target/48723] ICE in ix86_expand_prologue() with -fstack-check + function returning struct, on corei7-avx

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48723 --- Comment #9 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-04-26 06:10:02 UTC --- This task is in state RESOLVED FIXED, but the testcase still ICEs in current trunk (r172940, x86_64-linux) as the fix was reverted. Where can I track this ICE? Thanks

[Bug tree-optimization/48734] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in eliminate_redundant_comparison, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1321

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48734 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48769] New: [4.7 Regression] Multiple failures in libjava for -m64 on powerpc-apple-darwin9

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48769 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Multiple failures in libjava for -m64 on powerpc-apple-darwin9 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug libfortran/48589] Invalid G0/G0.d editing for NaN/infinity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589 Thomas Henlich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48734] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in eliminate_redundant_comparison, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1321

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48734 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-26 06:56:46 UTC --- Reduced testcase: unsigned int foo (int x, unsigned int y, unsigned int z) { z &= (x == -__INT_MAX__ - 1 ? x : -x) > y; z &= (x == -__INT_MAX__ - 1 ? x : -x) > y; z &= (x == -__