http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-18
18:46:00 UTC ---
This optimization test case is cute. We should ship it to the optimization
folks.
And it should be yet another PR, even if we can come up with a work around. I
am not going to have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #29 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-18
18:56:22 UTC ---
I should mention that optimization issue goes away at -O3.
It also goes away with -ffloat-store
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48671
Summary: [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with
bootstrap-profiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-18
20:56:02 UTC ---
The following seems to mostly work. I think some double resolving could happen
- thus, one might need to tweak resolve_all_program_units.
Paul & Mikael: What do you think?
Test-suite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48671
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-18
21:23:46 UTC ---
Jason, when this bug is fixed will this be allowed too?
template
struct S
{
template
void f(Args1... args1, Args2&&... args2)
{
}
};
S s;
Currently this gives:
var.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086
--- Comment #24 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-18
21:27:04 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:27:00 2011
New Revision: 172671
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172671
Log:
2011-04-18 Jack Howarth
PR lto/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48521
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-18
21:43:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> This is supposed to work, and did with 4.4:
>
> #include
> struct X
> {
> int foo();
> };
>
> typedef int (X::*pm)();
> std::result_of::type i = 0;
B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48672
Summary: [4.6 regression] control reaches end of non-void false
positive
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48672
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-18 21:49:55 UTC
---
Created attachment 24038
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24038
g++ -O0 -Wreturn-type -c abm.i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48672
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2011-04-18
21:54:18 UTC ---
These warnings are semi correct. The problem is that GCC does not know that
the enum value of either this->version or Get_version() cannot be either
ALLOCATED_BLOCK_MAP_V1 or ALLOCATE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
21:55:10 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:55:07 2011
New Revision: 172674
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172674
Log:
PR c++/48632
* parser.c (cp_parser_omp_for_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
21:56:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:56:12 2011
New Revision: 172675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172675
Log:
PR c++/48632
* parser.c (cp_parser_omp_for_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
21:58:05 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:58:03 2011
New Revision: 172676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172676
Log:
PR middle-end/48661
* gimple-fold.c (gimple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
21:58:53 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 18 21:58:51 2011
New Revision: 172677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172677
Log:
PR middle-end/48661
* gimple-fold.c (gimple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
--- Comment #6 from scott snyder 2011-04-18 21:58:51
UTC ---
Thanks Jakob!
I can confirm that that patch also fixes the problem in the original
source from which i derived that test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48673
Summary: [4.7 Regression] GCC generates WAW and RAW conflicts
on IA64.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48537
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-18
22:40:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 18 22:40:43 2011
New Revision: 172678
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172678
Log:
PR c++/48537
* init.c (build_value_init): H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48424
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-18
22:45:55 UTC ---
Yes, that looks OK too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47336
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-18
23:23:36 UTC ---
Here's another example which produces the "error reporting routines re-entered"
ICE, this time on invalid code:
template T declval();
template
struct S {
template
static U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48537
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-18
23:29:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 18 23:29:30 2011
New Revision: 172679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172679
Log:
PR c++/48537
* init.c (build_value_init): H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr48661.C
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedT
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48569
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-04-18
23:54:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Apr 18 23:54:47 2011
New Revision: 172680
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172680
Log:
PR c++/48569
* typeck2.c (build_functional_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48537
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48569
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #10 from Michael Hope 2011-04-19
01:05:42 UTC ---
The proposed patch bootstraps fine on i686, x86_64, and armv7l. See:
https://code.launchpad.net/~michaelh1/gcc-linaro/pr47976/+merge/58062
-FAIL: gfortran.dg/actual_array_constructo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #30 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-19
02:06:52 UTC ---
I can not reproduce the issue with optimization issue on my linux system
x86-64.
Thomas, what platform do you see the problem on? I only see it on a Cygwin
installation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675
Summary: [4.7 Regression]: 20_util/hash/chi2_quality.cc timeout
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675
--- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-04-19
03:58:08 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Tue Apr 19 03:58:04 2011
New Revision: 172691
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172691
Log:
PR testsuite/48675
* testsuite/20_util/ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675
--- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson 2011-04-19
03:59:19 UTC ---
Author: hp
Date: Tue Apr 19 03:59:16 2011
New Revision: 172692
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172692
Log:
PR testsuite/48675
* testsuite/20_util/ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48675
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
Summary: [sh] Unaligned userspace access in
gcc.dg/torture/pr37868.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48603
--- Comment #6 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-04-19 05:02:16 UTC ---
I guess it would be enough for GDB to provide there the name, without
namespaces.
Just in such case it needs to be a completely different attribute than
overloaded DW_AT{,_MIPS}_linka
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48405
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig 2011-04-19
05:19:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 24039
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24039
Proposed patch
This should work (and also fix some other bugs as well).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48676
--- Comment #2 from Nobuhiro Iwamatsu 2011-04-19
05:21:41 UTC ---
Work fine. Thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #31 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-19
06:06:44 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> I can not reproduce the issue with optimization issue on my linux system
> x86-64.
I can produce it with -m32 on Linux. Most such issues occur due to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #32 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-19 06:09:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> I can not reproduce the issue with optimization issue on my linux system
> x86-64.
>
> Thomas, what platform do you see the problem on? I only see it on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48677
Summary: cpp.exe broken ?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48678
Summary: [regression] unable to find a register to spill in
class ‘GENERAL_REGS’
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
101 - 145 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
