[Bug c/47939] Missing DW_TAG_typedef for qualified types

2011-04-15 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47939 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

2011-04-15 Thread richard at nod dot at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 --- Comment #8 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15 20:26:03 UTC --- Created attachment 24006 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24006 preprocessed __local_bh_enable function

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

2011-04-15 Thread richard at nod dot at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 --- Comment #9 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15 20:26:48 UTC --- Created attachment 24007 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24007 preprocessed softirq.c

[Bug fortran/48426] [patch] Quad precision promotion

2011-04-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426 --- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 20:30:44 UTC --- Super! If you have not already figured it out. We are really short on help.

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

2011-04-15 Thread thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Henlich 2011-04-15 20:41:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > OK I knew I was "looking" at it wrong. The formulas you mention we are using > and are in write_float.def starting at line 798. The table is there as well.

[Bug fortran/48462] [4.6/4.7 Regression] realloc on assignment: matmul Segmentation Fault with Allocatable Array

2011-04-15 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462 --- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-15 20:40:58 UTC --- Created attachment 24008 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24008 A fix for the PR This fixes the PR and bootstraps/regtests on FC9/x86_64. I will continue to look for

[Bug target/48634] New: Missed optimization for use of __builtin_ctzll() and __builtin_clzll

2011-04-15 Thread svfuerst at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48634 Summary: Missed optimization for use of __builtin_ctzll() and __builtin_clzll Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

2011-04-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15 20:57:31 UTC --- Ha, OK thanks. I see it.

[Bug libstdc++/48635] New: [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

2011-04-15 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 Summary: [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug fortran/48636] New: Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher

2011-04-15 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636 Summary: Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 C

[Bug fortran/48624] gfortran DECL issues in function declaration

2011-04-15 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48624 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-15 21:16:20 UTC --- The reason for the issue can be found in trans-decl.c: gfc_get_extern_function_decl (gfc_symbol * sym) [...] /* Do not use procedures that have a procedure argument because this

[Bug rtl-optimization/48633] IRA causes ICE in compensate_edge

2011-04-15 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48633 --- Comment #1 from Michael Matz 2011-04-15 21:17:22 UTC --- During reducing the testcase I had this hunk applied for ira-build.c: Index: ira-build.c === --- ira-build.c (Revision 1

[Bug fortran/18918] Eventually support Fortran 2008's coarrays [co-arrays]

2011-04-15 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918 --- Comment #36 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-15 21:41:28 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Fri Apr 15 21:41:25 2011 New Revision: 172522 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172522 Log: 2011-04-15 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/1

[Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

2011-04-15 Thread daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler 2011-04-15 21:44:56 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) The exactly same problem exists for the specialization std::unique_ptr.

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

2011-04-15 Thread matz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/44194] struct returned by value generates useless stores

2011-04-15 Thread eraman at google dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 --- Comment #15 from Easwaran Raman 2011-04-15 22:22:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #14) > On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, eraman at google dot com wrote: > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194 > > > > Easwaran Raman changed: > > > >

[Bug c/48623] gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with __attribute__((always_inline))

2011-04-15 Thread richard at nod dot at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623 --- Comment #11 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15 22:27:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > You have to make use of 'p' of course. Your return value still is based > on &ti. Damn, you're right! Now gcc produces a functional UML kernel. :-)

[Bug lto/48492] [4.7 Regression] LTO bootstrap failure in copy_constant

2011-04-15 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48492 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-15 22:52:08 UTC --- The scenario is as follows: 1. during LTO stage, copy-prop eliminates a DECL_IN_CONSTANT_POOL variable from the GIMPLE IR, except for a reference in a GIMPLE_DEBUG statement (ADDR_EX

[Bug target/48629] ICE on gcc.dg/pr42389.c on ia64-*-* with -fsched-pressure

2011-04-15 Thread bernds at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-15 23:32:58 UTC --- Author: bernds Date: Fri Apr 15 23:32:55 2011 New Revision: 172525 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172525 Log: PR target/48629 * haifa-sched.c (prune_rea

[Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

2011-04-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48495] ICE in in reload_cse_simplify_operands

2011-04-15 Thread bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48495 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

2011-04-15 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-16 00:55:49 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Apr 16 00:55:43 2011 New Revision: 172532 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172532 Log: 2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler Pao

[Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

2011-04-15 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-16 00:55:59 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Apr 16 00:55:53 2011 New Revision: 172533 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172533 Log: 2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler Pao

[Bug libstdc++/48635] [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of copying it

2011-04-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48631] [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

2011-04-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/48631] [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

2011-04-15 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-16 02:02:35 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Apr 16 02:02:29 2011 New Revision: 172534 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172534 Log: 2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler Pao

[Bug libstdc++/48631] [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

2011-04-15 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-16 02:05:01 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Apr 16 02:04:56 2011 New Revision: 172535 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172535 Log: 2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler Pao

[Bug libstdc++/48631] [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

2011-04-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libstdc++/48631] [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer conversions in function call operator

2011-04-15 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 f

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

2011-04-15 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-16 04:30:04 UTC --- Here is a patch for testing. Index: io/write_float.def === --- io/write_float.def(revision 172502) +++ io/write_flo

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

2011-04-15 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48630 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug inline-asm/48637] New: %c in ARM inline asm leads to ICE (in arm_print_operand)

2011-04-15 Thread rabin at rab dot in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48637 Summary: %c in ARM inline asm leads to ICE (in arm_print_operand) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libfortran/48602] Invalid F conversion of G descriptor for values close to powers of 10

2011-04-15 Thread thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602 --- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich 2011-04-16 06:42:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) > - if ((m > 0.0 && m < 0.1 - 0.05 * rexp_d) || (rexp_d * (m + 0.5) >= 1.0) ||\ > + if ((m > 0.0 && m < 0.1 - r * rexp_d) || (rexp_d * (m + r) >= 1.0) ||\

<    1   2