http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47939
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
--- Comment #8 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15
20:26:03 UTC ---
Created attachment 24006
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24006
preprocessed __local_bh_enable function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
--- Comment #9 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15
20:26:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 24007
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24007
preprocessed softirq.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #14 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15
20:30:44 UTC ---
Super! If you have not already figured it out. We are really short on help.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-15 20:41:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> OK I knew I was "looking" at it wrong. The formulas you mention we are using
> and are in write_float.def starting at line 798. The table is there as well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
--- Comment #6 from Paul Thomas 2011-04-15 20:40:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 24008
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24008
A fix for the PR
This fixes the PR and bootstraps/regtests on FC9/x86_64.
I will continue to look for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48634
Summary: Missed optimization for use of __builtin_ctzll() and
__builtin_clzll
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15
20:57:31 UTC ---
Ha, OK thanks. I see it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635
Summary: [C++0x] unique_ptr moves the deleter instead of
copying it
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48636
Summary: Enable more inlining with -O2 and higher
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48624
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-15
21:16:20 UTC ---
The reason for the issue can be found in trans-decl.c:
gfc_get_extern_function_decl (gfc_symbol * sym)
[...]
/* Do not use procedures that have a procedure argument because this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48633
--- Comment #1 from Michael Matz 2011-04-15 21:17:22
UTC ---
During reducing the testcase I had this hunk applied for ira-build.c:
Index: ira-build.c
===
--- ira-build.c (Revision 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
--- Comment #36 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-15
21:41:28 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Apr 15 21:41:25 2011
New Revision: 172522
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172522
Log:
2011-04-15 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler
2011-04-15 21:44:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
The exactly same problem exists for the specialization std::unique_ptr.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #15 from Easwaran Raman 2011-04-15
22:22:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #14)
> On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, eraman at google dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
> >
> > Easwaran Raman changed:
> >
> >
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
--- Comment #11 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15
22:27:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> You have to make use of 'p' of course. Your return value still is based
> on &ti.
Damn, you're right!
Now gcc produces a functional UML kernel. :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48492
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-15
22:52:08 UTC ---
The scenario is as follows:
1. during LTO stage, copy-prop eliminates a DECL_IN_CONSTANT_POOL variable
from the GIMPLE IR, except for a reference in a GIMPLE_DEBUG statement
(ADDR_EX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629
--- Comment #1 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-15
23:32:58 UTC ---
Author: bernds
Date: Fri Apr 15 23:32:55 2011
New Revision: 172525
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172525
Log:
PR target/48629
* haifa-sched.c (prune_rea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48495
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-16 00:55:49 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Apr 16 00:55:43 2011
New Revision: 172532
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172532
Log:
2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler
Pao
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-16 00:55:59 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Apr 16 00:55:53 2011
New Revision: 172533
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172533
Log:
2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler
Pao
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48635
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-16 02:02:35 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Apr 16 02:02:29 2011
New Revision: 172534
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172534
Log:
2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler
Pao
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-16 02:05:01 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sat Apr 16 02:04:56 2011
New Revision: 172535
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172535
Log:
2011-04-15 Daniel Krugler
Pao
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-16
04:30:04 UTC ---
Here is a patch for testing.
Index: io/write_float.def
===
--- io/write_float.def(revision 172502)
+++ io/write_flo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48630
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48637
Summary: %c in ARM inline asm leads to ICE (in
arm_print_operand)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-16 06:42:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> - if ((m > 0.0 && m < 0.1 - 0.05 * rexp_d) || (rexp_d * (m + 0.5) >= 1.0) ||\
> + if ((m > 0.0 && m < 0.1 - r * rexp_d) || (rexp_d * (m + r) >= 1.0) ||\
101 - 133 of 133 matches
Mail list logo