http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48615
Summary: Invalid UP/DOWN rounding with E and ES descriptors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
Summary: -ftree-vectorize -mxop miscompiles right shift
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Ass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48617
Summary: [C++0x] Problem with non-type template parameters and
decltype
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48612
--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak 2011-04-15 09:09:14
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This should work:
Yes, these mnemonics should be switched. Please go ahead and commit this
change.
Thanks,
Uros.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48618
Summary: Negative unit number in OPEN(...) is sometimes allowed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15
09:10:07 UTC ---
Yes, something like that. Though can_escape can be made simpler and more
precise by
bool
can_escape (tree expr)
{
tree base;
if (!expr)
return true;
base = get_base_add
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25829
--- Comment #21 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-15
09:10:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #19)
> A brute-force method would be to add a __sync_synchronize
Actually, this idea does not work properly - neither for INQUIRE(...,PENDING=)
nor for ASYNCHRON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48587
--- Comment #5 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-04-15 09:13:14
UTC ---
Reading the standard, my simple suggestion in #1 will not actually work. One
reason is that the NEWUNIT value may not be -1; with my approach this is
possible if one first closes fd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka 2011-04-15 09:22:36 UTC
---
> And indeed it does. Therefore I believe we should add it to the referenced
> set
> of a clone in the WPA stage...?
Yes, we spoke on this some time ago - when propagating constant int
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32037
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-15 09:26:08 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Apr 15 09:26:05 2011
New Revision: 172477
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172477
Log:
PR libobjc/32037
* Makefile.in (OBJC_GCFLAGS): M
gcc version 4.7.0 20110415 (experimental) (GCC)
COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-B' '/tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/'
'-L/tmp/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/winsup/mingw'
'-L/tmp/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/winsup/w32api/lib' '-isystem'
'/tmp/gcc/winsup/mingw/include'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48619
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jojelino at gmail dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-04-15
10:13:31 UTC ---
See pr48619 for a backtrace on i686-pc-mingw32.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-04-15
10:15:39 UTC ---
Oops!-(no backtrace in pr48619).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48605
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15
10:21:04 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 15 10:21:00 2011
New Revision: 172483
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172483
Log:
PR target/48605
* config/i386/sse.md (avx_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48614
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15
10:29:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 15 10:29:09 2011
New Revision: 172484
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172484
Log:
PR target/48614
* gcc.target/i386/pr46084.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48610
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.0 |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48614
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15
10:30:01 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 15 10:29:58 2011
New Revision: 172485
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172485
Log:
PR target/48614
* gcc.target/i386/pr46084.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48611
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48612
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48613
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41159
--- Comment #11 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15
10:33:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I believe I also have this occurring with host=x86_64-linux
> target=arm-linux-gnueabi. After reading this ticket, I retried my compiles
> with the same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48605
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15
10:34:46 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.6+ so far.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15
10:38:38 UTC ---
I see no vectorized loop which makes me suspect if-conversion. Can you
try if -ftree-loop-if-convert is enough to trigger the failure?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47976
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-04-15
12:10:54 UTC ---
Ramana,
it looks like I'm running out of time to test this properly before I disappear
for a few weeks. Can you give this a proper ARM test run and commit if it's
urgent?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
Matthias Kretz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64
--- Comment #3 from Matthias Kret
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48612
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-15
12:48:40 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Apr 15 12:48:36 2011
New Revision: 172492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172492
Log:
Switch SSE and AVX mnemonics.
2011-04-15 H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620
Summary: many libstdc++ tests FAIL with -m32
-fno-early-inlining -fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48612
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621
Summary: Can't install gcc because Ada doctool installation
process uses wrong gcc, thus producing incompatible
ALI file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48620
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48584
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15
13:07:56 UTC ---
The shift corresponding to
a = Vec(16);
a >>= shifts;
is actually there, but a wrong one, V4SImode = V4SImode >> SImode
rather than V4SImode = V4SImode >> V4SImode which needs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48622
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in estimate_size_after_inlining,
at ipa-inline-analysis.c:425 with -flto
-finline-small-functions -fno-early-inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15
13:39:08 UTC ---
I should mention it is the only vpsrad insn in the testcase.
In *.cunroll we have:
[pr48616.C : 113:76] D.52396_86 = MEM[(const AliasingEntryType *
{ref-all})&shifts];
...
[pr486
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48286
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48286
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15
14:06:51 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Apr 15 14:06:44 2011
New Revision: 172495
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172495
Log:
2011-04-15 Richard Guenther
PR testsui
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15
14:02:50 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Apr 15 14:02:41 2011
New Revision: 172494
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172494
Log:
2011-04-15 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
--- Comment #1 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15
14:16:22 UTC ---
Created attachment 23995
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23995
Testcase for gcc 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621
--- Comment #2 from Georg Bauhaus 2011-04-15
14:16:38 UTC ---
I did first run
$ make boostrap
which I should have stated less implicitly, sorry.
And then, as the report says,
$ make check # with -k, actually. ACATS results were good
and only
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
Summary: gcc 4.6.0 generates no code for a function with
__attribute__((always_inline))
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15
14:52:04 UTC ---
Instead using
static inline struct thread_info *current_thread_info(void)
{
struct thread_info *ti;
void *p;
asm volatile ("" : "=r" (p) : "0" (&ti));
ti = (struct thread_i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48476
--- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-04-15 14:53:02 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Apr 15 14:52:57 2011
New Revision: 172498
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172498
Log:
2011-04-15 Takaya Saito
PR libs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48476
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-15
14:53:52 UTC ---
Ping?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48622
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
--- Comment #6 from gee 2011-04-15 15:40:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 23996 [details]
> Proposed fix
>
> I don't have (easy) access to a platform exhibiting this bug but this
> patch should rather obviously fix it. It
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15
16:00:43 UTC ---
Created attachment 23997
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23997
pr48616.ii.bz2
Preprocessed, for -O2 -ftree-vectorize -mxop -m64.
The bug is during the second vect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-15
16:02:34 UTC ---
> I did first run
>
> $ make boostrap
>
> which I should have stated less implicitly, sorry.
Just run "make", this is how it is tested nowadays.
> I have started again using a abso
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl
2011-04-15 16:02:17 UTC ---
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:29:36PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> I have looked over the patch. I need to do some tests and I have about three
> bugs in front of this
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
--- Comment #35 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-15
16:13:35 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Fri Apr 15 16:13:28 2011
New Revision: 172499
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172499
Log:
2011-04-15 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48624
Summary: gfrtran DECL issues in function declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48625
Summary: Segfault in libitm when compiling with -O2
Product: gcc
Version: trans-mem
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: trans-mem
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40171
Dzianis Kahanovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22444|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15
16:29:50 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 15 16:29:44 2011
New Revision: 172502
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172502
Log:
2011-04-15 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15
16:33:14 UTC ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Apr 15 16:33:07 2011
New Revision: 172503
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172503
Log:
2011-04-15 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15
16:40:58 UTC ---
Steve, I can clean this up but i am not clear on copyright assignment. Any
issues on this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48589
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15
16:42:13 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk. Shall we backport to 4.6.1?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48626
Summary: --enable-objc-gc should be automatic
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libobjc
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15
16:49:36 UTC ---
extern void abort (void);
int a[4] __attribute__((aligned (32)));
int b[4] __attribute__((aligned (32)));
int c[4] __attribute__((aligned (32)));
int d[4] __attribute__((aligned (32)))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl
2011-04-15 16:59:41 UTC ---
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 04:41:06PM +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Steve, I can clean this up but i am not clear on copyright assignment. Any
> issues on this?
The patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32037
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48627
Summary: libobjc_gc should be tested
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libobjc
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48621
--- Comment #4 from Georg Bauhaus 2011-04-15
16:55:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > I have started again using a absolute path to configure, as you have
> > suggested.
>
> Thanks, let's see whether this changes something.
Findings so f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
--- Comment #4 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15
17:34:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 24000
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24000
objdump of __local_bh_enable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
Richard Weinberger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|INVAL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628
Summary: ICE in reload
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
--- Comment #6 from Richard Weinberger 2011-04-15
17:38:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 24001
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24001
objdump of __local_bh_enable
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628
--- Comment #1 from belagod at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-15 17:40:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 24002
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24002
test case with complex expressions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #6 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-15
17:48:01 UTC ---
Unfortunately it seems that cgraph_create_virtual_clone already does
that... so either this information is not actually used to create the
node in the LTRANS stage or it gets lost alon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629
Summary: ICE on gcc.dg/pr42389.c on ia64-*-* with
-fsched-pressure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-15
18:20:51 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Apr 15 18:20:46 2011
New Revision: 172512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172512
Log:
2011-04-15 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/48
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
--- Comment #3 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-15 18:30:23 UTC
---
I added the attachment; are you still waiting on something from me? Let me know
:)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48585
--- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor 2011-04-15
18:34:30 UTC ---
Well, I guess I should have verified this but it seems that
&__comp_dtor is not actually one of the constants propagated by
IPA-CP. So we'll have to figure out where it actually comes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-15
19:08:50 UTC ---
Created attachment 24003
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24003
gcc46-pr48616.patch
This untested patch seems to work for me, though the generated code is in some
c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
Easwaran Raman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eraman at google dot com
--- Comment #13
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-04-15 19:31:36 UTC ---
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, eraman at google dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44194
>
> Easwaran Raman changed:
>
>What|Removed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15
19:31:06 UTC ---
I am missing something here:
"print "(RU,G15.2)", .991d0
prints 1.00 but the expected result is 1.0 because 1 - r * 10**-2 < .991 with r
= 1 because of UP rounding mode"
We are askin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48630
Summary: Poor g++ suggestion: did you forget the ‘&’
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48426
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Kloeckner 2011-04-15
19:46:45 UTC ---
Just requested the assignment forms. I'll let you know when we've returned
them.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48631
Summary: [C++0x] default_delete accepts pointer
conversions in function call operator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-15 19:58:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I am missing something here:
>
> "print "(RU,G15.2)", .991d0
> prints 1.00 but the expected result is 1.0 because 1 - r * 10**-2 < .991 with
> r
> = 1 bec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632
Summary: Internal compiler error when using OpenMP with
template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632
--- Comment #1 from Phelippe Neveu 2011-04-15
20:06:07 UTC ---
Created attachment 24005
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24005
Preprocessed source file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-eabi
--- Comment #2 from Richard G
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-15
20:08:19 UTC ---
See PR48317 for one reason why vector stuff isn't optimized too well.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48623
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48633
Summary: IRA causes ICE in compensate_edge
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-04-15
20:13:12 UTC ---
OK I knew I was "looking" at it wrong. The formulas you mention we are using
and are in write_float.def starting at line 798. The table is there as well. I
have been exploring the code
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
