[Bug lto/48516] internal compiler error: in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.c:242

2011-04-08 Thread tommino at online dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48516 --- Comment #4 from tommino at online dot de 2011-04-08 22:12:02 UTC --- Created attachment 23935 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23935 SRC files Complete SRC.

[Bug lto/48516] internal compiler error: in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.c:242

2011-04-08 Thread tommino at online dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48516 --- Comment #5 from tommino at online dot de 2011-04-08 22:16:06 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Even with -flto in compilation/linking problem persisst. BTW, gcc-toolchain is ARM from yagarto.de

[Bug c++/48523] New: [C++0x] lambda cannot capture 'this' in class template

2011-04-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48523 Summary: [C++0x] lambda cannot capture 'this' in class template Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/48522] decltype((object)) with templated classes crashes g++ 4.5.1.

2011-04-08 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48522 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Known to work|

[Bug target/47829] no .eh_frame_hdr table will be created.

2011-04-08 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47829 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug testsuite/48506] ssa-ccp-17.c = g.i fails

2011-04-08 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506 --- Comment #5 from Mike Stump 2011-04-08 22:35:19 UTC --- Ah, insight, this is a no-common port I'm working on, so indeed an initializer would fix it for me.

[Bug testsuite/48506] ssa-ccp-17.c = g.i fails

2011-04-08 Thread mikestump at comcast dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506 --- Comment #6 from Mike Stump 2011-04-08 22:41:16 UTC --- How about something like the below. I't leaves the scan alone (nice property), ensures there is a memory access and will work on common and no-common ports equally well. Ok? Index: gcc

[Bug testsuite/48506] ssa-ccp-17.c = g.i fails

2011-04-08 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506 --- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08 23:54:02 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Apr 8 23:53:59 2011 New Revision: 172218 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172218 Log: PR testsuite/48506 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa

[Bug libfortran/48488] Wrong default format for real numbers

2011-04-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/48506] ssa-ccp-17.c = g.i fails

2011-04-08 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506 --- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08 23:56:48 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Fri Apr 8 23:56:45 2011 New Revision: 172219 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172219 Log: PR testsuite/48506 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa

[Bug testsuite/48506] ssa-ccp-17.c = g.i fails

2011-04-08 Thread mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug boehm-gc/48299] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

2011-04-08 Thread Hans.Boehm at hp dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 --- Comment #12 from Hans Boehm 2011-04-09 00:22:01 UTC --- The duplicate definition of LINUX_THREADS looks like an old problem. The upstream source now says: #ifndef GC_THREADS # define GC_THREADS #endif /* GC_THREADS */ GC_THREADS eventuall

[Bug driver/48524] New: spec language does not cover switches with separated form

2011-04-08 Thread dirtyepic at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524 Summary: spec language does not cover switches with separated form Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug c++/48525] New: -O0 produces incorrect results for inlined functions sharing the same name.

2011-04-08 Thread jroelofs at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48525 Summary: -O0 produces incorrect results for inlined functions sharing the same name. Product: gcc Version: 4.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

<    1   2