http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48516
--- Comment #4 from tommino at online dot de 2011-04-08 22:12:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 23935
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23935
SRC files
Complete SRC.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48516
--- Comment #5 from tommino at online dot de 2011-04-08 22:16:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
Even with -flto in compilation/linking problem persisst.
BTW, gcc-toolchain is ARM from yagarto.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48523
Summary: [C++0x] lambda cannot capture 'this' in class template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48522
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47829
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
--- Comment #5 from Mike Stump 2011-04-08
22:35:19 UTC ---
Ah, insight, this is a no-common port I'm working on, so indeed an initializer
would fix it for me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
--- Comment #6 from Mike Stump 2011-04-08
22:41:16 UTC ---
How about something like the below. I't leaves the scan alone (nice property),
ensures there is a memory access and will work on common and no-common ports
equally well.
Ok?
Index: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
--- Comment #7 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08
23:54:02 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Apr 8 23:53:59 2011
New Revision: 172218
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172218
Log:
PR testsuite/48506
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48488
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
--- Comment #8 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-08
23:56:48 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Apr 8 23:56:45 2011
New Revision: 172219
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172219
Log:
PR testsuite/48506
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48506
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #12 from Hans Boehm 2011-04-09 00:22:01
UTC ---
The duplicate definition of LINUX_THREADS looks like an old problem. The
upstream source now says:
#ifndef GC_THREADS
# define GC_THREADS
#endif /* GC_THREADS */
GC_THREADS eventuall
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48524
Summary: spec language does not cover switches with separated
form
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48525
Summary: -O0 produces incorrect results for inlined functions
sharing the same name.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo