http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48448
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453
Summary: [C++0x] Invalid reference initialization via explicit
conversion
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
Summary: Huge code size regression for all ARM configurations
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48454
Summary: gfortran.dg/char_result_13.f90 fails with -O3
-funroll-loops -mvectorize-with-neon-quad
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in fold_binary_loc, at
fold-const.c:9324
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: no
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Depends
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48456
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #43 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-05
09:02:56 UTC ---
> mips64-linux, right?
No, IA-64/Linux, I was replying to Steve, but this is indeed not very clear.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48434
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48434
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48252
--- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen 2011-04-05 09:33:40 UTC
---
Created attachment 23881
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23881
patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48252
Ira Rosen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||irar at il dot ibm.com
--- Comment #4 from Ir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48457
Summary: [C++0x] GCC does not recognize function rvalue
reference expressions as lvalues
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43920
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-05 10:04:48 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Apr 5 10:04:44 2011
New Revision: 171976
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171976
Log:
2011-04-05 Tom de Vries
PR target/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43920
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-05 10:12:17 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Apr 5 10:12:14 2011
New Revision: 171977
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171977
Log:
2011-04-05 Tom de Vries
PR target/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43920
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-05 10:33:16 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Apr 5 10:33:13 2011
New Revision: 171978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171978
Log:
2011-04-05 Tom de Vries
PR target/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48441
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48440
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-05
11:02:50 UTC ---
- static const short int ar[2] = {0, (short unsigned int) &l2 - (short
unsigned int) &l1};
+ static const short int ar[2] = {0, (short int) ((short unsigned int) (int)
&l2 - (shor
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-05
11:06:23 UTC ---
Would be interesting to know why fixincludes is not built. Can you try to
track that down?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48446
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|Huge code siz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48446
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-05
11:21:35 UTC ---
slightly further reduced:
template struct RefPtr {
~RefPtr();
T *operator->() const;
};
struct Message {
typedef RefPtr Ptr;
static Ptr create(in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48446
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||3.4.3
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wake
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48458
Summary: avr: inline assembly is broken
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-asm
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48437
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48459
Summary: avr: Assertion failure with -gdwarf-2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48446
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48435
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-05
11:57:39 UTC ---
*** Bug 48458 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48458
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33928
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48460
Summary: The compilation of Qemu 0.14.0 stops on a ARM cpu
based board
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48460
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |c
Version|unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48431
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48441
--- Comment #7 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-05
12:03:38 UTC ---
OK, confirmed that cprop_insn makes the insn deleted, in the second CPROP pass:
Breakpoint 3, one_cprop_pass () at ../../trunk/gcc/cprop.c:1799
1799changed |= cp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48431
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-05
12:11:13 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 5 12:11:08 2011
New Revision: 171982
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171982
Log:
2011-04-05 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48431
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-05
12:13:31 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 5 12:13:27 2011
New Revision: 171983
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171983
Log:
2011-04-05 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48447
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-04-05 12:42:52 UTC ---
For now, option -Wl,-plugin-opt=-pass-through=$(LIBGCC) can be manually added
to the command line (as discussed in PR42690).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48460
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43920
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-05 13:01:55 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Apr 5 13:01:50 2011
New Revision: 171986
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171986
Log:
2011-04-05 Tom de Vries
PR target/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48460
--- Comment #2 from Marietto 2011-04-05
13:02:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1)
>
> you ran out of memory.
I've read somewhere that's possible to compile qemu without to go out of
memory.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-05
14:51:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in
> > `/home/mancilla/current/soft/src/gcc-build-latest/x86_64-unkno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-04-05
14:51:46 UTC ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin10 r171957, I bootstrap with --enable-checking=release
(or with the default value), but I also get
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/final.o differs
gcc/h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48445
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-04-05
14:55:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> checking for suffix of object files... configure: error: in
> `/home/mancilla/current/soft/src/gcc-build-latest/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgcc':
> configu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47119
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46677
--- Comment #24 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-04-05
15:13:38 UTC ---
The sort of patches here should be updated for trunk and resubmitted now we are
in stage 1 for 4.7 and such patches are appropriate.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.6.1
Summary|[4.6 Regressi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46500
--- Comment #6 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-04-05
15:17:44 UTC ---
The cumulative_args_t changes should be updated and resubmitted now we are in
4.7 stage 1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
Summary: [4.7 Regression function.c:5268:1: error:
emit_use_return_register_into_block defined but not
used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Summary: matmul Segmentation Fault with Allocatable Array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|[4.7 Regressi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48463
Summary: gcov generating bad function coverage
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48463
Christian changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-04-05 15:40:41 UTC ---
somewhat reduced:
program main
implicit none
integer, parameter :: dp = kind(0.0d0)
real(kind=dp), allocatable :: a(:,:)
real(kind=dp), allocatable :: b(:,:)
allo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |law at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46489
--- Comment #7 from Joseph S. Myers 2011-04-05
15:43:46 UTC ---
FWIW, the following files include tm.h and appear not to have any direct uses
of target macros, or uses of the most common headers (such as rtl.h or
cp-tree.h) that depend on tm.h.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48403
--- Comment #44 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-04-05 15:45:20
UTC ---
Just a note for those experiencing a comparison failure with
--disable-checking, I know what's causing it and should have a fix shortly.
That failure is being tracked by PR48444.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-05 15:54:17 UTC ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Apr 5 15:54:13 2011
New Revision: 171990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171990
Log:
2011-04-05 Tom de Vries
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48462
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
Benjamin Kosnik changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.7.0 |---
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48461
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-04-05 16:03:32
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/05/11 09:58, bkoz at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
>
> Benjamin Kosnik changed:
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48464
Summary: Regression @171649: ICE in setup_pressure_classes, at
ira.c:877
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48464
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||vax-linux
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48454
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46548
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Severity|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46548
--- Comment #5 from Nathan Froyd 2011-04-05
16:33:00 UTC ---
I believe this was fixed by the fix for PR 46040.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46548
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46040
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||carrot at google dot com
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48444
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48465
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] undefined reference to
std::basic_string::_S_compare(unsigned long, unsigned
long)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48465
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Wrong variable locations at
-O0 on i686
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48441
--- Comment #8 from Steven Bosscher 2011-04-05
18:15:08 UTC ---
Author: steven
Date: Tue Apr 5 18:15:04 2011
New Revision: 171994
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171994
Log:
PR middle-end/48441
* cprop.c (one_cprop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48441
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48467
Summary: [LTO/driver] Anomalous behavior of -save-temps
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48468
Summary: [C++0x][SFINAE] noexcept operator does handle function
templates well
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48404
--- Comment #7 from Scot Breitenfeld 2011-04-05
18:46:26 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thus: How have you obtained the compiler? Are you sure that the correct
> compiler/library combination is used?
>
One compiler was from Debian packages,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-05
18:55:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 23885
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23885
gcc46-pr48466.patch
This seems to work and doesn't regress PR36977 (which I've added as guality
test
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48463
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48466
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-04-05 19:12:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created attachment 23885 [details]
> gcc46-pr48466.patch
>
> This seems to work and doesn't regress PR36977 (which I've added as guality
> testcase too). Whether
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
Summary: [4.7 Regression] bootstrap failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||froydnj at codesourcery dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
--- Comment #2 from Nathan Froyd 2011-04-05
19:33:52 UTC ---
Author: froydnj
Date: Tue Apr 5 19:33:49 2011
New Revision: 171998
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171998
Log:
PR bootstrap/48469
* combine.c (combine_in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48470
Summary: ICE in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 at expr.c:6835
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sje at cup dot hp.com
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48469
Nathan Froyd changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48377
--- Comment #6 from Matt Hargett 2011-04-05 20:38:41 UTC
---
in the 46bug/ dir in the attached tarball:
g++ -O3 -g -I. -c te_field_id.cpp && g++ *.o -o test
induces the crash:
==31412== General Protection Fault
==31412==at 0x400F38: TE_Fie
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
