http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48352
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328
--- Comment #1 from Carrot 2011-03-30 07:25:31 UTC
---
Another possible enhancement is we can also use HImode jump table entries.
Similar to cases min<0, although tbh is not available in arm mode, we can use
separate instruction to load offset an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48350
--- Comment #1 from tinlyx at gmail dot com 2011-03-30 07:28:55 UTC ---
As a matter of fact, make_tuple() cannot be used on any tuples with cardinality
other than 1. This contrasts with std::vector where we can have a vector of
vectors (e.g. a matr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
Summary: internal compiler error: in splice_child_die, at
dwarf2out.c:8064
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48355
Summary: Assigning NULL to string segfaults
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig..
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48351
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-30
08:04:13 UTC ---
trans-array.c's gfc_is_reallocatable_lhs fails at:
6859 /* All that can be left are allocatable components. */
6860 if ((expr->symtree->n.sym->ts.type != BT_DERIVED
6861
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48356
Summary: Compiler error on compilation of linux source file
p80211wep.c if -O2 is used
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48351
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48331
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48333
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-30
08:39:16 UTC ---
Interesting ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48334
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48336
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48339
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48355
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48342
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44384
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-30
08:47:32 UTC ---
The FE is also not very helpful when decaying arrays to pointers or when
generating array accesses.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48357
Summary: gcc compiling problem (mpfr)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48345
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-30
08:59:55 UTC ---
Created attachment 23814
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23814
gcc46-pr48335.patch
WIP patch I've been playing with. Unfortunately, it shows that even without
CON
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48346
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48207
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at use dot net
--- Comment #3 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48355
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-30
09:07:01 UTC ---
duplicate of PR 5258 and PR 994
I'll look into checking when _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is defined but the default
(non-debug mode) behaviour is NOT going to change, your code has a bug, your
c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44613
--- Comment #7 from Yaakov (Cygwin Ports) 2011-03-30 09:11:43 UTC ---
Isn't this just a case of "jump to case label crosses initialization", which is
now an error?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48355
--- Comment #3 from Amr Ali 2011-03-30 09:13:57
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> duplicate of PR 5258 and PR 994
>
> I'll look into checking when _GLIBCXX_DEBUG is defined but the default
> (non-debug mode) behaviour is NOT going to change, yo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48358
Summary: TREE_ADDRESSABLE overloading issues
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: rgue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48358
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48347
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-30
09:19:42 UTC ---
I'm sure that sete doesn't work with any general operand. Use proper
constraints.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48353
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Summary|Bootstrap fai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48354
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48355
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5258
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amr.ali.cc at gmail dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48356
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||molitor@microbiology-bonn.d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48027
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48350
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-30
09:41:26 UTC ---
works ok with 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48350
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-30
09:49:20 UTC ---
probably fixed by PR 45228
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23814|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48337
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-30 10:01:17 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Wed Mar 30 10:01:13 2011
New Revision: 171717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171717
Log:
2011-03-30 Joseph Myers
Rainer Orth
PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48337
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-30
10:05:13 UTC ---
A patch that might fix most of the issues could also be
Index: gcc/tree-ssa.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa.c (revision
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48349
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-30
10:42:23 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Mar 30 10:42:20 2011
New Revision: 171718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171718
Log:
Fix a typo in FLOAT_SSE_REGS.
2011-03-30 H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48349
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-30
10:43:58 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Mar 30 10:43:55 2011
New Revision: 171719
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171719
Log:
Fix a typo in FLOAT_SSE_REGS.
2011-03-30 H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45228
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tinlyx at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48350
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48349
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-30
10:48:13 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Mar 30 10:48:07 2011
New Revision: 171720
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171720
Log:
Fix a typo in FLOAT_SSE_REGS.
2011-03-30 H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48349
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-30
10:48:35 UTC ---
Author: hjl
Date: Wed Mar 30 10:48:31 2011
New Revision: 171721
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171721
Log:
Fix a typo in FLOAT_SSE_REGS.
2011-03-30 H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48349
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48360
Summary: ICE on array assignment statement with allocatable LHS
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-30 11:16:55 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-30
> 11:07:13 UTC ---
> Are you using a specific configure value for --enable-clocale or just using
> the
> default
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48336
--- Comment #4 from revital.eres at linaro dot org 2011-03-30 11:20:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Assumed fixed.
Yes. The build passes OK in -r171716.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-30
11:27:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-30
> > 11:07:13 UTC ---
> > Are you using a specific configure value for --enable-clocale or just using
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-30
11:29:27 UTC ---
it will be *at least* two weeks before I have time to start that work
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48361
Summary: gcov freezes when using --all-blocks (-a) flag.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48362
Summary: pretty printer fails for zero-size std::tuple<>
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23815|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48360
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48363
Summary: Recursion not converted into a loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48305
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-30
12:36:27 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Mar 30 12:36:18 2011
New Revision: 171723
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171723
Log:
PR c/48305
* fold-const.c (fold_binary_loc)
-I./ -I../rts
-I. -I/home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/ada -B../../ -g -O2 -gnatpg -gnata -I-
/home/eric/svn/gcc/gcc/ada/clean.adb
bad allocation for 512 and 412
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.7.0 20110330 (experimental) [trunk revision 171716] (i586-suse-linux-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48305
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48365
Summary: Non-constant references in std::valarray::operator
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48364
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2011-03-30
14:05:06 UTC ---
Created attachment 23820
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23820
Reduced testcase for x86
To be compiled in the build directory with:
gcc/gnat1 p.adb -O -gnatp -mt
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-30
14:11:13 UTC ---
Seems to be a combiner VTA bug.
try_combine decides to SUBST_MODE, because it has a single (non-debug) use and
single set, changes a pseudo from SImode to QImode, which magically chang
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48336
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48353
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
c,c++,objc,obj-c++,fortran,lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110330 (experimental) [trunk revision 171715] (GCC)
Probably, has to do with change in handling of cover classes. It
is not possible to copy directly between GENERAL_REGS and FP_REGS
on PA.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48260
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367
Summary: [4.7 Regression] 200.sixtrack/301.apsi in SPEC CPU
2000 are miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48208
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43590
--- Comment #5 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 14:52:42 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Mar 30 14:52:38 2011
New Revision: 171729
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171729
Log:
gcc/
2011-03-30 Richard Sandiford
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
--- Comment #8 from Markus Elfring 2011-03-30
14:55:34 UTC ---
I can also not rebuild the previously used GNU compiler software on my openSUSE
11.4 system at the moment.
"...
/bin/sh: Zeile 1: 1577 Speicherzugriffsfehler build/genmodes -m >
tm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48367
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48364
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48366
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47551
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 15:00:50 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Mar 30 15:00:44 2011
New Revision: 171730
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171730
Log:
gcc/
PR target/47551
* con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48363
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47551
--- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 15:02:27 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43590
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-30 15:06:04 UTC ---
> I'm planning to add isblank to std::locale (LWG 2019) which will need changes
> to all the locale models so while I'm doing that I will overhaul the ieee
> locale
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-30 15:06:50 UTC ---
> --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-30
> 11:29:27 UTC ---
> it will be *at least* two weeks before I have time to start that work
Don't worry about tha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47551
rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-30 15:16:57 UTC ---
> Why do you think this is bogus? It's correct for IBM long double, where
> the mantissa bits can be discontiguous, and so the least value greater
> than 1 that
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48365
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|denin at mail dot ru|g...@integrable-solutions.ne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48332
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-30 15:36:49 UTC ---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Wed Mar 30 15:36:45 2011
New Revision: 171733
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171733
Log:
gcc/
PR rtl-optimization/48332
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48363
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-30
15:38:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The parameter has its address taken in
> _gfortran_transfer_integer_write (&dt_parm.0, &i, 4);
True, but the value is not modified - which the ME should k
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
--- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-30 15:43:53 UTC ---
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-03-30 15:16:57 UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48368
Summary: gnat on arm-linux-gnueabi only has sjlj exception
support, not zcx
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48343
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48363
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-30
15:54:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > The parameter has its address taken in
> > _gfortran_transfer_integer_write (&dt_parm.0, &i, 4);
>
> True, but the value i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48368
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-30
15:56:06 UTC ---
That states a fact - what's the bug / enhancement request?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Hans.Boehm at hp dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #10 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-30 15:57:54
UTC ---
Btw., I forgot: could you try to compile that testcase on the 4.6 branch with
the same options used for leak_test.c, just to make sure this isn't caused
by my dg conversion?
Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48281
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-30
16:01:21 UTC ---
This was broken by r163893, when I changed finish_compound_literal to always
generate a TARGET_EXPR, rather than use a static variable in some cases.
I could (and probably will) parti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48369
Summary: [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE in
potential_constant_expression_1, at
cp/semantics.c:7746
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keyword
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26714
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miklcct at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2 f
1 - 100 of 166 matches
Mail list logo
