http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
--- Comment #6 from Ira Rosen 2011-03-29 07:04:08 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The patch in comment #3 fixes the ICE, but the test still fails:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "OUTER LOOP VECTORIZED"
> 1
>
This
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48252
--- Comment #1 from Johan Kristell 2011-03-29
07:18:37 UTC ---
Some additional info about the gcc version tested.
URL: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_6-branch
Revision: 171340
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48325
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-29
07:43:35 UTC ---
That's a heavily modified compiler by CodeSourcery. Please reproduce with a
vanilla FSF GCC, or report the problem to CodeSourcery as their compiler
clearly directs you to do (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48327
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-linux|x86_64-linux x86-linux
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48328
Summary: GCC failed to generate 16bit relative jump table
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48329
Summary: Program takes twice as long *without* -fopenmp than
with 1 OpenMP thread
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, openmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-03-29 09:22:15 UTC ---
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
>
> --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres
> 2011-03-28 18:26
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48095
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-29 09:39:13 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Tue Mar 29 09:39:10 2011
New Revision: 171654
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171654
Log:
2011-03-29 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48095
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.2.4
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48095
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-29
10:19:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I would assume that one needs a similar check in resolve_structure_cons.
That should then also take care of:
rect = rectangle (1.0, 2.0, get_my_area)
wh
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48326
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48327
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48330
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: in optimize_inline_calls, at
tree-inline.c:4201 with -fmudflap -fno-early-inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290
--- Comment #8 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-29 10:26:30 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Tue Mar 29 10:26:25 2011
New Revision: 171657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171657
Log:
PR tree-optimization/48290
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48329
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|openmp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48327
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-29
10:56:50 UTC ---
Binary search revealed it is actually gimple.o that got miscompiled by
stage1-gcc/cc1. Ignoring .L number differences, only is_gimple_val
and canonicalize_cond_expr_cond functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-29
11:21:53 UTC ---
At revision 171632 the test also failed on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0:
...
Executing on host: ../libtool --silent --tag=CC --mode=link
/opt/gcc/build_w/gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-29 11:30:31 UTC ---
> --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres
> 2011-03-29 11:21:53 UTC ---
> At revision 171632 the test also failed on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0:
[...]
> while it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-29
11:39:58 UTC ---
> This either suggests a different change being responsible or a timing
> issue. Some of those tests can be quite sensitive to load.
>
> Could you try to rerun the testcase man
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48331
Summary: [4.7 Regression]
gcc.c-torture/execute/built-in-setjmp.c FAILs with -O
-fira-algorithm=priority -fPIC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #7 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-29 11:46:29 UTC ---
> The failing test occured on a "quiet" state: i.e., terminal, safari, and xchat
> opened but not used.
> The tests run in a fraction of a second far away of the 30
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48195
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2011-03-29
11:55:36 UTC ---
Proposed patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-03/msg01982.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48331
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka 2011-03-29 12:10:38
UTC ---
The "while (1)" part of the testcase is not actually needed.
The problem seems to be there (at the assembly level):
...
movrax, QWORD PTR buf@GOTPCREL[rip]#,
movrax
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48332
Summary: optabs changes (PR48263 fix) broke m68k-linux
bootstrap
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48332
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-03-29 12:47:23 UTC ---
Please attach a preprocessed file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48333
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure (length) - "memmove" x
"__builtin_memmove"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48330
--- Comment #1 from Martin Jambor 2011-03-29
12:54:50 UTC ---
It's mudflap adding call graph nodes from outside the pass manager
again:
(gdb) bt
#0 fancy_abort (file=0x89fd0b8 "/home/mjambor/gcc/icln/src/gcc/tree-inline.c",
line=4201,
func
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48332
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-29
13:01:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 23799
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23799
preprocessed and reduced test case
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
--- Comment #3 from Markus Elfring 2011-03-29
13:10:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I can not generate a backtrace myself by the tool "GNU debugger" on my system
at the moment because of the issue "GDB or dependency python not properly
confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48330
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
--- Comment #4 from Markus Elfring 2011-03-29
13:13:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 23800
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23800
valgrind log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318
--- Comment #5 from Markus Elfring 2011-03-29
13:15:04 UTC ---
Created attachment 23801
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23801
valgrind log
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
13:27:31 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 13:27:25 2011
New Revision: 171661
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171661
Log:
PR c++/48296
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42687
Florian Sowade changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||f.sowade-gcc at r9e dot de
--- Comment #
Hi Nex here,
I try to compile a Canadian Cross Compiler
Configure for Candian Cross :
../../source/gcc-4.5.2/configure --build=i686-linux --host=mingw32
--target=powerpc-wrs-vxworks --with-gnu-ld --with-gnu-as --disable-nls
--disable-shared --enable-languages=c,c++
--prefix=/usr/share/tools/gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42687
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42687
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.1.2
Summary|The prevention
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48334
Summary: [4.7 Regression] gcc.target/i386/pr39445.c FAILs with
-fira-algorithm=priority
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
Summary: [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE in convert_move
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.5.2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
14:24:15 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 14:24:09 2011
New Revision: 171663
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171663
Log:
PR c++/47570
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_consta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47504
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
14:24:24 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 14:24:19 2011
New Revision: 171664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171664
Log:
PR c++/47504
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_consta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
14:25:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 14:25:22 2011
New Revision: 171669
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171669
Log:
PR c++/48313
* pt.c (maybe_adjust_types_for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47999
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
14:25:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 14:25:37 2011
New Revision: 171670
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171670
Log:
PR c++/47999
* semantics.c (finish_call_exp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
14:26:43 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 14:26:33 2011
New Revision: 171675
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171675
Log:
PR c++/48296
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48336
Summary: Error in generation of ARM ldrd instruction
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48334
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48331
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48289
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48337
Summary: [4.7 regression] options.c doesn't compile on SPARC
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47504
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47570
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48338
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Glibc miscompiled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47999
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48337
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-29 14:51:01 UTC ---
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, ro at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> options.c:753:3: error: enum conversion in initialization is invalid in C++
> [-Werror=c++-compat]
> options.c:753:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-29
14:55:51 UTC ---
And:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-sra" } */
typedef __float128 T __attribute__((__may_alias__));
struct S
{
_Complex double d __attribute__((aligned (16))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-29
14:59:50 UTC ---
Yet another testcase:
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-tree-sra" } */
typedef long long T __attribute__((__may_alias__));
struct S
{
_Complex float d __attribute__
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48331
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-29
15:12:00 UTC ---
> Run make check in boehm-gc/testsuite instead. Better yet, just build
> the failing test once and manually rerun it in a loop with
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH or equivalent set.
I have
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
--- Comment #2 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-03-29
15:24:07 UTC ---
I believe the issue is that for that source code, GCC emits two
identical .loc asm directives for line 3. In theory I don't thing
doing that would be wrong.
But in practise the seco
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48337
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-29 15:43:39 UTC ---
> Try adding Init(PROCESSOR_V7) to the lines in sparc.opt defining sparc_cpu
> and sparc_cpu_and_features. It appears an explicit initializer of 0 for
> these en
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48336
--- Comment #1 from revital.eres at linaro dot org 2011-03-29 15:43:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 23803
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23803
A testcase based on simple-object-elf.c
Here is the command line for running:
/home/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48337
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48335
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48327
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-03-29 15:59:11
UTC ---
It's a problem with updating the SSA graph in a relatively uncommon case.
We're failing to update a PHI argument correctly. I'm still thinking about how
best to address the problem.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-29
16:07:20 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 29 16:07:15 2011
New Revision: 171679
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171679
Log:
PR c++/48166
* decl.c (revert_static_member
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48166
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48325
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48339
Summary: Current release series version is incorrect
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo: unassi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42322
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43114
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46069
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47734
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47859
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
# binutils 2.21
# kernel headers 2.6.38.2
# libc headers 2.13
# gcc stage1 (c-only) 4.6.0
# libc libc_cv_forced_unwind=yes
libc_cv_c_cleanup=yes
gmp 5.0.1
mpfr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45460
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47964
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-29
16:51:47 UTC ---
Is this still present on the 4.5 branch, or later releases?
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > You need to provide self-contained testcase, this is not self-con
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47996
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
--- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-03-29 16:57:17 UTC ---
AFAICT this pr seems fixed by revision 171654 (pr48095).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42022
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48315
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
--- Comment #26 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-29 17:12:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> AFAICT this pr seems fixed by revision 171654 (pr48095).
Oh, wow. That's kind of unexpected. But nice :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36694
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45918
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45509
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-29
17:24:29 UTC ---
Please provide the information requested at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48340
Summary: Several wchar_t tests FAIL on IRIX 6.5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48315
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-29 17:26:17 UTC ---
On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, ramana at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Could you post a pre-processed file here ?
Attached.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47546
--- Comment #27 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-29 17:28:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> AFAICT this pr seems fixed by revision 171654 (pr48095).
I can confirm that comment #8 works with current trunk on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Howe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48341
Summary: LDBL_EPSILON is wrong on IRIX 6.5
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
--- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-29 17:35:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
The patch has regressions, even against: GNU C 4.6.1 20110329 (prerelease)
One of many:
-PASS: gdb.base/break.exp: run until quoted breakpoint
+FAIL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47471
--- Comment #4 from Jan Kratochvil
2011-03-29 17:36:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Please always attach the patch(es), I have tested the patch you mailed me, not
the one copy-pasted here.
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
