http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
--- Comment #1 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-18 19:31:20
UTC ---
Created attachment 23714
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23714
shorter test case
Shorter test case. Reproducible on IA64 HP-UX as well with -mlp64 (and -O3
-fPIC).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48196
Summary: ICE (segmentation fault) on inclusion of ,
C++0x
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48196
--- Comment #1 from gcchelp.5.adept at 0sg dot net 2011-03-18 19:35:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 23716
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23716
does not exhibit the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48167
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
--program-prefix=r171139- --enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.7.0 20110318 (experimental) (GCC)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48198
Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed: no
immediate_use list with -fopenmp --param
partial-inlining-entry-probability=101
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
St
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski 2011-03-18
19:56:42 UTC ---
x = (long)0 > ((unsigned int)0 ^ (signed short)0x8000);
x = (long)0 > ((unsigned)0 ^ (unsigned)0x8000);
I think you missed something here (unsigned)(signed short) still sign exte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #2 from John Regehr 2011-03-18 20:04:04
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
>x = (long)0 > ((unsigned int)0 ^ (signed short)0x8000);
>x = (long)0 > ((unsigned)0 ^ (unsigned)0x8000);
> I think you missed something here (unsigned)(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-18
20:09:18 UTC ---
That's true, the step from the 3rd to 4th line is wrong.
But that doesn't mean that on LP64 targets it should print 1.
On:
extern void abort (void);
static int y = 0x8000;
int
main
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Pawel Sikora changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-debug
Target|x86_64-pc-m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #4 from John Regehr 2011-03-18 20:12:31
UTC ---
Thanks Jakub, I was just about to send the same example!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #5 from John Regehr 2011-03-18 20:14:51
UTC ---
Here's a test case:
int printf(const char *format, ...);
int main (void)
{
int y = 0x8000;
int x1 = (long)0 > ((unsigned int)0 ^ (signed short)y);
int x2 = (long)0 > ((unsigned i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
--- Comment #17 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-18
20:20:01 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Mar 18 20:19:45 2011
New Revision: 171164
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171164
Log:
PR bootstrap/45381
* lex.c [ALTIVEC] (search_lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
--- Comment #18 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-18
20:20:45 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Mar 18 20:20:35 2011
New Revision: 171165
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171165
Log:
PR bootstrap/45381
* lex.c [ALTIVEC] (search_lin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45381
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
--- Comment #6 from John Regehr 2011-03-18 20:23:32
UTC ---
Bleh... nevermind the longer test, it carries along my misunderstanding of the
sign extension. Anyway, thanks!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48197
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48198
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48199
Summary: unable to emulate 'TF'. Patch for mips64el r5900
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48199
--- Comment #1 from Deny 2011-03-18 22:43:34 UTC
---
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=GREE7D1X
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
AssignedTo|meissner at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41482
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23718|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48192
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48192
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23711|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48191
--- Comment #3 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-18 23:40:43
UTC ---
It looks like this is the same problem as PR 43603 (but with a different error
result). I can reproduce it on the trunk at r167587, but it is fixed at
r167588.
To fix it in the 4.5 br
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43603
--- Comment #9 from Steve Ellcey 2011-03-18 23:45:07
UTC ---
Andrey,
I was just looking at PR 48191, a bug submitted against GCC 4.5.2. It looks
like it is caused by the same problem that this patch fixes. Can you back port
this fix to the 4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48187
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
et.o names-cache.o params.o caps.o sysfs.o proc.o i386-ports.o -lz
-lresolv
Then: objdump -T libpci.so.3.1.7 | grep pci_fill_info
No such symbol.
gcc (Gentoo SVN) 4.6.0-pre9999 20110318 (prerelease) rev. 171169
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
--- Comment #11 from Nicola Pero 2011-03-19
01:24:47 UTC ---
Having looked at some of the warnings generated in GNUstep if you compile
with -fstrict-aliasing, they seem to be C warnings with little relevance
to Objective-C (they mostly seem to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48201
Summary: ndefined reference to `__builtin_stdarg_start' when
compiling util-vserver-0.30.216 on gentoo
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48201
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
--- Comment #12 from Mike Stump 2011-03-19
03:58:25 UTC ---
Any warnings generated that are invalid are bugs. These bugs should be filed,
and we'll fix them. Please attach an example file that generate warnings.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
--- Comment #13 from John Engelhart
2011-03-19 04:06:28 UTC ---
I'm the original reporter.
At this point, I no longer have any specific examples that demonstrate this
problem (this was filed quite some time ago).
m...@gcc.gnu.org:
> So, I'm so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39753
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gc
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
